Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimde Okul Terki: Nitel Bir Çalışma

Year 2022, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 39 - 50, 30.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.21.587615

Abstract

Bu çalışmada yükseköğretimde lisans düzeyinde okulu terk eden bireylerin bakış açısından, okulu terk etme kararında etkili olan etkenler ve bu etkenler arası ilişkinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada nitel araştırma yaklaşımlarından olgubilim deseni kullanılmıştır. Çalışma grubu yükseköğretimde okul terki tecrübesine sahip 19 katılımcıdan oluşmuştur. Çalışmanın verileri, yüz yüze görüşme tekniği ile araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmelerle toplanmıştır. Toplanan veriler, başlıca örüntüleri belirleme, kodlama ve kategorilere ayırma işlemlerini kapsayan içerik analizi tekniği ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda mezun olunan ortaöğretim türü, yükseköğrenim görme nedenleri, mesleki olgunluk düzeyi, seçim yapmada özerk olamama, anne-babanın eğitim seviyesi ve lisans yerleştirme sınav puanı gibi konuların katılımcıların üniversite bölüm tercihini etkiyebildiği tespit edilmiştir. Okul terki kararında etkili olan yükseköğrenim süreçleri ise sosyal uyum, akademik süreçler, örgütsel süreçler ve maddi imkansızlıklardan oluştuğu belirtilebilir. Katılımcıların terk kararı vermesinde ise, akademik başarısızlık, mezuniyet sonucunda edinilecek mesleğin kişisel özelliklerine uygunluğunun değerlendirilmesi, evlilik ve mezuniyet sonrası iş olanaklarının etkili olabildiği görünmektedir.

References

  • Aina, C. (2013). Parental background and university dropout in Italy. Higher Education, 65, 437–456.
  • Allen, J., Robbins, S., Casillas, A., & Oh, I-S. (2008). Third-year college retention and transfer: Effects of academic performance, motivation, and social connectedness. Research in Higher Education, 49(7), 647–664.
  • Aypay, A., Çekiç, O., & Boyacı, A. (2012). Student retention in higher education in Turkey: A qualitative study. Journal of College Student Retention, 14(1), 91–116.
  • Bean, J. P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12, 155–187.
  • Berger, J. B. (2000). Optimizing capital, social reproduction, and undergraduate persistence: A sociological perspective. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 95–126). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
  • Bilgiç, N. (2000). Arkadaşlık becerisi eğitiminin ilköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencilerinin yalnızlık düzeylerine etkisi. Unpublished master’s thesis, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Braxton, J. M. (2012). The cross-national relevance of us formulated theories of college student departure. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 14(1), 149–156.
  • Braxton, J. M., Hirschy, A. S., & McClendon, S. A. (2004). Toward understanding and reducing college student departure. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 30(3), 1–105.
  • Bülbül, T. (2012). Dropout in higher education: Reasons and solutions. [Article in Turkish] Eğitim ve Bilim, 166, 219–235.
  • Chen, R. (2012). Institutional characteristics and college student drop out risks: A multilevel event history analysis. Research in Higher Education, 53, 487–505.
  • Creswell, J. (2016). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Elkin, S. A., Braxton, J. M., & James, G. W. (2000). Tinto’s separation stage and its influence on first-semester college student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 41(2), 251–268.
  • Ergen, H. (2009). Eğitimin ekonomik temelleri. In K. Kıroğlu, & C. Elma (Eds.). Eğitim bilimine giriş (pp. 193–220). Ankara: Pegem Yayınevi.
  • Eurydice (2020). Turkey bachelor. Retrieved from https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/turkey/bachelor_en (August 28, 2020).
  • Gençtanırım, D. (2014). Riskli davranışlar ölçeği üniversite formu: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 5(1), 24–34.
  • Gizir, S. (2014). A qualitative case study on the organizational identity of faculty members. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 14(4), 1309–1324.
  • Hartup, W. W., & Stevens, N. (1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 355–370.
  • Harvey, A., & Szalkowicz, G. (2015). From departure to arrival: Re-engaging students who have withdrawn from university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(1), 79–97.
  • Kniveton, B. H. (2004). The influences and motivations on which students base their choice of career. Research in Education, 72(1), 47–59.
  • Korkut-Owen, F. Kepir, D. D., Özdemir, S., & Yılmaz, O. (2012). Reasons for university student's program choice. [Article in Turkish] Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(3), 135–151.
  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. (1979). Interaction effects in Spady’s and Tinto’s conceptual models of college dropout. Sociology of Education, 52, 197–210.
  • Pasceralla, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1980). Predicting freshman persistence and voluntary dropout decisions from a theoretical model. Journal of Higher Education, 51, 60–75.
  • Quinn, J. (2013). Drop-out and completion in higher education in europe among students from under-represented groups. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/moreinformation/doc/neset/higher/ report_en.pdf (April 20, 2018).
  • Rabaglietti, E., & Ciairano, S. (2008). Quality of friendship relationships and developmental tasks in adolescence. Cognition, Brian, Behavior, 12(2), 183–203.
  • Sarıkaya, T., & Khorshid, L. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin meslek seçimini etkileyen etmenlerin incelenmesi: Üniversite öğrencilerinin meslek seçimi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 393–423.
  • Savickas, M. L. (1990). The use of career choice measures in counseling practice. In E. Watkins, & V. Campbell (Eds.), Testing in counseling practice, (pp. 373–417). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Schunk, D., & Ertmer, P. (2000). Self-regulatory process during computer skill acquisition: Goal and self-evaluative influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 9(2), 251–261.
  • Spady, W. (1970). Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis. Interchange, 1, 64–85.
  • Stake, R. E. (1998). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 86–109). London: Sage Publications.
  • Swenson, L. M., Nordstrom, A., & Hiester, M. (2008). The role of peer relationships in adjustment to college. Journal of College Student Development, 49(6), 551–567.
  • Taylı, A. (2008). Okulu bırakmanın önlenmesi ve önlemeye yönelik uygulamalar. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 91–104.
  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.
  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Tinto, V. (2015). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 17(1), 1–16.
  • Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2008). The first-year experience of higher education in the UK. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.

