Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

İlk Stok Boyunun Kıslatılmıs Tilapiaların Büyüme Performansı, Yem Degerlendirmesi ve Yem Alımı Üzerine Etkisi

Year 2014, Volume: 2014 Issue: 4, 0 - 0, 10.12.2014
https://doi.org/10.17693/yunusae.v2014i21954.235731

Abstract

Bu çalışmada nil tilapiaları ve onların melezlerinde (Oreochromis niloticus dişi x Oreochromis aureus erkek) ilk stok ağırlığının ve boylamanın büyümeye ve yem değerlendirmeye olan etkileri araştırılmış ve farklı boy kompozisyonları ile stoklamaya başlanarak ve hangi boyda stoklamanın hangi grupta daha verimli olduğu konusunda bir fikir oluşturulmuştur. Çalışmanın bir diğer boyutunda ise farklı ağırlıklara sahip bireyler karışık olarak yetiştirildiklerinde yalnız küçük ya da sadece büyük boyda yetiştirilenlere oranla ne ölçüde bu durumdan etkilenecekleri araştırılmıştır. Denemede küçük melez yavruların büyüklere oranla daha iyi büyüdüğü, kışlatılmış gruplarda hem nil tilapialarında hem de melezlerde karışık grupların daha iyi büyüme ve yem değerlendirme oranlarına ulaştığı saptanmıştır.

References

  • Kaynaklar:
  • Baardvik, B.M. ve Jobling, M. 1990. Effect of Size-sorting on Biomass Gain and Indivi-dual Growth Rates in Arctic Charr, Salveli-nus alpinus L., Aquaculture, 90: 11–16.
  • Brown, M.E. 1946. The Growth of Brown Trout (Salmo trutta Linn.). I. Factors Influ-encing The Growth of Trout Fry, Journal of Experimental Biology, 22: 118-129.
  • Company, R., Calduch-Giner, J.A., Perez-Sanchez, J. ve Kaushik,S.1999. Protein sparing effect of dietary in common dentex (Dentex dentex): a comparative study with sea bream (Sparus aurata) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquat. Living Resour. 12, 23–30.
  • Dikel, S. 1997. Effect of Different Stocking Densities on Growth of Hybrid Tilapia (Oreochromis aureus x Oreochromis niloticus) in Cages Standing in Concrete Ponds. Turkish journal of Veterinary and Animal Scienses. Vol 21, (3):247-250.
  • -
  • Dikel, S. 2009. Tilapia Yetiştiriciliği. T.C. Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı. Tarımsal Üretim Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları. ANKARA.
  • -
  • Eknath, A.E., Tayamen M.M., Palada-de Vera M.S., Danting J.C., Reyes R.A., Dionisio E.E., Capili J.B., Bolivar H.L., Abella T.A., Circa A.C., Bentsen, H.B., Gjerde, B., Gjedrem T. ve Pullin R.S.V. 1993. Genetic improvement of farmed tilapia: the growth performance of eight strains of Oreochromis niloticus tested in different farm environment. Aquaculture111,171-188.
  • Fitzsimmons, K., Ramotar, P., Cerozi, B. ve Anday, T. 2013. Tilapia Production And Market Situation In 2013 World Aquaculture Society: Aquaculture 2013 - Nashville, Tennessee February 21-25.
  • Goldan, O. Popper, D. Kolkovski, S. ve Karplus, I. 1998. Management of Size Variation in Juvenile Gilthead Sea bream (Sparus au-rata): II. Dry Food Type and Live/Dry Food Ratio, Aquaculture, 165: 313-320.
  • Gunnes, K. 1976. Effect of Size Grading Yo-ung Atlantic salmon Salmo salar on Sub-sequent Growth, Aquaculture, 9: 381-386.
  • Hargreaves, A.J. 1987. Feeding Practices for Caged Blue Tilapia.Virgin Island Perspective Agricultural Research Notes (Eclitted by Carol B. Fleming) Summer-Fall 1987 Vol.2 No.2.
  • Jobling, M. 1985. Physiological and Social Constraints on Growth of Fish with Special Reference to Arctic Charr, Salvelinus alpi-nus L., Aquaculture, 44: 83–90.
  • Jobling, M. 1995. Simple Indices for the As-sessment of the Influences of Social Environment on Growth Performance, Exempli-fied by Studies on Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus), Aquaculture International, 3: 60-65.
  • Knights, B. 1983. Food Particle-size Preferen-ces and Feeding Behavior in Warm Water Aquaculture of European eel Anguilla angu-illa L., Aquaculture, 30: 173-190.
  • Koebele, B.P. 1985. Growth and the Size Hie-rarchy Effect: An Experimental Assessment of Three Proposed Mechanisms; Activity Differences, Disproportional Food Acquisition, Physiological Stress, Environmental Biology of Fishes, 12: 181-188.
  • Lambert, Y. ve Dutil, J.D. 2001. Food İntake and Growth of Adult Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua L.) Reared Under Different Condi-tions of Stocking Density, Feeding Frequency and Size-Grading, Aquaculture, 192(2-4): 233-247.
  • Magnuson, J.J. 1962. An Analysis of Aggres-sive Behavior, Growth, and Space in Medakes Oryzias latipes, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 40: 313-363
  • Matsui, I. 1980. Theory and Practice of Eel Culture, in Balkema A.A.,edt., Aquaculture series 4. 133, Rotterdam, Nederland.
  • Mgaya, Y.D. ve Mercer, J.P. 1995. The Effects of Size Grading and Stocking Density on Growth Performance of Juvenile Abalone, Haliotis tuberculata Linneaus, Aquaculture, 136: 297-312.
  • -
  • Qinfang, Y., Heqin, G., Tao, Y. ve Zhenlun, Z. 1990. Nile tilapia culture in net cages in a Chinese reservoir. Reservoir Fisheries of Asia. Proceedings of the 2nd Asian reservoir fisheries workshop held in hangzhou, People's Republic of China. Sena S. De Silva (Editor). 203-235 pp.
  • Santinha, P.J.M., Medale, F., Corazze, G. ve Gomes, E.F.S. 1999. Effects of the dietary protein:lipid ratio on growth and nutrient utilization in Gilthead seabream Sparus aurata L. Aquaculture Nutrition, 5: 147-156.
  • Seymor, A. 1984. High Stocking Rates and Moving Water Solve the Grading Problem, Fish Farmer, 7: 12-14.
  • Wankowski, J.W.J. ve Thorpe, J.E. 1979. The Role of Food Particle Size in the Growth of Juvenile Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar L., Journal of Fish Biology, 14: 351-370.

