Para Talebinin Belirleyenleri ve İstikrarı Üzerine Bir Uygulama: Türkiye Örneği

Abstract

In this study, the stability of money demand is investigated using monthly data for the period 2005:12- 2012:10. First, the presence of a long-run equilibrium relationship among M2 monetary aggregate, real income, interest rate, and exchange rate is examined through Johansen cointegration test. After that, stability of money demand is analyzed using CUSUM and CUSUMSQ tests. The results are in support of a long-run relationship among variables of interest. However, stability of money demand function is rejected. Thus, it is not efficient for Central Bank of Turkey to apply a monetary policy based on M2 monetary aggregate.

Keywords

• Money demand, monetary policy, inflation targeting, cointegration analysis.

Para Talebinin Belirleyenleri ve İstikrarı Üzerine Bir Uygulama: Türkiye Örneği

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de para talebinin istikrarlı olup olmadığı 2005:12- 2012:10 dönemi için aylık veriler kullanılarak sorgulanmaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda ilk olarak Johansen eşbütünleşme testi kullanılarak M2 reel parasal büyüklüğü ile reel gelir, faiz oranı ve döviz kuru arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişkinin varlığı sınanmaktadır. Daha sonra para talebi fonksiyonun istikrarlı olup olmadığı CUSUM ve CUSUMSQ testleri ile analiz edilmektedir. Elde edilen bulgular, reel gelir, faiz oranı ve döviz kurunun teoride beklenildiği gibi para talebi ile ilişkili olduğu ancak, değişkenlerin katsayılarının kararlı olmadıkları yönündedir.Dolayısıyla Merkez Bankasının M2 parasal büyüklüğünü referans alan bir para politikası uygulamasının etkin olmayacağı söylenebilecektir.

Keywords

• Para talebi, para politikası, enflasyon hedeflemesi, eşbütünleşme analizi.

References

1. ACHSANI, N.A. (2010), “Stability of Money Demand in an Emerging Market Economy: An Error Correction and ARDL Model for Indonesia,” Research Journal of International Studies, 13, 54-62.
2. AKINLO, A.E. (2006), “The stability of money demand in Nigeria: An autoregressive distributed lag approac, Journal of Policy Modeling, 28, 445-452.
3. ALTINTAŞ, H. (2008), “Türkiye’de Para Talebinin İstikrarı ve Sınır Testi Yaklaşımıyla Öngörülmesi: 1985–2006”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 15-46.
4. ARANGO, S. ve M.I. NADIRI (1981), “Demand for Money in Open Economies”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 7(1), 69–83.
5. BAHMANI, S. (2008), “Stability of the Demand for Money in the Middle East”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 44(1), 62–83.
6. BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. (2001), “How Stable is M2 Money Demand Function Stable in Japan?”, Japan and World Economy, 13(4), 455-461.
7. BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. ve M. KARACAL (2006), “The demand for money in Turkey and currency Substitution”, Applied Economics Letters, 13(10), 635-642
8. BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. ve S. CHOMSISENGPHET (2002), “Stability of M2 money demand function in industrial countries”, Applied Economics, 34, 2075–83.

9. BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. ve M. BOHL (2000),” German monetary unification and the stability of long–run German money demand function”, Economics Letters, 66, 203–208.
10. BRUGGEMAN, A. (2000), “The stability of EMU-wide money demand functions and the monetary policy strategy of the European central bank”, The Manchester School, 68 (2), 184-202. BROWN, R.L., DURBIN, J. ve J.M. EVANS (1975), “Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships over Time”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 37, 1491
11. BUCH, C.M. (2001), “Money demand in Hungary and Poland”, Applied Economics, 33(8), 9899
12. CHEN, S.L. ve J.L. WU (2005), “Long-run money demand revisited: evidence from a non-linear approach”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 24, 19-37.
13. CZIRAKY, D. ve M. GILLMAN (2006), “Money Demand in an Eu Accession Country: A VECM Study of Croatia”, Bulletin of Economic Research, 58(2), 105-127.
14. ÇATIK, A. N. (2007), “Yapısal Kırılma Altında Para Talebinin İstikrarı: Türkiye Örneği”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 22(251), 103-113.
15. DEADMAN, D. ve S. GHATAK (1981) “On the stability of the demand for money in India”, Indian Economic Journal, 29, 41-54.
16. DEKLE, R. ve M. PRADHAN (1999), “Financial liberalization and money demand in ASEAN countries”, International Journal of Finance and Economics, 4(3), 205-215.
17. DICKEY, D.A. ve W.A. FULLER (1979), “Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427–431.
18. DICKEY, D.A. ve W.A. FULLER (1981), “Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root”, Econometrica, 49, 1057-72.
19. FISHER, I.(1911), The Purchasing Power of Money, New York, MacMillan Ltd.
20. FRIEDMAN, M. (1956), “The Quantity Theory of Money: A Restatement”. M. Friedman (der.), Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money içinde,University of Chicago Press.
21. GOLDFELD, S.M. (1976), “The case of missing money”, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 3(1976), 683–730.
22. GÖKTAŞ, Ö. (2005), Teorik ve Uygulamalı Zaman Serileri Analizi, İstanbul: Beşir Kitabevi
23. HALICIOĞLU F. ve M. UĞUR (2005), “On Stability of the Demand for Money in a Developing OECD Country: The Case of Turkey” Global Business and Economics Review, 7(2), 2032
24. HAMORİ, S. ve A.TOKİHİSA (2001), “Seasonal cointegration and the money demand function: Some evidence from Japan”. Applied Economics Letters, 8, pp. 305-310.
25. JOHANSEN, S. (1988), “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231- 254.
26. JOHANSEN, S. ve K. JUSELIUS (1990), “Maksimum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration-with Applications to The Demand for Money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210.
27. KALAYCI, Ş. (2002), “Parasal Hedefleme, Enflasyon Hedeflemesi ve Enflasyonist Bekleyişler: Türkiye Ekseninde bir Değerlendirme”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, İİBF Dergisi, 7(2), 271-284.
28. KOĞAR, Çigdem i. (1995), “Cointegration Test For Money Demand The Case For Turkey and Israel”, The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Research Department Discussion Paper No: 9514.
29. KUMAR, S. ve D.J. WEBBER (2010), “Australasian money demand stability:Application of structural break tests”, MPRA Paper No. 27569.
30. LUTKEPOHL, H. (2007), Univariate Time Series Analysis, In H. Lütkepohl ve M. Kratzig (Ed), Applied Time Series Econometrics, NewYork, Cambridge University Press.
31. MACKINNON, J.G. (1996), “Numerical Distribution Functions for Unit Root and Cointegration Tests”, Journal of Applied Econometrics,11, 601-618.
32. NAGAYASU, J. (2003), “A re-examination of the Japanese money demand function and structural shifts”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 25, 359-375.
33. NARAYAN, P. K. (2008), “Revisiting the US money demand function: an application of the Lagrange multiplier structural break unit root test and the bounds test for a long-run relationship”, Applied Economics, 40(7), 897-904
34. OLUWOLE, O. ve A. O. OLUGBENGA (2007), “M2 targeting, money demand, and real GDP growth in Nigeria: Do rules apply?”, Journal of Business and Public Affairs, 1(2), 1-20. ORDONEZ J. (2003), “Stability and non-linear dynamics in the broad demand for money in Spain”, Economics Letters, 78, 139–146.
35. ÖZDEMİR, K.A. ve M. SAYGILI (2010), “Economic Uncertainty and Money Demand Stability in Turkey”, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Working Paper, No:10/15, August.
36. PADHAN, P.C. (2011), “Stability of Demand for Money in India: Evidence from Monetary and Liquidity Aggregates”, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(1), 271-182. PAPADOPOULOS, A.P. ve G. ZIS (1997), “The demand for money in Greece: further empirical results and policy implications”, The Manchester School, 65, 71-89.
37. POOLE, W. (1970), “The optimal choice of monetary policy instruments in a simple macro model”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 197-216.
38. RAMACHANDRAN, M. (2004), “Do broad money, output, and prices standfor a stable relationship in India?”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 26, 983–1001
39. SAMRETH, S. (2008), “Estimating Money Demand Function in Cambodia:ARDL Approach”, MPRA Paper No. 16274.
40. SEVÜKTEKİN, M. ve M. NARGELEÇEKENLER (2007), “Finansal Faktörlerin Reel Para Talebi Üzerindeki Rolü: Türkiye Örneği”, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(18), 45-61.
41. TANG, C.F. (2007), “The stability of money demand function in Japan: Evidence from Rolling cointegration approach” MPRA Paper No. 19807.
42. TCMB (2011), “2012 Yılında Para ve Kur Politikası”, Ankara, http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/yeni/duyuru/2011/Baskan_ParaPol12.pdf(27/12/2012)
43. TCMB, (2006), Enflasyon Hedeflemesi Rejimi Kitapçığı, TCMB, Ankara.
44. YILANCI, V. (2012), “Türkiye’de Para Talebi İstikrarlılığının Testi: Kayan Pencerelerde Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 33, 67-74.