Haber Kaynaklarının Korunması Meselesinde Kadim Çelişkiler, Yeni Sorunlar: Dijital Güvenlik Odaklı Bir Perspektife Doğru

Year 2022, Issue: 15, 136 - 170, 31.05.2022

Serhatcan Yurdam

https://doi.org/10.47124/viraverita.995046

Abstract

Haber kaynakları, gazeteciliğin demokratik işlevlerinin hayata geçirilmesinde kilit roldedir. Kaynaklara normatif düzeyde atfedilen rolün gerçekleşmesinde ise belirli pratik çelişkiler vardır. Bunların başlıcalarından biri, aynı zamanda bir basın özgürlüğü meselesi olan haber kaynaklarının güvenliği sorunudur. Gazeteciler meslek pratiği ve etiği açısından kaynaklarını korumakla yükümlüdürler. Bu yönüyle haber kaynaklarının korunması, gazeteciliğin temel meselelerinden biridir. Haber kaynaklarının korunması temelde kaynağın gizliliği ilkesine dayanır. Bu ilkenin pratikte işlerlik kazanması ise etik ve hukuki bağlamda çeşitli çelişkilere konu olur. Günümüzde ise yeni dijital aracıların gazetecilik ortamını biçimlendirmesiyle birlikte, kaynağın korunması ve gizliliği açısından yeni çelişkiler gözlenmektedir. Bu kapsamda haber kaynağının korunmasında temel karakteristiklere ve süregelen çelişkilere bir de dijital güvenlik boyutu eklenmiştir. Bu çalışma, bütünleyici bir literatür değerlendirmesi olarak, geleneksel yaklaşımda esas kabul edilen hukuki koruma mantığının günümüz koşullarında başlı başına yeterli olamayacağını ve dijital güvenlik odaklı etkin bir korumaya giderek daha fazla ihtiyaç duyulduğunu iddia etmektedir. Bu husus göz ardı edilirse kaynağın korunmasına ilişkin mevcut çelişkilerin giderek derinleşeceği varsayımına dayanan çalışmanı amacı kaynakların korunmasına ilişkin bir araştırma gündeminin inşa edilmesine katkı sunmaktır. Bu kapsamda, öncelikle haber kaynağına atfedilen normatif değer ve pratik çelişkiler ele alınmakta ve kaynakların önemi vurgulanmaktadır. Ardından, kaynağın korunmasının etik ve hukuki boyutlarının karakteristikleri ve çelişkileri değerlendirilmekte ve son olarak günümüz gazetecilik ortamında öne çıkan bir boyut olarak dijital güvenlik boyutu ele alınmaktadır.

Keywords

Haber Kaynağı, Haber Kaynağının Önemi, Haber Kaynağının Korunması, Haber Kaynağının Gizliliği, Dijital Güvenlik

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

Old Contradictions and New Problems in the Issue of the Protection of Journalistic Sources: Towards a Digital Safety-Focused Perspective

Abstract

Journalistic sources play a key role in the realization of the democratic functions of journalism. There are practical contradictions in the realization of the role attributed to the journalistic sources at the normative level. Journalists are responsible for protecting their sources in terms of professional practices and ethics. In this respect, the protection of news sources is one of the main issues of journalism. The protection of news sources is basically based on the principle of source confidentiality. The practical application of this principle involves various ethical and legal contradictions. In the digital age, new contradictions arise in terms of source protection and confidentiality as new digital intermediaries shape the journalistic landscape. In this context, digital safety becomes more and more important. This study argues that legal protection which is considered as fundamental in the traditional approach, is not sufficient itself in today's conditions and an effective protection focused on digital security is increasingly needed. It is argued that if this issue is not taken into account, the existing contradictions related to the protection of the journalistic source will gradually deepen. The aim of the study is to contribute to the building of a research agenda on the subject. In this context, first of all, the normative value and practical contradictions of the news source are discussed and the importance of sources is emphasized. Then, the characteristics and contradictions of the ethical and legal dimensions of source protection are taken into account, and finally, the digital safety dimension as a prominent dimension in today's journalism environment is discussed.

