Türkiye’de Çevresel Düzenlemeler ve Ekonomik Büyümenin Hava Kirliliği Üzerindeki Etkileri: Ampirik Bir Uygulama

Year 2023, , 113 - 126, 05.01.2023

Melike Atay Polat , Suzan Ergün

https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.1059047

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, ekonomik büyüme ve çevresel düzenlemelerin hava kirliliği üzerine etkilerini Türkiye ekonomisi için 1990-2015 yılları kapsamında araştırmaktır.

Yöntem: Çalışmada Yapısal Kırılmasız ADF Birim Kök Testi kullanılarak değişkenler için durağanlık sınaması yapılmıştır. Değişkenler arasındaki uzun dönem ilişkisinin belirlenmesinde birim kök testi sonuçları ARDL sınır testinin uygun olduğunu göstermiştir. Son olarak değişkenler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisinin araştırılmasında Frekans alanı nedensellik testinden yararlanılmıştır.

Bulgular: Sınır testi bulguları, değişkenler açısından uzun dönem ilişkisini ortaya koymuştur. Uzun dönem sonuçları, ekonomik büyümenin hava kirliliği üzerine pozitif etkisinin olduğunu göstermiş, buna karşılık çevre teknolojileri ile ilgili patent sayısının hava kirliliği üzerine negatif etkisinin olduğu görülmüştür. Nedensellik testi sonuçlarına göre, hava kirliliği ile çevresel düzenlemeler arasında kısa dönemde ve orta dönemde çift yönlü nedensellik bulunmuştur. Hava kirliliğinin azaltılmasında çevresel düzenlemelerin kısa ve orta dönemde önemli bir etkisi vardır.

Özgünlük: Literatürde, Türkiye’de çevresel düzenlemelerin hava kirliliği üzerine etkisini analiz eden başka bir çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Dolayısıyla, çevresel düzenlemelerin hava kirliliği üzerine etkisini Türkiye ekonomisi için analiz eden ilk çalışmadır. Ayrıca, hava kirliliği üzerine çevre ile ilgili teknolojilerin etkisi de araştırılmıştır.

Keywords

Çevre Kirliliği, Hava Kirliliği, Çevresel Düzenleme, Nedensellik Analizi

Impacts of Environmental Regulations and Economic Growth on Air Pollution in Türkiye: An Empirical Study

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, the impact of the economic growth and the environmental regulations on air pollution were investigated in Turkish economy on the basis of the years 1990-2015. 

Methodology: In the study the stationarity test for the variables was performed using the ADF unit root test without structural break. The unit root test outcomes showed that the ARDL bounds test was appropriate in determining the long-term relationship between the variables. Finally, Frequency domain causality test were used to investigate the causality relationship between variables.

Findings: Boundary test findings revealed a long-term relationship between the variables. Long-term results have shown that economic growth has a positive effect on air pollution, whereas the number of patents related to environmental technologies has a negative effect on air pollution. According to the causality test findings, bidirectional causality was found between air pollution and environmental regulations in the short-term and mid-term. The environmental regulations have a significant impact on reducing air pollution in the short and mid-term.

Originality: There is no other paper in the literature that analyzes the effects of environmental regulations on air pollution in Türkiye. Therefore, this is the first paper to analyze the impact of environmental regulations on air pollution for the Turkish economy. In addition, the effect of environmental technologies on air pollution was also investigated.

Keywords

Environmental Pollution, Air Pollution, Environmental Regulation, Causality Analysis

