IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EU RURAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY IN TÜRKİYE: MALATYA PROVINCIAL CASE

Year 2022, , 659 - 676, 26.10.2022

Haydar Albayrak

https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.1013175

Abstract

Purpose: The Rural Development Component of the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPARD) program, which was first implemented by the EU between 2007 and 2013, has been implemented in Turkiye since 2011. In the study, it is aimed to investigate whether the implementation of the EU Rural Development Policy in Turkiye is successful or not.

Methodology: The evaluation is made based on the data obtained from previous research, the data of the Agriculture and Rural Development Support Institution (ARDSI) and Malatya Provincial Coordinatorship, and the data obtained from a survey conducted with beneficiaries in Malatya. Pearson Correlation analysis and One-Way ANOVA analysis were performed on the data obtained through the questionnaire. According to the results of the analysis, evaluations were made on the results of the IPARD program in Turkiye.

Findings: In the study, the Turkish implementation of the IPARD program was generally successful, a large number of enterprises producing in EU standards were brought to the province of Malatya, a culture of preparing investment projects was created, experience was gained in making feasibility studies and financial analysis on the sustainability of agricultural enterprises, and it contributed directly or indirectly to employment increase.

Originality: There are very few studies in the literature on the success of the IPARD program in Turkiye. In these studies, no data was collected directly from the beneficiaries by the questionnaire method and there is no previous study on the case of Malatya province.

Keywords

European Union, Rural Development Policy, IPARD, Turkiye, Malatya

AB KIRSAL KALKINMA PROGRAMININ TÜRKİYE UYGULAMASI: MALATYA İLİ ÖRNEĞİ

Abstract

Amaç: AB tarafından ilk defa 2007-2013 yılları arasında uygulanmaya başlanan Katılım Öncesi Yardım Aracının Kırsal Kalkınma Bileşeni (IPARD) programı, Türkiye’de 2011 yılından itibaren fiili olarak uygulanmaya başlamıştır. Çalışmada, IPARD programı üzerinden AB Kırsal Kalkınma Politikasının Türkiye uygulamasının başarılı olup olmadığı araştırılması amaçlanmaktadır.

Yöntem: Çalışmada, Türkiye genelinde daha önce yapılan araştırmadan elde edilen veriler, Tarım ve Kırsal Kalkınmayı Destekleme Kurumu (TKDK) ve Malatya İl Koordinatörlüğü verileri ile Malatya ilinde destek alan faydalanıcılarla yapılan anket sonucunda elde edilen veriler esas alınmaktadır. Anket aracılığıyla elde edilen veriler, istatistiksel olarak analiz edilmekte ve analiz sonuçlarına göre IPARD programının Türkiye’deki sonuçları üzerinde değerlendirmelerde bulunulmaktadır.

Bulgular: Çalışmada, IPARD programının Türkiye uygulamasının genel olarak başarılı olduğu, IPARD programı aracılığıyla Malatya ilinde AB standartlarında üretim yapan çok sayıda işletme kazandırıldığı, yatırım projesi hazırlama kültürü oluşturulduğu, tarımsal işletmelerinin sürdürülebilirliğine ilişkin fizibilite çalışmaları ve mali analiz yapma konusunda tecrübeler edinildiği, doğrudan veya dolaylı olarak istihdam artışına önemli katkılar sunduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Özgünlük: IPARD programının Türkiye'deki başarısı ile ilgili literatürde çok az sayıda çalışma bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmaların hiçbirinde anket yöntemiyle faydalanıcılardan veri toplanmamıştır ve Malatya ili örneğiyle ilgili daha önce yapılmış bir çalışma bulunmamaktadır.

Keywords

Avrupa Birliği, Kırsal Kalkınma Politikası, IPARD, Türkiye, Avrupa Birliği, Kırsal Kalkınma Politikası, IPARD, Türkiye, Malatya

