Effects of Content-Associated Applied Measurement and Evaluation Course

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 96 - 111, 20.04.2020

Gülden Gürsoy Mustafa Aydoğdu

https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.19.004

Cited By: 1

Öz

The objective of the present study is to examine the effects of content-associated applied measurement and evaluation course on pre-service teachers' assessment literacy, their attitudes towards the measurement and evaluation course, and their field-specific content knowledge. Furthermore, the study aims to reveal the pre-service teachers' views on content-associated applied measurement practices. The mixed method research approach, which combines qualitative and quantitative research methods, was used in the study. The quantitative data collection was conducted with 90 science teacher candidates. The qualitative data collection was conducted with six teacher candidates from the experimental group. The Classroom Assessment Literacy Inventory (CALI), Measurement and Evaluation Course Attitude Scale (MECAS), Academic Achievement Test (AAT), and Focus Group Interview Form were used as the data collection tools in the study. It was found that the content-associated applied measurement and evaluation course improves the measurement and evaluation literacy of the candidate teachers, fosters their positive attitudes towards the course of measurement and evaluation, and increases their content knowledge. Furthermore, the focus group interviews with the pre-service teachers both helped explain the reasons behind the quantitative results, and provided detailed information about the degree of effectiveness of the method applied in the teaching process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Assessment literacy, attitude towards the course of measurement and evaluation, content knowledge, teacher education

Alanla İlişkilendirilmiş Uygulamalı Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dersinin Etkileri

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, alan ile ilişkilendirilmiş uygulamalı Ölçme ve Değerlendirme dersinin öğretmen adaylarının ölçme ve değerlendirme okuryazarlıklarına, ölçme ve değerlendirme dersine yönelik tutumlarına ve alan bilgilerine etkisini incelemektir. Araştırma ayrıca, deney grubu öğretmen adaylarının, alanla ilişkilendirilmiş ölçme ve değerlendirme uygulamalarına yönelik görüşlerini ortaya koymayı hedeflemektedir. Araştırmada karma yöntem olarak adlandırılan, nicel ve nitel araştırma yöntemlerinin birlikte kullanıldığı araştırma modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın nicel boyutu, 90 fen bilgisi öğretmen adayı ile nitel boyutu ise, deney grubunda yer alan 6 öğretmen adayı ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak; Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği, Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dersine Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği, Akademik Başarı Testi ve Odak Görüşme Formu kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda, alanla ilişkilendirilmiş ölçme ve değerlendirme uygulamalarının öğretmen adaylarının ölçme ve değerlendirme okuryazarlık düzeylerini geliştirdiği, ölçme ve değerlendirme dersine yönelik tutumlarını olumlu yönde etkilediği ve konu alan bilgi düzeylerini arttırdığı belirlenmiştir. Öğretmen adayları ile yapılan odak görüşme, hem nicel sonuçların nedenini açıklamış hem de öğretim sürecinde uygulanan yöntemin hizmet etme derecesine ilişkin ayrıntılar vermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Konu alan bilgisi, öğretmen yetiştirme, ölçme ve değerlendirme dersine yönelik tutum, ölçme ve değerlendirme okuryazarlığı

