Being a Syrian in Mardin: On Feeling at Home versus Exclusion from the City

Yıl 2018, Sayı: 8, 67 - 98, 18.12.2018

Meral Gezici Yalçın , Serhat Yalçın

Öz

In this paper, the impact of migration has been examined on a city scale. For this purpose, we have chosen Mardin, a city challenged by migration flows in the past and the present, as a case example. The similarity of Mardin to Syrian cities and the native languages of refugees, also spoken by locals, constitute features for refugees’ feeling at home. Feeling at home can only be possible when refugees appropriate the city as do locals. When appropriating the city is examined by looking at the frequency of using the city center and its places, it can be seen that refugees spend more time in their neighborhoods than locals. Moreover, the traditional gender-based division of labor among refugees are pursued more strongly after migration. Female refugees’ lives are limited to domestic sphere whereas male refugees work in short-term jobs under precarious conditions. Refugees minimize household expenses while they maximize the household income by adopting a “survival strategy”. Refugees are perceived culturally different by locals even if they belong to the same ethnic group. The border can be argued to be one of the reasons for this. It can be claimed that nation-states have been able to create different citizen profiles by establishing a border, which divides ethnicities and even families. It is, for instance, striking to witness the discourse of local Kurds referring to themselves as Turks when they make comparisons between themselves and refugees whom they see as backward people. It is also observed that gender and class play important roles at the perception of competition and threat felt from refugees. Female refugees are not welcomed, because they are accused of taking the local men away, and male refugees are not wanted, because they are accused of taking the jobs away by working for lower wages. Employers, on the other hand, are generally satisfied with the presence of refugees. As a result, the content and severity of the perceived competition and threat changes depending on what matters to the locals. It can be argued that restricting refugees’ right to the city by “pushing” them to the certain neighborhoods mitigates the locals’ perceived threat from refugees to a certain degree.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Migration, Feeling At Home, City, Class, Gender, Syrian Refugees

Mardin’de Suriyeli Olmak: Kendini Evinde Hissetmekle Kentin Dışına İtilmek Üzerine

Öz

Bu yazıda, göçün etkileri bir kent ölçeğinde ele alınmıştır. Bunun için göçle imtihanı tarihsel olduğu kadar güncel de olan Mardin seçilmiştir. Mardin’in Suriye’deki kentleri çağrıştırması, şive farklılıklarına rağmen sığınmacıların anadilinin kentte konuşulan temel diller arasında olması, Suriyeli sığınmacıların kendilerini burada evlerinde hissetmelerine hizmet edebilecek özelliklerdir. Kendini evinde hissetmek, bir sığınmacının da tıpkı bir yerli gibi yaşadığı kenti kendinin kılmasıyla (ortaklaşmasıyla) mümkün olabilir. Kenti kendinin kılma, kent merkezini ve mekânlarını kullanma sıklığı açısından ele alındığında, sığınmacıların yerlilere kıyasla mahallelerde daha fazla zaman geçirdiği görülür. Bunun yanında, sığınmacılar arasında geleneksel cinsiyetler arası işbölümünün göçten sonra daha da güçlendiği gözlenir. Sığınmacı kadınlar çoğunlukla ev içi alanla sınırlı bir yaşama sahipken, sığınmacı erkekler kısa süreli işlerde ve güvencesiz koşullarda çalışır. Sığınmacılar, “hayatta kalma stratejisiyle” hane halkı giderlerini en aza indirmeye, gelirlerini ise artırmaya çalışır. Sığınmacılar, yerlilerle aynı etnik grubun mensubu olsalar bile, kültürel olarak farklı algılanırlar. Bunun bir nedeninin sınır olduğu iddia edilebilir. Etnik grupları hatta aileleri bölen sınırla birlikte, ulus-devletlerin birbirinden farklı vatandaş profillerini yaratmada “başarılı” olduğu söylenebilir. Dolayısıyla, karşıdan gelenler Kürt sığınmacılar bile olsa Mardin’de yaşayan Kürtler tarafından Suriye vatandaşı olarak görülürler. Sığınmacıları geri gören ve onlarla karşılaştırma yaptığında kendilerine Türk diyen yerli Kürtlerin söylemleri bu anlamda çarpıcıdır. sığınmacılarla ilgili rekabet ve tehdit algısında, toplumsal cinsiyetin ve sınıfsal bağlamın önemli bir role sahip olduğu da gözlenir: Sığınmacı kadınlar, yerli kadınların “erkeklerini ellerinden aldığı” için, sığınmacı erkekler ise “düşük ücretlere çalıştığı” için yerli işçiler ve aileleri tarafından istenmez. Buna karşın, işverenler genellikle sığınmacıların varlığından memnundur. Kısaca, göç yerlileri hangi konuda etkiliyorsa, rekabet ve tehdit algısı ona göre içerik kazanır. Sığınmacıların belirli mahallelere “itilmesi” yoluyla kent hakkını kullanmalarının sınırlandırılmasının, yerlilerin algıladığı tehdidin şiddetini belirli ölçüde hafiflettiği ileri sürülebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

