Year 2017, Volume 3 , Issue 2, Pages 89 - 102 2017-12-25

Küresel Girdi-Çıktı Analizi: Ağ Yaklaşımı
Global Input – Output Analysis: A Network Approach

Semanur Soyyiğit [1] , Çiğdem Boz [2]


Ağ analizi, kompleks-adaptif bir sistem olarak tanımladığımız iktisatta da yer alan kompleks sistemlerin analiz edilmesinde kullanılan bir araçtır. İktisatta en çok kullanıldığı alanlar uluslararası ticaret ağları ve finansal ağlar olmakla birlikte, son dönemlerde girdi-çıktı ağlarının analizinde de kullanılmaktadır.

Günümüzdeki küreselleşmiş üretim zincirinde, uluslararası ticaret ağı, ağ içerisindeki her bir ülkenin her bir sektörü arasında gerçekleşen girdi akışını yansıtması açısından önemli bir role sahiptir. Bu yapı nedeniyle de, küreselleşmiş üretim zinciri artık ‘küresel üretim ağı’ olarak anılmaktadır. Ağ analizi, ulusal ekonomilerin sektörleri arasındaki ilişkileri dikkate almasından dolayı önemli bir araçtır. Bu nedenle, analizin bulguları, olası bir talep ya da arz şokunun bu küresel girdi akışı içerisinde, söz konusu küresel üretim ağını nasıl etkileyeceği konusunda bilgilendirici olabilir.

Bu çalışmada, 1995 ve 2011 yılları için küresel girdi-çıktı tabloları ağ analizi yardımıyla analiz edilecek ve birbiri ile karşılaştırılacaktır. Çalışma sonunda, sektörler arası bağlantısallık ve sektörlerin merkeziliklerinin ortaya koyulması, ayrıca ağ özelliklerinin 1995 yılından 2011 yılına kadar geçirdiği değişimin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. 

Network analysis, a tool that is used to analyze complex systems, which also appeared in economics, which is defined as a complex – adaptive system. Although the international trade networks and financial networks are most popular areas, this method has been employed for input-output Networks.

In today’s globalized production chain, international input-output network has a prominent role since it captures input flows among each sector of each country which occurs in the network. So, it can easily be understood why globalized production chain is also called as ‘global production network’. Network analysis is a significant tool since it takes international links among sectors of national economies into consideration. Thus, findings of the analysis can be informative about how a potential demand/supply shock in this global input flow may affect this globalized production chain.

In this study, global input-output tables will be examined and compared for 1995 and 2011, via network tools. It is aimed to reveal both inter-sectoral connectivity and centralities of sectors and also change of these properties from 1995 to 2011. 

