BibTex RIS Cite

Lisansüstü Programlara Öğrenci Seçiminde Sübjektiflik Eğilimi: Giriş Mülakatlarına İlişkin Bir Araştırma

Year 2017, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 125 - 131, 01.08.2017

Abstract

Lisansüstü programlara öğrenci seçim sistemi 1997 yılından itibaren aşamalı olarak yeni bir modele evrilmiştir. Yeni model, öğrenci seçiminde sadece mülakat notu gibi sübjektif ölçütleri değil, aynı zamanda ALES (Lisansüstü Eğitime Giriş Sınavı) puanı, mezuniyet notu ve yabancı dil puanı gibi objektif ölçütleri de dikkate almaktadır. Objektif ölçütler, seçme sürecinde sübjektif davranışların etkisini azaltmak amacıyla sisteme dâhil edilmiştir. Buna karşılık, mevcut sistemin bu beklentiyi ne ölçüde karşıladığı tartışmalı bir husustur. Bu çalışma, lisansüstü programlara başvuran adayların değerlendirilmesi sürecinde sübjektif ölçütlerin etkisini analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bulgular, seçme sürecinde sübjektif ölçütlerin (mülakat notu) objektif ölçütlere (ALES puanı, mezuniyet notu ve yabancı dil puanı) kıyasla daha güçlü bir belirleyici olduğuna işaret etmektedir.

References

  • Allesina, S. (2011). Measuring nepotism through shared last names: The case of Italian Academia. PLoS One, 6(8), e21160.
  • Aydoğan, İ. (2008). Favoritism in the classroom: A study on Turkish schools. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(2), 159–168.
  • Aydogan, İ. (2012). The existence of favoritism in organizations. African Journal of Business Management, 6(12), 4577–4586.
  • Bozionelos, N. (2014). Careers patterns in Greek Academia: Social capital and intelligent careers, but for whom? Career Development International, 19(3), 264–294.
  • Bramoullé, Y., and Goyal, S. (2009). Favoritism. CIRPEE Working Paper, 09–41, 1–34.
  • Büte, M. (2011). Kayırmacılığın çalışanlar üzerine etkileri ile insan kay- nakları uygulamaları ilişkisi: Türk kamu bankalarına yönelik bir araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(1), 383–404.
  • Çıkrıkçı-Demirtaşlı, N. (2002). Lisansüstü eğitim programlarına girişte lisansüstü eğitimi giriş sınavı (LES) sonucunun ve diğer ölçütlerin kul- lanımına ilişkin bir tarama. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1–2), 61–70.
  • Durante, R., Labartino, G., and Perotti, R. (2012). Academic dynasties: Decentralization and familism in the Italian Academia. NBER Working Papers Series, 17572, 1–53.
  • Ferlazzo, F, and Sdoia, S. (2012). Measuring nepotism through shared last names: Are we really moving from opinions to facts? PLoS One, 7(8): e43574.
  • Kamudan (06.11.2014). Torpilli mülakatlar 27 Ocak 2015 tarihinde <www. kamudan.com> adresinden erişildi.
  • Milliyet (13.01.2015). Koç’tan yeni VIP torpil listesi. 27 Ocak 2015 tarihinde <www.milliyet.com.tr> adresinden erişildi.
  • Sandstrom, U., and Hallsten, M. (2008). Persistent nepotism in peer- review. Scientometrics, 74(2), 175–189.
  • Zinovyeva, N., and Bagues, M. (2011). Does gender matter for academic promotion? Evidence from a randomized natural experiment. IZA Discussion Papers Series, 5513, 1–43.
  • Zinovyeva, N., and Bagues, M. (2012). The role of connections in academ- ic promotions. IZA Discussion Papers Series, 6821, 1–35.

The subjectivism in the selection of students to the graduate programs: A study on the entry interviews

Year 2017, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 125 - 131, 01.08.2017

Abstract

Starting at the year of 1997, the system of graduate selection has gradually evolved a new model. The new model, in the selection of students, considers not only subjective such as interview score but also objective criteria including ALES (academic staff and graduate education test) score, graduation grade and foreign language score. The existence of objective criteria indicates the intention that reduces the subjectivity in the assessment process. However, it is t is controversial to what extent the new system meets this expectation. The purpose of this study is to examine the subjectivism in the assessment of the applicants to the graduate school programs of a university in Turkey. The findings point out that the subjective factor (interview score) plays a more determining role than the objective factors (ALES score, graduation grade and foreign language score) in the selection process.

