Öldürmenin Otobiyografisi: Gerçek Easterman Kim? Sosyal Yapısalcı Bir Yaklaşım Olan Anlatı Psikolojisinin İzinde Otobiyografik Performans

Year 2018, Issue: 19, 31 - 40, 22.01.2018

T.gözde Pelister

https://doi.org/10.17484/yedi.382981

Abstract

Bir sosyal yapısalcı yaklaşım olarak kabul edilen anlatı psikolojisi benliği zaman, anlatı ve yeniden yaratım süreçleriyle

ilişkilendirmiştir. Bu süreçlerin anlatı türünde temsili olan otobiyografi ise tiyatro çalışmalarında geleneksel gerçek yaşam

öyküsünün sınırlarını aşıp, kurgusal edimsel otobiyografik biçimlere evrilmiştir. Anthony Horrowitz’in Ermişler ya da Günahkarlar

oyunu bu yeni yaklaşımın boyutlarının gözlemlenebileceği bir metindir. Gerçek öznenin, geçmişin yardımıyla şimdiyi

kurmaya çalışmasına ilginç bir örnektir.

Keywords

Benlik, otobiyografi, anlatı psikolojisi, Easterman, Anthony Horrowitz

The Autobiography of Killing: which one is Real Easterman? The Autobiographic Performance On the Track of Narrative Psychology as a Social Constructionist Approach

Abstract

Narrative psychology as a social constructionist approach, attempts to associate the self to time, narrative and reconstruction processes.

Autobiography being represented in narrative genre, has been evolved to performative autobiographic morphologies as expanding

the boundaries of real life-story. Anthony Horrowitz’s Mindgame is a text in which the characteristics of this new approach could be

analysed. It’s an interesting example for a subject who tries to construct a present with the help of the past.

Keywords

Self, Autobiography, Narrative Psychology, Easterman, Anthony Horowitz

References

• Brewer, W. F. (1986). “What Is Autobiographical Memory?”, Au tobiographical Memory, 25-49, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bruner, J. (1987). “Life as Narrative”, Social Research, 54. 1: 11-32.
• Carr, D. (1986). Time, Narrative And History, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Crossley, M. L. (2000). “Narrative Psychology, Trauma and The Study of Self/Identity”, Theory & Psychology, Vol. 10(4): 527- 546.
• Edwards, D. & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive Psychology, London: Sage.
• Eakin, PJ. (1985). Fictions in Autobiography: Studies in the Art of Self- Invention, Princeton University Press.
• Henke, S. A. (2000). Shattered Subjects: Trauma and Testimony in Women’s Life-Writing, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
• Horrowitz, A. (2005). Ermişler ya da Günahkarlar, çev: Zeynep Avcı. (Yayımlanmamış oyun metni)
• Lejeune, P. (1989). On Autobiography, Ed: P. J. Eakin, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
• Malina, D. (2002). Breaking The Frame: Metalepsis and the Construction of the Subject, Colombus: Ohio State University Press.
• Neisser, U. (1988). “Five Kinds of Self Knowledge”, Philosophical Psychology 1.1, 35-59.
• Ochs, E., Capps, L. (1966). “Narrating Self”, Annual Review of Anthropology 25, 19-43.
• Parker, I. (1991). Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology, London: Sage.
• Polkinghorne, D.P. (1988). Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences, Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Potter, J., Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour, London: Sage.
• Ricoeur, P. (1986). “Life: A story in Search of a Narrator”, eds: M. Doeser & J. Kray, Facts and Values, pp. 34-68, Dordrecht: Nijhoff.
• Ricoeur, P. (1991). “Life in Quest of Narrative”, ed. D. Wood, Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and Interpretation (pp. 20-33), London: Routledge.
• Sarbin, T.R. (1986). Narrative Psychology: The Storied Natıre of Human Conduct, New York: Prager.
• Stephenson, J. (2013). Performing Autobiography: Contemporary Canadian Drama, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ünlü, A. (2015). Biyografi ve Biyografik Dram, Ankara: NotaBene Yayınları.