Veteriner hekimliği alanında karar ağaçları uygulamalarının incelenmesi

Year 2023, , 177 - 187, 15.06.2023

Özgecan Korkmaz Ağaoğlu , Safa Gürcan

https://doi.org/10.33188/vetheder.1203378

Abstract

Bilimsel araştırmalar sonucunda elde edilen verilerin analiz edilmesinde istatistiksel yöntemler önemli birer araçtır. Bununla birlikte; elde edilen verinin çok büyük olması gibi durumlarda klasik istatistiksel yöntemler yetersiz kalabilmektedir. Teknolojinin hızla gelişmesi ve bilgilerin depolanabilme kapasitelerinin artması, bilginin önemini daha da arttırmıştır. Bilginin önemli hale gelmesi, toplanan verinin büyük olması ve klasik istatistiksel yöntemlerin bu veriyi analiz etmede yetersiz kalması ise veri madenciliği gibi yöntemlerin doğmasına neden olmuştur. Veri madenciliği, dijital platformlarda depolanan devasa büyüklükteki veriler arasındaki örüntülerin değerlendirilmesi, çıkarımlar yapılması ve bunun sonucunda da anlamlı bilgiler elde edilmesi için uygulanan analizler olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Veteriner hekimliği; hayvan yetiştiriciliği, gıda güvenliği, gıda kalitesinin belirlenmesi, hayvan hastalıklarının yayılımı, hastalıkların teşhis ve tedavisi gibi birçok konuda veri üretilmesi nedeniyle veri madenciliğinin uygulanabileceği bir alandır. Bu derlemede veteriner hekimliği alanında son yıllarda yaygın bir şekilde kullanılmaya başlanan ve önemli bir sınıflandırma modeli olan karar ağaçları modelleme yönteminin içeriği ve kullanım alanlarının tanıtılması amaçlanmıştır

Keywords

veri madenciliği, karar ağaçları, veteriner hekimlik, data mining, decision tree, veterinary medicine

Examination of decision trees applications in the veterinary medicine

Abstract

Statistical methods are important tools in the analysis of data obtained as a result of scientific research. However, in cases where the data obtained is very large, classical statistical methods may be insufficient. The rapid development of technology and the increase in the storage capacity of information have increased the importance of information even more. The fact that information has become important, the data collected is large, and classical statistical methods are insufficient to analyze this data has led to the emergence of methods such as data mining. Data mining is defined as the analysis applied to evaluate the patterns among the huge data stored on digital platforms and to make inferences to obtain meaningful information. Veterinary science is an area where data mining can be applied because it produces data on many subjects such as animal husbandry, food safety, determination of food quality, the spread of animal diseases, diagnosis and treatment of diseases. This review, it is aimed to introduce the content and usage areas of the decision tree modeling method, which has been widely used in the field of veterinary medicine in recent years and is an important classification model.