Dropout from Higher Education in Turkey: A Qualitative Study

Year 2022, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 39 - 50, 30.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.21.587615

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the factors which affect the decision to drop out at undergraduate level from the point of view of the individuals who dropped out from higher education. In this study, phenomenological research design, which is one of the qualitative research approaches, was used. The study group consisted of nineteen participants with dropout experience in higher education. The study data were collected using semi-structured interviews, and analyzed using the content analysis method. The findings of the study show that pre-college experiences affecting dropout, based on the type of graduated high school, the reasons for leaving university education, the level of vocational maturity, the lack of autonomy in department choice, parental education level and university entrance examination scores may have affected the department choice of the participants. The problems experienced during the college study leading to dropout are related to social adjustment, academic factors, organizational factors and financial difficulties. According to the participants’ statements, the final dropout decision was made as a result of academic failure, evaluation of appropriateness of vocational choice, marriage, or employment opportunities after graduation.

References

  • Aina, C. (2013). Parental background and university dropout in Italy. Higher Education, 65, 437–456.
  • Allen, J., Robbins, S., Casillas, A., & Oh, I-S. (2008). Third-year college retention and transfer: Effects of academic performance, motivation, and social connectedness. Research in Higher Education, 49(7), 647–664.
  • Aypay, A., Çekiç, O., & Boyacı, A. (2012). Student retention in higher education in Turkey: A qualitative study. Journal of College Student Retention, 14(1), 91–116.
  • Bean, J. P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12, 155–187.
  • Berger, J. B. (2000). Optimizing capital, social reproduction, and undergraduate persistence: A sociological perspective. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 95–126). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
  • Bilgiç, N. (2000). Arkadaşlık becerisi eğitiminin ilköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencilerinin yalnızlık düzeylerine etkisi. Unpublished master’s thesis, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Braxton, J. M. (2012). The cross-national relevance of us formulated theories of college student departure. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 14(1), 149–156.
  • Braxton, J. M., Hirschy, A. S., & McClendon, S. A. (2004). Toward understanding and reducing college student departure. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 30(3), 1–105.
  • Bülbül, T. (2012). Dropout in higher education: Reasons and solutions. [Article in Turkish] Eğitim ve Bilim, 166, 219–235.
  • Chen, R. (2012). Institutional characteristics and college student drop out risks: A multilevel event history analysis. Research in Higher Education, 53, 487–505.
  • Creswell, J. (2016). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Elkin, S. A., Braxton, J. M., & James, G. W. (2000). Tinto’s separation stage and its influence on first-semester college student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 41(2), 251–268.
  • Ergen, H. (2009). Eğitimin ekonomik temelleri. In K. Kıroğlu, & C. Elma (Eds.). Eğitim bilimine giriş (pp. 193–220). Ankara: Pegem Yayınevi.
  • Eurydice (2020). Turkey bachelor. Retrieved from https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/turkey/bachelor_en (August 28, 2020).
  • Gençtanırım, D. (2014). Riskli davranışlar ölçeği üniversite formu: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 5(1), 24–34.
  • Gizir, S. (2014). A qualitative case study on the organizational identity of faculty members. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 14(4), 1309–1324.
  • Hartup, W. W., & Stevens, N. (1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 355–370.
  • Harvey, A., & Szalkowicz, G. (2015). From departure to arrival: Re-engaging students who have withdrawn from university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(1), 79–97.
  • Kniveton, B. H. (2004). The influences and motivations on which students base their choice of career. Research in Education, 72(1), 47–59.
  • Korkut-Owen, F. Kepir, D. D., Özdemir, S., & Yılmaz, O. (2012). Reasons for university student's program choice. [Article in Turkish] Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(3), 135–151.
