Türkiye'de Güçlenen Mesleki Eğitim Kapasitesinin Covid-19 ile Mücadeleye Katkısı

Year 2020, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 134 - 140, 01.08.2020

Mahmut Özer

https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.20.726951

Cited By: 28

Abstract

Eğitim, Covid-19 pandemisinin neden olduğu olumsuzluklardan en fazla etkilenen alanlardan birisi olmuştur. Ülkeler eğitimin kesintiye uğramaması için uzaktan eğitim ile öğrencilere destek olmaya çalışmaktadır. Türkiye'de de benzer durum söz konusu olup Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı hem internet üzerinden eğitim platformunu kullanarak hem de televizyon yayınları ile uzaktan eğitim desteği sağlamaktadır. Diğer ülkelerle karşılaştırıldığında ve eğitim sistemindeki öğrenci sayısı dikkate alındığında Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı uzaktan kitlesel eğitim desteğini başarılı bir şekilde yürütmekte ve sürekli yenilikler ve iyileştirmelerle uzaktan eğitim kalitesini de artırmaktadır. Diğer taraftan, Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı son yıllarda mesleki eğitimi güçlendirmek için çok önemli adımlar atmış ve mesleki eğitim hem öğrenciler ve öğretmenler hem de sektörler açısından daha olumlu bir noktaya ulaşmıştır. Covid-19 salgını ile mücadele günlerinde mesleki eğitim, acil ihtiyaç duyulan tıbbi ve medikal ürünlerin üretilmesine ve dolayısıyla kolayca erişilmesine çok önemli katkı sağlamıştır. Bu çalışmada Türkiye'de mesleki eğitimin mevcut yapısı, dört temel sorun alanı, 2023 Eğitim Vizyonu'ndan sonra mesleki eğitimde yapılan iyileştirmeler ele alınmakta, Covid-19 ile mücadelede mesleki eğitimin katkılarına değinilmekte ve mesleki eğitimin daha fazla güçlendirilmesi için öneriler geliştirilmektedir.

Keywords

Covid-19, eğitim politikası, mesleki eğitim, okul ayrıştırması

The Contribution of the Strengthened Capacity of Vocational Education and Training System in Turkey to the Fight against Covid-19

Abstract

Education is one of the most heavily affected sectors by the negative consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic. Countries make an effort to support their students via distance education solutions and to avoid the interruption of education. The same predicament is experienced by Turkey, where the Ministry of National Education (MoNE) presents the distance education via both its online education platform and television broadcasts. Considering the number of students in Turkey and the situation in other countries, MoNE is observed to have been successfully delivering mass distance education support and increasing the quality of its distance education through continuous innovations and improvements. In addition, MoNE has taken some important steps to strengthen the vocational education and training (VET) system in Turkey, elevating VET to a much more favorable status for students, teachers and various sectors. In the days of struggle with the Covid-19 pandemic in Turkey, VET has made a great contribution to the manufacturing of some urgently needed medical products, ensuring their ready availability. In this study, the current structure and the four major problems of VET in Turkey are discussed, the improvements made in VET after the introduction of Turkey's 2023 Education Vision are reviewed, the contribution of VET to the fight against the Covid-19 pandemic is analyzed, and some suggestions are made on further strengthening the VET system in Turkey.

