Sosyal Ağ Siteleri: Tanım, Tarih ve Araştırmalar

Year 2021, Issue: 11, 138 - 157, 30.12.2021

Translator: Şeyda Koçak Kurt

Abstract

Sosyal ağ siteleri (SAS), merak uyandıran olanakları ve erişimleriyle akademik ve endüstri araştırmacılarının giderek artan bir şekilde ilgisini çekmektedir. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication’ın bu özel tema sayısı, ortaya çıkan bu olgular üzerine yapılmış araştırmaları bir araya getirmektedir. Bu giriş niteliğindeki makalede, SAS’ın özelliklerini açıklıyoruz ve kapsamlı bir tanım öneriyoruz. Ardından, bu tür sitelerin tarihine ilişkin önemli değişikleri ve gelişmeleri tartışarak bir bakış açısı sunuyoruz. SAS ile ilgili mevcut araştırmaları kısaca özetledikten sonra, bu özel sayıda makaleleri tartışıyor ve gelecekteki araştırmalar için değerlendirmelerle sonuçlandırıyoruz.

Keywords

sosyal ağ siteleri, facebook, myspace, orkut

Social Network Sites: Definition, History and Scholarship

Abstract

Social network sites (SNSs) are increasingly attracting the attention of academic and industry researchers intrigued by their affordances and reach. This special theme section of the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication brings together scholarship on these emergent phenomena. In this introductory article, we describe features of SNSs and propose a comprehensive definition. We then present one perspective on the history of such sites, discussing key changes and developments. After briefly summarizing existing scholarship concerning SNSs, we discuss the articles in this special section and conclude with considerations for future research.

