İşletmelerin Açık Kaynak Kodlu Yazılım Benimseme Kabiliyetleri ile Dijital Dönüşüm Stratejileri İlişkisi

Year 2023, Volume: 57 Issue: 3, 513 - 532, 31.07.2023

Arafat Salih Aydıner , Erdem Erzurum , Ahmet Esat Kara

https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.1244984

Abstract

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı açık kaynak kodlu yazılım kabiliyetlerinin benimsenmesinin işletmelerdeki değer oluşturma ve yapısal değişiklik dijital dönüşüm stratejilerine etkisinin incelenmesi ve işletmelere sürdürülebilir, verimli ve rekabet edilebilir bir dijital dönüşüm perspektifi sunulmasıdır.
Yöntem: Ampirik yöntemin belirlendiği bu çalışmada bilişim teknolojileri departmanı olan 200 firmanın üst düzey yöneticilerinden anketle nicel veri toplanmış ve verilerin demografik betimsel, güvenirlik ve geçerlilik, normallik ve regresyon analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir.
Bulgular: Entegrasyon ile ilgili kabiliyetler ile dijital dönüşümde değer oluşturma ve yapısal değişiklik stratejileri arasında ve yönetim kabiliyeti ile dijital dönüşümde değer oluşturma stratejileri arasında anlamlı ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Yönetim kabiliyeti değer oluşturmayı, insan kaynakları kabiliyeti ise hem değer oluşturmayı hem yapısal değişikliği etkilememektedir.
Özgünlük: Araştırma değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkiler temel yaklaşımlar çerçevesinde bütüncül olarak incelenmiş, geçmiş araştırmalardaki ürün ve sektörel yaklaşımların dikkate almadığı işletmeler bazındaki stratejik perspektif yakalanmıştır. Dinamik kabiliyetler teoremi çerçevesinde açık kaynak kodlu yazılım kabiliyetleri ile dijital dönüşüm stratejilerinin değerlendirilmesi çalışmanın teorik katkısını oluşturmaktadır.

Keywords

Açık Kaynak Kodlu Yazılım Kabiliyetleri, Dijital Dönüşüm Stratejisi, Değer Oluşturma, Yapısal Değişiklik

The Relationship Between Open-Source Software Adoption Capabilities of Enterprises and Digital Transformation Strategies

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study is to examine the impact of the adoption of open source software capabilities on value creation and structural change digital transformation strategies in businesses and to offer businesses a sustainable, efficient, and competitive digital transformation perspective.
Methodology: In this study, the empirical method was determined and quantitative data were collected through a questionnaire from top managers of 200 companies with information technology departments; descriptive, reliability, validity, normality and regression analyses were performed.
Findings: Significant relationships were found between integration-related capabilities and strategies for value creation and structural change in digital transformation, and between management capability and value creation strategies in digital transformation. While management capability was ineffective in explaining value creation, human resources capability was found ineffective in value creation and structural change.
Originality: Relationships between the research variables were examined holistically within the framework of basic approaches, and the strategic perspective on the basis of enterprises, which was not taken into account by the product and sectoral approaches in previous studies, was captured. In addition, the evaluation of open source software capabilities and digital transformation strategies within the framework of the dynamic capabilities theorem constitutes the theoretical contribution of this study.

Keywords

Open Source Software Capabilities, Digital Transformation Strategy, Value Creation, Structural Change

