Belirsizlik Altında Strateji: Türk Lojistik Sektöründe Stratejik Duruş ve Performans Üzerine Sektörel Analiz

Year 2022, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 13 - 29, 21.07.2022

Saniye Yıldırım Ozmutlu Esin Can

https://doi.org/10.51803/yssr.1146866

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Türk lojistik sektöründe, çevresel belirsizliğin firma performansı üzerindeki etkisi özelinde, stratejik duruşun aracılık (mediator) rolünün varlığı ve değişkenler arası nasıl bir etkileşimin olduğu araştırılmıştır. Marmara bölgesini kapsayan veri seti Türkiye çapında genişletilmiş ve periyodu uzatılarak oluşturulan araştırma modelindeki hipotezler yeniden test edilerek çalışma tekrarlanmış, bulgular karşılaştırmalı olarak yeniden değerlendirilerek sektör ülkemiz çapında incelenmiştir. Araştırmada; Türk lojistik sektöründe faaliyet gösteren firmalarda yönetici pozisyonunda çalışan 475 kişiye, anket uygulanmıştır. Yapılan çalışma, stratejik duruşun arabuluculuk rolü hakkında ampirik bir kanıt sağlamaktadır. Sonuçta, Türk lojistik firmalarının stratejik bir duruşa sahip olmalarının ne kadar önemli olduğu ve performansın artırılmasında çok önemli bir tamamlayıcı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca araştırma kapsamındaki firmaların, çevresel etkilerine uyan stratejik seçimlerde bulunmalarının gerekliliği ortaya çıkmıştır.

Keywords

Çevresel belirsizlik, stratejik duruş, stratejik seçimler, performans, Türk lojistik sektörü

Strategy Under Uncertainty: A Sectoral Analysis of Strategic Posture and Performance in the Turkish Logistics Sector

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of environmental conditions on firm performance in the Turkish logistics sector, in the context of the mediating role of strategic posture and interaction between the variables. The data set covering the Marmara region was expanded to cover all Turkey, and the hypotheses in the research model created by extending the period were retested and the study was repeated. The sector was analyzed on a country basis by comparing the findings. In this research, a survey was conducted with 475 people working in managerial positions in firms operating in the Turkish logistics sector. Empirical evidence regarding the mediating role of strategic posture was obtained from this study. As a result, it was determined how important it is for Turkish logistics companies to have a strategic posture, and it is a very important complement in terms of improving performance. In addition, the necessity for companies examined within the scope of the study to make strategic choices in line with the impact of environmental conditions was revealed.

Keywords

Environmental uncertainty, strategic posture, strategic choices, performance, Turkish logistics sector