Keywords

social network sites, facebook, myspace, orkut

References

• Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In P. Golle & G. Danezis (Eds.), Proceedings of 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (ss. 36–58). Cambridge, UK: Robinson College.
• Adamic, L. A., Büyükkökten, O., & Adar, E. (2003). A social network caught in the Web. First Monday, 8(6). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_6/adamic/index.html (30 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Backstrom, L., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., & Lan, X. (2006). Group formation in large social networks: Membership, growth, and evolution. Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining (ss. 44–54). New York: ACM Press.
• Bahney, A. (2006, 9 Mart). Don’t talk to invisible strangers. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/09/fashion/thursdaystyles/09parents.html (21 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Barnes, S. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_9/barnes/index.html (8 Eylül 2007’de erişildi).
• BBC. (2005, 19 Temmuz). News Corp in $580m Internet buy. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4695495.stm (21 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Benzie, R. (2007, 3 Mayıs). Facebook banned for Ontario staffers. The Star. http://www.thestar.com/News/article/210014 (21 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• boyd, d. (2004). Friendster and publicly articulated social networks. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ss. 1279–1282). New York: ACM Press.
• boyd, d. (2006a). Friends, Friendsters, and MySpace Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11(12). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_12/boyd/ (21 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• boyd, d. (2006b, 21 Mart). Friendster lost steam. Is MySpace just a fad? Apophenia Blog. http://www.danah.org/papers/FriendsterMySpaceEssay.html (21 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• boyd, d. (baskıda-a). Facebook’s privacy trainwreck: Exposure, invasion, and social convergence. Convergence, 14(1).
• boyd, d. (baskıda-b). None of this is real. In J. Karaganis (Ed.), Structures of Participation. New York: Social Science Research Council.
• boyd, d. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, Identity, and Digital Media (ss. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• boyd, d., & Heer, J. (2006). Profiles as conversation: Networked identity performance on Friendster. Proceedings of Thirty-Ninth Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
• Byrne, D. (baskıda). The future of (the) ‘race’: Identity, discourse and the rise of computer-mediated public spheres. In A. Everett (Ed.), MacArthur Foundation Book Series on Digital Learning: Race and Ethnicity Volume (ss. 15–38). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Cassidy, J. (2006, 15 Mayıs). Me media: How hanging out on the Internet became big business. The New Yorker, 82(13), 50.
• Chafkin, M. (2007, Haziran). How to kill a great idea! Inc. Magazine. http://www.inc.com/magazine/20070601/features-how-to-kill-a-great-idea.html (27 Ağustos 2007’de erişildi).
• Charnigo, L., & Barnett-Ellis, P. (2007). Checking out Facebook.com: The impact of a digital trend on academic libraries. Information Technology and Libraries, 26(1), 23.
• Choi, J. H. (2006). Living in Cyworld: Contextualising Cy-Ties in South Korea. In A. Bruns & J. Jacobs (Eds.), Use of Blogs (Digital Formations) (ss. 173–186). New York: Peter Lang.
• Cohen, R. (2003, 5 Temmuz). Livewire: Web sites try to make internet dating less creepy. Reuters. http://asia.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=internetNews&storyID=3041934 (5 Temmuz 2003’te erişildi).
• comScore. (2007). Social networking goes global. Reston, VA. http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1555 (9 Eylül 2007’de erişildi).
• Consumer Affairs. (2006, 5 Şubat). Connecticut opens MySpace.com probe. Consumer Affairs. http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2006/02/myspace.html (21 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Donath, J., & boyd, d. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71–82.
• Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S. R., & Passerini, K. (2007). Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace. Proceedings of AMCIS 2007, Keystone, CO. http://csis.pace.edu/~dwyer/research/DwyerAMCIS2007.pdf (21 Eylül 2007’de erişildi).
• Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘‘friends’’: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), article 1. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html (30 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Ewers, J. (2006, 9 Kasım). Cyworld: Bigger than YouTube? U.S. News & World Report. LexisNexis (30 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Festa, P. (2003, 11 Kasım). Investors snub Friendster in patent grab. CNet News. http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-5106136.html (26 Ağustos 2007’de erişildi).
• Finkelhor, D., Ybarra, M., Lenhart, A., boyd, d., & Lordan, T. (2007, 3 Mayıs). Just the facts about online youth victimization: Researchers present the facts and debunk myths. Internet Caucus Advisory Committee Event. http://www.netcaucus.org/events/2007/youth/20070503transcript.pdf (21 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Fono, D., & Raynes-Goldie, K. (2006). Hyperfriendship and beyond: Friends and social norms on LiveJournal. In M. Consalvo & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), Internet Research Annual Volume 4: Selected Papers from the AOIR Conference (ss. 91–103). New York: Peter Lang.
• Fragoso, S. (2006). WTF a crazy Brazilian invasion. In F. Sudweeks & H. Hrachovec (Eds.), Proceedings of CATaC 2006 (ss. 255–274). Murdoch, Australia: Murdoch University.
• Frosch, D. (2007, May 15). Pentagon blocks 13 web sites from military computers. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/15/washington/15block.html (21 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Gajjala, R. (2007). Shifting frames: Race, ethnicity, and intercultural communication in online social networking and virtual work. In M. B. Hinner (Ed.), The Role of Communication in Business Transactions and Relationships (ss. 257–276). New York: Peter Lang.
• Geidner, N. W., Flook, C. A., & Bell, M. W. (2007, Nisan). Masculinity and online social networks: Male self-identification on Facebook.com. Paper presented at Eastern Communication Association 98th Annual Meeting, Providence, RI.
• George, A. (2006, 18 Eylül). Living online: The end of privacy? New Scientist, 2569. http://www.newscientist.com/channel/tech/mg19125691.700-living-online-the-end-of-privacy.html (29 Ağustos 2007’de erişildi).
• Goldberg, S. (2007, 13 Mayıs). Analysis: Friendster is doing just fine. Digital Media Wire. http://www.dmwmedia.com/news/2007/05/14/analysis-friendster-is-doing-just-fine (30 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Golder, S. A., Wilkinson, D., & Huberman, B. A. (2007, Haziran). Rhythms of social interaction: Messaging within a massive online network. In C. Steinfield, B. Pentland, M. Ackerman, & N. Contractor (Eds.), Proceedings of Third International Conference on Communities and Technologies (ss. 41–66). London: Springer.
• Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. Proceedings of WPES’05 (ss. 71–80). Alexandria, VA: ACM.
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication, & Society, 8(2), 125–147.
• Heer, J., & boyd, d. (2005). Vizster: Visualizing online social networks. Proceedings of Symposium on Information Visualization (ss. 33–40). Minneapolis, MN: IEEE Press.