göç, kendini evinde hissetmek, kent, sınıf, toplumsal cinsiyet, Suriyeli sığınmacılar

Kaynakça

• Abadan-Unat, N. (1977). Implications of migration on emancipation and pseudo-emancipation of Turkish women. International Migration Review, 11(1), 31-57.
• Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic versus feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 768-776.
• Akinwale, A. A. (2012). The informal sector as a catalyst for employment generation in Lagos State, Nigeria. African and Asian Studies, 11, 315-344. doi:10.1163/15692108-12341236
• Bakioğlu, A., Artar, F. ve İzmir, H. (2018). Ankara’daki Suriyelilerin mültecilik deneyimleri göç, gündelik yaşam, geçim deneyimleri ve sosyal dışlanma. Ankara: Sosyoloji Derneği Yayını. http://www.sosyolojidernegi.org.tr/s/2300/i/Multecilikdeneyimleri.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2018.
• Behar, D. ve İslam, T. (Der.) (2006). İstanbul’da “soylulaştırma”: Eski kentin yeni sakinleri. İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi.
• Benton, M., Sumption, M., Alsvik, K., Fratzke, S. Kuptsch, C., & Papademetriou, D. G. (2014). Aiming higher: Policies to get immigrants into middle-skilled work in Europe. Migration Policy Institute and ILO. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/aiming-higherpolicies- get-immigrants-middle-skilled-work-europe.
• Berg, M. L., & Sigona, N. (2013). Ethnography, diversity and urban space. Identities, 20(4), 347–360.
• Bilecen, B. (2015). Home-making practices and social protection across borders: An example of Turkish migrants living in Germany. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 32(1), 77-90. doi:10.1007/s10901-015-9490-1
• Bilgin, N. (2011). Sosyal düşüncede kent kimliği. İdeal Kent, 3, 20-47.
• Boccagni, P. (2017). Migration and the search for home: Mapping domestic space in migrants’ everyday lives. UK: Palgrave Macmillian.
• Boccagni, P., & Brighenti, A. M. (2015). Immigrants and home in the making: thresholds of domesticity, commonality and publicness. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 32(1), 1-11. doi:10.1007/s10901-015-9487-9
• Boccagni, P., Bonfanti, S., Miranda, A., & Massa, A. (2018). Home and migration: A bibliography. HOMInG Working paper no. 2_2018. www.homing.soc.unitn.it. Erişim tarihi: 01.09.2018
• Bongen, R., Jabarine, A., & Seidel, N. (2018). Flucht aus Deutschland: Syrer kehren in die Türkei. https://daserste.ndr.de/panorama/archiv/2018/Flucht-aus-Deutschland-Syrer-gehenzurueck,umgekehrteflucht100.html. Retrieved at September 5, 2018.
• Bourdieu, P. (1986) The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
• Bozok, M., & Bozok, N. (2018). The household, the street and the labour market: masculinities and homosocial solidarity networks of Afghan migrant boys in a squatter neighbourhood in Istanbul. Norma International Journal of Masculinity Studies. doi:10.1080/18902138.2018.1519241
• Brewer, M. B. (2001). The many faces of social identity: Implications for political psychology. Political Psychology, 22, 115-125.
• Brewer, M. B. (1991). Optimal distinctiveness theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.
• Bridges, S., & Mateut, S. (2009). Attitudes towards immigration in Europe. Sheffield, Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield Economic Research Paper Series, 2009008.
• Bristol-Rhys, J. (2012). Socio-spatial boundaries in Abu Dhabi. In M. Kamrawa, & Z. Babar (Eds.), Migrant labor in the Persian Gulf (pp. 59-84). London: Hurst.
• Brown, R., & Zagefka, H. (2011). The dynamics of acculturation: An intergroup perspective. In J. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 129-184). Burlington: Academic Press.
• Castenada, E. (2018). A Place to call home: Immigrant exclusion and urban belonging in New York, Paris, and Barcelona. CA: Stanford University Press.
• Crisp, R. J., & Turner, R. N. (2012). The imagined intergroup contact hypothesis. In M. P. Zanna, & J. Olson (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 46, pp. 125-182). Burlington: Academic Press.
• Cohen, R. (1987). The new helots: Migrants in the international division of labour. Avebury: Gower Publishing Group.