Keywords

data mining, decision tree, veterinary medicine

References

• 1. Lovell MC. Data Mining. Rev Econ Stat 1983; 65(1): 1–12.
• 1. Lovell MC. Data Mining. Rev Econ Stat 1983; 65(1): 1–12.
• 2. Coenen F. Data Mining: Past, Present and Future, The Knowledge Engineering Review, Cambridge University Press; 2004.
• 2. Coenen F. Data Mining: Past, Present and Future, The Knowledge Engineering Review, Cambridge University Press; 2004.
• 3. Fayyad UM, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Smyth P, Uthurusamy R. F Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, AAAI Press/The MIT Press; 1996.
• 3. Fayyad UM, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Smyth P, Uthurusamy R. F Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, AAAI Press/The MIT Press; 1996.
• 4. Ganesh SH. Data Mining: Should It Be Included In The 'Statistics' Curriculum? ICOTS6, 2002.
• 4. Ganesh SH. Data Mining: Should It Be Included In The 'Statistics' Curriculum? ICOTS6, 2002.
• 5. Koyuncugil A.S., Özgülbaş N. Veri Madenciliği: Tıp ve Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Kullanımı ve Uygulamaları, Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi 2009; 2(2): 21-32.
• 5. Koyuncugil A.S., Özgülbaş N. Veri Madenciliği: Tıp ve Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Kullanımı ve Uygulamaları, Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi 2009; 2(2): 21-32.
• 6. Ogunleye JO. The Concept of Data Mining. In: Thomas C, editor. Data Mining - Concepts and Applications [Internet]. London: IntechOpen; 2021.
• 6. Ogunleye JO. The Concept of Data Mining. In: Thomas C, editor. Data Mining - Concepts and Applications [Internet]. London: IntechOpen; 2021.
• 7. Rojas E, Munoz-Gama J, Sepúlveda M, Capurro D. Process mining in healthcare: A literature review J Biomed Inform 2016; 61, 224-236.
• 7. Rojas E, Munoz-Gama J, Sepúlveda M, Capurro D. Process mining in healthcare: A literature review J Biomed Inform 2016; 61, 224-236.
• 8. Grzesiak W, Zaborski D Examples of the use of data mining methods in animal breeding. In: Karahoca A, editör Data mining applications in engineering and medicine, [Internet]. London: IntechOpen; 2012.
• 8. Grzesiak W, Zaborski D Examples of the use of data mining methods in animal breeding. In: Karahoca A, editör Data mining applications in engineering and medicine, [Internet]. London: IntechOpen; 2012.
• 9. Hsiao T-C, Shieh S-L, Chen T-L, Liu C-H, Yeh Y-C. Data Analysis of Medical Records in Veterinary Hospital Using Clustering Method and Association Rule. App Math Info Sci 2015; 9(6):59.
• 9. Hsiao T-C, Shieh S-L, Chen T-L, Liu C-H, Yeh Y-C. Data Analysis of Medical Records in Veterinary Hospital Using Clustering Method and Association Rule. App Math Info Sci 2015; 9(6):59.
• 10. Pandey SC. Data mining techniques for medical data: a review. 2016; SCOPES; 972-982.
• 10. Pandey SC. Data mining techniques for medical data: a review. 2016; SCOPES; 972-982.
• 11. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Stone CJ, Olshen RA. Classification and regression trees, 1st ed. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1984.
• 11. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Stone CJ, Olshen RA. Classification and regression trees, 1st ed. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1984.
• 12. McCulloch W, Walter P. A Logical Calculus of Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity. Bull Math Biophys 1943; 5 (4): 115–133.
• 12. McCulloch W, Walter P. A Logical Calculus of Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity. Bull Math Biophys 1943; 5 (4): 115–133.
• 13. Holland JH. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan; 1975.
• 13. Holland JH. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan; 1975.
• 14. Duda RO, Hart PE. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. Wiley, New York; 1973.
• 14. Duda RO, Hart PE. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. Wiley, New York; 1973.
• 15. Joseph B Application to the Logistic Function to Bio-Assay. J Am Statist Assoc 1944; 39: 357–365.
• 15. Joseph B Application to the Logistic Function to Bio-Assay. J Am Statist Assoc 1944; 39: 357–365.
• 16. Han J, Kamber M. Data mining: concepts and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, ABD; 2000.