Effect of First Stocking Size on Growth Performance and Feed Intake of Tilapia Hybridization

Year 2014, Volume: 2014 Issue: 4, 0 - 0, 10.12.2014
https://doi.org/10.17693/yunusae.v2014i21954.235731

Abstract

In this study, effects of first stocking size and size grading on growth of nile tilapia and their hybrids (Oreochromis niloticus female x Oreochromis aureus male) were investigated. A decision has been made on which stocking system has been more effective on which size grading of stocking, starting the stocking with different size grading compositions. In another dimension of the study; it's been researched that in what amount would this situation effects when individual with variable weights are placed randomly compared to placements with either only small or large. At the end of the research hybrids were higher growth value than nile tilapia. Furthermore, mixed groups either hybrids, or nile tilapia groups were made better growth rate and FCR than the other groups (graded groups).

References

  • Kaynaklar:
  • Baardvik, B.M. ve Jobling, M. 1990. Effect of Size-sorting on Biomass Gain and Indivi-dual Growth Rates in Arctic Charr, Salveli-nus alpinus L., Aquaculture, 90: 11–16.
  • Brown, M.E. 1946. The Growth of Brown Trout (Salmo trutta Linn.). I. Factors Influ-encing The Growth of Trout Fry, Journal of Experimental Biology, 22: 118-129.
  • Company, R., Calduch-Giner, J.A., Perez-Sanchez, J. ve Kaushik,S.1999. Protein sparing effect of dietary in common dentex (Dentex dentex): a comparative study with sea bream (Sparus aurata) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquat. Living Resour. 12, 23–30.
  • Dikel, S. 1997. Effect of Different Stocking Densities on Growth of Hybrid Tilapia (Oreochromis aureus x Oreochromis niloticus) in Cages Standing in Concrete Ponds. Turkish journal of Veterinary and Animal Scienses. Vol 21, (3):247-250.
  • -
  • Dikel, S. 2009. Tilapia Yetiştiriciliği. T.C. Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı. Tarımsal Üretim Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları. ANKARA.
  • -
  • Eknath, A.E., Tayamen M.M., Palada-de Vera M.S., Danting J.C., Reyes R.A., Dionisio E.E., Capili J.B., Bolivar H.L., Abella T.A., Circa A.C., Bentsen, H.B., Gjerde, B., Gjedrem T. ve Pullin R.S.V. 1993. Genetic improvement of farmed tilapia: the growth performance of eight strains of Oreochromis niloticus tested in different farm environment. Aquaculture111,171-188.
  • Fitzsimmons, K., Ramotar, P., Cerozi, B. ve Anday, T. 2013. Tilapia Production And Market Situation In 2013 World Aquaculture Society: Aquaculture 2013 - Nashville, Tennessee February 21-25.
  • Goldan, O. Popper, D. Kolkovski, S. ve Karplus, I. 1998. Management of Size Variation in Juvenile Gilthead Sea bream (Sparus au-rata): II. Dry Food Type and Live/Dry Food Ratio, Aquaculture, 165: 313-320.
  • Gunnes, K. 1976. Effect of Size Grading Yo-ung Atlantic salmon Salmo salar on Sub-sequent Growth, Aquaculture, 9: 381-386.
  • Hargreaves, A.J. 1987. Feeding Practices for Caged Blue Tilapia.Virgin Island Perspective Agricultural Research Notes (Eclitted by Carol B. Fleming) Summer-Fall 1987 Vol.2 No.2.