• Herring, S. C., Paolillo, J. C., Ramos Vielba, I., Kouper, I., Wright, E., Stoerger, S., Scheidt, L. A., & Clark, B. (2007). Language networks on LiveJournal. Proceedings of the Fortieth Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
• Hewitt, A., & Forte, A. (2006, Kasım). Crossing boundaries: Identity management and student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. Poster presented at CSCW, Banff, Alberta.
• Hjorth, L., & Kim, H. (2005). Being there and being here: Gendered customising of mobile 3G practices through a case study in Seoul. Convergence, 11(2), 49–55.
• Hjorth, L., & Yuji, M. (baskıda). Logging on locality: A cross-cultural case study of virtual communities Mixi (Japan) and Mini-hompy (Korea). In B. Smaill (Ed.), Youth and Media in the Asia Pacific. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Hodge, M. J. (2006). The Fourth Amendment and privacy issues on the ‘‘new’’ Internet: Facebook.com and MySpace.com. Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 31, 95–122.
• Hogan, B. (baskıda). Analyzing social networks via the Internet. In N. Fielding, R. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• H. R. 5319. (2006, 9 Mayıs). Deleting Online Predators Act of 2006. H.R. 5319, 109th Congress. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h109-5319 (21 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Hsu, W. H., Lancaster, J., Paradesi, M. S. R., & Weninger, T. (2007). Structural link analysis from user profiles and friends networks: A feature construction approach. Proceedings of ICWSM-2007 (ss. 75–80). Boulder, CO.
• Jagatic, T., Johnson, N., Jakobsson, M., & Menczer, F. (2007). Social phishing. Communications of the ACM, 5(10), 94–100.
• Kopytoff, V. (2004, 29 Kasım). Google’s orkut puzzles experts. San Francisco Chronicle. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/11/29/BUGU9A0BH441.DTL (30 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Kornblum, J., & Marklein, M. B. (2006, 8 Mart). What you say online could haunt you. USA Today. http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/internetprivacy/2006-03-08-facebook-myspace_x.htm (29 Ağustos 2007’de erişildi).
• Kumar, R., Novak, J., & Tomkins, A. (2006). Structure and evolution of online social networks. Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining (ss. 611–617). New York: ACM Press.
• Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2006). A Face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. Proceedings of CSCW-2006 (ss. 167–170). New York: ACM Press.
• Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfeld, C. (2007). A familiar Face(book): Profile elements as signals in an online social network. Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ss. 435–444). New York: ACM Press.
• Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007, 18 Nisan). Teens, privacy, & online social networks. Pew Internet and American Life Project Report. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Privacy_SNS_Report_Final.pdf (30 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Liben-Nowell, D., Novak, J., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., & Tomkins, A. (2005) Geographic routing in social networks. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 102(33) 11,623–11,628.
• Liu, H., Maes, P., & Davenport, G. (2006). Unraveling the taste fabric of social networks. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 2(1), 42–71.
• Madhavan, N. (2007, 6 Temmuz). India gets more Net Cool. Hindustan Times. http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=f2565bb8-663e-48c1-94ee-d99567577bdd (30 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Marwick, A. (2005, Ekim). ‘‘I’m a lot more interesting than a Friendster profile:’’ Identity presentation, authenticity, and power in social networking services. Paper presented at Internet Research 6.0, Chicago, IL.
• Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I’ll see you on ‘‘Facebook:’’ The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1–17.
• McLeod, D. (2006, 6 Ekim). QQ Attracting eyeballs. Financial Mail (South Africa), p. 36. LexisNexis (30 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• National School Boards Association. (2007, Temmuz). Creating and connecting: Research and guidelines on online social—and educational—networking. Alexandria, VA. http://www.nsba.org/site/docs/41400/41340.pdf (23 Eylül 2007’de erişildi).
• Nyland, R., & Near, C. (2007, Şubat). Jesus is my friend: Religiosity as a mediating factor in Internet social networking use. Paper presented at AEJMC Midwinter Conference, Reno, NV.
• O’Shea, W. (2003, 4-10 Temmuz). Six Degrees of sexual frustration: Connecting the dates with Friendster.com. Village Voice. http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0323,oshea, 44576, 1.html (21 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Paolillo, J. C., & Wright, E. (2005). Social network analysis on the semantic web: Techniques and challenges for visualizing FOAF. In V. Geroimenko & C. Chen (Eds.), Visualizing the Semantic Web (ss. 229–242). Berlin: Springer.
• Perkel, D. (baskıda). Copy and paste literacy? Literacy practices in the production of a MySpace profile. In K. Drotner, H. S. Jensen, & K. Schroeder (Eds.), Informal Learning and Digital Media: Constructions, Contexts, Consequences. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.
• Preibusch, S., Hoser, B., Gürses, S., & Berendt, B. (2007, June). Ubiquitous social networks—opportunities and challenges for privacy-aware user modelling. Proceedings of Workshop on Data Mining for User Modeling. Corfu, Greece. http://vasarely.wiwi.hu-berlin.de/DM.UM07/Proceedings/05-Preibusch.pdf (20 Ekim 2007’de erişildi).
• Recuero, R. (2005). O capital social em redes sociais na Internet. Revista FAMECOS, 28, 88–106. http://www.pucrs.br/famecos/pos/revfamecos/28/raquelrecuero.pdf (13 Eylül 2007’de erişildi).
• S. 49. (2007, 4 Ocak). Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act. S. 49, 110th Congress. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c110:1:./temp/;c110dJQpcy:e445: (30 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Shirky, C. (2003, 13 Mayıs). People on page: YASNS.Corante’s Many-to-Many. http://many.corante.com/archives/2003/05/12/people_on_page_yasns.php (21 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Skog, D. (2005). Social interaction in virtual communities: The significance of technology. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 1(4), 464–474.
• Spertus, E., Sahami, M., & Buyukkokten, O. (2005). Evaluating similarity measures: A large-scale study in the orkut social network. Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining (ss. 678–684). New York: ACM Press.
• Stutzman, F. (2006). An evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communities. Journal of the International Digital Media and Arts Association, 3(1), 10–18.
• Sunde´n, J. (2003). Material Virtualities. New York: Peter Lang.
• Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S. Y., & Westerman, D. (baskıda). The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research.
• Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach (ss. 19–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2006). Online victimization of youth: Five years later. Report from Crimes Against Children Research Center, University of New Hampshire. http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV138.pdf (21 Temmuz 2007’de erişildi).
• Zinman, A., & Donath, J. (2007, Ağustos). Is Britney Spears spam? Paper presented at the Fourth Conference on Email and Anti-Spam, Mountain View, CA.