Keywords

Journalistic Sources, The Importance of News Source, The Protection of Journalistic Sources, Sources Confidentiality, Digital Safety

Project Number

-

References

• Ataman, B., & Çoban, B. (2018). Counter-surveillance and alternative new media in Turkey. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 1014-1029. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1451908
• Belair-Gagnon, V., Agur, C., & Frisch, N. (2018). Mobile sourcing: A case study of journalistic norms and usage of chat apps. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(1), 53–70. doi: /10.1177/2050157917725549
• Belair-Gagnon, V & Revers, M. (2018). The Sociology of Journalism. T.P. Vos (ed.), Journalism Handbooks of Communication Science (257-280). Berlin: De Gruyter.
• Belmas, G. I., Shepard, J. M., & Overbeck, W. (2017). Major principles of media law. Boston: Cengage Learning.
• Berger, G. (2017). Why the world became concerned with journalistic safety, and why the issue will continue to attract attention. U. Carlsson, & R. Pöyhtäri (ed.) The Assault on Journalism—Building Knowledge to Protect Freedom of Expression. (33-44). Göteborg: Nordicom.
• Bernal, P. (2016). Data gathering, surveillance and human rights: recasting the debate. Journal of Cyber Policy, 1(2), 243-264. doi: 10.1080/23738871.2016.1228990
• Beytagh, F. X. (1962). Constitutional Law: Freedom of the Press: Right of News Media Personnel to Refuse to Disclose Confidential Sources of Information. Michigan Law Review, 61(1), 184-191.
• Bindman, G. (1990). A shadow across press freedom. British Journalism Review, 2(1), s. 22-26.
• Bradshaw, P. (2017). Chilling Effect: Regional journalists’ source protection and information security practice in the wake of the Snowden and Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) revelations. Digital Journalism, 5(3), 334-352. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2016.1251329
• Bourdieu, P. (1997). Televizyon Üzerine. (T. Ilgaz, çev.). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
• Bucak, S. (2021). Survival in Turkey. P. Lashmar (ed), Investigative Journalism (149-161). Routledge.
• Calvert, C., Kozlowski, D. V., & Silver, D. (2018). Mass Media Law. New York: McGraw Hill Education.
• Carlson, M. (2009). Dueling, dancing, or dominating? Journalists and their sources. Sociology Compass, 3(4), 526-542. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00219.x
• Carlson, M. (2011). Whither anonymity? Journalism and unnamed sources in a changing media environment. B. Franklin & M. Carlson (ed.), Journalists, Sources, and Credibility: New Perspectives (37-48). New York: Routledge
• Carlson, M. (2016). Sources as news producers. T. Witschge, C. W. Anderson, D. Domingo, & A. Hermida (ed.), The SAGE Handbook Of Digital Journalism (236– 249). Los Angeles: Sage.
• CPJ. (2020). Annual Report 2020. The Committee to Protect Journalists. https://cpj.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/CPJ.2020.Annual.Report.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 24.08.2021
• Crete-Nishihata, M. Oliver, J., Parsons, C., Walker, D. Tsui, L. & Deibert, R. (2020) The Information Security Cultures of Journalism, Digital Journalism, 8(8), 1068-1091, DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2020.1777882
• Cottle, S. (2000) Rethinking News Access, Journalism Studies, 1(3), 427-448. doi: 10.1080/14616700050081768
• Cottle, S. (2016). On the violent history of the globalised present, S. Cootle, R. Sambrook, N. Mosdell (ed.), Reporting Dangerously Journalist Killings, Intimidation and Security (61-88). Londra: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Cottle, S. (2017). Journalists Killings and the Responsibility to Report. U. Carlsson, & R. Poyhtari (ed.), The Assault on Journalism: Building Knowledge to Protect Freedom of Expression (21–32). Goteborg: Nordicom.
• Curran, J. (2019). Triple crisis of journalism. Journalism, 20(1), 190–193. doi: 10.1177/1464884918807034
• Çalışkan, B. (2019). Digital security awareness and practices of journalists in Turkey: A descriptive study. Conflict & Communication, 18(1).
• Diamond, L. (2010). Liberation technology. Journal of Democracy, 21(3), 69-83.
• Diamond, L. (2019). The road to digital unfreedom: The threat of postmodern totalitarianism. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 20-24.
• Dimitrova, D. V., & Strömbäck, J. (2009a). Look who's talking: Use of sources in newspaper coverage in Sweden and the United States. Journalism Practice, 3(1), 75-91. doi: 10.1080/17512780802560773
• Dimitrova, D. V., & Strömbäck, J. (2009b). The Conditionality of Source Use : Comparing Source Use in U.S. and Swedish Television News. Journal of Global Mass Communication, 2(1/2), 149–166.