References

• Acaravcı, A. ve Ozturk, G. (2010). “On the Relationship Between Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth in Europe”, Energy, 35, 5412-5420.
• Akbostancı, E., Turut-Asık, S. ve Tunc, G.I. (2009). “The Relationship Between Income and Environment in Turkey: Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve?”, Energy Policy, 37(3), 861-867.
• Bagayev, I. ve Lochard, J. (2017). “EU Air Pollution Regulation: A Breath of Fresh Air for Eastern European Polluting Industries?”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 83, 145-163.
• Bayat, T., Şahbaz, A. ve Akçaci, T. (2013). “Petrol Fiyatlarının Dış Ticaret Açığı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, 67-90.
• Blackman, A. (2009). “Alternative Pollution Control Policies in Developing Countries Informal, Informational, and Voluntary”, Environment for Development Discussion Paper Series, EfD DP 09-14.
• Breitung, J. ve Candelon, B. (2006). “Testing for Short and Lon Run Causality: A Frequency-Domain Approach, Journal of Econometrics”, 132(2), 363-378.
• Cai, S., Ma, Q., Wang, S., Zhao, B., Brauer, M., Cohen, A., Martin, R.V., Zhang, Q., Li, Q., Wang, Y., Hao, J., Frostad, J., Forouzanfar ve M.H., Burnett, R.T. (2018). “Impact of Air Pollution Control Policies on Future PM2.5 Concentrations and Their Source Contributions in China”, Journal of Environmental Management, 227, 124- 133.
• Cole, M.A. (2004). “Trade, The Pollution Haven Hypothesis and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Examining the Linkages”, Ecological Economics, 48(1), 71-81.
• Cole, M.A., Elliott, R.J.R. ve Shimamoto, K. (2005). “Industrial Characteristics, Environmental Regulations and Air Pollution: An Analysis of the UK Manufacturing Sector”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50, 121-143.
• Cole, M., Rayner, A. ve Bates, J. (1997). “The Environmental Kuznets Curve: An Empirical Analysis”, Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), 401-416.
• Coondoo, D. ve Dinda, S. (2002). “Causality Between Income and Emission: A Country Group-Specific Econometric Analysis”, Ecological Economics, 40, 351-367.
• Dickey, D.A. ve Fuller, W.A. (1979). “Disribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431.
• Dickey, D.A. ve Fuller, W.A. (1981). “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root”, Econometrica, 49, 1057-1072.
• Dinda, S., Coondoo, D. ve Pal, M. (2000). “Air Quality and Economic Growth: An Empirical Study”, Ecological Economics, 34, 409-423.
• Dünya Bankası, (1992). “Development and Environment”, World Development Report 10517.
• Egli, H. (2004). “The Environmental Kuznets Curve-Evidence From Time Series Data For Germany”, Economics Working Paper Series, Working Papero3/28, 1-39.
• Ekins, P. (1997). “The Kuznets Curve for the Environment and Economic Growth: Examining the Evidence”, Environment and Planning, 29, 805-830.
• Engle, F.R. ve Granger, C.W.J. (1987). “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing”, Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
• Eren, M.V., Ünal, A.E. ve Aydın, H.İ. (2018). “Türkiye’de Vergi Gelirleri İle Ekonomik Kalkınma Arasındaki İlişki: Frekans Alanı Nedensellik Analizi”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 19(1), 1-18.
• Gayer, T. (2011). “A Better Approach to Environmental Regulation: Getting the Costs and Benefits Right”, The Hamilton Project Discussion Paper 2011-06.
• Greenstone, M. ve Hanna, R. (2014). “Environmental Regulations, Air and Water Pollution, and Infant Mortality in India”, American Economic Review, 104(10), 3038-3072.
• Grossman, G.M. ve Krueger, A.B. (1995). “Economic Growth and the Environment”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377.
• Grossman, G. ve Kreuger, A. (1991). “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement”, NBER Working Paper, No. 3914.
• Halicioglu, F. (2008). “An Econometric Study of CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Income and Foreign Trade in Turkey”, Energy Policy, 37, 1156-1164.
• Hao, Y., Deng, Y., Lu, Z. ve Chen, H. (2018). “Is Environmental Regulation Effective in China? Evidence from City-Level Panel Data”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 966-976.
• Johansen, S. (1988). “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231-254.
• Johansen, S. ve Juselius, K. (1990). “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Application to the Demand for Money”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 165-178.
• Kaufman, K.R., Brynhildur, D., Sophie, G. ve Pauly, P. (1998). “The Determinants of Atmospheric SO2 Concentrations: Reconsidering the Environmental Kuznets Curve”, Ecological Economics, 25, 209-220.
• Lee, S., Yoo, H. ve Nam, M. (2018). “Impact of the Clean Air Act on Air Pollution and Infant Health: Evidence from South Korea”, IZA DP No. 11542.