References

• Almatrooshi, B., Singh, S. K., & Farouk, S. (2016). Determinants of organizational performance: A proposed framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(6), 844–859. [CrossRef]
• Andersen, T. J. (2000). Strategic planning, autonomous actions and corporate performance. Long Range Planning, 33(2), 184–200. [CrossRef]
• Andersen, T. J. (2004). Integrating decentralized strategy making and strategic planning processes in dynamic environments. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1271–1299. [CrossRef]
• Arun, K. & Yıldırım Özmutlu, S. (2021), "Narratives of environmental munificence of 3PL firms on the relationship between dynamic capabilities, strategic management and organizational performance", Journal of Strategy and Management, doi: 10.1108/JSMA-01-2021-0019. [Online ahead of print] [CrossRef]
• Bae, H. S. (2017). Empirical relationships of perceived environmental uncertainty, supply chain collaboration and operational performance: analyses of direct, indirect and total effects. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33(4), 263–272. [CrossRef]
• Ballou, Ronald H. (2004). Business Logistics/Supply Chain Management (5th ed). Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2019). Strategic management and competitive advantage: Concepts and cases (6th ed). Pearson.
• Beadle, R., & Moore, G. (2011). MacIntyre, neo-Aristotelianism and organization theory. In H. Tsoukas & R. Chia (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 32, pp. 85–121). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. [CrossRef]
• Bedi, H. S., & Puri, G. (2019). Environment uncertainty–business performance relationship: mediating effect of entrepreneurial orientation. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(4), 3816–3820. [CrossRef]
• Boyd, B. K., & Fulk, J. (1996). Executive scanning and perceived uncertainty: A multidimensional model. Journal of Management, 22(1), 1–21. [CrossRef]
• Bradley, S. W., Shepherd, D. A., & Wiklund, J. (2011). The Importance of Slack for New Organizations Facing ‘Tough’ Environments: The Importance of Slack. Journal of Management Studies, 48(5), 1071–1097. [CrossRef]
• Bruns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management of innovation. London.
• Bryson, J M. (2011). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: a guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. Jossey-Bass.
• Cannella, A. A., Park, J. H., & Lee, H. U. (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 768–784. [CrossRef]
• Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Singh, R. (2019). The impact of leanness and innovativeness on environmental and financial performance: Insights from Indian SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 212, 111-124. [CrossRef]
• Chandler, A.D. (1962). Strategy and Structure. MIT Press.
• Chandler, D., & Hwang, H. 2015. Learning from learning theory: A model of organizational adoption strategies at the microfoundations of institutional theory. Journal of Management, 41, 1446–1476. [CrossRef]
• Chi, T. (2015). Business contingency, strategy formation, and firm performance: An empirical study of Chinese apparel SMEs. Administrative Sciences, 5(2), 27–45. [CrossRef]
• Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1–22. [CrossRef]
• Clark, B. R. (1971). Belief and loyalty in college organization. The Journal of Higher Education, 42(6), 499–515.
• Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87. [CrossRef]
• DeSarbo, W. S., Anthony Di Benedetto, C., Song, M., & Sinha, I. (2005). Revisiting the Miles and Snow strategic framework: uncovering interrelationships between strategic types, capabilities, environmental uncertainty, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(1), 47–74. [CrossRef]
• Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52–73. [CrossRef]
• Dess, G. G., & Davis, P. S. (1984). Porter's (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance. Academy of Management journal, 27(3), 467–488. [CrossRef]
• Dess, G. G., & Keats, B. W. (1987). Environmental boundary-spanning and information-processing effects on organisational performance. In Academy of Management Proceedings, (pp. 21-25). [CrossRef]
• Dey, P. K., & Cheffi, W. (2013). Green supply chain performance measurement using the analytic hierarchy process: A comparative analysis of manufacturing organisations. Production Planning & Control, 24(8–9), 702–720. [CrossRef]
• Dollinger, M. J., & Golden, P. A. (1992). Interorganizational and collective strategies in small firms: Environmental effects and performance. Journal of Management, 18(4), 695–715. [CrossRef]
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Sull, D. N. (2001). Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 106–119.
• Eker, M., & Eker, S. (2019). Exploring the relationships between environmental uncertainty, business strategy and management control system on firm performance. Business and Economics Research Journal, 10(1), 115–130.
• Elbanna, S., & Child, J. (2007). Influences on strategic decision effectiveness: Development and test of an integrative model. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4), 431–453. [CrossRef]
• Elbanna, S., Di Benedetto, C. A., & Gherib, J. (2015). Do environment and intuition matter in the relationship between decision politics and success?. Journal of Management and Organization, 21(1), 60–81. [CrossRef]
• Ellinger, A. E., Daugherty, P. J., & Keller, S. B. (2000). The relationship between marketing/logistics interdepartmental integration and performance in US manufacturing firms: an empirical study. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), 1–22. [CrossRef]
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. [CrossRef]
• George, B., Walker, R. M., & Monster, J. (2019). Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A meta‐analysis. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 810–819.
• Gnizy, I. (2016). Power dynamics of the international marketing within firms and how they shape international performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 148–158.