References

  • Allesina, S. (2011). Measuring nepotism through shared last names: The case of Italian Academia. PLoS One, 6(8), e21160.
  • Aydoğan, İ. (2008). Favoritism in the classroom: A study on Turkish schools. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(2), 159–168.
  • Aydogan, İ. (2012). The existence of favoritism in organizations. African Journal of Business Management, 6(12), 4577–4586.
  • Bozionelos, N. (2014). Careers patterns in Greek Academia: Social capital and intelligent careers, but for whom? Career Development International, 19(3), 264–294.
  • Bramoullé, Y., and Goyal, S. (2009). Favoritism. CIRPEE Working Paper, 09–41, 1–34.
  • Büte, M. (2011). Kayırmacılığın çalışanlar üzerine etkileri ile insan kay- nakları uygulamaları ilişkisi: Türk kamu bankalarına yönelik bir araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(1), 383–404.
  • Çıkrıkçı-Demirtaşlı, N. (2002). Lisansüstü eğitim programlarına girişte lisansüstü eğitimi giriş sınavı (LES) sonucunun ve diğer ölçütlerin kul- lanımına ilişkin bir tarama. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1–2), 61–70.
  • Durante, R., Labartino, G., and Perotti, R. (2012). Academic dynasties: Decentralization and familism in the Italian Academia. NBER Working Papers Series, 17572, 1–53.
  • Ferlazzo, F, and Sdoia, S. (2012). Measuring nepotism through shared last names: Are we really moving from opinions to facts? PLoS One, 7(8): e43574.
  • Kamudan (06.11.2014). Torpilli mülakatlar 27 Ocak 2015 tarihinde <www. kamudan.com> adresinden erişildi.
  • Milliyet (13.01.2015). Koç’tan yeni VIP torpil listesi. 27 Ocak 2015 tarihinde <www.milliyet.com.tr> adresinden erişildi.
  • Sandstrom, U., and Hallsten, M. (2008). Persistent nepotism in peer- review. Scientometrics, 74(2), 175–189.
  • Zinovyeva, N., and Bagues, M. (2011). Does gender matter for academic promotion? Evidence from a randomized natural experiment. IZA Discussion Papers Series, 5513, 1–43.
  • Zinovyeva, N., and Bagues, M. (2012). The role of connections in academ- ic promotions. IZA Discussion Papers Series, 6821, 1–35.
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA45CJ47KR
Journal Section Original Empirical Research
Authors

Tekin Akgeyik This is me

Publication Date August 1, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 7 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Akgeyik, T. (2017). Lisansüstü Programlara Öğrenci Seçiminde Sübjektiflik Eğilimi: Giriş Mülakatlarına İlişkin Bir Araştırma. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 7(2), 125-131.

Yükseköğretim Dergisi/TÜBA Higher Education Research/Review (TÜBA-HER) does not officially agree with the ideas of manuscripts published in the journal and does not guarantee for any product or service advertisements on both printed and online versions of the journal. Scientific and legal responsibilities of published manuscripts belong to their authors. Materials such as pictures, figures, tables etc. sent with manuscripts should be original or written approval of copyright holder should be sent with manuscript for publishing in both printed and online versions if they were published before. Authors agree that they transfer all publishing rights to the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA), the publisher of the journal. Copyrights of all published contents (text and visual materials) belong to the journal. No payment is done for manuscripts under the name of copyright or others approved for publishing in the journal and no publication cost is charged; however, reprints are at authors' cost.

To promote the development of global open access to scientific information and research, TÜBA provides copyrights of all online published papers (except where otherwise noted) for free use of readers, scientists, and institutions (such as link to the content or permission for its download, distribution, printing, copying, and reproduction in any medium, without any changing and except the commercial purpose), under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND3.0) License, provided the original work is cited. To get permission for commercial purpose please contact the publisher.