References

• Ajila, S. ve Wu, D. (2007). "Empirical Study of the Effects of Open Source Adoption on Software Development Economics", Journal of Systems and Software, 80(9), DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.01.011.
• Akram, U., Fülöp, M., Tiron-Tudor, A., Topor, D. ve Căpușneanu, S. (2021). "Impact of Digitalization on Customers’ Well-Being in the Pandemic Period: Challenges and Opportunities for the Retail Industry", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18147533.
• Allison, P. (1999). "Multiple Regression: A Primer”, Pine Forge Press, California, London, New Delhi.
• AlNuaimi, B., Kumar Singh, S., Ren, S., Budhwar, P. ve Vorobyev, D. (2022). "Mastering Digital Transformation: The Nexus between Leadership, Agility, and Digital Strategy", Journal of Business Research, 145, 636-648, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.038.
• Appleyard, M. ve Chesbrough, H. (2017). "The Dynamics of Open Strategy: From Adoption to Reversion". Long Range Planning, 50(3), 310-321, DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2016.07.004.
• Aşar, E., Bülbül, F., Akbulut, M., Bayarslan, P., Kermen, T. ve Fındık, D. (2022). “Measuring Firm Perception to Adaptation of Industry 4.0: The Case of Turkey”, Verimlilik Dergisi, Dijital Dönüşüm ve Verimlilik Özel Sayısı, 141-155, DOI: 10.51551/Verimlilik.971100.
• Aydiner, A.S. (2020). "A Model for Digital Business Governance for Strategic Growth and Innovation with Dynamic Capabilities", Strategic Outlook for Innovative Work Behaviours,(Editörler: Dincer, H., Yüksel, S.), Springer, Cham, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-50131-0_8.
• Aydıner, A.S. ve Kubilay, B. (2022). "Türkiye’deki Bakım Yönetim ve Kestirimci Bakım Bilişim Sistemlerinin Firmaya Özgü Durumları Üzerine Bir Saha Araştırması", Verimlilik Dergisi, Dijital Dönüşüm ve Verimlilik Özel Sayısı, 123-140, DOI: 10.51551/verimlilik.986969.
• Bakırtaş, T. ve Ustaömer, K. (2019). "Türkiye'nin Bankacılık Sektöründe Dijitalleşme Olgusu", Ekonomik İşletme ve Yönetim Dergisi, 3(1), 1-24.
• Basole, R. (2016). "Accelerating Digital Transformation: Visual Insights from the API Ecosystem", IT Professional, 18(6), 20-25, DOI: 10.1109/MITP.2016.105.
• Berghaus, S. ve Back, A. (2016). "Stages in Digital Business Transformation: Results of an Empirical Maturity Study", MCIS 2016 Proceedings, 22.
• Bin Azmy, I., Azmi, A., Sulaiman, M. ve Yusop, O. (2021). "Digital Transformation in Oil and Gas Industry: Developing an OSDU Third-Party Application", 7th International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies, ICEET 2021, DOI: 10.1109/ICEET53442.2021.9659636.
• Borangiu, T., Trentesaux, D., Thomas, A., Leitão, P. ve Barata, J. (2019). "Digital Transformation of Manufacturing through Cloud Services and Resource Virtualization", Computers in Industry, 108, 150-162, DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2019.01.006.
• Burchardt, C. ve Maisch, B. (2019). "Digitalization Needs a Cultural Change-Examples of Applying Agility and Open Innovation to Drive the Digital Transformation", Procedia CIRP, 84, 112-117, DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.05.009.
• Butler, S., Gamalielsson, J., Lundell, B., Brax, C., Mattsson, A., Gustavsson, T., Feist, J., Kvarnström, B. ve Lönroth, E. (2022). “Considerations and Challenges for the Adoption of Open Source Components in Software-Intensive Businesses”, Journal of Systems and Software, 186, 111152, DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.111152.
• Craney, T. ve Surles, J. (2002). "Model-Dependent Variance İnflation Factor Cutoff Values", Quality Engineering, 14(3), 391-403.
• Çavuş, M.F. ve Soysal Kurt, H. (2017). "Kamu Kurumlarında Açık Kaynak Kodlu Yazılımların Kullanımı", Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştirmalari Dergisi, 5(3), 39-49.
• Damanpour, F. ve Wischnevsky, J.D. (2006). "Research on Innovation in Organizations: Distinguishing Innovation-Generating from Innovation-Adopting Organizations", Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(4), 269-291.
• Ebert, C. ve Duarte, C. (2018). "Digital Transformation", IEEE Software, 35(4), 16-21.
• Elliott, M. ve Scacchi, W. (2005). "Mobilization of Software Developers: Free Software Development", Information Technology and People, 21(1), 4-33.