Kaynakça

• Ainsworth, L., & Viegut, D. (2006). Common formative assessments: How to connect standards-based instruction and assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
• Aktaş, M., & Alıcı, D. (2012). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme dersine yönelik Tutum Ölçeği’nin (EÖD-TÖ) geliştirilmesi. Qafqaz Üniversitesi Dergisi, 33, 63–73.
• Alkharusi, H., Kazem, A. M., & Al-Musawai, A. (2011). Knowledge, skills and attitudes of preservice and inservice teachers in educational measurement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 113–123.
• American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association (1990). The standards for teacher competence in the educational assessment of students. Accessed through <http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED323186.pdf> on January 13, 2014.
• Andrade, H. L., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 27(2), 3–13.
• Beziat, T. L. R., & Coleman, B. K. (2015). Classroom assessment literacy: Evaluating pre-service teachers. The Researcher, 27(1), 25–30.
• Birgin, O. (2007). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının ölçme-değerlendirme konusundaki okuryazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. XVI. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, 5–7 Eylül 2007, Tokat.
• Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
• Bonner, S. M., & Chen, P. P. (2009). Teacher candidates’ perceptions about grading and constructivist teaching. Educational Assessment, 14(2), 57–77.
• Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3–12.
• Brown, G. T. L. (2008). Conceptions of assessment: Understanding what assessment means to teachers and students. NewYork, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
• Buldur, S. (2009). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının alternatif ölçme ve değerlendirme yaklaşımlarına yönelik okuryazarlık ve öz yeterlik düzeylerinin geliştirilmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sivas.
• Bütüner, S. Ö., Yiğit, N. ve Çimer, S. O. (2010). Ölçme değerlendirme okuryazarlığı envanterinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 5(3), 792–809.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Canbazoğlu, S., Demirelli, H., & Kavak, N. (2010). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının maddenin tanecikli yapısı ünitesine ait konu alan bilgileri ile pedagojik alan bilgileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 9(1), 275–291.
• Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294–343.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Davidheiser, A. S. (2013). Identifying areas for high school teacher development: A study of assessment literacy in the Central Bucks School district. Doctoral thesis, Drexel University, School of Education, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
• Davies, A. (2008). Textbook trends in teaching language testing. Language Testing, 25(3) 327–347.
• DeLuca, C., & Klinger, D. (2010). Assessment literacy development: Identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Assessment in Education, 17(4), 419–438.
• Duncan, C. R., & Noonan, B. (2007). Factors affecting teachers’ grading and assessment. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 53(1), 1–21.
• Fırat, M., Kabakçı-Yurdakul, I., & Ersoy, A. (2014). Bir eğitim teknolojisi araştırmasına dayalı olarak karma yöntem araştırması deneyimi. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(1), 65–86.
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis).
• Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113–132.
• Gotch, C. M., & French, B. F. (2013). Elementary teachers’ knowledge and self-efficacy for measurement concepts. The Teacher Educator, 48(1), 46–57.
• Green, K. E., & Stager, S. F. (1986). Measuring attitudes of teachers toward testing. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and development, 19, 141–150.
• Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, LA: Jossey-Bass.
• Gül, E. (2011). İlköğretim öğretmen adaylarının ölçme-değerlendirme okuryazarlığı ve ölçme-değerlendirmeye ilişkin tutumlarının belirlenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
• Halim, L., & Meerah, S. M. (2002). Science trainee teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 215–225.
• Hashweh, M. Z. (1987). Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching & Teacher Education, 3(2), 109–120.
• Inbar Lourie, O., & Donitsa Schmidt, S. (2009). Exploring classroom assessment practices: The case of teachers of English as a foreign language. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(2), 185–204.
• Jadama, L. M. (2014). Impact of subject matter knowledge of a teacher in teaching and learning process. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, 7, 20–32.
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher 33(7), 14–26.
• Kalaycı, Ş. (Ed.). (2008). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayıncılık.
• Kan, A. (2008). Ölçme aracı geliştirme. In S. Tekindal (Ed.), Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme (pp. 247–287). Ankara: Pegem A Yayınları.
• Käpylä, M., Heikkinen, J. P., & Asunta, T. (2009). The influence of content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge: The case of teaching photosynthesis and plant growth. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1395–1415.
• Karaman, P. (2014). Öğretmen adaylarının ölçme-değerlendirme okuryazarlıklarının belirlenmesi ve mikro-öğretim yoluyla geliştirilmesi. Doktora tezi, On Sekiz Mart Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Çanakkale.
• Karaman, P., & Şahin, Ç. (2014). Öğretmen adaylarının ölçme değerlendirme okuryazarlıklarının belirlenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2), 175–189.
• King, J. D. (2010). Criterion-referenced assessment literacy of educators. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
• Lederman, N. G., & Gess-Newsome, J. (1992). Do subject matter knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge constitute the ideal gas law of science teaching? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3(1), 16–20.