• 16. Han J, Kamber M. Data mining: concepts and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, ABD; 2000.
• 17. Lewis RJ. An Introduction to Classification and Regression Tree (CART) Analysis. The 2000 Annual Meeting Of The Society For Academic Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California, ABD; 2000.
• 17. Lewis RJ. An Introduction to Classification and Regression Tree (CART) Analysis. The 2000 Annual Meeting Of The Society For Academic Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California, ABD; 2000.
• 18. Song Y, Lu Y. Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction. Shangai Arch Psychiatry 2015; 27(2):130-135.
• 18. Song Y, Lu Y. Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction. Shangai Arch Psychiatry 2015; 27(2):130-135.
• 19. Adua E, Kolog EA, Afrifa-Yamoah E, Amankwah B, Obirikorang C, Anto EO, Acheampong E, Wang W, Tetteh AY. Predictive model and feature importance for early detection of type II diabetes mellitus. Transl Med Commun 2021; 6:17.
• 19. Adua E, Kolog EA, Afrifa-Yamoah E, Amankwah B, Obirikorang C, Anto EO, Acheampong E, Wang W, Tetteh AY. Predictive model and feature importance for early detection of type II diabetes mellitus. Transl Med Commun 2021; 6:17.
• 20. Song Y, Lu Y. Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction. Shangai Arch Psychiatry 2015; 27(2):130-135.
• 20. Song Y, Lu Y. Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction. Shangai Arch Psychiatry 2015; 27(2):130-135.
• 21. Morgan JN, Sonquist JA. Problems in the analysis of survey data, and a proposal. J Amer Statist Assoc 1963; 58:415-434.
• 21. Morgan JN, Sonquist JA. Problems in the analysis of survey data, and a proposal. J Amer Statist Assoc 1963; 58:415-434.
• 22. Kass GV. An explanory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Appl Statist 1980; 29(2):119-127.
• 22. Kass GV. An explanory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Appl Statist 1980; 29(2):119-127.
• 23. Quinlan JR. Induction of decision trees. Mach Learn 1986; 1:81-106.
• 23. Quinlan JR. Induction of decision trees. Mach Learn 1986; 1:81-106.
• 24. Biggs D, Ville BD, Suan E. A method of choosing multiway partitions for classification and decision trees. J Appl Stat 1991; 18:49-62.
• 24. Biggs D, Ville BD, Suan E. A method of choosing multiway partitions for classification and decision trees. J Appl Stat 1991; 18:49-62.
• 25. Friedman J. Multivariate adaptive regression splines (with discussion), Ann Stat 1991; 19:1-141.
• 25. Friedman J. Multivariate adaptive regression splines (with discussion), Ann Stat 1991; 19:1-141.
• 26. Quinlan JR. C4.5: Programs for machine learning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1993; 17-55.
• 26. Quinlan JR. C4.5: Programs for machine learning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1993; 17-55.
• 27. Michie D, Spiegelhalter DJ, Taylor CC. Machine learning, neural and statistical classification. Ellis Horwood Limited, 1994.
• 27. Michie D, Spiegelhalter DJ, Taylor CC. Machine learning, neural and statistical classification. Ellis Horwood Limited, 1994.
• 28. Shafer J, Agarwal R, Mehta M. SPRINT: A scalable parallel classifier for data mining. Proc. of 22nd International Conference on Very Large Databases, 1996.
• 28. Shafer J, Agarwal R, Mehta M. SPRINT: A scalable parallel classifier for data mining. Proc. of 22nd International Conference on Very Large Databases, 1996.
• 29. Loh W-Y, Shih Y-S. Split selection methods for classification trees. Stat Sinica 1997; 7:815-840.
• 29. Loh W-Y, Shih Y-S. Split selection methods for classification trees. Stat Sinica 1997; 7:815-840.
• 30. Breiman L. Random Forests. Mach Learn 2001; 45: 5–32.
• 30. Breiman L. Random Forests. Mach Learn 2001; 45: 5–32.
• 31. Friedman JH. Stochastic Gradient Boosting. Comput Stat Data An, 2002; 28:367-378.
• 31. Friedman JH. Stochastic Gradient Boosting. Comput Stat Data An, 2002; 28:367-378.
• 32. Witten IH, Frank E, Hall MA. Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques 3rd Edition, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington, MA, ABD, 2011.
• 32. Witten IH, Frank E, Hall MA. Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques 3rd Edition, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington, MA, ABD, 2011.