• Çağlar, A., & Glick-Schiller, N. (2018). Migrants and city-making: Dispossession, displacement, and urban regeneration. UK: Duke University Press.
• Dahdah, A., & Dippel, A. (2018). German and French “spatial management” of refugees illustrated by Syrians’ urban experineces in Berlin and Marseilles. Alternatif Politika, Özel Sayı, 74-98.
• Dovidio, J. F., & Esses, V. M. (2001). Immigrants and immigration: Advancing the psychological perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 375-387.
• Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 684-696. doi:10.1177/0146167205284282
• Duncan, H., & Popp, I. (2017). Migrants and cities: Stepping beyond World Migration Report 2015. In M. MacAuliffe, & M. Ruhs, World Migration Report 2018. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.
• Eberhardt, P., & Schwenken, H. (2010). Gender knowledge in migration studies and in practice. In B. Young & C. Scherrer (Eds.), Gender knowledge and knowledge networks in international political economy (pp. 94 – 114). Baden Baden: Nomos.
• Ehrkamp, P. (2005). Placing identities: Transnational practices and local attachments of Turkish immigrants in Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(2), 345-364.
• Esses, V., Hamilton, L. K., & Gaucher, D. (2017). The global refugee crisis: Empirical evidence and policy implications for improving public attitudes and facilitating refugee resettlement. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 78-123.
• Faist, T. (2003). Uluslararası göç ve ulusaşırı toplumsal alanlar. Ankara: Bağlam.
• Fleischmann, F., Kristen, C., Heath, A. F., Brinbaum, Y., Deboosere, P., Granato, N. et al., (2014). Gender inequalities in the educatıon of the second generation in Western countries. Sociology of Education, 87(3), 143-170.
• Fenster, T. (2005). The right to the gendered city: Different formations of belonging in everyday life. Journal of Gender Studies, 14(3), 217–231. doi:10.1080/09589230500264109.
• Fullin, G., & Reyneri, E. (Eds.) (2010). Employment penalisation of immigrants in Western Europe. International Migration, 49(1), 1-187.
• Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
• Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1–26). New York: Wiley.
• Gerhards, J., Hans, S., & Schupp, J. (2016). German public opinion on admitting refugees. DIW Economic Bulletin 21. Berlin: DIW Berlin.
• Gezici Yalçın, M. (2017). Göç psikolojisi. Ankara: Pharmakon.
• Gezici Yalçın, M. ve Tanriverdi, V. (2018). “Kavanozu açan” erkeklerle “kafasını kullanabilen” kadınlar: Erkek üniversite öğrencilerinin erkeklik müzakereleri. Masculinities: A Journal of Identity and Culture, 9-10 (Özel Sayı), 129-167.
• Gezici Yalçın, M., Yılmaz, N., Batu, M. ve Kan, Ö. (2017). Mardin’deki Suriyelilerle yerlilerin gruplararası algıları araştırması sonuç raporu. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.28292.22405
• Glick-Schiller, N. & Çağlar, A. (Eds.) (2010). Locating migration: Rescaling cities and migrants. New York: Cornell University Press.
• Glick-Schiller, N., & Çağlar, A. (2009). Towards a comparative theory of locality in migration studies: Migrant incorporation and city scale. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(2), 177-202. doi:10.1080/13691830802586179
• Gonzalez de la Rocha, M. (1994). The resources of poverty: Women and survival in a Mexican City. Oxford, MA: Blackwell.
• Göregenli, M. (2014). Kente entegrasyonun, yer kimliği, bireycilik-toplulukçuluk ve kültürlenme süreçleri açısından incelenmesi. TÜBÜTAK 1001 Proje Sonuç Raporu (Proje No: 111K249).
• Göregenli, M. ve Karakuş, P. (2015). Göç, kente bağlılık ve bireycilik-toplulukçuluk: Kültürel ve mekânsal göstergeler. B. D. Şeker, İ. Sirkeci ve M. M. Yüceşahin (Der.) içinde, Göç ve uyum. UK: Transnational Press London.
• Göregenli, M. ve Karakuş, P. (2014). Göç araştırmalarında mekan boyutu: Kültürel ve mekansal bütünleşme, Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 17(34), 101-115.
• Göregenli, M., Karakuş, P., Kösten, E. Y. Ö. ve Umuroğlu, İ. (2014). Mahalleye bağlılık düzeyinin kent kimliği ile ilişkisi içinde incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 29(73). 73-85.
