Research Article

Device Boundaries: An Ecological Network Paradox

Number: 24 July 24, 2020
TR EN

Device Boundaries: An Ecological Network Paradox

Abstract

This paper discusses the concept of paradox in communication networks and the relations defined by artifacts with living entities in hybrid ecologies. While communication networks are essential in our daily life, this paper presents how the relationship between people and devices poses critical questions as paradoxes and challenges. The paradox of socio-technical impotence and time-pressure presents two challenges: the absence of time and space and the presence of ownership and filter. This theoretical framework constitutes a background for Device Boundaries, a design research project that seeks for sociality among people and devices. The aim of Device Boundaries is to encourage close distance communication among people by superimposing digital layers over physical communities. The resulting ecology shapes an alternative communication network. Accordingly, the paper first illustrates the role of technological devices in our social life and describes the ecological paradoxes and challenges. Then, it explores how we might liberate communication technologies from these paradoxes, and introduces a series of case studies that adopt alternative systems to the creation of networks of services. In conclusion, it factualizes and discusses the theoretical research in a series of design projects under Device Boundaries research.

Keywords

Interaction ecologies , interaction design , design activism , communication technologies , network of digital devices

References

  1. Akasha. [n.d.]. Retrieved from https://hack.akasha.org/fullstack-developer.
  2. Allain, R. (2013, February 26). A duet from space. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2013/02/a-duet-from-space/
  3. Ballagas, R., Rohs, M., Sheridan, J. G., and Borchers, J. (2004). BYOD: Bring your own device. Retrieved from http://www.vs.inf.ethz.ch/publ/papers/rohs-byod-2004.pdf
  4. Berners-Lee, T. (2010, December 1). Long live the web: A call for continued open standards and neutrality. Scientific American, 303(6). Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/long-live-the-web/
  5. Bonnett, A. (1991). The situationist legacy. Variant, 1(9), 28–33.
  6. Boyle, J. (2019). Is the Internet over?! (Again?). Duke Law & Technology Review, 18, 32–60.
  7. Brooker, K. (2018, July 09). "I was devastated": The man who created the World Wide Web has some regrets. Vanity Fair. Retrieved from https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/07/the-man-who-created-the-world-wide-web-has-some-regrets
  8. Chen, Q. and Yan, Z. (2016). Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 34–42.
  9. Commotion. [n.d]. Retrieved from https://commotionwireless.net/docs/cck/
  10. Denovan A. and Dagnall N. (2019). Development and evaluation of the chronic time pressure inventory. Frontiers in Psychology, 10.
APA
Savasta, D. (2020). Device Boundaries: An Ecological Network Paradox. Yedi, 24, 113-126. https://izlik.org/JA35CL42NW