• Goll, I., & Rasheed, A. A. (2004). The moderating effect of environmental munificence and dynamism on the relationship between discretionary social responsibility and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 41–54. [CrossRef]
• González‐Benito, J. (2005). A study of the effect of manufacturing proactivity on business performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(3), 222–241. [CrossRef]
• González-Benito, J., & González-Benito, Ó. (2005). Environmental proactivity and business performance: An empirical analysis. Omega, 33(1), 1–15. [CrossRef]
• Grant, R. M. (2003). Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: Evidence from the oil majors. Strategic Management Journal, 24(6), 491–517. [CrossRef]
• Guo, H., Wang, C., Su, Z., & Wang, D. (2020). Technology push or market pull? Strategic orientation in business model design and digital start‐up performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(4), 352–372. [CrossRef]
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th edition). Pearson Education Limited.
• Hambrick, D. C. (1983). High profit strategies in mature capital goods industries: A contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 687–707. [CrossRef]
• Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1986). Where do organizational forms come from?. Sociological Forum, 1(1), 50–72. [CrossRef]
• Hansen, G. S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1989). Determinants of firm performance: The relative importance of economic and organizational factors. Strategic Management Journal, 10(5), 399–411. [CrossRef]
• Hayes, R. H., & Wheelwright, S. C. (1984). Restoring our competitive edge: Competing through manufacturing. John Wiley&Sons.
• Hofer, C. W., & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. West.
• Hsiao, Y. C., & Wu, M. H. (2020). How organizational structure and strategic alignment influence new product success. Management Decision, 58(1), 182–200. [CrossRef]
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. [CrossRef]
• Israel, G. D. (2013). Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS), University of Florida. Retrieved from Agricultural. In Education and Communication Department, UF/IFAS Extension. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pd006 Accessed on Apr 19, 2022.
• Jacobsen, D. I., & Johnsen, A. (2020). Alignment of strategy and structure in local government. Public Money & Management, 40(4), 276–284. [CrossRef]
• Jauch, L. R., Osborn, R. N., & Glueck, W. F. (1980). Short term financial success in large business organizations: The environment‐strategy connection. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 49–63. [CrossRef]
• Karim, A., & Arif‐Uz‐Zaman, K. (2013). A methodology for effective implementation of lean strategies and its performance evaluation in manufacturing organizations. Business Process Management Journal, 19(1), 169–196.
• Lai, K., Wong, C. W. Y., & Lam, J. S. L. (2015). Sharing environmental management information with supply chain partners and the performance contingencies on environmental munificence. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 445–453. [CrossRef]
• Lakomski, G., & Evers, C. W. (2011). Analytic philosophy and organization theory: Philosophical problems and scientific solutions. In H. Tsoukas & R. Chia (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 32, pp. 23–54). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. [CrossRef]
• Lee, H. L. (2002). Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties. California Management Review, 44(3), 105–119. [CrossRef]
• Legionosuko, T., Sundari, S., & Sutawijaya, A. H. (2019). The Effect of Training, Integrity and Competency Knowledge of Cooperation Team Official Human Resources in Directorate General of Defense Strategy the Ministry. International Review of Management and Marketing, 9(6), 128. [CrossRef]
• Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429–451. [CrossRef]
• Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., & Towill, D. R. (2000). Lean, agile or leagile? Matching your supply chain to the marketplace. International Journal of Production Research, 38(17), 4061–4070. [CrossRef]
• Mazzarol, T., & Reboud, S. (2020). Entrepreneurship and Innovation: Theory, Practice and Context. Springer Singapore. [CrossRef]
• McArthur, A. W., & Nystrom, P. C. (1991). Environmental dynamism, complexity, and munificence as moderators of strategy-performance relationships. Journal of Business Research, 23(4), 349–361. [CrossRef]
• Miles, M. P., Covin, J. G., & Heeley, M. B. (2000). The relationship between environmental dynamism and small firm structure, strategy, and performance. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 8(2), 63–78. [CrossRef]
• Miller, D. (1988). Relating Porter's business strategies to environment and structure: Analysis and performance implications. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 280–308. [CrossRef]
• Mintzberg, H. (1979). Patterns in strategy formation. International Studies of Management & Organization, 9(3), 67–86. [CrossRef]
• Mohammad, H. I. (2019). Mediating effect of organizational learning and moderating role of environmental dynamism on the relationship between strategic change and firm performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(2), 275–297. [CrossRef]
• Morgan, R. E., & Strong, C. A. (2003). Business performance and dimensions of strategic orientation. Journal of Business Research, 56(3), 163–176. [CrossRef]
• Nakano, M. (2015). Exploratory analysis on the relationship between strategy and structure/processes in supply chains: Using the strategy-structure-processes-performance paradigm. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 26(2), 381–400. [CrossRef]
• Nandakumar, M. K., Ghobadian, A., & O’Regan, N. (2010). Business‐level strategy and performance: The moderating effects of environment and structure. Management Decision, 48(6), 907–939. [CrossRef]
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed). McGraw-Hill.
