Opinion Article

Hagia Sophia, God’s Chosen Ruler, and St. Nicholas: New Perspectives on the Macedonian Dynasty

Volume: 2 December 22, 2020
  • Brigitte Pıtarakıs
TR EN

Hagia Sophia, God’s Chosen Ruler, and St. Nicholas: New Perspectives on the Macedonian Dynasty

Abstract

The second thematic dossier in Meclis, edited by Brigitte Pitarakis, marks Hagia Sophia’s recent reconversion to a mosque, probably the most consequential event in 2020 concerning Istanbul’s historical heritage. It deals with experiencing Hagia Sophia in the past, and the diverse encounters with it. This piece by Brigitte Pitarakis discusses common or related characteristics at Hagia Sophia, the Nea Ekklesia in Constantinople, and the shrine of St. Nicholas in Myra that shed light on the forces behind the promotion of St. Nicholas’s cult and his impact on the Macedonians’ political ideology.

Keywords

Thanks

I would like to thank Stephanos Efthymiadis, Michael Featherstone, and Catherine Jolivet-Lévy who kindly accepted to read the last version of my paper. All errors and conclusions remain mine.

References

  1. 1 See for instance, Bissera V. Pentcheva, Hagia Sophia: Sound, Space, and Spirit in Byzantium (University Park: Pennsylvania University Press, 2017); Natalia B. Teteriatnikov, Justinianic Mosaics of Hagia Sophia and Their Aftermath (Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 2017);
  2. Ken Dark and Jan Kostenec, Hagia Sophia in Context: An Archaeological Re-examination of the Cathedral of Byzantine Constantinople (Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2019); Alicia Walker, “The Emperor at the Threshold: Making and Breaking Taxis at Hagia Sophia,” in The Emperor in the Byzantine World: Papers from the Forty-Eighth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, ed. Shaun Tougher (London: Routledge, 2019), 281–321.
  3. 2 Constantin Porphyrogénète. Le Livre des Cérémonies, ed., Gilbert Dagron (♰) and Bernard Flusin in coll. with Michel Stavrou, I–V, 6 vols., CFHB 52 (Paris: Amis du Centre d’histoire et civilisation de Byzance, 2020), 1:58–61, 1:330–333; 4.1:95–96, 4.1:173–174, 4.1:347–348; 5:95; Constantini Porphyrogeniti imperatoris De cerimoniis aulae byzantinae libri duo, ed. I. I. Reiske, CSHB (Bonn, 1829), esp. vol. 1, chap. 34 and 1:181–183;
  4. in English, Anne Moffat and Maxeme Tall, trans., Constantine Porphyrogennetos: The Book of Ceremonies, 2 vols., Byzantina Australiensia 18 (Canberra: Australian Association for Byzantine Studies, 2012). For a recent discussion on the archaeological structures, see Dark and Kostenec, Hagia Sophia in Context, 35, fig. 23, 75–76 (here diabatika is translated as “corridor”).
  5. 3 Gilbert Dagron, Emperor and Priest: The Imperial Office in Byzantium (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 92–96, 101–103.
  6. 5 Eugène M. Antoniades, Ἔκφρασις τῆς Ἁγίας Σοφίας, ἤτοι μελέτη συνθετικὴ καὶ ἀναλυτικὴ ὑπὸ ἔποψιν ἀρχιτεκτονικήν, ἀρχαιολογικὴν καὶ ἱστορικὴν τοῦ πολυθρυλήτου τεμένους Κωνσταντινουπόλεως (Athens: P. D. Sakellariou, 1907–1909), 2:163–169 and 2:169–85; Cyril Mango, The Brazen House: A Study of the Vestibule of the Imperial Palace of Constantinople (Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1959), 67–72, 76–77, 81.
  7. See also Ernest Mamboury, “Sainte-Sophie, le sanctuaire et la solea, le mitatorion, la Sacré puits, le passage de St. Nicolas,” Atti del V Congresso di Studi bizantini. II. Archeologia e storia dell’arte. Liturgia e musica. Cronaca del congresso, Roma 20-26 settembre, 1936 (Rome: Tip. Del Senato del dott. G. Bardi, 1940), 197–209.
  8. 6 The alternative that this mosaic may represent Basil I was not dismissed in scholarship. See Leslie Brubaker, Vision and Meaning in Ninth-Century Byzantium: Images as Exegesis in the Homilies of Gregory of Nazianzus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 149–150.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Opinion Article

Authors

Brigitte Pıtarakıs This is me
France

Publication Date

December 22, 2020

Submission Date

October 12, 2020

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 2

APA
Pıtarakıs, B. (2020). Hagia Sophia, God’s Chosen Ruler, and St. Nicholas: New Perspectives on the Macedonian Dynasty. YILLIK: Annual of Istanbul Studies, 2, 165-177. https://doi.org/10.53979/yillik.2020.13
AMA
1.Pıtarakıs B. Hagia Sophia, God’s Chosen Ruler, and St. Nicholas: New Perspectives on the Macedonian Dynasty. YILLIK. 2020;2:165-177. doi:10.53979/yillik.2020.13
Chicago
Pıtarakıs, Brigitte. 2020. “Hagia Sophia, God’s Chosen Ruler, and St. Nicholas: New Perspectives on the Macedonian Dynasty”. YILLIK: Annual of Istanbul Studies 2 (December): 165-77. https://doi.org/10.53979/yillik.2020.13.
EndNote
Pıtarakıs B (December 1, 2020) Hagia Sophia, God’s Chosen Ruler, and St. Nicholas: New Perspectives on the Macedonian Dynasty. YILLIK: Annual of Istanbul Studies 2 165–177.
IEEE
[1]B. Pıtarakıs, “Hagia Sophia, God’s Chosen Ruler, and St. Nicholas: New Perspectives on the Macedonian Dynasty”, YILLIK, vol. 2, pp. 165–177, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.53979/yillik.2020.13.
ISNAD
Pıtarakıs, Brigitte. “Hagia Sophia, God’s Chosen Ruler, and St. Nicholas: New Perspectives on the Macedonian Dynasty”. YILLIK: Annual of Istanbul Studies 2 (December 1, 2020): 165-177. https://doi.org/10.53979/yillik.2020.13.
JAMA
1.Pıtarakıs B. Hagia Sophia, God’s Chosen Ruler, and St. Nicholas: New Perspectives on the Macedonian Dynasty. YILLIK. 2020;2:165–177.
MLA
Pıtarakıs, Brigitte. “Hagia Sophia, God’s Chosen Ruler, and St. Nicholas: New Perspectives on the Macedonian Dynasty”. YILLIK: Annual of Istanbul Studies, vol. 2, Dec. 2020, pp. 165-77, doi:10.53979/yillik.2020.13.
Vancouver
1.Brigitte Pıtarakıs. Hagia Sophia, God’s Chosen Ruler, and St. Nicholas: New Perspectives on the Macedonian Dynasty. YILLIK. 2020 Dec. 1;2:165-77. doi:10.53979/yillik.2020.13

Cited By