Year 2012,
Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 104 - 108, 01.08.2012
Abstract
Son yıllarda yüksek öğretimde eğitim, eğitici merkezli olmaktan öğrenci merkezli olmaya doğru yön değiştirmektedir. Bu değişime bilgisayar ve iletişim teknolojilerindeki ilerlemeler ve çevrimiçi olarak ulaşılan bilginin fazlalığı hız kazandırmaktadır. Ancak internet üzerinden ulaşılan bilginin fazlalığı ve çoğu zaman kaynakların belirgin olmaması güvenilir kanıta ulaşmakta zorluklar yaratabilmektedir. Kanıta dayalı karar vermede ve problem temelli eğitimde bilgi kaynağı olarak veri tabanlarının nitelikli kullanımı vazgeçilmezdir. Yükseköğretimde müfredata en iyi bilimsel kanıta nereden ve nasıl ulaşılacağına dair eğitimlerin de eklenmesi gerekmektedir. Bu makalede önemli tıbbi veri tabanları ve bu veri tabanlarının özellikleri incelenmektedir.
References
- Akobeng, A. K. (2005). Principles of evidence based medicine. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 90(8), 837-840.
- Apfel, C. C., Cakmakkaya, O. S., Kolodzie, K., and Pace, N. L. (2010). Anaesthetic techniques for risk of malignant tumour recurrence. The Cochrane Library. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD008877
- Bundy, A. (2010). Arguments about propositions. In: Budy, A (Ed). The computer modelling of mathematical reasoning (Digital edition, pp 13- 52). Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh, Informatics Forum.
- Chalmers, I. (1993). The Cochrane collaboration: preparing, maintain- ing, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 156-165.
- Crowley, P. (2006). Prophylactic corticosteroids for preterm birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. Art. No: CD000065. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
- De Groote, S. L., Raszewski, R. (2012). Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: A case study of the h-index in nursing. Nursing Outlook. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2012.04.007
- Kulkarni, A. V., Aziz, B., Shams, I., and Busse, J. W. (2009). Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(10), 1092-1096.
- Liggins, G., Howie, R. N. (1972). A controlled trial of antepartum glu- cocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syn- drome in premature infants. Pediatrics, 50(4), 515-525.
- Peh, W., and Ng, K. (2010). Effective medical writing. Singapore Medical Journal, 51(1), 10-14.
- Phillips, B., Ball, C., Sackett, D., Badenoch, D., Straus, S., Haynes, B., et al. (2001). Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. 08 Temmuz 2012 tarihinde <http://www.cebm.net> adresinden erişildi.
- Rosenberg, W. M., Deeks, J., Lusher, A., Snowball, R., Dooley, G., and Sackett, D. (1998). Improving searching skills and evidence retrieval. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 32(6), 557.
- Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W., Gray, J., Haynes, R. B., and Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312(7023), 71-72.
- Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Glasziou, P., and Haynes, R. B. (2011). Acquiring the evidence: How to find current best evidence and have current best evidence find us. In: S. E. Straus, W. S. Richardson, P. Glasziou, and Haynes, R. B. (Eds.) Evidence-based medicine: How to prac- tice and teach EBM. (4th ed., pp 29-63). Edinburgh: Elsevier Science.
- Tugwell, P. (2012). Cochrane İşbirliği ve Kütüphanesi, H. Yazıcı (Ed.) Ro- matolojide klinik araştırmalar ve nesnel tıp V (s. 29-36). İstanbul: Deomed.
Year 2012,
Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 104 - 108, 01.08.2012
Abstract
Over the last decade higher education has shifted from the teacher centered delivery of information towards a student centered problem based learning approach. This shift was made possible by the increasing availability of scientific information from online resources. However, the amount and often ambiguous information provided by the internet poses a challenge to find the best available evidence. Consequently, a new area of learning has to be added to the curricula of higher education: Where and how to search for the best evidence available. This article reviews the most important medical databases and their features. The skilled utilization of these databases as a source of information is indispensable for problem based learning and evidence based decision making in medical education today.