• Di Salvo, P. (2020). Digital whistleblowing platforms in journalism: Encrypting leaks. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Di Salvo, P. (2022). Information security and journalism: Mapping a nascent research field. Sociology Compass, 16(3), e12961. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12961
• Duffy, M. J. (2014). Anonymous sources: A historical review of the norms surrounding their use. American Journalism, 31, 236-261. doi: 10.1080/08821127.2014.905363
• Duffy, M. J., & Freeman, C. P. (2011). Unnamed sources: A utilitarian exploration of their justification and guidelines for limited use. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 26(4), 297-315. DOI: 10.1080/08900523.2011.606006
• Eide, E. (2016). Threatened source protection. Freedom of expression and extremist adversaries. U. Carrlson (ed.), Freedom of Expression and Media in Transition (107-117). Göteborg: Nordicom.
• Eide, E. (2019). Chilling Effects on Free Expression: Surveillance, Threats and Harassment. R. Krøvel & M. Thowsen (ed.), Making Transparency Possible. An Interdisciplinary Dialogue (227–242). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
• Ekström, M., & Westlund, O. (2019). The dislocation of news journalism: A conceptual framework for the study of epistemologies of digital journalism. Media and Communication, 7(1), 259-270. doi: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1763
• Fathaigh, R. Ó., & Voorhoof, D. (2013). The European Court of Human Rights, media freedom and democracy. M. E. Price, S. G. Verhulst, & L. Morgan (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Media Law (107–124). New York: Routledge
• Freedom House. (2018). Freedom on the Net 2018: The Rise of Digital Authoritarianism. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2018/rise-digital-authoritarianism Erişim Tarihi: 10.11.2020
• Freedom House. (2020). Freedom in the World 2020: A Leaderless Struggle for Democracy. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2020/leaderless-struggle-democracy Erişim Tarihi: 18.12.2020
• Global Freedom of Expression. (Ağustos, 2020). Goodwin v. United Kingdom. Erişim Adresi: https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/goodwin-v-united-kingdom/ Erişim Tarihi: 10.08.2020
• Goodwin v. Birleşik Krallık. (1996). Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi. Erişim Adresi: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57974 Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2020
• González-Tosat, C., & Sádaba-Chalezquer, C. (2021). Digital Intermediaries: More than New Actors on a Crowded Media Stage. Journalism and Media, 2(1), 77-99. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2010006
• Greenwald, G., MacAskill, E., & Poitras, L. (2013). Edward Snowden: The Whistleblower Behind the NSA Surveillance Revelations, The Guardian, 11 Haziran 2013. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/09/edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-surveillance Erişim Tarihi: 20.11.2020
• Harcup, T. (2014). Oxford Dictionary of Journalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Henrichsen, J. R. (2020). Breaking through the ambivalence: Journalistic responses to information security technologies. Digital Journalism, 8(3), 328-346. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2019.1653207
• Henrichsen, J. R., Betz, M., & Lisosky, J. M. (2015). Building digital safety for journalism: A survey of selected issues. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232358
• Holcomb, J., Mitchell, A. & Purcell, K. (2015). “Investigative Journalists and Digital Security.” Pew Research Center’s Journalism Project. http://www.journalism.org/2015/02/05/investigative-journalists-and-digital-security/ Erişim Tarihi: 02.11.2021
• Hueso, L. C. (2021). Journalists, Confidentiality, and Sources. L. Corredoira, I.B. Mallen, R.C. Presuel (ed.), The Handbook of Communication Rights, Law, and Ethics: Seeking Universality, Equality, Freedom and Dignity (101-121). ABD: John Wiley & Sons.
• IFJ. (2019). Global Charter of Ethics for Journalists. International Federation of Journalists. https://www.ifj.org/who/rules-and-policy/global-charter-of-ethics-for-journalists.html Erişim Tarihi: 18.01.2022
• IFJ. (2021). Killed Journalists Report–2020. International Federation of Journalists. https://www.ifj.org/fileadmin/user_upload/IFJ_KILLED_LIST_REPORT_2020.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 11.08.2021
• Jamil, S. (2021). The monitored watchdogs: Journalists’ surveillance and its repercussions for their professional and personal lives in Pakistan. Journalism Studies, 22(7), 878-895. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2021.1904272