• McMillan, J. H. (2001). Secondary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(1), 20–32.
• McMillan, J. H. (2014). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
• Mertler, C. A. (1999). Assessing student performance: A descriptive study of the classroom assessment practices of Ohio teachers. Education, 120, 285–296.
• Mertler, C. A. (2003). Pre-service versus in-service teachers’ assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference? Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, October 15–18, 2003, Columbus, OH, USA.
• Mertler, C. A. (2009). Teachers’ assessment knowledge and their perceptions of the impact of classroom assessment professional development. Improving Schools, 12(2), 101–113.
• Mertler, C. A., & Campbell, C. (2005). Measuring teachers’ knowledge and application of classroom assessment concepts: Development of the assessment literacy inventory. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 11–15, 2005, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
• Ogan-Bekiroglu, F., & Suzuk, E. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ assessment literacy and its implementation into practice. The Curriculum Journal, 25(3), 344–371.
• Özdamar, K. (1999). Paket program ile istatistiksel veri analizi. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitapevi.
• Özsevgeç, T., Çepni, S. ve Demircioğlu, G. (2004). Fen bilgisi öğretmenlerin ölçme-değerlendirme okur-yazarlık düzeyleri. VI. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresinde sunulmuş bildiri, 16–18 Eylül 2004, İstanbul.
• Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
• Popham, W. J. (2011). Assessment literacy overlooked: A teacher educator’s confession. The Teacher Educator, 46(4), 265–273.
• Quilter, S. M., & Gallini, J. K. (2000). Teachers’ assessment literacy and attitudes. The Teacher Educator, 36(2), 115–131.
• Richardson, V. (1995). The consideration of belief in staff development. In V. Richardson (Ed.), A theory of teacher change and the practice of staff development: A case in reading instruction (pp. 102–119). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
• Russell, M. K., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
• Shepard, L., Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Rust, F., Snowden, J. B., Gordon, E., ... Pacheco, A. (2005). Assessment. In L. Darling-Hammond, & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 275–326). New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
• Stacey, K., Helme, S., Steinle, V., Baturo, A., Irwin, K., & Bana, J. (2001). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of difficulties in decimal numeration. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(3), 205–225.
• Stiggins R. J. (1991). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534-539.
• Stiggins, R. J. (2008). Assessment manifesto: A call fort he development of balanced assessment systems. Portland, OR: ETS Assessment Training Institute.
• Stiggins, R. J. (2010). Essential formative assessment competencies for teachers and school leaders. In H. L. Andrade, & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 233–250). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Şahin, Ç., & Karaman, P. (2013). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının ölçme ve değerlendirmeye ilişkin inançları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2), 394–407.
• Tao, N. (2014). Development and validation of Classroom Assessment Literacy Scales: English as a foreign language (EFL) instructors in a Cambodian higher education setting.. Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University, College of Education, Melbourne, Australia.
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Tsagari, D. (2008). Assessment literacy of EFL teachers in Greece: Current trends and future prospects. 5th Annual EALTA Conference, May 8–11, 2008 Athens, Greece.
• Türnüklü, E. B. (2005). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının pedagojik alan bilgileri ile matematiksel alan bilgileri arasındaki ilişki. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 21, 234–247.
• Uluman, M. (2009). Sınıf içi durum belirleme tekniklerine dayalı öğretimin öğrencilerin ölçme ve değerlendirme dersine ilişkin yeterlikleri üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bolu.
• Volante, L., & Fazio, X. (2007). Exploring teacher candidates’ assessment literacy: Implications for teacher education reform and professional development. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(3), 749–770.
• Walters, F. S. (2010). Cultivating assessment literacy: Standards evaluation through language-test specification reverse engineering. Language Assessment Quarterly, 7(4), 317–342.
• Wayman, J. C., Midgley, S., & Stringfield, S. (2006). Leadership for data-based decision-making: Collaborative data teams. In A. B. Danzig, K. M. Borman, B. A. Jones, & W F. Wright (Eds.), New models of professional development for learner centered leadership (pp. 189–206). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education, 11, 49–65.
• Wise, S. L., Lukin, L., & Roos, L. L. (1991). Teacher beliefs about training in testing and measurement. Journal of Teacher Education, 42, 37–42.
• Xu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2009). Teacher assessment knowledge and practice: A narrative inquiry of Chinese college EFL teacher’s experience. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 493–513.
• Yamtim, V., & Wongwanich, S. (2014) Study of classroom assessment literacy of primary school teachers. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2998–3004.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Zhang, Z., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1997). Assessment practices inventory: A multivariate analysis of teachers perceived assessment competency. Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, March 25–27, 1997, Chicago, IL, USA.