Keywords

Covid-19, education policy, school tracking, vocational education

References

• Acemoğlu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation and work. NBER Working Paper 24196. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Allmendinger, J. (1998). Educational systems and labour market outcomes. European Sociological Review, 5(3), 231–250.
• Benovat, A. (1983). The rise and decline of vocational education. Sociology of Education, 56(2), 63–76.
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage Publications.
• Brunello, G. (2004). Stratified or comprehensive? Some economic considerations on the design of secondary education. CESifo DICE Report 4, 7–10.
• Burgess, S., & Sievertsen, H. H. (2020). Schools, skills, and learning: The impact of COVID-19 on education. CEPR Policy Portal. Accessed through <https://voxeu.org/article/impact-covid-19-education> on April 23rd, 2020.
• Damon, A., & Tuysuz, G. (2020, April 17). With weekend lockdowns and age-specific restrictions, Turkey takes a different coronavirus approach. CNN. Accessed through <https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/17/europe/ turkeycoronavirus-lockdown-response-intl/index.html> on April 17th, 2020.
• ETF (2020). Coping with COVID-19: Mapping education and training responses to the health crisis in ETF partner countries. Torino: ETF Publishing.
• Foreign Policy (2020, March 20). How the world will look after the coronavirus pandemic. Foreign Policy. Accessed through <https://foreignpolicy. com/2020/03/20/world-order-after-coroanviruspandemic> on April 24th, 2020.
• Fuller, A. (2015). Vocational education. In: J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 25, pp. 232–238). Oxford: Elsevier.
• Gall, C. (2020, April 7). Turkey orders all citizens to wear masks as infections rise. The New York Times. Accessed through <https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/07/world/europe/turkey-virus-erdogan-masks.html> on April 7th, 2020.
• Gamoran, A., & Mare, R. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality. American Journal of Sociology, 94(5), 1146–1183.
• Grubb, W. N. (1985). The convergence of educational systems and the role of vocationalism. Comparative Education Review, 29(4), 526–548.
• Günay, D., & Ozer, M. (2014). Türkiye’de meslek yüksekokulları, mevcut durum, sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Ankara: Yükseköğretim Kurulu.
• Günay, D., & Ozer, M. (2016). Türkiye’de meslek yüksekokullarının 2000’li yıllardaki gelişimi ve mevcut zorluklar. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 6(1), 1–12.
• Gür, B. S., Özoğlu, M., Akgeyik, T., Çetinkaya, E., Karagöl E. T., Öztürk, M., ... Çelik, Z. (2012). Türkiye’nin insan kaynağının belirlenmesi. Ankara: SETA.
• Hanushek, E. A., Schwerdt, G., Woessman, L., & Zhang, L. (2017). General education, vocational education, and labor-market outcomes over the life-cycle. The Journal of Human Resources, 52(1), 48–87.
• Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal, 116(510), C63–C76.
• Marks, G. N. (2006). Are between- and within-school differences in student performance largely due to socioeconomic background? Evidence from 30 countries. Educational Research, 48(1), 21–40.
• Müller, W., & Shavit, Y. (1998). The institutional embeddedness of the stratification process. A comparative study of qualifications and occupations in thirteen countries. In Y. Shavit, & W. Müller (Eds.), From school to work: A comparative study of educational qualifications and occupational destinations (pp. 1–47). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• OECD (2018). Skills for jobs. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• OECD (2019). OECD skills strategy 2019-Turkey: Skills to shape a better future. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• OECD (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Ozer, M. (2018). The 2023 Education Vision and new goals in vocational and technical education. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 8(3), 425–435.
• Ozer, M. (2019a). Reconsidering the fundamental problems of vocational education and training in Turkey and proposed solutions for restructuring. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 39(2), 1–19.
• Ozer, M. (2019b). Background of problems in vocational education and training and its road map to solution in Turkey’s Education Vision 2023. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 9(1), 1–11.
• Ozer, M. (2020a). Educational policy actions by the Ministry of National Education in the times of COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(3), 1124–1129.
• Ozer, M. (2020b). Vocational education and training as “a friend in need” during Coronavirus pandemic in Turkey. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 9(2), 1–7.
• Ozer, M., Çavuşoğlu, A., & Gür, B. S. (2011). Restorasyon ve toparlanma dönemi: Mesleki ve teknik eğitimde 2000’li yıllar. In B. S. Gür (Ed.), 2000’li yıllar: Türkiye’de eğitim (pp. 163–192). İstanbul: Meydan.
• Ozer, M., & Perc, M. (2020). Dreams and realities of school tracking and vocational education. Palgrave Communications, 6, 34.
• Ozer, M., & Suna, H. E. (2019). Future of vocational and technical education in Turkey: Solid steps taken after Education Vision 2023. Journal of Education and Humanities, 10(20), 165–192.
• Ozer, M., & Suna, H. E. (2020). The linkage between vocational education and labor market in Turkey: Employability and skill mismatch. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(2), 558–569.
• Perc, M., Ozer, M., & Hojnik, J. (2019). Social and juristic challenges of artificial intelligence. Palgrave Communications, 5, 61.
• Raffe, D. (2008). The concept of transition system. Journal of Education and Work, 21(4), 277–296.
• Reichelt, M., Collischon, M., & Eberl, A. (2019). School tracking and its role in social reproduction: Reinforcing educational inheritance and the direct effects of social origin. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(4), 1–26.
• Reimers, F. M. (2020). What the Covid-19 Pandemic will change in education depends on the thoughtfulness of education responses today. Worlds of Education. Accessed through <https://www.worldsofeducation.org/en/ woe_homepage/woe_detail/16727/%E2%80%9Cwhat-the-covid-19-pandemic-will-change-in-education-depends-on-the-thoughtfulness- ofeducation-responses-today%E2%80%9D-by-fernando-m-reimers> on April 23rd, 2020.
• Roemer, J. E. (1998). Equality of opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Saavedra, J. (2020). Educational challenges and opportunities of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. World Bank Blogs. Accessed through <https://blogs.worldbank.org/education/educational-challenges-and- opportunitiescovid-19-pandemic> on April 23rd, 2020.
• Sahlberg, P. (2007). Secondary education in OECD countries: Common challenges, differing solutions. European Training Foundation. Accessed through <https://www.etf.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/ publications/secondary-education-oecd-countries-common-challenges> on April 20th, 2020.
• Shavit, Y. (1984). Tracking and the persistence of ethnic occupational inequalities in Israel. International Perspectives on Education and Society (Vol. 2). Greenwich. CT: JAI Press.
• Shavit, Y., & Müller, W. (2000). Vocational secondary education: Where diversion and where safety net? European Societies, 2(1), 29–50.
• Solga, H., Protsch, P., Ebner, C., & Brzinsky-Fay, C. (2014). The German vocational education and training system: Its institutional configuration, strength, and challenges. WZB Discussion Paper SP-I-2014-502. Berlin: WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
• Suna, H. E., Tanberkan, H., Gür, B. S., Perc, M., & Ozer, M. (2020). Socioeconomic status and school type as predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, doi:10.26650/JECS2020-0034
• Trow, M. (1961). The second transformation of American secondary education. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 2(2), 144–166.
• UNESCO (2020a). How are countries addressing the Covid-19 challenges in education? A snapshot of policy measures. Global Education Monitoring Reports. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
• UNESCO (2020b, March 27). Teacher Task Force calls to support 63 million teachers touched by the COVID-19 crisis. UNESCO. Accessed through <https://en.unesco.org/news/teacher-task-force-calls-support-63-million-teachers-touched-covid-19-crisis> on March 27th, 2020.
• WHO (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situaiton report – 96. World Health Organization. Accessed through <from https://www. who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200425-sitrep-96-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=a33836bb_2> on April 25th, 2020.
• Woessmann, L. (2009). International evidence on school tracking: A review. CESifo DICE Report 1, 26–34.
• Zimmer, R. (2003). A new twist in the educational tracking debate. Economics of Education Review, 22(3), 307–315