• Griffith, P., & Chan-Kam, S. (2002). Why do we hate refugees? Public opinion, citizenship and integration. In P. Griffith, & M. Leonard (Eds.), Reclaiming Britishness. London: The Foreign Policy Centre.
• Gurin, P., & Epps, E. G. (1975). Black consciousness, identity, and achievement: A study of students in historically Black colleges. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
• Güney, Ü. ve Konak, N. (2016). Bolu’da Suriyeli ve Iraklı sığınmacılar vatandaşlık ve kaynak dağılımı temelinde öteki algısı. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2). 113-133.
• Harvey, D. (2013). Asi şehirler: Şehir hakkından kentsel devrime doğru. İstanbul: Metis.
• Harvey, D. (2003). Sosyal adalet ve şehir. İstanbul: Metis.
• Hayes, N. (2010). Doing psychological research: Gathering and analyzing data. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
• Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604.
• Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1993). Towards a single process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 173–90). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
• Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2015). At home in inner-city immigrant community gardens. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 32(1), 13-28. doi: 10.1007/s10901-015-9491-0.
• Hopkins, N., Reicher, S. D., & Harrison, K. (2006). Young people’s deliberations on geographic mobility: Identity and cross-border relocation. Political Psychology, 27, 227-245.
• Hussmans, R. (2004). Defining and measuring informal employment. Geneva: ILO.
• IOM (International Organization for Migration) (2015). How the world views migration. Paris: IOM.
• Jütting, J., Parlevliet, J., & Xenogiani, T. (2008). Informal employment re-loaded, IDS Bulletin, 39(2), 28-36.
• Kalandides, A., & Vaiou, D. (2012). ‘Ethnic’ neighbourhoods? Practices of belonging and claims to the city. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(3), 254-266. doi:10.1177/0969776412438328
• Kaya, A. (2017). Istanbul as a space of cultural affinity for Syrian refugees “Istanbul is safe despite everything!”. Southeastern Europe, 41(3), 333–358. doi: 10.1163/18763332- 04103003
• Khoudja, Y., & Fleischmann, F. (2017). Labor force participation of immigrant women in the Netherlands: Do traditional partners hold them back? International Migration Review, 51(2), 506-541.
• Kılıçarslan, G. (2016). Forced migration, citizenship, and space: the case of Syrian Kurdish refugees in İstanbul. New Perspectives on Turkey, 54, 77–95. doi: 10.1017/npt.2016.8
• Kofman E. (2014). Reviewing theories of gender and migration: Perspectives from Europe and North America. In Battistella G. (Eds.) Global and Asian perspectives on international migration. Global Migration Issues, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-08317-9_6
• Korkut, L. (2008). Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi kararlarının devletlerin sığınmacıları sınırdışı etme egemen yetkisine etkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 4, 20-35.
• Kurtoğlu, A. (2005). Mekansal bir olgu olarak hemşehrilik ve bir hemşehrilik mekanı olarak dernekler. European Journal of Turkish Studies [Online], 2. http://ejts.revues.org/375. Erişim tarihi: 07.09.2018
• Lalli, M. (1992). Urban-related identity: Theory, measurement, and empirical findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 285-303. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80078-7
• Lees, L., Shin, H. B., & López- Morales, E. (Eds.) (2015). Global gentrifications: Uneven development and displacement. Bristol, UK: Policy Press,
• Louis, W. R., Esses, V. M., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013), National identification, perceived threat, and dehumanization as antecedents of negative attitudes toward immigrants in Australia and Canada. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 156–165.
• Marx, K. (1989/1876). Das Kapital. Marx-Engels-Werke, Band 23. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.
• Mazumdar, S., Mazumdar, S., Docuyanan, F., & McLauglin, C. M. (2000). Creating a sense of place: The Vietnamese-Americans and Little Saigon. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 47-61.
• Morokvasic, M. (2014). Gendering migration. Migracijske i etničke teme, 30(3), 355-358.
