YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR

Mehmet Mert Kaleci

doi:10.11611/yead.421160

YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR

Abstract

Devlet olgusunun siyasette aldığı rollere koşut olarak, siyaset analizlerinde de devletin yeri sıklıkla gözden geçirilmiştir. 1970’lerle birlikte güç kazanmaya başlayan devlet-merkezci analizi, 1990’larda yoğunlaşan küreselleşme-bölgeselleşme akımlarına rağmen, çeşitlenerek devam etmiştir. Devlette süreklilikleri odağına alan yeni kurumsalcı devlet kuramı, 1990’ların ikinci yarısı ile birlikte değişim olgusunu da analiz alanına dahil etmek durumunda kalmıştır. Bu kuramsal açılım, devleti özerk bir yapı olarak tanımlayan devlet-merkezci yaklaşım içinde, tartışmalar ile birlikte çeşitlenmelere de neden olmuştur. Aynı zamansal kesitlerde, Türkiye'de de devlet, zemin kaybeder göründüğü zamanlarda dahi, siyasetin en önemli konusu olmaya devam etmiştir. Bu çalışmada, yeni kurumsalcı devlet kuramlarının izlediği süreç, çeşitlenmesi ve iddiaları; Türkiye siyasetinden bazı olgular eşliğinde, resmedilmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu anlamda, Türkiye siyasetinin derin izleğini (gezingesini) oluşturan, aşkıncı devlet geleneğine özellikle değinilmiştir.

Keywords

Devlet Kuramları,Yeni Kurumsalcılık,Devlet Geleneği

References

Badie, B. ve Birnbaum, P. (1983) “The Sociology of the State”, Çev. Arthur Goldhammer, University of Chicago Press.
Bell, S. (2002) “Institutionalism: Old and New”, Summers, J. (Ed.), Government, Politics, Power and Policy in Australia, Pearson Education Australia: 363-380
Berki, R. N. (1979) "State and Society: An Antithesis of Modern Political Thought", Robertson, M. (Ed.), State and Society in Contemporary Europe, Oxford.
Blyth, M. (2002), Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge University Press.
Blyth, M. (2003) "Structures do not Come with an Instruction Sheet: Interests, Ideas and Progress in Political Science", Perspective on Politics, 1(4): 695-706.
Campbell J. L. (2004), Institutional Change and Globalization, Princeton University Press, 2004
Campbell, J. L. (1998) “Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy”, Theory and Society, June 1998, 27(3): 377-409.
Campbell, J. L. (2010) “Institutional Reproduction and Change”, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis, Morgan, G., Campbell J. L., Crouch, C., Kristensen, P. H., Pedersen, O. K., ve Whitley, R., Oxford University Press: 5-8.

Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D. ve Skocpol, T. (1985) Bringing the State back in, Cambridge University Press.
Finnemore M., Sikkink, K. (2001) “TAKING STOCK: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics”, Annual Review of Political Science.
Finnemore, M. (1996) "Norms, Culture and World Politics: Insights from Sociology's Institutionalism.", International Organization, 50(02): 325-347.
Finnemore, M., Sikkink, K. (1998) “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change”, International Organizations, 52: 887-917.
Hall, P. A. ve Taylor, C. R. (1996) “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms”, Political Studies, 44:…
Hay C. ve Wincott D., (1998) "Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism." Political Studies, 46: 5.
Hay, C. (2006) "Constructivist Institutionalism: Or, Why Interests into Ideas Don't Go", Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
Hay, C. ve Lister, M. (2006) “Introduction: Theories of the State”, The State: Theories and Issues, Hay, C., Lister, M. ve Marsh, R. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Heper, M. (1985) “The State Tradition in Turkey”, Eothen Press, Walkington.
Heper, M. (2006) “Türkiye'de Devlet Geleneği”, Çev. Nalan Soyarık, Doğu Batı Yayınları.
Kathleen T. (2000) "Timing and Temporality in the Analysis of Institutional Evolution and Change", Studies in American Political Development, 14:1.
Katznelson, I. (1998) "The Doleful Dance of Politics and Policy: Can Historical Institutionalism Make a Difference?", American Political Science Review, 92(01): 191-197.
Koelble, T. A. (1995) "The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology.", Comparative Politics: 231-243.
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1984) “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life”, American Political Science Review, 78: 734–49.
Nettl, J. P. (1968) "The State as a Conceptual Variable", World Politics, 20(4): 559-592.
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Changes and Economic Performance, Cambridge.
Nullmeier, F. (2006) “The Cognitive Turn in Public Policy Analysis”, Governance for Sustainability Working Paper, Bremen, 4: 2.
Özman, A. ve Coşar, S. (2001) “Siyasal Tahayyülde Devletin Belirleyiciliği: Metin Heper Çalışmaları Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, Türk Düşünce Serüveni: Geç Aydınlanmanın Erken Aydınları, Doğu Batı Düşünce Dergisi, 16: 81-97.
Risse, T. (2001) “Who are we? A Europeanization of National Identities”, Europeanization and Domestic Change, Cowles, M. G., Caporaso, J., Risse T., Cornell University Press: 198-216.
Schmidt, V. A. (2006a) “Institutionalism”, Hay, C., Lister, M. ve Marsh, D. (Ed.), The State: Theories and Issues, Palgrave Macmillan, New York: 98-117
Schmidt, V. A. (2006b) "Give Peace a Chance: Reconciling Four (not Three) “New Institutionalisms”", Presentation for the National Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
Schmidt, V. A. (2008). “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse”. Annual Review of Political Science, 11.
Schmidt, V. A. (2010), “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism’”, European Political Science Review, 2(1): 1-25.
Schmidt, V. A., Radaelli, C. M. (2004). “Policy Change and Discourse in Europe: Conceptual and Methodological Issues”, West European Politics, 27(2): 183-210.
Soysal, Y. N. (1994) Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe, University of Chicago Press.
Steinmo, S. (1996), “Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British, and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State”, Yale University Press.
Steinmo, S. (2001) “The New Institutionalism”, The Encyclopedia of Democratic Thought, Clark, B. ve Foweraker J., Routledge, London.
Thelen, K. (1999), “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics”, Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1): 369-404.
Thelen, K. ve Steinmo, S. (1992) “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics”, Thelen, K., Steinmo, S. ve Longstreth, F. (Ed.), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge University Press: 1-32.
Tilly, C. (1975) "Reflections on the History of European State-Making", Tilly, C. (Ed.), The Formation of National States in Western Europe, Princeton University Press.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Mehmet Mert Kaleci
0000-0002-6236-4243
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 30, 2018

Submission Date

May 4, 2018

Acceptance Date

June 30, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 16 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.421160

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA83WF32KC

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kaleci, M. M. (2018). YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 16(2), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.421160

AMA

1.Kaleci MM. YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR. Journal of Management and Economics Research. 2018;16(2):247-263. doi:10.11611/yead.421160

Chicago

Kaleci, Mehmet Mert. 2018. “YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR”. Journal of Management and Economics Research 16 (2): 247-63. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.421160.

EndNote

Kaleci MM (June 1, 2018) YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR. Journal of Management and Economics Research 16 2 247–263.

IEEE

[1]M. M. Kaleci, “YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR”, Journal of Management and Economics Research, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 247–263, June 2018, doi: 10.11611/yead.421160.

ISNAD

Kaleci, Mehmet Mert. “YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR”. Journal of Management and Economics Research 16/2 (June 1, 2018): 247-263. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.421160.

JAMA

1.Kaleci MM. YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR. Journal of Management and Economics Research. 2018;16:247–263.

MLA

Kaleci, Mehmet Mert. “YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR”. Journal of Management and Economics Research, vol. 16, no. 2, June 2018, pp. 247-63, doi:10.11611/yead.421160.

Vancouver

1.Mehmet Mert Kaleci. YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR. Journal of Management and Economics Research. 2018 Jun. 1;16(2):247-63. doi:10.11611/yead.421160

Cited By

TÜRK SİYASİ HAYATINA DAİR: KURUMSALCI YAKLAŞIMLARIN İNCELEMESİ

İmgelem

https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.1192036