BibTex RIS Cite

Lisansüstü Eğitimin Sorunları

Year 2014, Volume: 4 Issue: 3, 117 - 123, 01.12.2014

Abstract

Lisansüstü eğitim -özellikle doktora-, araştırmaların yapılması ve bilginin üretilmesini; bilimsel ve teknolojik ilerlemelerin, kalkınmanın lokomotifi olan yüksek nitelikli insan gücünün (bilim insanları, öğretim üyeleri, araştırmacılar) yetiştirilmesini sağlar. Gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olsun tüm ülkelerde önem verilmesine karşın, lisansüstü eğitimin bazı sorunları vardır. Bu makalede, lisansüstü eğitimde dünya ülkelerinde ve Türkiye'de öne çıkan başlıca sorunlar alanyazına ve gözlemlere dayalı olarak ele alınmıştır. Bu bağlamda, Türkiye'de lisansüstü eğitimle ilgili yapılan araştırmalar, ulusal gelirden ayrılan kaynaklar, uluslararasılaşma, doktora öğrencilerinin hareketliliği ve doktora öğretiminin niteliği konularındaki sorunlar değerlendirilmiştir.

References

  • Abiddin, N. Z., and Ismail, A. (2011). Attrition and completion issues in post- graduate studies for student development. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 15–99.
  • Carlozo, L. (2012). Why college students stop short of a degree? 17 Eylül 2014 ta- rihinde <http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/27/us-attn-andrea- education-dropouts-idUSBRE82Q0Y120120327> adresinden erişildi.
  • Duan, X, and Shan, G. (2013). Suggestions for graduate curriculum reform. In Proceedings of AASRI Winter International Conference on Engineering and Technology (AASRI-WIET 2013), December 28-29, 2013, Saipan, USA, 202–203.
  • Erkiletlioğlu, H. (2013). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de AR-GE faaliyetleri. İstanbul: İş Bankası Yayınları.
  • Güven, İ. ve Tunç, B. (2007). Lisansüstü öğrencilerin akademik sorunları (Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Örneği). Millî Eğitim, 173, 157–172.
  • Guardian Higher Education Network (2013). The postgraduate funding prob- lem and three possible solutions. 17 Eylül 2014 tarihinde <http://www.the- guardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2013/jul/04/postgradu- ate-funding-three-possible-solutions> adresinden erişildi.
  • Humphrey, R., and McCarthey, P. (1999). Recognising difference: providing for graduate students. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 371–386.
  • Johnson, J. M. (2009). Avrupa, Asya ve Amerika’da lisansüstü öğretim reformu ve bilim insanları ile mühendislerin uluslararası hareketliliği. NSF (National Science Foundation) Çalıştayı Bildirileri (K. Karakütük, Çev. Ed). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Karakütük, K. (2002). Öğretim üyesi ve bilim insanı yetiştirme: Lisansüstü öğretimin planlanması. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Karakütük, K. (Ed.) (2009). Lisansüstü öğretim sistemleri (İkinci bası). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Kayıkçı, K. ve Ercan, B (2013). The evaluation of educational administration and supervision graduate programs in Turkey: A case study. e- International Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 74–94.
  • Lessing, N., and Lessing, A. C. (2004). The supervision of research for dis- sertations and theses. Acta Commercii, 4(1), 73–87.
  • McAlpine, L., and Norton, J. (2006). Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: an interactive framework for action and research. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(1), 3–17.
  • OECD (2014). OECD istatistikleri. 25 Kasım 2014 tarihinde <http://stats. oecd.org/Index.aspx?DatasetCode=PATS_IPC> adresinden erişildi.
  • TÜİK (2012). Araştırma-Geliştirme Faaliyetleri Araştırması. 25 Kasım 2014 tarihinde <http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1082> adresinden erişildi.

The problems of graduate education

Year 2014, Volume: 4 Issue: 3, 117 - 123, 01.12.2014

Abstract

Graduate education -especially the doctorate- helps to perform researches and generate information, to support the scientific and technological progress and bring up highly qualified manpower considered the locomotive of development (scientists, university professors, researchers). In all developed and developing countries, despite the importance given to the graduate education, there are problems in this field. In this article the main problems of graduate education in different countries and in Turkey are discussed based on literature and observations. In this context problems related to researches performed in the field of graduate education in Turkey, resources allocated from the national income, internationalization, graduate student's mobility and the quality of the doctorate education were mentioned.

