SANAYİ SEKTÖRÜ İÇİN “TEKNOLOJİ-ÖRGÜT-ÇEVRE MODELİ” TEMELLİ YENİ BİR TEMİZ TEKNOLOJİ EDİNİM MODELİ ÖNERİSİ

Year 2017, Issue: 2, 39 - 74, 01.03.2017

Tuğba Dinçbaş Mustafa Hakan Yiğitbaşıoğlu

Abstract

Başarılı
teknoloji edinimi firmaların rekabet güçlerini, ekonomik ve çevresel
performanslarını belirgin bir biçimde etkilemektedir. İklim değişikliği
literatüründe ise teknoloji kavramı iklim değişikliği ile mücadelede çok hayati
bir araç olarak belirmektedir. Sanayi sektörünün küresel emisyonlara olan büyük
etkisi ve emisyon azaltımı hususunda büyük potansiyeli göz önüne alındığında,
bu sektörde gerçekleşecek başarılı teknoloji ediniminin emisyon azaltımına ve
iklim değişikliği ile mücadeleye katkı sağlayacağı açıktır. Fakat birçok
politik ve sosyal çabaya rağmen faydaları son derece aşikâr olan enerji
verimliliğine yönelik teknolojilerin bile sanayi sektöründe yaygınlaştığı
söylenememektedir. Teknoloji edinim süreci önündeki engeller ne tam anlamıyla
aşılabilmekte ne de teşvik unsurlarına tam olarak eğilinmektedir. Firmaların
temiz teknoloji edinimini etkileyen değişkenlerin önemine dikkat çeken yeni ve
daha etkili yollar bulunmalıdır. Bu bağlamda teknoloji ediniminin nasıl ve
neden gerçekleştiğinin ve bu sürecin belirleyicilerinin tespit edilmesi ve
öneminin anlaşılması örgütsel hedeflere ulaşmada ve edinimi daha etkili hale
getirmede yüksek öneme sahiptir.

Bu çalışmada doğası gereği sosyal etkileri yüksek,
karmaşık ve gelişmeye açık bir konu olan ve “kirliliğin oluşmadan önlenmesini
sağlayan teknolojiler” olarak tanımlanan temiz teknolojilerin edinim sürecini
sanayi sektörü özelinde teknolojik, örgütsel ve çevresel faktörler açısından
ortaya koyan bir model geliştirilmiştir. Model aracılığıyla bugüne kadar
üzerinde çok az çalışılan bir konu olan firma düzeyinde temiz teknoloji
ediniminin dinamikleri teknolojik, örgütsel ve çevresel değişkenler açısından
tespit edilmeye çalışılmakta, temiz teknolojilerin yapısı göz önüne alınarak
belirlenen değişkenlerin edinim sürecini nasıl etkileyebileceklerine ilişkin öngörüler
oluşturulmaktadır.