• Kimball, M. B. (2011). Granting sources anonymity requires complex process. Newspaper Research Journal, 32(2), 36-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F073953291103200204
• Kleberg, C. F. (2015). The death of source protection? Protecting journalists' source in a post-Snowden age. Londra: LSE Polis. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/63140/ Erişim Tarihi: 18.09.2020
• Kleemans, M., Schaap, G., & Hermans, L. (2017). Citizen sources in the news: Above and beyond the vox pop?. Journalism, 18(4), 464-481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915620206
• Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2021). The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. (4. Baskı).
• Lacy, S. & Rosenstiel, T. (2015). Defining and Measuring Quality Journalism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers School of Communication and Information.
• Lashmar, P. (2017). No more sources? The impact of Snowden’s revelations on journalists and their confidential sources. Journalism Practice, 11(6), 665-688. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2016.1179587
• McGregor, S. E. (2014). Digital Security and Source Protection for Journalists. Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia University. https://academiccommons. columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D89P3D4M
• McGregor, S. E. (2021). Information security Essentials. A guide for reporters, Editors, and newsroom Leaders. Columbia University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.7312/mcgr19232
• McNair, B. (2009). Journalism in the 21st century—evolution, not extinction. Journalism, 10(3), 347-349. doi: 10.1177/1464884909104756
• McQuail, D., & Deuze, M. (2020). McQuail’s Media and Mass Communication Theory. Londra: Sage.
• McQuail, D., & Windahl, S. (1993). Communication models for the study of mass communications. Routledge.
• Michaelsen, M., & Glasius, M. (2018). Authoritarian Practices in the Digital Age—Introduction. International Journal Of Communication, 12, 3788–3794.
• Molyneux, L., & McGregor, S. C. (2021). Legitimating a platform: evidence of journalists’ role in transferring authority to Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 1-19. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874037
• Murakami Wood, D. (2017). The global turn to authoritarianism and after. Surveillance & Society, 15(3-4), 357-370. doi: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v15i3/4.6835
• Nash, S. (1997). Freedom of Expression, Disclosure of Journalists’ Sources and the European Court of Human Rights: Goodwin v United Kingdom. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 1(5), 410–418. doi: 10.1177/136571279700100504
• Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge University Press
• Nielsen, R.K., & Ganter, S. A. (2018). Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New media & society, 20(4), 1600-1617. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444817701318
• Oster, J. (2015). Media Freedom as a Fundamental Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Olesen, T. (2021). “The Birth of an Action Repertoire: On the Origins of the Concept of Whistleblowing.” Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04868-3.
• Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?. International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
• Pavlik, J. V. (2004). A sea-change in journalism: Convergence, journalists, their audiences and sources. Convergence, 10(4), 21-29.
• Pearson, M., & Polden, M. (2019). The Journalist’s Guide to Media Law: A handbook for communicators in a digital world (6. baskı). Avustralya: Allen & Unwin.
• Phillips, A. (2010). Journalists as Unwilling ‘Sources’: Transparency and the New Ethics of Journalism. B. Franklin. & M. Carlson (ed.), Journalists, Sources, and Credibility, (61-72). Routledge.
• Posetti, J. (2017). Protecting Journalism Sources in the Digital Age. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000248054.locale=en.
• Posey, J. (17 Nisan 2018). “Q&A with Barbie Zelizer”. Penn Today. https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/qa-barbie-zelizer Erişim Tarihi: 09.01.2022
• Reeves, I., & Keeble, R. (2015). The newspapers handbook. (5. Baskı). Routledge.
• Reich, Z. (2011). Source credibility and journalism: Between visceral and discretional judgment. Journalism Practice, 5(1), 51-67. doi: 10.1080/17512781003760519
• RSF. (Ekim, 2020). World press freedom index – 2020. Reporters Without Borders. https://rsf.org/en/2020-world-press-freedom-index-entering-decisive-decade-journalism-exacerbated-coronavirus Erişim Tarihi: 05.10.2020
• Ricketson, M. (2018). When one person's noble whistleblower becomes another's poisonous leaker. J. Lidberg, J., & D. Muller (ed.), In the Name of Security—Secrecy, Surveillance and Journalism (101-120.) Anthem Press.