• Morokvasic, M. (1983). Beyond the reductionist outlook. In A. Phizacklea (Ed.) One way ticket: Migration and female labour (pp. 13-31). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract. Standford: Standford University Press.
• Pettigrew, T. F. (1998a). Reactions toward the new minorities of Western Europe. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 77-103.
• Pettigrew, T. F. (1998b). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
• Pettigrew, T.F. (1972). When a Black candidate runs for mayor: Race and voting behavior. H. Hahn (Ed.), People and politics in urban society. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Pickerill, E. (2011). Informal and entrepreneurial strategies among sub-Saharan migrants in Morocco. The Journal of North African Studies, 16(3), 395-413, DOI:10.1080/13629387.2010.484217
• Piore, M. J. (1979). Birds of passage: Migrant labor and industrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Reicher, S. D., Hopkins, N., & Harrison, K. (2006). Social identity and spatial behaviour: The relationship between national category salience, the sense of home, and labour mobility across national boundaries. Political Psychology, 27, 247-263.
• Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88-106.
• Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo (2nd Ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Savran, G. ve Tura, N. (Der.) (1992). Kadının görünmeyen emeği: Maddeci bir feminizm üzerine. İstanbul: Kardelen.
• Schneider, S. L. (2007). Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: Outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 24(1), 53-67.
• Scraton, S., & Watson, B. (1998). Gendered cities: women and public leisure space in the ‘postmodern city’. Leisure Studies, 17(2), 123-137. doi: 10.1080/026143698375196
• Stavrides, S. (2018). Müşterek mekan: Müşterekler olarak şehir. (C. Saraçoğlu, Çev.). İstanbul: Sel.
• Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Mahwah, N.J: Erlbaum.
• Tagesschau, 2018, April 12. Syrische Flüchtlinge reisen in die Türkei aus. https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/fluechtlinge-syrien-flucht-101.html. Retrieved at September 7, 2018.
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Tezcan, T. (2008). Küçük Türkiye’nin göç serüveni. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları 361, Göç Çalışmaları 12.
• The Economist, (2018, 23 Ağustos). Home to home: Syrian refugees find Turkey more welcoming than western Europe. https://www.economist.com/europe/2018/08/25/syrian-refugeesfind-turkey-more-welcoming-than-western-europe. Erişim tarihi:03.09.2018
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987): Rediscovering the social group. A Self-Categorization Theory. NY: Basil Blackwell.
• Özgen, N. (2005a). Sınırın iktisadi antropolojisi: Suriye ve Irak sınırlarında iki kasaba. B. Kümbetoğlu ve H. Birkalan-Gedik (Der.) içinde, Gelenekten geleceğe antropoloji (ss. 100- 129). İstanbul: Epsilon.
• Özgen, N. (2005b). Nusaybin ve sınırı. E. Y. Tanhan (Der.) içinde, Kaniyek ji Mezopotamyayê, Nisêbin (ss. 301-303), Weşanên Enstîtuya Kurdîya Stranbolê. http://neseozgen.net/wpcontent/ uploads/30.pdf
• Vora, N. (2015). Expat/Expert camps: Redefining ‘labour’ within Gulf migration. In A. Kalaf, O. AlShebabi, & A. Hanieh (Eds.), Transit states. Labour, migration and citizenship in the Gulf (pp. 170-197). London: Pluto Press
• Yalçın, S., & Gezici Yalçın, M. (2018, in press). Refugees, labour and capital: The political economy of labour market access of Syrian refugees in a border city in Turkey. Publication by International Centre for Development and Decent Work (ICDD), University of Kassel, Rainer Hampp Verlag.
• Yalçın, S., Gezici Yalçın, M. ve Güney, Ü. (2018). “Syrian brides”: A gendered approach to Syrian female refugees in Turkey. Unpublished field research.
• Yon, A., & Nadimpalli, S. (2017). Cities for whom? Re-examining identity, to reclaim the right to the city for women. Australian Planner, 54(1), 33-40. doi:10.1080/07293682.2017.1297317
• Wagner, U., Hewstone, M., & Machleiht, U. (1989). Contact and prejudice between Germans and Turks: A correlational study. Human Relations, 42(7), 561-574.