• 33. Rodriguez JJ, Kuncheva L, Alonso CJ. Rotation forest: A new classifier ensemble method. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2006; 28(10):1619-30.
• 33. Rodriguez JJ, Kuncheva L, Alonso CJ. Rotation forest: A new classifier ensemble method. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2006; 28(10):1619-30.
• 34. Quinlan JR. Simplifying decision trees. Int J Man-Mach Stud 1987; 27: 221- 234.
• 34. Quinlan JR. Simplifying decision trees. Int J Man-Mach Stud 1987; 27: 221- 234.
• 35. Quinlan JR. Learning logical definition from relations. Mach Learn 1990; 5:239-266.
• 35. Quinlan JR. Learning logical definition from relations. Mach Learn 1990; 5:239-266.
• 36. Quinlan JR. C4.5: programs for machine learning. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014.
• 36. Quinlan JR. C4.5: programs for machine learning. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014.
• 37. Mingers J. An empirical comparison of pruning methods for decision tree induction. Mach Learn 1989; 4:227–243.
• 37. Mingers J. An empirical comparison of pruning methods for decision tree induction. Mach Learn 1989; 4:227–243.
• 38. Webb GI. Overfitting. In: Sammut C, Webb GI, editors. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning. Springer, Boston, MA, ABD; 2011.
• 38. Webb GI. Overfitting. In: Sammut C, Webb GI, editors. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning. Springer, Boston, MA, ABD; 2011.
• 39. Vale MM, Moura DJ, Nääs IA, Oliveira SRM, Rodridues LHA. Data mining to estimate. broiler mortality when. exposed to heat wave. Sci Agric 2008; 65(3):223-229.
• 39. Vale MM, Moura DJ, Nääs IA, Oliveira SRM, Rodridues LHA. Data mining to estimate. broiler mortality when. exposed to heat wave. Sci Agric 2008; 65(3):223-229.
• 40. Piwczyński D. Using Classifıcation Trees in Statistical Analysis of Discrete Sheep Reproduction Traits. J Cent Europ Agri 2009; 10 (3): 303-309.
• 40. Piwczyński D. Using Classifıcation Trees in Statistical Analysis of Discrete Sheep Reproduction Traits. J Cent Europ Agri 2009; 10 (3): 303-309.
• 41. Pinzón-Sáchez C, CabreraVE, Ruegg PL. Decision tree analysis of treatment strategies for mild and moderate cases of clinical mastitis occurring in early lactation. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94:1873-1892.
• 41. Pinzón-Sáchez C, CabreraVE, Ruegg PL. Decision tree analysis of treatment strategies for mild and moderate cases of clinical mastitis occurring in early lactation. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94:1873-1892.
• 42. Židek R, Šidlová V, Kasarda R, Fuerst-Waltl B. Methods for Distinction of Cattle Using Supervised Learning. Int J Biol Vet Agri Food Engin 2014; 8(5):500-502.
• 42. Židek R, Šidlová V, Kasarda R, Fuerst-Waltl B. Methods for Distinction of Cattle Using Supervised Learning. Int J Biol Vet Agri Food Engin 2014; 8(5):500-502.
• 43. Wylie CE, Shaw DJ, Verheven KLP, Newton JR. Decision tree analysis of clinical data to aid diagnostic reasoning for equine laminitis. Vet Record 2016; 178(17):420.
• 43. Wylie CE, Shaw DJ, Verheven KLP, Newton JR. Decision tree analysis of clinical data to aid diagnostic reasoning for equine laminitis. Vet Record 2016; 178(17):420.
• 44. Velásquez L, Cruz-Tirado JP, Siche R, Quevedo R. An application based on the decision tree. to classify the marbling of beef by hyperspectral imaging. Meat Science 2017; 133:43-50.
• 44. Velásquez L, Cruz-Tirado JP, Siche R, Quevedo R. An application based on the decision tree. to classify the marbling of beef by hyperspectral imaging. Meat Science 2017; 133:43-50.
• 45. Wold JP, Kermit M, Woll A. Rapid nondestructive determination of edible meat content in crabs (Cancer pagurus) by near-infrared imaging spectroscopy. Applied Spectroscopy 2010; 64(7): 691-699.
• 45. Wold JP, Kermit M, Woll A. Rapid nondestructive determination of edible meat content in crabs (Cancer pagurus) by near-infrared imaging spectroscopy. Applied Spectroscopy 2010; 64(7): 691-699.
• 46. López Osornio MM, Hough G, Salvador A, Chambers IV E, McGray S, Fiszman S. Beef's optimum internal cooking temperature as seen by consumers from different countries using survival analysis statistics. Food Qual Prefer (2008; 19(1):12-20.