  • Barabasi, A.L. & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science, 286, 509-512. DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509.
  • Barrat, A. , Barthelemy, M. & Vespignani, A. (2004). Traffic-Driven Model of the World Wide Web Graph. Algorithms and Models for the Web-Graph, Third International Workshop, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 56-67. DOI: 10.1007/b101552.
  • Blöchl, F., Theis, F., Redondo, F.V. & Fisher, E. (2011). Vertex Centralities in Input-Output Networks Reveal the Structure of Modern Economies. Physical Review E, 83, 1-8. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.046127.
  • Caldarelli, G. (2008). Lectures in complex networks. International Workshop & Conference on Network Science. http://www.ifr.ac.uk/netsci08/Download/Invited/ws1_Caldarelli.pdf.
  • Chen, Zhan-Ming & Chen, G.Q. (2013). Demand-driven Energy Requirement of World Economy 2007: A Multi-region Input-Output Network Simulation. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 18, 1757-1774.
  • De Backer, K. & Yamano, N. (2007). The Measurement of Globalisation using International Input-Output Tables. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 08, OECD Publishing, 1-32. DOI 10.1787/242020221356
  • De Backer, K. & Miroudot, S. (2014). Mapping Global Value Chains. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, 1677, 1-40.
  • Decarlo, L. (1997). On the Meaning and the Use of Kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2 (3), 292-307. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.2.3.292
  • Estrada, E. (2015). Introduction to Complex Networks: Structure and Dynamics. Evolutionary Equations with Applications in Natural Sciences. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 2126. J. Banasiak, M. & M. Mokhtar-Kharroubi (eds.). p. 93-131. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-11322-7__3.
  • Fagiolo, G., Reyes, J. & Schiavo, S. (2010). The Evolution of the World Trade Web: A Weighted Network Analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20, 479-514. DOI: 10.1007/s00191-009-0160-x.
  • Fuge, M., Tee, K. & Agogino, A. Network Analysis of Collaborative Design Networks: A Case Study of OpenIDEO. http://www.markfuge.com/papers/fuge_tee_openideo_jcise_final_2013.pdf, 14.03.2016.
  • Grazzini, J. & Spelta, A. (2015). An Empirical Analysis of the Global Input-Output Network and Its Evolution. Universite Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Working Paper Series , 31, 1-28.
  • Hein, O., Schwind, M. & König, W. (2006). Scale-Free Networks – The Impact of Fat Tailed Degree Distribution on Diffusion and Communication Processes. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 48, 267-275.
  • Howell, A. (2012). Network statistics and modeling the global trade economy: exponential random graph models and latent space models: is geography dead?. unpublished thesis, University of California.
  • Kleinberg, J.M. (1999). Authoritative Sources in a Hyperlinked Enironment. 1-34.
  • Kolaczyk, E. (2009). Statistical Analysis of Network Data Methods and Models. Springer.
  • Leon, C., Perez, J. (2013). Authority Centrality and Hub Centrality as Metrics of Systemic Importance of Financial Market Infrastructure. Borradores de Economia, 754, 1-24.
  • Leon Rincon, C. , Machado, C. & Paipilla, S. (2015). Identifying Central Bank Liquidity Super-Spreader in Interbank Funds Network. ”, EBC Discussion Paper, Vol. 2015-010, 1-43.
  • Leon, C. & Berndsen, R.J. (2014). Rethinking Financial Stability: Challenges Arising from Financial Networks’ Modular Scale-free Architecture. 1-37.
  • Lovric, M. (2010). Skewness. International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, Springer: New York.
  • Milberg, W.& Winkler, D. (2013). Outsourcing Economics – Global Value Chains in Capitalist Development, Cambridge University Press, 1st published.
  • Mitchell, M. (2006). Complex Systems: Network Thinking. SFI Working Paper, 2006-10-036.
  • Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity A Guided Tour. Oxford University Press.
  • Newman, M.E.J. (2010). Networks An Introduction.
  • Newman, M.E.J. Mixing Patterns in Network. http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0209450v2.pdf
  • OECD (2009). Applications of Complexity Science for Public Policy- New Tools for Finding Unanticipated Consequences and Unrealized Opportunities. 1-25.
  • Reichardt, J. (2009). Introduction to Complex Networks. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Soyyiğit, S. & Eren, E. (2016). Network Approach to Input-Output Analysis: The Case of Turkey. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Social Science, Vol.2. Istanbul, 822-839.
  • Timmer, M. , Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R. & Vries, Gaaitzen, J. (2015). An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input-Output Database: the Case of Global Automative Production. Review of International Economics, 23 (3), 575-605. DOI: 10.1111/roie.12178.
  • Wong, Y.M. (2014). Fair Share of Supply Chain Responsibility for Low Carbon Manufacturing. Smart Manufacturing Innovation and Transformation: Interconnection and Intelligence, USA.
  • Wu, L. . Centrality of the Supply Chain Network. 5th Annual SWUFE Baruch Research Symposium, 1-24.
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Author: Semanur Soyyiğit
Institution: ERZİNCAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Country: Turkey


Author: Çiğdem Boz
Institution: BATMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Country: Turkey


Dates

Publication Date : December 25, 2017

Bibtex @research article { yssr322986, journal = {Yildiz Social Science Review}, issn = {2149-4363}, address = {}, publisher = {Yildiz Technical University}, year = {2017}, volume = {3}, pages = {89 - 102}, doi = {}, title = {Küresel Girdi-Çıktı Analizi: Ağ Yaklaşımı}, key = {cite}, author = {Soyyiğit, Semanur and Boz, Çiğdem} }
APA Soyyiğit, S , Boz, Ç . (2017). Küresel Girdi-Çıktı Analizi: Ağ Yaklaşımı. Yildiz Social Science Review , 3 (2) , 89-102 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/yssr/issue/33542/322986
MLA Soyyiğit, S , Boz, Ç . "Küresel Girdi-Çıktı Analizi: Ağ Yaklaşımı". Yildiz Social Science Review 3 (2017 ): 89-102 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/yssr/issue/33542/322986>
Chicago Soyyiğit, S , Boz, Ç . "Küresel Girdi-Çıktı Analizi: Ağ Yaklaşımı". Yildiz Social Science Review 3 (2017 ): 89-102
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Küresel Girdi-Çıktı Analizi: Ağ Yaklaşımı AU - Semanur Soyyiğit , Çiğdem Boz Y1 - 2017 PY - 2017 N1 - DO - T2 - Yildiz Social Science Review JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 89 EP - 102 VL - 3 IS - 2 SN - 2149-4363- M3 - UR - Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 Yildiz Social Science Review Küresel Girdi-Çıktı Analizi: Ağ Yaklaşımı %A Semanur Soyyiğit , Çiğdem Boz %T Küresel Girdi-Çıktı Analizi: Ağ Yaklaşımı %D 2017 %J Yildiz Social Science Review %P 2149-4363- %V 3 %N 2 %R %U
ISNAD Soyyiğit, Semanur , Boz, Çiğdem . "Küresel Girdi-Çıktı Analizi: Ağ Yaklaşımı". Yildiz Social Science Review 3 / 2 (December 2017): 89-102 .
AMA Soyyiğit S , Boz Ç . Küresel Girdi-Çıktı Analizi: Ağ Yaklaşımı. Yildiz Social Science Review. 2017; 3(2): 89-102.
Vancouver Soyyiğit S , Boz Ç . Küresel Girdi-Çıktı Analizi: Ağ Yaklaşımı. Yildiz Social Science Review. 2017; 3(2): 102-89.