BibTex RIS Cite

Yükseköğretimde değişim mühendisliği

Year 2013, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 48 - 52, 01.04.2013

Abstract

İş dünyasında değişim mühendisliği devrimi hakkında Hammer ve Champynin orijinal kitabı (1993) ile birlikte birçok makale ve kitap yazılmıştır. Bu yazı bir yükseköğretim kurumunda değişim mühendisliği uygulaması için gereken değişiklikleri açıklamak için Hammer ve Champynin kitabını esas almaktadır. İlk olarak, makale değişim mühendisliği uygulanan bir üniversitenin nasıl olması gerektiği açıklamaktadır. Daha sonra, olması gereken değişimler listelenmektedir. Yazı geleceğin üniversitesi için gereken şartların bir özeti ile sonuçlanmaktadır.

References

  • Adenzo-Diaz, B., and Cantelli, A. F. (2001). Business process reengineer- ing and university organisation: A normative approach from the Spanish case. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 23(1), 63-73.
  • Allen, D. K., and Fifield, N. (1999). Re-engineering change in higher edu- cation. Information Research, 4(3).
  • Alho, J. M., and Salo M. A. (2000). Merit-rating and formula-based resource allocation. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(3), 95-100.
  • Barnett, R. (2011). The idea of the university in the Twenty-First Century. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 1(2), 88-94.
  • Calantone, R. J., Yeniyurt, S., Townsend, J. D., and Schmidt, J. B. (2010). Life-cycle markets: The case of motion pictures. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(3), 349-361.
  • Davies, B. (1996). Re-engineering school leadership. International Journal of Educational Management, 10(2), 11-16.
  • Hammer, M., and Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A man- ifesto for business revolution. New Rork, NY: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
  • Li, Heng, (1998). Information-technology-based tools for reengineering construction engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 6(1), 15-21.
  • Liang, C. C., Cheng, F., and Wang, E. H. H. (1998). Reengineering uni- versity information services: Yuan Ze University’s experience. CAUSE/ EFFECT, 21(4), 1-12.
  • Miller, R. I., and Miller, P. M. (1998). Promises and perils of three organ- isational innovations. Higher Education Review, 30(2), 23-28.
  • Newman, F., Couturier, L., and Scurry, J. (2004). The future of higher edu- cation: Rhetoric, reality, and the risks of the market. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Penrod, J. I., and Dolence, M. G. (1991). Concepts for reengineering high- er education. CAUSE/EFFECT, 14(2), 10-17.
  • Seidman, R. H. (1998). Re-engineering four years of college into three: The makings of a competency-based three year bachelor’s degree. American Educational Research Association, Annual Meeting 1998, San Diego, CA.
  • Weller, D. L. (1998) Unlocking the culture for quality schools: Reengineering. International Journal of Educational Management, 12(6), 250-259.
  • Wiendahl, H. P., and Heger, C. L. (2011). Justifying changeability. A methodical approach to achieving cost effectiveness. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Production, 6(1-2), 33-40.

Reengineering Higher Education

Year 2013, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 48 - 52, 01.04.2013

Abstract

Several articles and books have been written about the reengineering revolution in the business world, including the seminal book by Hammer and Champy (1993). This article uses their book as a basis to explain the changes necessary to reengineer a higher education institution. First, the article explains what a reengineered university will look like. Then, it lists the required changes. The article concludes with a summary of necessary conditions of a futuristic university.

References

  • Adenzo-Diaz, B., and Cantelli, A. F. (2001). Business process reengineer- ing and university organisation: A normative approach from the Spanish case. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 23(1), 63-73.
  • Allen, D. K., and Fifield, N. (1999). Re-engineering change in higher edu- cation. Information Research, 4(3).
  • Alho, J. M., and Salo M. A. (2000). Merit-rating and formula-based resource allocation. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(3), 95-100.
  • Barnett, R. (2011). The idea of the university in the Twenty-First Century. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 1(2), 88-94.
  • Calantone, R. J., Yeniyurt, S., Townsend, J. D., and Schmidt, J. B. (2010). Life-cycle markets: The case of motion pictures. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(3), 349-361.
  • Davies, B. (1996). Re-engineering school leadership. International Journal of Educational Management, 10(2), 11-16.
  • Hammer, M., and Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A man- ifesto for business revolution. New Rork, NY: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
  • Li, Heng, (1998). Information-technology-based tools for reengineering construction engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 6(1), 15-21.
  • Liang, C. C., Cheng, F., and Wang, E. H. H. (1998). Reengineering uni- versity information services: Yuan Ze University’s experience. CAUSE/ EFFECT, 21(4), 1-12.
  • Miller, R. I., and Miller, P. M. (1998). Promises and perils of three organ- isational innovations. Higher Education Review, 30(2), 23-28.
  • Newman, F., Couturier, L., and Scurry, J. (2004). The future of higher edu- cation: Rhetoric, reality, and the risks of the market. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Penrod, J. I., and Dolence, M. G. (1991). Concepts for reengineering high- er education. CAUSE/EFFECT, 14(2), 10-17.
  • Seidman, R. H. (1998). Re-engineering four years of college into three: The makings of a competency-based three year bachelor’s degree. American Educational Research Association, Annual Meeting 1998, San Diego, CA.
  • Weller, D. L. (1998) Unlocking the culture for quality schools: Reengineering. International Journal of Educational Management, 12(6), 250-259.
  • Wiendahl, H. P., and Heger, C. L. (2011). Justifying changeability. A methodical approach to achieving cost effectiveness. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Production, 6(1-2), 33-40.
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA24RD65SZ
Journal Section Literature Review
Authors

Enar A. Tunç This is me

Publication Date April 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 3 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Tunç, E. A. (2013). Yükseköğretimde değişim mühendisliği. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 3(1), 48-52.

Yükseköğretim Dergisi/TÜBA Higher Education Research/Review (TÜBA-HER) does not officially agree with the ideas of manuscripts published in the journal and does not guarantee for any product or service advertisements on both printed and online versions of the journal. Scientific and legal responsibilities of published manuscripts belong to their authors. Materials such as pictures, figures, tables etc. sent with manuscripts should be original or written approval of copyright holder should be sent with manuscript for publishing in both printed and online versions if they were published before. Authors agree that they transfer all publishing rights to the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA), the publisher of the journal. Copyrights of all published contents (text and visual materials) belong to the journal. No payment is done for manuscripts under the name of copyright or others approved for publishing in the journal and no publication cost is charged; however, reprints are at authors' cost.

To promote the development of global open access to scientific information and research, TÜBA provides copyrights of all online published papers (except where otherwise noted) for free use of readers, scientists, and institutions (such as link to the content or permission for its download, distribution, printing, copying, and reproduction in any medium, without any changing and except the commercial purpose), under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND3.0) License, provided the original work is cited. To get permission for commercial purpose please contact the publisher.