Kuzey Batı Nijerya'daki Domates Üreticileri Arasında Çiftlik Düzeyindeki Finansman Açığı ve Tahsis Etkinliğinin Tahmini

Year 2024, Volume: 15 Issue: 44, 1216 - 1228, 30.11.2024

Olugbenga Oladele , Ibrahim Maharazu , Olugbenga Omotayo Alabı , Jeremiah Aluwong

https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.1497662

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Kuzey Batı Nijerya'daki domates üreticileri arasında çiftlik düzeyindeki finansman açığını ve tahsis etkinliğini tahmin etmiştir. Birincil veriler, iyi yapılandırılmış bir anket temelinde toplanmıştır. Sonuçlar, domates üreticilerinin teknik verimliliğini etkileyen önemli faktörlerin tarla büyüklüğü, tohum, gübre, kimyasal madde ve işgücü olduğunu göstermektedir. Domates üreticilerinin teknik verimsizliğini etkileyen önemli değişkenler ise yaş, alınan kredi miktarı, deneyim süresi, eğitim seviyesi ve uzatma bağlantısıdır. Üretim faktörlerinin birinci dereceden türevlerinin eklenmesiyle elde edilen ölçek etkinliği, sınır versiyonunda 0,9748'e kadar azalan ölçek getirilerini göstermektedir. Tahsis etkinliği sonuçları [r], domates üreticilerinin tohum, arazi, gübre, kimyasal madde ve işgücünü yeterince kullanmadığını göstermektedir. Domates üreticilerinin bir sezon boyunca elde ettikleri ortalama finansman (kredi) miktarı 54.470 Naira iken, sınır aşamasında üretim yapmak için gereken finansman (kredi) açığının (FINGAP) ortalama tahmini 312.641,66 Naira'dır. Bu, yaklaşık %82,57'lik bir kredi açığını göstermektedir. Küçük ölçekli domates üreticilerinin FINGAP'ının giderilmesi, pirinç çiftçilerinin verimlilik ve üretkenliğini artırarak artan talebi karşılamalarını sağlayacaktır.

Keywords

Çiftlik Düzeyi, Finansman Açığı, Tahsis Etkinliği, Domates Üreticileri, Nijerya

Estimating Farm Level Financing Gap and Allocative Efficiency Among Tomato Producers in North West, Nigeria

Abstract

The study estimates farm level financing gap and allocative efficiency among tomato producers in North West, Nigeria. Primary data are collected based on a well-structured questionnaire. The result shows that the significant stimulus influencing technical efficiency of tomato producers are farm size, seed, fertilizer, chemical, and labour. The significant regressors influencing technical inefficiency of tomato producers are age, amount of credit received, years of experience, educational level, and extension contact. The addition of first order derivatives of the production factors which is called the scale efficiency shows the decreasing return to scale in the frontier version adding up to 0.9748. The outcomes of the allocative efficiency [r] show that tomato producers under-utilized seed, land, fertilizer, chemical, and labour. The mean amount of finance (credit) per season the tomato producers had obtained is N 54,470, while the mid-estimate of financing gap (FINGAP) in the form of finance (credit) needed to produce (yield) at the frontier stage is N 312,641.66, this shows a credit shortfall of about 82.57%. Filling the FINGAP of smallholder tomato producers would increase the efficiency and productivity of rice farmers to meet the rise in demand.