Keywords

Temiz Teknoloji, Edinim (Adoption), Sanayi Sektörü, İklim Değişikliği, Teknoloji

References

• • ABDULLAH, M, ZAILANI S., IRANMANESH M., JAYARAMAN K., (2016), Barriers to Green Innovation Initiatives Among Manufacturers: The Malaysian Case, Review of Managerial Science, 10 (4), 683–709. • AHMAD, Z. S., HARUN N., SHUHAIMI H., (2015), Using Technology, Organization, Environment Framework to Investigate the Determinants of the Adoption of Electronic Publishing Amongst Malaysian Publishers, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9 (3), 37-44. • AL-JABRI, I., (2014), The Perceptions of Adopters and Non-Adopters of Cloud Computing: Application of Technology-Organization-Environment Framework, The Fourteenth International Conference on Electronic Business & The First Global Conference on Internet and Information Systems. Taipei, 250-527. • ALTUNOĞLU, A. E., DOĞAN, B., (2014), Bilgi Yönetimi, Çevre, Teknoloji ve Örgütsel Performans İlişkileri, İnternet Uygulamaları ve Yönetimi, 5 (1), 21-37. • ANGELES, R., (2013), 7G’s Environmental Initiative through the Lens of the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) Framework, Computer Technology and Application, 4, 39-68. • ARIFIN, Z., (2015), The Effect of Dynamic Capability to Technology Adoption and its Determinant Factors for Improving Firm’s Performance; Toward a Conceptual Model, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 786-796. • AWA, H., UKOHA, O., EMECHETA B., (2016), Using T-O-E Theoretical Framework to Study the Adoption of ERP Solution, Cogent Business & Management, 3, 1-23. • BAKER, J., (2011), Chapter 12: The Technology–Organization–Environment Framework, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226145805, Erişim Tarihi: 02.07.2016. • BATTISTI, G., (2008), Innovations and the Economics of New Technology Spreading within and across Users: Gaps and Way Forward, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 22-31. • BRETSCHGER, T., (2005), Economics of Technological Change and the Natural Environment:How Effective Are Innovations as a Remedy for Resource Scarcity?, Ecological Economics, 54, 148-163. • BRUNKE, J., JOHANSSON, M., THOLLANDER, P., (2014), Empirical Investigation of Barriers and Drivers to the Adoption of Energy Conservation Measures, Energy Management Practices and Energy Services in the Swedish Iron and Steel Industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 509-525. • CAGNO, E., TRIANNI A., (2014), Evaluating the Barriers to Spesific Industrial Energy Efficiency Measures: An explanotary Study in Small and Medium Sized Enterprieces, Journal of Cleaner Production, 70-83. • CAGNO, E., TRIANNI, A., ABEELEN, C., WORRELL, E., MIGGIANO. F., (2015), Barriers and Drivers for Energy Efficiency: Different Perspectives from an Explonatory Study in the Netherlands, Energy Conversion and Management, 102, 26-38. • CARR, Jr. V. H., (2016), Technology Adoption and Diffusion. http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/innovation/adoptiondiffusion.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2016. • ÇAKIR, C. B., (2009), İnternet Üzerinden Satın Alma Davranışının İncelenmesi ve Bir Uygulama, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul. • DAĞDEMİR, Ö., (2005), Birleşmiş Milletler İklim Değişikliği Çerçeve Sözleşmesi ve Ekonomik Büyüme: İklim Değişikliği Politikasının Türkiye İmalat Sanayi Üzerindeki Olası Etkileri, Ankara Üniveristesi SBF Dergisi, 60 (2), 49-68. • DEL RÍO GONZÁLEZ, P., (2009), The Empirical Analysis of the Determinants for Environmental Technological Change: a Research Agenda, Ecological Economics, 68, 861-878. • DU, P., ZHENG, L., XIE, B., MAHALINGAM A., (2014), Barriers to the Adoption of Energy-Saving Technologies in the Building Sector: A Survey Study of Jing-Jin-Tang,China, Energy Policy, 75, 206-216. • FISCHEDICK M., ROY, J., ABDEL-AZİZ, A., ACQUAYE, A., ALLWOOD, J. M., CERON, J.-P., GENG, Y., KHESHGI, H., LANZA, A., PERCZYK, D., PRICE, L.. (2014), Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the 5th Assessment Report of the IPCC, http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter10.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 08.02.2016. • FLORIDA, R., ATLAS, M., CLINE, M., (2000), What Makes Companies Green? Organizational and Geographic Factors in the Adoption of Environmental Practices, Pittsburgh: National Science Foundation Division of Geography and Regional Science and Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing Program. • GALANG, R., (2014), Divergent Diffusion: Understanding the Interaction between Institutions, Firms, Networks and Knowledge in the International Adoption of Technology, Journal of World Business, 49, 512-521. • GUZIANA, B., (2011), Is the Swedish Environmental Technology Sector Green?, Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 827-835. • HAMMAR, H., LOFGREN, A., (2010), Explaining Adoption of End Of Pipe Solutions and Clean Technologies: Determinants of Firms’ Investments for Reducing Emissions to Air in Four Sectors in Sweden, Enegy Policy 38, 3644-3651. • HO, Y., LIN, C., TSAI, J., (2014), An Empirical Study on Organizational Infusion of Green Practices in Chinese Logistics Companies, Journal of Economic and Social Studies, 4 (2), 159-189. • HWANG, B., HUANG, C., WU, C., (2016), A TOE Approach to Establish a Green Supply Chain Adoption Decision Model in the Semiconductor Industry, Sustainability, 8, 168-198. • İNCEOĞLU, M., (2010), Tutum Algı İletişim, İmaj Yayınları, İstanbul. • JABBOUR, C., LOPES DE SOUSA JABBOUR, A.B., GOVINDAN, K., PIGNATTI DE FREITAS, T., SOUBIHIA, D., KANNAN, D., LATAN, H., (2016), Barriers to the Adoption of Green Operational Practices at Brazilian Companies:Effects on Green and Operational Performance, International Journal of Production Research, 54(10), 3042-3058. • KEMP, R., VOLPI, M., (2008), The Diffusion of Clean Technologies: A Review with Suggestions for Future Diffusion Analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 14-21. • LIN, C., HO, Y. (2011), Determinants of Green Practice Adoption for