• 46. López Osornio MM, Hough G, Salvador A, Chambers IV E, McGray S, Fiszman S. Beef's optimum internal cooking temperature as seen by consumers from different countries using survival analysis statistics. Food Qual Prefer (2008; 19(1):12-20.
• 47. Gagaoua M, Monteils V, Picard B. Decision tree, a learning tool for the prediction of beef tenderness using rearing factors and carcass characteristics. J Sci Food 2019; 99:1275-1283.
• 47. Gagaoua M, Monteils V, Picard B. Decision tree, a learning tool for the prediction of beef tenderness using rearing factors and carcass characteristics. J Sci Food 2019; 99:1275-1283.
• 48. Ekiz B, Baygül O, Yalçıntan H, Özcan M. Comparison of the decision tree, artificial neural network and multiple regression methods for prediction of carcass tissues composition of goat kids. Meat Sci 2020; 161:108011.
• 48. Ekiz B, Baygül O, Yalçıntan H, Özcan M. Comparison of the decision tree, artificial neural network and multiple regression methods for prediction of carcass tissues composition of goat kids. Meat Sci 2020; 161:108011.
• 49. Tamura T, Okubo Y, Deguchi Y, Koshikawa S, Takahashi M, Chida Y, Okada K. Dairy cattle behavior classifications based on decision tree learning using 3 axis neck mounted accelerometers. Anim Sci J 2019; 90:589-596.
• 49. Tamura T, Okubo Y, Deguchi Y, Koshikawa S, Takahashi M, Chida Y, Okada K. Dairy cattle behavior classifications based on decision tree learning using 3 axis neck mounted accelerometers. Anim Sci J 2019; 90:589-596.
• 50. Piwczyński D, Sitowska B, Kolenda M, Brzozowski M, Aerts J, Sshork PM. Forecasting the milk yield of cows on farms equipped with automatic milking system with the use of decision. trees. Anim Sci J 2020; 91:e13414.
• 50. Piwczyński D, Sitowska B, Kolenda M, Brzozowski M, Aerts J, Sshork PM. Forecasting the milk yield of cows on farms equipped with automatic milking system with the use of decision. trees. Anim Sci J 2020; 91:e13414.
• 51. Pascottini OB, Probo M, Leblanc SJ, Opsomer G, Hostens M. Assessment of associations between transition diseases and reproductive performance of dairy cows using survival analysis and decision tree algorithms. Prevent Vet Med 2020; 176:104908.
• 51. Pascottini OB, Probo M, Leblanc SJ, Opsomer G, Hostens M. Assessment of associations between transition diseases and reproductive performance of dairy cows using survival analysis and decision tree algorithms. Prevent Vet Med 2020; 176:104908.
• 52. Kamphius C, Mollenhorst H, Feelders A, Pietersma D, Hogeveen H. Decision-tree induction to detect clinical mastitis with automatic milking. Comput Electron Agric 2010a; 70:60–68.
• 52. Kamphius C, Mollenhorst H, Feelders A, Pietersma D, Hogeveen H. Decision-tree induction to detect clinical mastitis with automatic milking. Comput Electron Agric 2010a; 70:60–68.
• 53. Firk R, Stamer E, Junge W, Krieter J. Improving oestrus detection by combination of activity measurements with information about previous oestrus cases. Livest Prod Sci 2003; 82:97-103.
• 53. Firk R, Stamer E, Junge W, Krieter J. Improving oestrus detection by combination of activity measurements with information about previous oestrus cases. Livest Prod Sci 2003; 82:97-103.
• 54. Sun Z, Samarasighe S, Jago J. Detection of mastitis and its stage of progression by automatic milking systems using artificial neural networks J Dairy Res 2010; 77:168-175.
• 54. Sun Z, Samarasighe S, Jago J. Detection of mastitis and its stage of progression by automatic milking systems using artificial neural networks J Dairy Res 2010; 77:168-175.
• 55. Caraviello DZ, Weige KA, Craven M, Gianola D, Cook NB, Norlund KV, Fricke PM, Wiltbank MC. Analysis of reproductive performance of lactating cows on large dairy farms using machine learning algorithms. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89:4703-4722.
• 55. Caraviello DZ, Weige KA, Craven M, Gianola D, Cook NB, Norlund KV, Fricke PM, Wiltbank MC. Analysis of reproductive performance of lactating cows on large dairy farms using machine learning algorithms. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89:4703-4722.