• Li, X., Qiao, Y., Zhu, J., Shi, L. ve Wang, Y. (2017). “The “APEC Blue” Endeavor: Causal Effects of Air Pollution Regulation on Air Quality in China”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1381-1388.
• Ma, Z., Liu, R., Liu, Y. ve Bi, J. (2019). “Effects of Air Pollution Control Policies on PM2.5 Pollution İmprovement in China from 2005 to 2017: A Satellite Based Perspective”, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 19, 6861-6877.
• Mazhar, U. ve Elgin, C. (2013). “Environmental Regulation, Pollution and the Informal Economy”, SBP Research Bulletin, 9, 62-81.
• Neidell, M. (2017). “Air Pollution and Worker Productivity”, IZA World of Labor.
• OECD (2022). “OECD.Stat”, https://stats.oecd.org.,(Erişim Tarihi: 05.01.2022).
• Oh, I., Yoo, W. ve Yoo, Y. (2019). “Impact and Interactions of Policies for Mitigation of Air Pollutants and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Korea”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 1161.
• Orubu, C.O. ve Omotor, D.G. (2011). “Environmental Quality and Economic Growth: Searching for Environmental Kuznets Curves for Air and Water Pollutants in Africa”, Energy Policy, 39(7), 4178-4188.
• Ouyang, X., Shao, Q., Zhu, X., He, Q., Xiang, C. ve Wei, G. (2019). “Environmental Regulation, Economic Growth and Air Pollution: Panel Threshold Analysis for OECD Countries”, Science of the Total Environment, 657, 234-241.
• Panayotou, T. (1993). “Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development”, ILO Technology and Empoloyment Programme Working Paper, WP238.
• Panayotou, T. (2003). “Economic Growth and the Environment”, Economic Survey of Europe, No. 2, 45-72. Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y. ve Smith, R. (2001). “Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 389-326.
• Roca, J., Padilla, E., Farre, M. ve Galletto, V. (2001). “Economic Growth and Atmospheric Pollution in Spain: Discussing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis”, Ecological Economics, 39, 85-99.
• Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J. ve Mohd, S. (2012). “Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions in Malaysia: A Cointegration Analysis of The Environmental Kuznets Curve”, Energy Policy, 51, 184-191.
• Sağlık Etkileri Enstitüsü (2020). “State of Global Air 2020 Report”, Special Report, Boston, MA.
• Selden, T. ve Song, D. (1994), Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution?, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(2), 147-162.
• Shafik, N. ve Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). “Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time Series and Cross-Country Evidence”, Background Paper for World Development Report 1992, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
• Shahbaz, M., Mutascu ve Azim, M.P. (2013). “Environmental Kuznets Curve in Romania and the Role of Energy Consumption”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 165-173.
• Sinha, A. ve Shahbaz, M. (2018). “Estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emission: Role of Renewable Energy Generation in India, Renewable Energy, 119, 703-711.
• Stern, D.I. ve Common, M.S. (2001). “Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve for Sulfur?”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Environmental Management, 41, 162-178.
• Stoerk, T. (2018). “Effectiveness and Cost of Air Pollution Control in China”, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Working Paper No. 273.
• Tanaka, S. (2015). “Environmental Regulations on Air Pollution in China and Their Impact on Infant Mortality”, Journal of Health Economics, 42, 90-103.
• UNEP (2016). Healthy Environment, Healthy People Thematic Report Ministerial Policy Review Session Second Session of the United Nations Environment Assembly of the United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, 23-27 May.
• Wang, J., Zhao, B., Wang, S., Yang, F., Xing, J., Morawska, L., Ding, A., Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V., Kujansuu, J., Wang, Z., Ding, D., Zhang, X., Wang, H., Tian, M., Petäjä, T., Jiang, J. ve Hao, J. (2017). “Particulate Matter Pollution over China and the Effects of Control Policies”, Science of the Total Environment, 426-447.
• Wang, S.S., Zhou, D.Q., Zhou ve P. ve Wang, Q.W. (2011). “CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in China: A Panel Data Analysis”, Energy Policy, 39, 4870-4875.
• WHO (2022). “Ambient Air Pollution: Pollutants", http://www.who.int/airpollution/ambient/pollutants/en, (Erişim Tarihi: 23.09.2019).
• World Bank (2019). “World Development Indicators (WDI)”, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2019).
• Zhao, B., Wang, S., Wang, J., Fu, J. S., Liu, T., Xu, J., Fu, X. ve Hao, J. (2013). “Impact of National NOx and SO2 Control Policies on Particulate Matter Pollution in China”, Atmospheric Environment, 77, 453-463.
• Zivot, A. ve W.K. Andrews (1992). “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270.