Logistics Companies in China, Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 67-83. • LIU, Y., (2014), Barriers to the Adoption of Low Carbon Production:A Multiple-Case Study of Chinese Industrial Firms, Energy Policy 67, 412-421. • LUKEN, R., VAN ROMPAEY, F., (2007), Environment and Industry in Developing Countries: Assesssing the Adoption of Environmentally Sound Technology, UNIDO, Edward Elgar, Cambridge. • LUKEN, R., VAN ROMPAEY, F., ZIGOVA, K., (2008), The Determinants of EST Adoption by Manufacturing Plants in Developing Countries, Ecological Economics 66, 141-152. • MAÇANEIRO, M., KINDL DA CUNHA, S., (2014), Theoretical Analysis Model of the Adoption of Reactive and Proactive Eco-Innovation Strategies: the Influence of Contextual Factors Internal and External to Organizations, Brazilian Business Review, 11 (5), 1-23. • MARTINS, R., OLIVEIRA, T., THOMAS, M., (2016), An Empirical Analysis to Assess the Determinants of SaaS Diffusion in Firms, Computers in Human Behavior 62, 19-33. • MCKINNIE, M., (2016), Cloud Computing: TOE Adoption Factors By Service Model In Manufacturing, Dissertation, Georgia State University, Georgia. • MCMASTER, T., WASTELL, D., FERNELEY, E., DEGROSS, J., (2007), Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation: Diversifying the Research Agenda, Springer, New York. • MISHRA, A. N., KONANA, P., BARUA, A., (2007), Antecedents and Consequences of Internet Use in Procurement: An Empirical Investigation of Us Manufacturing Firms, Information Systems Research, 18 (1), 103-120. • MONTALVO, C., (2008), General Wisdom Concerning the Factors Affecting the Adoption of Cleaner Prodcution:A Survey 1990-2007, Journal of Cleaner Production, 7-13. • NAPP, T, GAMBHIR, A., HILLS, T. P., FLORIN, N., FENNELL, P. S., (2014), A Review of the Technologies, Economics and Policy Instruments for Decarbonising Energy-Intensive Manufacturing Industries, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (30), 616-640. • OKTAL, Ö., (2013), Kullanıcıların Bilgi Sistemini Kabulünü Etkileyen Faktörlerin Utaut Perspektifinden İncelenmesi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31 (1), 153-170. • OLIVEIRA, T., MARTINS, M., (2011), Literature Review of Information Technology Adoption Models at Firm Level, The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 14 (1), 110-121. • OLIVEIRA, T., THOMAS, M., ESPADANAL, M., (2014), Assessing the Determinants of Cloud Computing Adoption: An Analysis of the Manufacturing and Services Sectors, Information and Management, 51, 497-510. • RADONJIC, G., TOMINC, P., (2007), The Role of Environmental Management System on Introduction of New Technologies in the Metal And Chemical/Paper/Plastics Industries, Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1482-1493. • ROGERS, M. E., (1983), Diffusion of Innovations, Third Edition, The Free Press, New York. • SEITZ, C., BEUTTENMÜLLER, O., TERZIDIS, O., (2015), Organizational Adoption Behavior of CO2-Saving Power Train Technologies: An Empirical Study on the German Heavy-Duty Vehicles Market, Transportation Research, 80, 247-262. • SHI, H., PENG, S. Z., LİU, Y., ZHONG, P., (2008), Barriers to the Implementation of Cleaner Production in Chinese SMEs: Government, Industry and Expert Stakeholders’ Perspectives, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 842-852. • SUEYOSHI, T., GOTO, M., (2014), Environmental Assessment for Corporate Sustainability by Resource Utilization and Technology Innovation: Dea Radial Measurement on Japanese Industrial Sectors, Energy Economics, 46, 295-307. • SUZUKI, M., (2015), Identifying Roles of International Institutions in Clean Energy Technology Innovation and Diffusion in the Developing Countries: Matching Barriers with Roles of the Institutions, Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 229-240. • TARHINI, A., ARACHCHILAGE, N., MASA'DEH, R., ABBASI, M., (2015), A Critical Review of Theories and Models of Technology Adoption and Acceptance in Information System Research, International Journal of Technology Diffusion, 6 (4), 58-77. • THOLLANDER, P., BACKLUND, S., TRIANNI, A., CAGNO, E., (2013), Beyond Barriers:A Case Study on Driving Forces for Improved Energy Efficiency in the Foundry Industries in Finland, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Applied Energy, 111, 636-643. • TRIANNI, A., CAGNO, E., THOLLANDER, P., (2013), Barriers to Industrial Energy Efficiency in Foundries: Aeuropean Comparison, Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 161-176. • TURAN, B., HAŞİT. G., (2014), Teknoloji Kabul Modeli ve Sınıf Öğretmenleri Üzerinde Bir Uygulama, Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 6 (1),109-119. • UNFCCC, (2016), United Nations Framework Conventon on Climate Change, http://unfccc.int/focus/technology/items/7000.php#intro, Erişim Tarihi: 05 03 2016. • UNIDO, (2015), United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Overview: Industrial Development Report 2016: The Role of Technology and Innovation in Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development, https://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_media_upgrade/Resources/Publications/EBOOK_IDR2016_FULLREPORT.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 05 03 2016. • VEISI, H., (2012), Exploring the Determinants of Adoption Behaviour of Clean Technologies in Agriculture: A Case of Integrated Pest Management, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 20 (1), 67-82. • WANG, Y., LI, H., LI, C., ZHANG, D., (2016), Factors Affecting Hotels' Adoption Of Mobile Reservation Systems: A Technology-Organization-Environment Framework, Tourism Management, 53, 163-172. • WENG, M., LIN, C., (2011), Determinants of Green Innovation Adoption for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises (SMEs), African Journal of Business Management 5 (22), 9154-9163. • ZHU, K., DONG S., XIN XU, S., KRAEMER, K., (2006), Innovation Diffusion in Global Contexts: Determinants of Post-Adoption Digital Transformation of European Companies, European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 601-616.