• Savla, S. (1997). "Company Informants and Disclosure of Journalistic Sources: Goodwin v United Kingdom", Journal of Financial Crime, 4(4), 351-354. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025804
• Schmitz Weiss, A., & Higgins Joyce, V. D. M. (2009). Compressed dimensions in digital media occupations: Journalists in transformation. Journalism, 10(5), 587-603. doi: 10.1177/1464884909106534
• Schudson, M. (1994). Haber Üretiminin Sosyolojisi. (A. Altun & M.A. Gevrek, çev.). İlef Yıllık, 94. 307-325.
• Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104. 333-339. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
• Splendore, S. (2020). The dominance of institutional sources and the establishment of non-elite ones: The case of Italian online local journalism. Journalism, 21(7), 990-1006. doi: 10.1177%2F1464884917722896
• Steiner, N. D. (2012). Testing for a political bias in freedom house democracy scores: Are US friendly states judged to be more democratic. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 18, 329-394.
• Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism studies, 6(3), 331-345. doi: 10.1080/14616700500131950
• TGC. (2016). Türkiye Gazetecileri Hak ve Sorumluluk Bildirgesi. Türkiye Gazeteciler Cemiyet.i https://www.tgc.org.tr/bildirgeler/türkiye-gazetecilik-hak-ve-sorumluluk-bildirgesi/bildirge.html Erişim Tarihi: 18.01.2022
• Thorsen, E. (2017) Cryptic Journalism. Digital Journalism, 5(3), 299-317. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2016.1243452
• Thorsen, E. (2019). Surveillance of Journalists/Encryption Issues. The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies.
• Tiffen, R., Jones, P. K., Rowe, D., Aalberg, T., Coen, S., Curran, J., ... & Soroka, S. (2014). Sources in the news: A comparative study. Journalism studies, 15(4), 374-391. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2013.831239
• Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404-428. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
• Townend, J., & Danbury, R. (2017). Protecting Sources and Whistleblowers in a Digital Age. Information Law and Policy Centre, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies. http://infolawcentre.blogs.sas.ac.uk/files/2017/02/Sources-Report_webversion_22_2_17.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 10.12.2020
• Tsui, L. (2019). The importance of digital security to securing press freedom. Journalism, 20(1), 80-82. doi:10.1177/1464884918809276
• Tuchman, G. (2002). The production of news. K. B. Jensen (ed.), A handbook of media and communication research (78-90). Londra: Routledge.
• Tumber, H., & Zelizer, B. (2019). Special 20th anniversary issue: The challenges facing journalism today. Journalism, 20(1), 5–7. doi:10.1177/1464884918804736
• Türay, A. (2018). Haber Kaynaklarının Gizliliğinin Hukuksal Boyutu. Ceza Hukuku Dergisi, 13(37), 111-170.
• UNESCO Observatory of Killed Journalists. (2022). UNESCO https://en.unesco.org/themes/safety-journalists/observatory Erişim Tarihi: 26.02.2022
• Wahl-Jorgensen, K., Williams, A., Sambrook, R., Harris, J., Garcia-Blanco, I., Dencik, L., Cushion, S., Cynthia Carter, C., & Allan, S. (2016). The Future of Journalism, Digital Journalism, 4(7), 809-815, doi: 10.1080/21670811.2016.1199469
• Ward, S.J.A. (2021). What Is Global Media Ethics?. S.J.A. Ward (ed.), Handbook of Global Media Ethics (5-23). İsviçre: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32103-5
• Wasserman, E. (2017). Safeguarding the News in the Era of Disruptive Sources, Journal of Media Ethics, 32(2), 72-85. doi: 10.1080/23736992.2017.1294020
• Wheatley, D. (2020) A Typology of News Sourcing: Routine and Non-Routine Channels of Production, Journalism Practice, 14:3, 277-298. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2019.1617042
• Van Leuven, S., Kruikemeier, S., Lecheler, S. & Hermans, L. (2018). Online and newsworthy, Digital Journalism, 6(7), 798-806. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2018.1498747
• V-Dem. (2020). Autocratization surges – resistance grows: Democracy report 2020. Varieties of Democracy Institute https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/de/39/de39af54-0bc5-4421-89ae fb20dcc53dba/democracy_report.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 06.01.2021
• Vobič, I. & Poler Kovačič, M. (2015). Watchdog journalism and confidential sources: A study of journalists’ negotiation of confidentiality with their sources. Teorija in Praksa, 52(4), 591–611. http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/db/pdfs/TiP2015_4_VobicPoler-Kovacic.pdf
• Zuboff, S. (2021). Gözetleme Kapitalizmi Çağı: Ürünün ‘Sen’ Olduğu Çağda İnsanın Geleceği İçin Savaş, (E. Evlice, çev.). İstanbul: Okuyan Us Yayınları.