Review

COMPARISON OF PAIN SCALES USED IN ADULT NON-VERBAL CRITICAL CARE PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Volume: 29 Number: 1 April 30, 2025
EN TR

COMPARISON OF PAIN SCALES USED IN ADULT NON-VERBAL CRITICAL CARE PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose The purpose of this study was to verify the literature evaluating the Behavioral Pain Scale, the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool, and the Nonverbal Pain Scale, which are routinely used to assess pain in the patient. Methods This study was a methodological systematic review. Herein, MEDLINE, OVID, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Scopus and PubMed databases were used from 2010 to 2024 (April). The mnemonic PICOS was used to define the eligibility criteria in this study. Data were extracted, summarized, evaluated using published compatibility and usability classifications. Findings Research has verified that the Behavioral Pain Scale, the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool, and the Nonverbal Pain Scale are legitimate and reliable scales for assessing pain in patients who cannot communicate verbally. Pain assessment tools were similar in terms of compatibility and usability, with the exception of two studies. Conclusions Of all the pain assessment units considered, Behavioral Pain Scale and the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool were found to be most appropriate for critical care patients at hemodynamic risk. The systematic and consistent use of an appropriate pain assessment tool in the critical care setting optimizes and improves pain control.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Destekleyen kurum/kuruluş bulunmamaktadır.

References

  1. 1. Ada M, Yılmaz E. Pain behaviors in patients under mechanical ventilatory support during intravascular interventions. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020;6(2):138-144.
  2. 2. Efe KA, Çaydam ÖD. Assessment of pain behaviour among patients submitted to mechanical ventilation in Intensive Care Unit. Avrasya Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020;3(1):23-34.
  3. 3. Erden S. Yoğun bakımda ağrı yönetiminde hemşirenin anahtar rolleri. Van Tıp Dergisi. 2015;22(4):332-336.
  4. 4. Kaya P, Erden S. Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Revised Nonverbal Pain Scale. Agri. 2019; 31(1):15-22.
  5. 5. Yaman Aktaş Y, Karabulut N. Relief of procedural pain in critically ill patients by music therapy: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2019;26(3):156-165.
  6. 6. Candan Dönmez Y, Demir Korkmaz F, Geçit S. Yoğun bakım ünitesindeki çevresel stresörlerin hastalar tarafından algılanması. Türkiye Klinikleri Hemşirelik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020;12(2):190-197.
  7. 7. Çelik S. Yoğun bakım hastalarında ağrı yönetimi. Yoğun Bakım Hemşireliği Dergisi. 2016;20(1):1-8.
  8. 8. Topolovec-Vranic J, Canzian S, Innis J, et al. Patient satisfaction and documentation of pain assessments and management after implementing the adult nonverbal pain scale. Am J Crit Care. 2010;19(4):345-354.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Intensive Care , ICU Nursing

Journal Section

Review

Publication Date

April 30, 2025

Submission Date

May 2, 2024

Acceptance Date

September 6, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 29 Number: 1

Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

30490