• Petrou, A. P., Hadjielias, E., Thanos, I. C., & Dimitratos, P. (2020). Strategic decision-making processes, international environmental munificence and the accelerated internationalization of SMEs. International Business Review, 29(5), Article 101735. [CrossRef]
• Prajogo, D., Mena, C., & Nair, A. (2018). The fit between supply chain strategies and practices: A contingency approach and comparative analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(1), 168–180. [CrossRef]
• Priem, R. L., Rasheed, A. M., & Kotulic, A. G. (1995). Rationality in strategic decision processes, environmental dynamism and firm performance. Journal of Management, 21(5), 913–929. [CrossRef]
• Rajagopalan, N., Rasheed, A. M., & Datta, D. K. (1993). Strategic decision processes: Critical review and future directions. Journal of Management, 19(2), 349–384. [CrossRef]
• Reeves, M., Haanes, K., & Sinha, J. (2016). Your Strategy Needs a Strategy: How to Choose and Execute the Right Approach. Audible Studios on Brilliance Audio.
• Rojo, A., Stevenson, M., Lloréns Montes, F. J., & Perez-Arostegui, M. N. (2018). Supply chain flexibility in dynamic environments: The enabling role of operational absorptive capacity and organisational learning. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(3), 636–666. [CrossRef]
• Sabherwal, R., Sabherwal, S., Havakhor, T., & Steelman, Z. (2019). How does strategic alignment affect firm performance? The roles of information technology investment and environmental uncertainty. MIS Quarterly, 43(2), 453–474. [CrossRef]
• Sarkar, S., Coelho, D. M., & Maroco, J. (2016). Strategic orientations, dynamic capabilities, and firm performance: an analysis for knowledge intensive business services. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(4), 1000–1020. [CrossRef]
• Schendel, D., & Hofer, C. W. (1979). Strategic management. Little, Brown.
• Schilke, O. (2018). A micro-institutional inquiry into resistance to environmental pressures. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1431–1466. [CrossRef]
• Schilke, O., & Cook, K. S. (2013). A cross-level process theory of trust development in interorganizational relationships. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 281–303.
• Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the Grassroots, University of California Press. [CrossRef]
• Sharfman, M. P., & Dean, J. W. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Management, 17(4), 681-700. [CrossRef]
• Shibin, K. T., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Hazen, B., Roubaud, D., Gupta, S., & Foropon, C. (2020). Examining sustainable supply chain management of SMEs using resource based view and institutional theory. Annals of Operations Research, 290(1), 301–326. [CrossRef]
• Snow, C. C., & Hrebiniak, L. G. (1980). Strategy, distinctive competence, and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 317–336. [CrossRef]
• Stank, T. P., Daugherty, P. J., & Ellinger, A. E. (1999). Marketing/logistics integration and firm performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 10(1), 11–24. [CrossRef]
• Talke, K. (2007). Corporate mindset of innovating firms: Influences on new product performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(1-2), 76–91.
• Tan, J. (2002). Impact of ownership type on environment–strategy linkage and performance: Evidence from a transitional economy. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3), 333–354. [CrossRef]
• Tan, J., & Tan, D. (2005). Environment–strategy co‐evolution and co‐alignment: a staged model of Chinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 141–157. [CrossRef]
• Uzkurt, C., Kimzan, H. S., & Yılmaz, C. (2016). A case study of the mediating role of innovation on the relationship between environmental uncertainty, market orientation, and firm performance. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 13(06), Article 1750003. [CrossRef]
• Venkatraman, N. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35(8), 942–962. [CrossRef]
• Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. Jossey-Bass.
• Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1997). Dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Partners for the Learning Organization.
• White, R. E., & Hamermesh, R. C. (1981). Toward a model of business unit performance: An integrative approach. Academy of Management Review, 6(2), 213–223. [CrossRef]
• Witcher, B. (2020). Absolute Essentials of Strategic Management. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. [CrossRef]
• Wolf, C., & Floyd, S. W. (2017). Strategic planning research: Toward a theory-driven agenda. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1754–1788. [CrossRef]
• Wolff, J. A., & Pett, T. L. (2006). Small‐firm performance: modeling the role of product and process improvements. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 268–284.
• Yayla, A. A., & Hu, Q. (2012). The impact of IT-business strategic alignment on firm performance in a developing country setting: exploring moderating roles of environmental uncertainty and strategic orientation. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(4), 373–387.
• Yu, C. L., Wang, F., & Brouthers, K. D. (2016). Competitor identification, perceived environmental uncertainty, and firm performance. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 33(1), 21–35. [CrossRef]
• Zajac, E. J., Kraatz, M. S., & Bresser, R. K. (2000). Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 429–453. [CrossRef]
• Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2007). How does strategic orientation matter in Chinese firms? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4), 447–466. [CrossRef]
• Zimmermann, R., Ferreira, L. M. D. F., & Moreira, A. C. (2020). An empirical analysis of the relationship between supply chain strategies, product characteristics, environmental uncertainty and performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(3), 375–391. [CrossRef]
• Zuckerman, Alan M. (2005). Healthcare Strategic Planning (2nd ed). Health Administration Press.