References

  • Abiddin, N. Z., and Ismail, A. (2011). Attrition and completion issues in post- graduate studies for student development. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 15–99.
  • Carlozo, L. (2012). Why college students stop short of a degree? 17 Eylül 2014 ta- rihinde <http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/27/us-attn-andrea- education-dropouts-idUSBRE82Q0Y120120327> adresinden erişildi.
  • Duan, X, and Shan, G. (2013). Suggestions for graduate curriculum reform. In Proceedings of AASRI Winter International Conference on Engineering and Technology (AASRI-WIET 2013), December 28-29, 2013, Saipan, USA, 202–203.
  • Erkiletlioğlu, H. (2013). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de AR-GE faaliyetleri. İstanbul: İş Bankası Yayınları.
  • Güven, İ. ve Tunç, B. (2007). Lisansüstü öğrencilerin akademik sorunları (Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Örneği). Millî Eğitim, 173, 157–172.
  • Guardian Higher Education Network (2013). The postgraduate funding prob- lem and three possible solutions. 17 Eylül 2014 tarihinde <http://www.the- guardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2013/jul/04/postgradu- ate-funding-three-possible-solutions> adresinden erişildi.
  • Humphrey, R., and McCarthey, P. (1999). Recognising difference: providing for graduate students. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 371–386.
  • Johnson, J. M. (2009). Avrupa, Asya ve Amerika’da lisansüstü öğretim reformu ve bilim insanları ile mühendislerin uluslararası hareketliliği. NSF (National Science Foundation) Çalıştayı Bildirileri (K. Karakütük, Çev. Ed). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Karakütük, K. (2002). Öğretim üyesi ve bilim insanı yetiştirme: Lisansüstü öğretimin planlanması. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Karakütük, K. (Ed.) (2009). Lisansüstü öğretim sistemleri (İkinci bası). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Kayıkçı, K. ve Ercan, B (2013). The evaluation of educational administration and supervision graduate programs in Turkey: A case study. e- International Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 74–94.
  • Lessing, N., and Lessing, A. C. (2004). The supervision of research for dis- sertations and theses. Acta Commercii, 4(1), 73–87.
  • McAlpine, L., and Norton, J. (2006). Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: an interactive framework for action and research. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(1), 3–17.
  • OECD (2014). OECD istatistikleri. 25 Kasım 2014 tarihinde <http://stats. oecd.org/Index.aspx?DatasetCode=PATS_IPC> adresinden erişildi.
  • TÜİK (2012). Araştırma-Geliştirme Faaliyetleri Araştırması. 25 Kasım 2014 tarihinde <http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1082> adresinden erişildi.
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA95AH23ZC
Journal Section Original Empirical Research
Authors

Erkan İbiş This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 4 Issue: 3

Cite

APA İbiş, E. (2014). Lisansüstü Eğitimin Sorunları. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 4(3), 117-123.

TÜBA Higher Education Research / Review (TÜBA-HER) is indexed in ESCI, TR Dizin, EBSCO, and Google Scholar.

Publisher
34633
112 Vedat Dalokay Street, Çankaya , 06700 Ankara, Türkiye

3415434156  34153 34146 34148 34155 34157 3415834160

TÜBA-HER Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Higher Education Research/Review (TÜBA-HER) does not officially endorse the views expressed in the articles published in the journal, nor does it guarantee any product or service advertisements that may appear in the print or online versions. The scientific and legal responsibility for the published articles belongs solely to the authors.

Images, figures, tables, and other materials submitted with manuscripts must be original. If previously published, written permission from the copyright holder must be provided for reproduction in both print and online versions. Authors retain the copyright of their works; however, upon publication in the journal, the economic rights and rights of public communication— including adaptation, reproduction, representation, printing, publishing, and distribution rights—are transferred to the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA), the publisher of the journal. Copyright of all published content (text and visual materials) belongs to the journal in terms of usage and distribution. No payment is made to the authors under the name of copyright or any other title, and no article processing charges are requested. However, the cost of reprints, if requested, is the responsibility of the authors.

In order to promote global open access to scientific knowledge and research, TÜBA allows all content published online (unless otherwise stated) to be freely used by readers, researchers, and institutions. Such use (including linking, downloading, distribution, printing, copying, or reproduction in any medium) is permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, provided that the original work is properly cited, not modified, and not used for commercial purposes. For permission regarding commercial use, please contact the publisher.