• Ernst, N. A., Easterbrook, S. ve Mylopoulos, J. (2010). “Code Forking in Open-Source Software: A Requirements Perspective”, DOI:10.48550/arXiv.1004.2889.
• Faridian, P.H. (2022). "Leading Open Innovation: The Role of Strategic Entrepreneurial Leadership in Orchestration of Value Creation and Capture in Github Open Source Communities", Technovation, 119, 102546.
• Fiorina, C., Shriwise, P., Dufresne, A., Ragusa, J., Ivanov, K., Valentine, T., . . . Dechenaux, B. (2020). "An Initiative for the Development and Application of Open-Source Multi-Physics Simulation in Support of R&D and E&T in Nuclear Science and Technology", International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future, PHYSOR 2020, DOI:10.1016/j.lrp.2016.07.004.
• Franch, X., Kenett, R., Susi, A., Galanis, N., Glott, R. ve Mancinelli, F. (2015). "Community Data for OSS Adoption Risk Management", The Art and Science of Analyzing Software Data (Editörler: Bird, C., Menzies, T. ve Zimmermann, T.), 377-409, Elsevier Science, San Diego, CA, USA.
• Fukawa, N., Zhang, Y. ve Erevelles, S. (2021). "Dynamic Capability and Open-Source Strategy in the Age of Digital Transformation", Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 1-16.
• Gebauer, H., Fleisch, E., Lamprecht, C. ve Wortmann, F. (2020). "Growth Paths for Overcoming the Digitalization Paradox", Business Horizons, 63(3), 313-323, DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2020.01.005.
• George, D. ve Mallery, P. (2022). "IBM SPSS Statistics 27 Step by Step: A Simple Study Guide and Reference", 17. Baskı, Routledge, New York.
• Georgopoulou, P. (2009). "The Free/Open Source Software Movement: Resistance or Change?", Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais, 9(1), 65-76, DOI:10.15448/1984-7289.2009.1.5569.
• Gimpel, H., Hosseini, S., Huber, R., Probst, L., Röglinger, M. ve Faisst, U. (2018). "Structuring Digital Transformation: A Framework of Action Fields and Its Application at ZEISS", Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 19(1), 31-54.
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. ve Anderson, R. (2013). "Multivariate Data Analysis", Pearson Education Limited, Londra.
• Hauge, Ø., Ayala, C. ve Conradi, R. (2010). "Adoption of Open Source Software in Software-Intensive Organizations- A Systematic Literature Review", Information and Software Technology, 52(11), 1133-1154, DOI: 10.1016/j.datak.2015.06.007.
• Helander, N., Aaltonen, T., Mikkonen, T., Oksanen, V., Puhakka, M., Seppänen, M., Vaden, T. ve Vainio, N. (2007). "Open Source Software Management Framework", Tampere University of Technology and University of Tampere, Tampere.
• Henriette, E., Feki, M. ve Boughzala, I. (2016). "Digital Transformation Challenges", Tenth Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS), Cyprus, 4-6 September.
• Hossain, S. (2018). "Blockchain Computing: Prospects and Challenges for Digital Transformation", 6th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), 1-6.
• İnel, M. (2019). "An Empirical Study on Measurement of Efficiency of Digital Transformation by Using Data Envelopment Analysis", Management Science Letters, 9(2019), 549-556, DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.1.008.
• Katsamakas, E. ve Xin, M. (2019). Open source adoption strategy. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 36(July 2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100872.
• Klein, M. (2020). "İşletmelerde Dijital Dönüşüm ve Etmenleri", Dijital Çağda İşletmecilik Dergisi, 3(1), 24-35.
• Kula Kartal, S. ve Mor Dirlik, E. (2016). "Geçerlilik Kavramının Tarihsel Gelişimi ve Güvenilirlikte En Çok Tercih Edilen Yöntem: Cronbach Alfa Katsayısı", Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(4), 1865-1879.
• Kutnjak, A., Pihir, I. ve Tomicic Furjan, M. (2019). "Digital Transformation Case Studies Across Industries - Literature Review", 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics, MIPRO 2019 - Proceedings, 1293 – 1298, DOI: 10.23919/MIPRO.2019.8756911.
• Lin, Y., Ko, T., Chuang, T. ve Lin, K. (2006). “Open Source Licenses and the Creative Commons Framework: License Selection and Comparison”, Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 22(1), 1-17.