• 56. Shahinfar S, Page D, Guenther J, Cabrera V, Fricke P, Wigel K. Prediction of insemination outcomes in Holstein dairy cattle using alternative machine learning algorithms. J Dairy Sci 2014; 97:731-742.
• 56. Shahinfar S, Page D, Guenther J, Cabrera V, Fricke P, Wigel K. Prediction of insemination outcomes in Holstein dairy cattle using alternative machine learning algorithms. J Dairy Sci 2014; 97:731-742.
• 57. Romero MP, Chang Y-M, Brunton LA, Parry J, Prosser A, Upton P, Rees E, Tearne O, Arnold M, Stevens K, Drewe JA. Decision tree machine learning applied to bovine tuberculosis risk factors to aid disease control decision making. PreventVet Med 2020; 175:104860.
• 57. Romero MP, Chang Y-M, Brunton LA, Parry J, Prosser A, Upton P, Rees E, Tearne O, Arnold M, Stevens K, Drewe JA. Decision tree machine learning applied to bovine tuberculosis risk factors to aid disease control decision making. PreventVet Med 2020; 175:104860.
• 58. Hilbe JM. Logistic Regression Models, 1st ed. Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2009.
• 58. Hilbe JM. Logistic Regression Models, 1st ed. Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2009.
• 59. Campbell MJ, Swinscow TDV. Statistics at Square One, 11th ed. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, UK; 2009.
• 59. Campbell MJ, Swinscow TDV. Statistics at Square One, 11th ed. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, UK; 2009.
• 60. Kuhn M. Building predictive models in R using the caret package. J Stat Softw 2008; 28.
• 60. Kuhn M. Building predictive models in R using the caret package. J Stat Softw 2008; 28.
• 61. Therneau, T, Atkinson E. An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning Using the Rpart Routines. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman; Hall/CRC; 2019.
• 61. Therneau, T, Atkinson E. An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning Using the Rpart Routines. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman; Hall/CRC; 2019.
• 62. Tyasi TL, Eyduran E, Celik S. Comparison of tree-based regression tree methods for predicting. live body weight from morphological traits in Hy-line silver brown commercial layer and indigenous Potchefstroom Koekoek breeds raised in South Africa. Trop Anim Health and Pro 2021; 53:7
• 62. Tyasi TL, Eyduran E, Celik S. Comparison of tree-based regression tree methods for predicting. live body weight from morphological traits in Hy-line silver brown commercial layer and indigenous Potchefstroom Koekoek breeds raised in South Africa. Trop Anim Health and Pro 2021; 53:7
• 63. Zhao B, Xue B. Improving prediction accuracy using decision tree based meta strategy and multi-threshold sequential voting exemplified by miRNA target prediction. Genomics 2017; 109:227-232.
• 63. Zhao B, Xue B. Improving prediction accuracy using decision tree based meta strategy and multi-threshold sequential voting exemplified by miRNA target prediction. Genomics 2017; 109:227-232.
• 64. Enright AJ, John EB, Gaul U, Tuschl T, Sander C, Marks DS. MicroRNA targets in drosophila, Genome Biol 2003; 5:R1.
• 64. Enright AJ, John EB, Gaul U, Tuschl T, Sander C, Marks DS. MicroRNA targets in drosophila, Genome Biol 2003; 5:R1.
• 65. Wang X. Improving microRNA target prediction by modeling with unambiguously identified microRNA-target pairs from CLIP-ligation studies. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:1316–1322.
• 65. Wang X. Improving microRNA target prediction by modeling with unambiguously identified microRNA-target pairs from CLIP-ligation studies. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:1316–1322.
• 66. Swain SN, Makunin A, Simanchal Dora A, Barık TK. SNP barcoding based on decision tree algorithm: A new tool for identification of mosquito species with special reference to Anopheles. Acta Tropica 2019; 199: 105152.
• 66. Swain SN, Makunin A, Simanchal Dora A, Barık TK. SNP barcoding based on decision tree algorithm: A new tool for identification of mosquito species with special reference to Anopheles. Acta Tropica 2019; 199: 105152.
• 67. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz M, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35: 1547–1549.
• 67. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz M, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35: 1547–1549.