References
- Akobeng, A. K. (2005). Principles of evidence based medicine. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 90(8), 837-840.
- Apfel, C. C., Cakmakkaya, O. S., Kolodzie, K., and Pace, N. L. (2010). Anaesthetic techniques for risk of malignant tumour recurrence. The Cochrane Library. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD008877
- Bundy, A. (2010). Arguments about propositions. In: Budy, A (Ed). The computer modelling of mathematical reasoning (Digital edition, pp 13- 52). Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh, Informatics Forum.
- Chalmers, I. (1993). The Cochrane collaboration: preparing, maintain- ing, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 156-165.
- Crowley, P. (2006). Prophylactic corticosteroids for preterm birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. Art. No: CD000065. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
- De Groote, S. L., Raszewski, R. (2012). Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: A case study of the h-index in nursing. Nursing Outlook. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2012.04.007
- Kulkarni, A. V., Aziz, B., Shams, I., and Busse, J. W. (2009). Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(10), 1092-1096.
- Liggins, G., Howie, R. N. (1972). A controlled trial of antepartum glu- cocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syn- drome in premature infants. Pediatrics, 50(4), 515-525.
- Peh, W., and Ng, K. (2010). Effective medical writing. Singapore Medical Journal, 51(1), 10-14.
- Phillips, B., Ball, C., Sackett, D., Badenoch, D., Straus, S., Haynes, B., et al. (2001). Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. 08 Temmuz 2012 tarihinde <http://www.cebm.net> adresinden erişildi.
- Rosenberg, W. M., Deeks, J., Lusher, A., Snowball, R., Dooley, G., and Sackett, D. (1998). Improving searching skills and evidence retrieval. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 32(6), 557.
- Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W., Gray, J., Haynes, R. B., and Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312(7023), 71-72.
- Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Glasziou, P., and Haynes, R. B. (2011). Acquiring the evidence: How to find current best evidence and have current best evidence find us. In: S. E. Straus, W. S. Richardson, P. Glasziou, and Haynes, R. B. (Eds.) Evidence-based medicine: How to prac- tice and teach EBM. (4th ed., pp 29-63). Edinburgh: Elsevier Science.
- Tugwell, P. (2012). Cochrane İşbirliği ve Kütüphanesi, H. Yazıcı (Ed.) Ro- matolojide klinik araştırmalar ve nesnel tıp V (s. 29-36). İstanbul: Deomed.
There are 14 citations in total.
Details
| Other ID | JA77KC47ZS |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Original Empirical Research |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | August 1, 2012 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2012 Volume: 2 Issue: 2 |
TÜBA Higher Education Research / Review (TÜBA-HER) is indexed in ESCI, TR Dizin, EBSCO, and Google Scholar.
Publisher
112 Vedat Dalokay Street, Çankaya , 06700 Ankara, Türkiye
TÜBA-HER Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Higher Education Research/Review (TÜBA-HER) does not officially endorse the views expressed in the articles published in the journal, nor does it guarantee any product or service advertisements that may appear in the print or online versions. The scientific and legal responsibility for the published articles belongs solely to the authors.
Images, figures, tables, and other materials submitted with manuscripts must be original. If previously published, written permission from the copyright holder must be provided for reproduction in both print and online versions. Authors retain the copyright of their works; however, upon publication in the journal, the economic rights and rights of public communication— including adaptation, reproduction, representation, printing, publishing, and distribution rights—are transferred to the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA), the publisher of the journal. Copyright of all published content (text and visual materials) belongs to the journal in terms of usage and distribution. No payment is made to the authors under the name of copyright or any other title, and no article processing charges are requested. However, the cost of reprints, if requested, is the responsibility of the authors.
In order to promote global open access to scientific knowledge and research, TÜBA allows all content published online (unless otherwise stated) to be freely used by readers, researchers, and institutions. Such use (including linking, downloading, distribution, printing, copying, or reproduction in any medium) is permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, provided that the original work is properly cited, not modified, and not used for commercial purposes. For permission regarding commercial use, please contact the publisher.