References

• ARDSI (2015). “Agriculture and Rural Development Support Institution Projects Impact Assessment Report”, Agriculture and Rural Development Support Institution (ARDSI), Ankara, Türkiye.
• Aslan, S., Demirhan, Y. and Ertaş, M. (2016). “EU Pre-Accession Assistance For Rural Development Component (IPARD I) and The Effect To Province of Mardin”, Journal of Academic Approaches, 7(1), 232-254.
• Asoğlu, V. and Binici, T. (2015). “Evaluation of Rural Development Investment Support Program’s Economic Investment: The Example of Şanlıurfa and Diyarbakır”, Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 14(52), 221-230.
• Baş, T. (2010). “Survey”, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Bedel, N.E. (2019). “A Field Study on Concept of Rural Development, Quality and Sustainability in the Agricultural Enterprises which Supported by Agriculture and Rural Development Support Institution (Province of Bursa)”, Unpublished Master Thesis, Uludağ University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Bursa, Türkiye.
• BRSA (2019). “Turkish Banking Sector Key Indicators (September-2019)”, Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency (BRSA), Ankara, Türkiye. https://www.bddk.org.tr/ContentBddk/dokuman/duyuru_0744_01.pdf, (Access Date: 18.01.2020).
• Çimen, A.O. (2017). “A Survey on the Contributions of IPARD Programme to the Economic Development and Beneficiaries in Rural Areas and Their Expectations”, Unpublished Master Thesis, Ankara University, Science Institute, Department of Agricultural Economics, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Çütçü, İ. and Telli, R. (2019). “The Relationship with Agricultural Export of EU Support Program for Agricultural and Rural Development (IPARD): The Case of Turkey”, Journal of Economics Business and Political Researches, 4(8), 101-117.
• Dağlıoğlu, E. (2008). “Payment Process on Support That Shall Be Granted to Turkey Under IPARD Programme and Evloluation Regarding Turkey”, Experted Thesis, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ankara. Gluscevic, S., Maksimovic, S., Pejanovic, R. and Simeunovic, T. (2017). “Possibility of Rural Sector Development in Serbia Using IPARD Program”, Economics of Agriculture, 64(2), 753-767.
• Gülçubuk, B., Köksal, Ö., Ataseven, Y., Gül, U. and Kan, M. (2016). “Effects of Rural Development Supports at the National Level: Research Results on Agriculture and Rural Development Support Institution (ARDSI) Projects”, XII. National Agricultural Economics Congress, May 25-27, 2016, Isparta, Türkiye.
• Gülçubuk, B., Köksal, Ö., Ataseven, Y., Gül, U. and Kan, M. (2017). “Evaluation of projects supported by Agriculture and Rural Development Support Institution in term of Employment Creation”, Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University (JAFAG), 34(1), 189-201.
• Gürbüz, İ.B. and Bedel, N.E. (2014). “EU Financial Support Policy System and its Assesment in Term of Agriculture and Rural Development Institution”, XI National Agricultural Economics Congress, September 3-5, 2014, Samsun, Türkiye.
• İnal, M. (2020). “The Effect of Supports Under IPARD Program on Rural Development: The Case of Diyarbakır Province”, Unpublished Master Thesis, Ankara University Social Sciences Institute Departmant of Economics, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Kaplan, L. (2019). Rural Development Policies in the European Union and Türkiye, IPARD Program Implementatiğon (Malatya Province), Unpublished Master Thesis, İnönü University Social Science Institute, Malatya, Türkiye.
• Koç, A. (2016). “IPARD in Funding Rural Development in Turkiye on the Path Towards the EU”, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Süleyman Demirel University, Social Sciences Institute, Department of International Relations, Isparta, Türkiye.
• Koç, E., Şenel, M.C. and Kaya, K. (2017). “Economic Indicators in Turkiye: Manufacturing Industry Capacity Utilization Rate”, Journal of Engineers and Machinery, 58(689), 1-22.
• MAF (2019). “ARDSI General Information”, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF), Ankara. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/sgb/Belgeler/SagMenuVeriler/TKDK.pdf, (Access Date: 07.08.2019).
• MFAL (2010). “2010 Project Introduction Booklet in 2010”, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock (MFAL) General Directorate of Organization and Support, Ankara, Türkiye.
• MFAL (2014). “Instrument for Pre-Accesion Asssitance Rural Development (IPARD) Programme”, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock (MFAL), Ankara, Türkiye
• Özak, E.U. (2018). “Inverstors’ Mistakes and Encountered Problems in State-supported Investment Projects and an Application in the TRB1 Region”, Unpublished Master Thesis, Uludağ University, Social Sciences Institute, Bursa, Türkiye. http://acikerisim.uludag.edu.tr/jspui/bitstream/11452/1218/3/502247.pdf, (Access Date: 18.08.2021).
• TCA (2018). “ARDSI 2017 Audit Report of the Turkish Court of Accounts”, Presidency of Turkish Court of Accounts (TCA), Ankara, Türkiye, https://www.sayistay.gov.tr/tr/Upload/62643830/files/raporlar/kid/2017/Di%C4%9Fer_Kamu_%C4%B0dareleri/TARIM%20VE%20KIRSAL%20KALKINMAYI%20DESTEKLEME%20KURUMU.pdf, (Access Date: 07.08.2019).
• TTCC (2020). “Announcements Published in the TTCC Registry Gazette (2016-January 2020)”, Türkiye Tradesmen and Crafsmen Confederation (TTCC), Ankara, Türkiye. https://www.tesk.org.tr/resimler/sicil/1.pdf, (Access Date: 10.02.2020).
• Yontar, İ.G. and Söztutar, M. (2018). “Agriculture and Rural Development Support Insitution (ARDSI), with the Dimensions of Enterpreneurship, Production and Development in Rural Areas: The Case of Manisa Provincial Coordination Office”, Journal of Turkish Court of Accounts, 111, 43-77.