Keywords

Farm Level, Financing Gap, Allocative Efficiency, Tomato Producers, Nigeria

References

• Abdulai, A. N., & Abdulahi, A. (2016). Allocative and scale efficiency among maize farmers in Zambia: A zero efficiency stochastic frontier approach. Appl Econ. 48(55), 5364-5378. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1176120
• Abu, O., Alumunku, M., & Tsue, P. T. (2011). Can smallscale tomato farmers flourish in Benue State, Nigeria?. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2(2), 77-82.
• Adenuga, A. H., Muhammad-Lawal, A., & Rotimi, O. A. (2013). Economics and technical efficiency of dry season tomato production in selected areas in Kwara State, Nigeria. Agris-on-Line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 5(1), 11-19.
• Ahmed, S. S., & Oyewole, S. O. (2012). Profitability analysis and resource use efficiency in tomato production in Kano State, Nigeria. NSUK Journal of Science & Technology, 2(1&2), 1 – 7
• Akinniran, T. N., Adetunji, B. J., & Ojedokun, I. K. (2020). Economic analysis of tomato production in Nigeria (1981 – 2017). Elixir Economics, 148, 54929-54935.
• Alabi, O. O., & Safugha, G. F. (2022). Efficiency of resource-use and marginal value productivity analysis among maize farmers, Abuja, Nigeria. International Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and Life Sciences, 6(2), 28-33.
• Alabi, O. O., Oladele, A. O., & Maharazu, I. (2022). Economies of scale and technical efficiency of smallholder pepper (capsicum species) production in Abuja, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Sciences (Belgrade), 67 (1), 63 – 82. https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS2201063A
• Ayyagari, M., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2012). Financing of firms in developing countries: Lessons from research. policy research (Working Paper 6036). World Bank, Washington DC. Bifarin, J. O., Alimi, T., Baruwa, O. I., & Ajewole, O. C. (2010). Determinants of technical, allocative and economic efficiencies in the plantain (musa spp) production industry, Ondo State, Nigeria. In T. Dubois et al. (Ed.), Proceedings of International Conference on Banana and Plantain in Africa (p. 199-210).
• Dominic T. K., Franklin, N. M., & Hamdiyah, Alhassan, F. Y. (2019). Technical and resource-use-efficiency among smallholder rice farmers in Northern Ghana, Cogent Food & Agriculture, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1651473
• FAO. (2024). Food and agriculture organization. Data Base, Rome, Italy, 2024.
• Hitayezu, P., Okello, J. J., & Gor, C. O. (2010). Drivers of household participation in the rural non-farm labor markets in the Post War Rwanda (No 320-2016-10088).
• Kassa, M. D., & Demissie, W.M (2019). Smallholders technical efficiency of Teff production in Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(33), 1641 – 1648
• Katungwe, F., Elepu, G., & Dzanja, J (2017). Technical efficiency of smallholder Tea production in South-Eastern Malawi: A stochastic frontier approach. Journal of Agricultural Sciences- Sri Lanka, 12:3.
• Khan, K., Wotto, M., Liaqat, S., Khan, G.,Rasheed, B., Rafiq, S., & Xiangyu, G. (2020). An assessment of technical efficiency of tomato farms in District Lasbela, Balochistan, Journal of Innovative Sciences, 6(1), 60-65
• Kumar, N., Bharat, D., Amaresh, N., Shivakumar, H., Shivakumar, R., Arshad, P., Subramanian, R., Easdown, W., Bindumadhava, H., & Nair, R. M. (2018). Science – based horticultural interventions for improving vegetable productivity in the State of Karnataka, India. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 4(1), 1461731.
• Murthy, D. S., Sudha, M., Hegde, M. R., & Dakshinamoorthy, V. (2009). Technical efficiency and its determinants in tomato production in Karnataka, India: Data envelopment analysis (DAE) approach. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 22, 215-224.
• Mwangi, T. M., Ndirangu, S. N & Isaboke, H. N (2020). Technical Efficiency in Tomato Production among Smallholder Farmers in Kirinyaga County, Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 16(5), 667-677.
• Ochilo, W. N., Nyamasyo, G. N., Kilalo, D.,Otieno, W., Otipa, M., Chege, F., Teresia, K., & Linnera, E. K. (2019). Characteristics and production constraints of smallholder tomato production in Kenya. Scientific African, 2, e00014
• Ogaji, A., Odine, A. I., Adebayo, C. O., & Adewara, I. T. (2013). Analysis of technical efficiency in tomatoes production in Zaria Local Government Area of Kaduna State, Nigeria. International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences, 3(8), 1-13.
• Ojo, T. O., Ogundeji, A. A., Babu, S. C., & Alimi, T. (2020). Estimating financing gaps in rice production in Southwestern Nigeria. Journal of Economic Structures, 9(12), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-020-0190-y
• Peer, S., Oya, P. A., & Martins, H. (2013). Closing the credit gap for formal and informal micro, small, and medium enterprises. International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group, Washington DC.
• Rahji, M. A. Y. (2005). Determinants of efficiency differentials in lowland rice production systems in Niger State, Nigeria. Ibadan Journal of Agricultural Research, 1(1), 7-17.
• Saavedra, T. M., Figueroa, G. A., & Cauih, J. G. D (2017). Origin and evaluation of tomato production (Lycopersicum esculentem) in Mexico. Cienciae Rural, 47(3).
• Simwaka, F., Ferrer, S., & Harris, G. (2013). Analysis of factors affecting technical efficiency of smallholders’ farmers: comparing time-varying and time-invariant efficiency models. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(29), 3983-3993
• Shettima, B. G., Amaza, P. S., & Ihenacho, A. C. (2015). Analysis of technical efficiency of irrigated vegetable production in Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Economics, Environment, and Social Sciences, 1(1), 88-97.
• Singh, M. C., Singh, J. P., Pandey, S. K., Mahay, D., & Srivastava, V. (2017). Factors affecting the performance of greenhouse cucumber cultivation: A review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(10), 2304-2323.
• Tabe-Ojong, M. P & Molua, E. L. (2017). Technical efficiency of smallholder tomato production in semi-urban farms in Cameroon: A stochastic frontier production approach. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 7(4), 27-35. Tirra, A. N., Oluoch, K. W., Nyanganga, H., & Mwang’ombe, A. W. (2019). Factors influencing the level of commercialization among smallholder cassava farmers in Taita-Taveta and Kilifi counties Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(32), 1584-1592
• Wanjiku, G. G. (2015). Post-harvest fungi diversity and level of Aflatoxin contamination in stored maize: Case of Kitui Nakuru and Tansnozoia Counties in Kenya [Doctoral Dissertation]. Kenyatta University.
• Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd Edition). Harper and Row, 33-50.
• Yusuf, S. A., & Malomo, O. (2007). Technical efficiency of poultry egg production in Ogun state: A data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6(9), 622-629.