  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. (1979). Interaction effects in Spady’s and Tinto’s conceptual models of college dropout. Sociology of Education, 52, 197–210.
  • Pasceralla, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1980). Predicting freshman persistence and voluntary dropout decisions from a theoretical model. Journal of Higher Education, 51, 60–75.
  • Quinn, J. (2013). Drop-out and completion in higher education in europe among students from under-represented groups. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/moreinformation/doc/neset/higher/ report_en.pdf (April 20, 2018).
  • Rabaglietti, E., & Ciairano, S. (2008). Quality of friendship relationships and developmental tasks in adolescence. Cognition, Brian, Behavior, 12(2), 183–203.
  • Sarıkaya, T., & Khorshid, L. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin meslek seçimini etkileyen etmenlerin incelenmesi: Üniversite öğrencilerinin meslek seçimi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 393–423.
  • Savickas, M. L. (1990). The use of career choice measures in counseling practice. In E. Watkins, & V. Campbell (Eds.), Testing in counseling practice, (pp. 373–417). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Schunk, D., & Ertmer, P. (2000). Self-regulatory process during computer skill acquisition: Goal and self-evaluative influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 9(2), 251–261.
  • Spady, W. (1970). Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis. Interchange, 1, 64–85.
  • Stake, R. E. (1998). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 86–109). London: Sage Publications.
  • Swenson, L. M., Nordstrom, A., & Hiester, M. (2008). The role of peer relationships in adjustment to college. Journal of College Student Development, 49(6), 551–567.
  • Taylı, A. (2008). Okulu bırakmanın önlenmesi ve önlemeye yönelik uygulamalar. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 91–104.
  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.
  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Tinto, V. (2015). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 17(1), 1–16.
  • Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2008). The first-year experience of higher education in the UK. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.
There are 35 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Original Empirical Research
Authors

Fatma Uslu Gülşen This is me 0000-0001-6847-9271

Ayhan Aydın 0000-0003-4399-9654

Sıdıka Gizir 0000-0003-4071-8220

Publication Date April 30, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 12 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Uslu Gülşen, F., Aydın, A., & Gizir, S. (2022). Dropout from Higher Education in Turkey: A Qualitative Study. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 12(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.21.587615

Yükseköğretim Dergisi/TÜBA Higher Education Research/Review (TÜBA-HER) does not officially agree with the ideas of manuscripts published in the journal and does not guarantee for any product or service advertisements on both printed and online versions of the journal. Scientific and legal responsibilities of published manuscripts belong to their authors. Materials such as pictures, figures, tables etc. sent with manuscripts should be original or written approval of copyright holder should be sent with manuscript for publishing in both printed and online versions if they were published before. Authors agree that they transfer all publishing rights to the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA), the publisher of the journal. Copyrights of all published contents (text and visual materials) belong to the journal. No payment is done for manuscripts under the name of copyright or others approved for publishing in the journal and no publication cost is charged; however, reprints are at authors' cost.

To promote the development of global open access to scientific information and research, TÜBA provides copyrights of all online published papers (except where otherwise noted) for free use of readers, scientists, and institutions (such as link to the content or permission for its download, distribution, printing, copying, and reproduction in any medium, without any changing and except the commercial purpose), under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND3.0) License, provided the original work is cited. To get permission for commercial purpose please contact the publisher.