BibTex RIS Cite

Daha İyi Tıp Eğitimi İçin Tartışılan Güncel Görüşler

Year 2013, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 165 - 168, 01.12.2013

Abstract

Tıp fakültelerinde mezuniyet öncesi eğitimin daha iyi yapılabilmesi için ulusal ve uluslararası kurumlarda çeşitli çalışmalar yapılmaktadır. Tıp eğitiminin sistematik, probleme dayalı, temel ve klinik bilimler arasında dikey ve yatay entegrasyon sağlanmış, insan bilimleri ile entegre, topluma dayalı, seçmelilerle zenginleştirilmiş, öğrenci merkezlilik ilkeleri temelinde yapılması vurgulanmaktadır.

References

  • Abaoğlu, C., Aleksanyan, V. (1981). Teşhisten tedaviye. 8. baskı. İstabul: Filiz Kitabevi.
  • Abaoğlu, C., Aleksanyan, V. (2000). Semptomdan teşhise. 10. baskı. İstabul: Filiz Kitabevi.
  • Ann, W. F., and Hemmer, P. A. (2012). Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE Guide No. 67. Medical Teacher, 34(5), e288- 299.
  • Bilham, T. (2009) e-Learning in medical education: Guide Supplement 32.5 – Viewpoint. Medical Teacher, 31(5), 449-451.
  • Blake, J. M., Norman, G. R., and Smith, E. K. M. (1995). Report card from McMaster: student evaluation at a problem based medical school. The Lancet, 345, 899-901.
  • Cater, J. I., Forsyth, J. S., Frost, G. J. (1991). The use of the objective structured clinical examination as an audit of teaching and student performance. Medical Teacher, 13(3), 253-257.
  • Dennick, R.,Wilkinson, S., and Purcell, N. (2009) Online eAssessment: AMEE Guide, No. 39. Medical Teacher, 31(3), 129-206.
  • Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., and Snellen-Balerdong, H. A. M. (1994). Improving the effectiveness of tutors in problem- based learning. Medical Teacher, 16(4), 369-378.
  • Garcio-Barbero, M., Salas, J. C., and Ortega, J. C. (1994). Educational programmes for health professionals: WHO learning to work for health series. No (1). Copenhagen: WHO.
  • General Medical Council. (1991). Undergaduate medical education. The need for change. London: GMC.
  • General Medical Council. (1993). Recommen dations on under graduate medical education. London: GMC.
  • Godfrey, R.C. (1995). Undergraduate examinations – a continuing tyran- ny. The Lancet, 345, 765-767.
  • Grieve, C. (1992). Knowledge increment assessed for three methodolo- gies of teaching physiology. Medical Teacher, 14(1), 27-32.
  • Harden, R. M., and Davis, M. H. (1995). AMEE Medical Education Guide No (5). The core curriculum with options or special study modules. Medical Teacher, 17(2), 125-148.
  • Harden, R. M, Laidlaw, J. M., Ker, J. S., and Mitchell, H. E. (1996). AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 7.: Task-based learning: An educational strategy for undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing medical education, Part 2. Medical Teacher, 18(2), 91-98.
  • İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Özdeğerlendirme Raporu (2012). İstanbul: İ.Ü. İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi.
  • Nordquist J. (2013) The case method in education.BMJ Lerning. 14 Nisan 2013 tarihinde <http://www.docstoc.com/docs/115008547/ CaseBasedLearningppt---BMJ-Group> adresinden erişildi.
  • Mitchell, G. (1998). Problem-based learning in medical schools: a new aproach. Medical Teacher, 10(1), 57-68.
  • Parmelee, D., Michaelsen, L. K., Cook, S., and Hudes, D. P. (2012). Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 65. Medical Teacher, 34(5), e275-287.
  • Posluns, E., Shafir, M S., Keystone, J. S., Ennis, J., and Claessons, E. A. (1990). Rewarding medical teaching excellence in a major Canadian teaching hospital. Medical Teacher, 12(1), 13-22.
  • Robinson, Z., Hazelgrove-Planel, E., Edwards, Z., and Siassakos, D. (2010). Peer-assisted learning: a planning and implementation frame- work. Guide supplement 30.7 – practical application. Medical Teacher, 32(9), e366-368.
  • Rolfe, I., and McPherson, J. (1995). Formative assessment: how am I doing? The Lancet, 345, 837-839.
  • Schormair, C., Swietlik, U., Hofmann, U., and Wilm, S. (1992). Ten statements on the motivation of medical teacher stoteach. Medical Teacher, 14(4), 283-286.
  • Shumak, K. H. (1992). Medical curriculum changes in Ontario. The Lancet, 340, 1152.
  • Vleuten, C. P. M., and Newble, D. I. (1995). How can we test clinical reasoning? The Lancet, 345, 1032-1034.

Current concepts on better medical education

Year 2013, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 165 - 168, 01.12.2013

Abstract

There are several national and international reports on how to improve the quality and scope of medical education in medical schools. It is emphasized that the medical education should be systematical, problem-based, horizontally and vertically integrated between basic and clinical sciences, integrated with human sciences, community-based, enriched with electives and student-centered.