• López, L., Costal, D., Ayala, C., Franch, X., Annosi, M., Glott, R. ve Haaland, K. (2015). "Adoption of OSS Components: A Goal-Oriented Approach", Data and Knowledge Engineering, 99, 17-38, DOI: 10.1016/j.datak.2015.06.007.
• Matt, C., Hess, T. ve Benlian, A. (2015). "Digital Transformation Strategies", Business and Information Systems Engineering, 57(5), 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5.
• Nadeem, A., Abedin, B., Cerpa, N. ve Chew, E. (2018). "Editorial: Digital Transformation & Digital Business Strategy in Electronic Commerce-The Role of Organizational Capabilities", Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 13(2), I-VIII.
• Nadkarni, S. ve Prügl, R. (2021). "Digital Transformation: A Review, Synthesis and Opportunities for Future Research", Management Review Quarterly, 71(2), 233-341, DOI:10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7.
• Nigel, V. (2021). “Digital Business Transformation: How Established Companies Sustain Competitive Advantage from Now to Next”, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Pan, Y. ve Jackson, R. (2008). "Ethnic Difference in the Relationship between Acute Inflammation and Serum Ferritin in US Adult Males", Epidemiology and Infection, 136(3), 421- 431.
• Peppard, J. ve Ward, J. (2016). “The Strategic Management of Information Systems: Building a Digital Strategy”, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Ritter, T. ve Pedersen, C. (2020, 4). "Digitization Capability and the Digitalization of Business Models in Business-to-Business Firms: Past, Present, and Future", Industrial Marketing Management, 86, 180-190, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022.
• Setia, P., Bayus, B.L. ve Rajagopalan, B. (2020). “The Takeoff of Open Source Software: A Signaling Perspective Based on Community Activities”, MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 44(3), 1439-1458.
• Schober, P. ve Schwarte, L. (2018). "Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation", Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768.
• Sipahi, B., Yurtkoru, E.S. ve Çinko, M. (2006). "Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS'le Veri Analizi", Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Stief, S., Eidhoff, A. ve Voeth, M. (2016). "Transform to Succeed: An Empirical Analysis of Digital Transformation in Firms", International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 10(6), 1833-1842.
• Şimşek Demirbağ, K. ve Yıldırım, N. (2022). “Endüstri 4.0 Veri̇mli̇li̇k: Türk Beyaz Eşya Sektöründe Keşfedi̇ci̇ Durum Çalışması”, Verimlilik Dergisi, Dijital Dönüşüm ve Verimlilik Özel Sayısı, 207-224.
• Tabachnick, B.G. ve Fidell, L.S. (2007). "Time-Series Analysis" Using Multivariate Statistics, 1-63.
• Ursachi, G., Horodnic, I. ve Zait, A. (2015). "How Reliable are Measurement Scales? External Factors with Indirect Influence on Reliability Estimators". Procedia Economics and Finance, 20, 679-686.
• Verhoef, P., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N. ve Haenlein, M. (2021). "Digital Transformation: A Multidisciplinary Reflection and Research Agenda", Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022.
• Vial, G. (2019). "Understanding Digital Transformation: A Review and a Research Agenda", Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144, DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.
• Wasserman, A.I. (2013). “Community and Commercial Strategies in Open Source Software / Gemeinschafts- und Kommerzielle Strategien in der Open-Source-Softwarewelt”, IT-Information Technology, 55(5), 181–188. DOI: 10.1515/itit.2013.1003.
• Yankın, F.B. (2019). "Dijital Dönüşüm Sürecinde Çalışma Yaşamı", Trakya Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, 7(2), 1 - 38.
• Yordanova, S. ve Stefanova, K. (2019). "Major Technologies and Practical Aspects of the Digital Transformation of Business in a Big Data Environment", Business Management / Biznes Upravlenie, 1, 5 - 21.
• Zaoui, F. ve Souissi, N. (2020). "Roadmap for Digital Transformation: A Literature Review", Procedia Computer Science, 175, 621-628, DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.07.090.
• Zittrain, J. (2004). "Normative Principles for Evaluating Free and Proprietary Software", University of Chicago Law Review, 71(1), 265-287.