References

  • Abaoğlu, C., Aleksanyan, V. (1981). Teşhisten tedaviye. 8. baskı. İstabul: Filiz Kitabevi.
  • Abaoğlu, C., Aleksanyan, V. (2000). Semptomdan teşhise. 10. baskı. İstabul: Filiz Kitabevi.
  • Ann, W. F., and Hemmer, P. A. (2012). Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE Guide No. 67. Medical Teacher, 34(5), e288- 299.
  • Bilham, T. (2009) e-Learning in medical education: Guide Supplement 32.5 – Viewpoint. Medical Teacher, 31(5), 449-451.
  • Blake, J. M., Norman, G. R., and Smith, E. K. M. (1995). Report card from McMaster: student evaluation at a problem based medical school. The Lancet, 345, 899-901.
  • Cater, J. I., Forsyth, J. S., Frost, G. J. (1991). The use of the objective structured clinical examination as an audit of teaching and student performance. Medical Teacher, 13(3), 253-257.
  • Dennick, R.,Wilkinson, S., and Purcell, N. (2009) Online eAssessment: AMEE Guide, No. 39. Medical Teacher, 31(3), 129-206.
  • Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., and Snellen-Balerdong, H. A. M. (1994). Improving the effectiveness of tutors in problem- based learning. Medical Teacher, 16(4), 369-378.
  • Garcio-Barbero, M., Salas, J. C., and Ortega, J. C. (1994). Educational programmes for health professionals: WHO learning to work for health series. No (1). Copenhagen: WHO.
  • General Medical Council. (1991). Undergaduate medical education. The need for change. London: GMC.
  • General Medical Council. (1993). Recommen dations on under graduate medical education. London: GMC.
  • Godfrey, R.C. (1995). Undergraduate examinations – a continuing tyran- ny. The Lancet, 345, 765-767.
  • Grieve, C. (1992). Knowledge increment assessed for three methodolo- gies of teaching physiology. Medical Teacher, 14(1), 27-32.
  • Harden, R. M., and Davis, M. H. (1995). AMEE Medical Education Guide No (5). The core curriculum with options or special study modules. Medical Teacher, 17(2), 125-148.
  • Harden, R. M, Laidlaw, J. M., Ker, J. S., and Mitchell, H. E. (1996). AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 7.: Task-based learning: An educational strategy for undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing medical education, Part 2. Medical Teacher, 18(2), 91-98.
  • İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Özdeğerlendirme Raporu (2012). İstanbul: İ.Ü. İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi.
  • Nordquist J. (2013) The case method in education.BMJ Lerning. 14 Nisan 2013 tarihinde <http://www.docstoc.com/docs/115008547/ CaseBasedLearningppt---BMJ-Group> adresinden erişildi.
  • Mitchell, G. (1998). Problem-based learning in medical schools: a new aproach. Medical Teacher, 10(1), 57-68.
  • Parmelee, D., Michaelsen, L. K., Cook, S., and Hudes, D. P. (2012). Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 65. Medical Teacher, 34(5), e275-287.
  • Posluns, E., Shafir, M S., Keystone, J. S., Ennis, J., and Claessons, E. A. (1990). Rewarding medical teaching excellence in a major Canadian teaching hospital. Medical Teacher, 12(1), 13-22.
  • Robinson, Z., Hazelgrove-Planel, E., Edwards, Z., and Siassakos, D. (2010). Peer-assisted learning: a planning and implementation frame- work. Guide supplement 30.7 – practical application. Medical Teacher, 32(9), e366-368.
  • Rolfe, I., and McPherson, J. (1995). Formative assessment: how am I doing? The Lancet, 345, 837-839.
  • Schormair, C., Swietlik, U., Hofmann, U., and Wilm, S. (1992). Ten statements on the motivation of medical teacher stoteach. Medical Teacher, 14(4), 283-286.
  • Shumak, K. H. (1992). Medical curriculum changes in Ontario. The Lancet, 340, 1152.
  • Vleuten, C. P. M., and Newble, D. I. (1995). How can we test clinical reasoning? The Lancet, 345, 1032-1034.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA79AK84YM
Journal Section Original Empirical Research
Authors

Zeynep Solakoğlu This is me

Feyza Darendeliler This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 3 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Solakoğlu, Z., & Darendeliler, F. (2013). Daha İyi Tıp Eğitimi İçin Tartışılan Güncel Görüşler. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 3(3), 165-168.

TÜBA Higher Education Research / Review (TÜBA-HER) is indexed in ESCI, TR Dizin, EBSCO, and Google Scholar.

Publisher
34633
112 Vedat Dalokay Street, Çankaya , 06700 Ankara, Türkiye

3415434156  34153 34146 34148 34155 34157 3415834160

TÜBA-HER Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Higher Education Research/Review (TÜBA-HER) does not officially endorse the views expressed in the articles published in the journal, nor does it guarantee any product or service advertisements that may appear in the print or online versions. The scientific and legal responsibility for the published articles belongs solely to the authors.

Images, figures, tables, and other materials submitted with manuscripts must be original. If previously published, written permission from the copyright holder must be provided for reproduction in both print and online versions. Authors retain the copyright of their works; however, upon publication in the journal, the economic rights and rights of public communication— including adaptation, reproduction, representation, printing, publishing, and distribution rights—are transferred to the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA), the publisher of the journal. Copyright of all published content (text and visual materials) belongs to the journal in terms of usage and distribution. No payment is made to the authors under the name of copyright or any other title, and no article processing charges are requested. However, the cost of reprints, if requested, is the responsibility of the authors.

In order to promote global open access to scientific knowledge and research, TÜBA allows all content published online (unless otherwise stated) to be freely used by readers, researchers, and institutions. Such use (including linking, downloading, distribution, printing, copying, or reproduction in any medium) is permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, provided that the original work is properly cited, not modified, and not used for commercial purposes. For permission regarding commercial use, please contact the publisher.