  • Jobling, M. 1985. Physiological and Social Constraints on Growth of Fish with Special Reference to Arctic Charr, Salvelinus alpi-nus L., Aquaculture, 44: 83–90.
  • Jobling, M. 1995. Simple Indices for the As-sessment of the Influences of Social Environment on Growth Performance, Exempli-fied by Studies on Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus), Aquaculture International, 3: 60-65.
  • Knights, B. 1983. Food Particle-size Preferen-ces and Feeding Behavior in Warm Water Aquaculture of European eel Anguilla angu-illa L., Aquaculture, 30: 173-190.
  • Koebele, B.P. 1985. Growth and the Size Hie-rarchy Effect: An Experimental Assessment of Three Proposed Mechanisms; Activity Differences, Disproportional Food Acquisition, Physiological Stress, Environmental Biology of Fishes, 12: 181-188.
  • Lambert, Y. ve Dutil, J.D. 2001. Food İntake and Growth of Adult Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua L.) Reared Under Different Condi-tions of Stocking Density, Feeding Frequency and Size-Grading, Aquaculture, 192(2-4): 233-247.
  • Magnuson, J.J. 1962. An Analysis of Aggres-sive Behavior, Growth, and Space in Medakes Oryzias latipes, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 40: 313-363
  • Matsui, I. 1980. Theory and Practice of Eel Culture, in Balkema A.A.,edt., Aquaculture series 4. 133, Rotterdam, Nederland.
  • Mgaya, Y.D. ve Mercer, J.P. 1995. The Effects of Size Grading and Stocking Density on Growth Performance of Juvenile Abalone, Haliotis tuberculata Linneaus, Aquaculture, 136: 297-312.
  • -
  • Qinfang, Y., Heqin, G., Tao, Y. ve Zhenlun, Z. 1990. Nile tilapia culture in net cages in a Chinese reservoir. Reservoir Fisheries of Asia. Proceedings of the 2nd Asian reservoir fisheries workshop held in hangzhou, People's Republic of China. Sena S. De Silva (Editor). 203-235 pp.
  • Santinha, P.J.M., Medale, F., Corazze, G. ve Gomes, E.F.S. 1999. Effects of the dietary protein:lipid ratio on growth and nutrient utilization in Gilthead seabream Sparus aurata L. Aquaculture Nutrition, 5: 147-156.
  • Seymor, A. 1984. High Stocking Rates and Moving Water Solve the Grading Problem, Fish Farmer, 7: 12-14.
  • Wankowski, J.W.J. ve Thorpe, J.E. 1979. The Role of Food Particle Size in the Growth of Juvenile Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar L., Journal of Fish Biology, 14: 351-370.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Suat Dikel This is me

Ilgın Özşahinoğlu This is me

Pınar Mumoğullarında This is me

Fırat Tellioğlu This is me

Mustafa Öz This is me

Publication Date December 10, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 2014 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Dikel, S., Özşahinoğlu, I., Mumoğullarında, P., Tellioğlu, F., et al. (2014). İlk Stok Boyunun Kıslatılmıs Tilapiaların Büyüme Performansı, Yem Degerlendirmesi ve Yem Alımı Üzerine Etkisi. Aquaculture Studies, 2014(4). https://doi.org/10.17693/yunusae.v2014i21954.235731
AMA Dikel S, Özşahinoğlu I, Mumoğullarında P, Tellioğlu F, Öz M. İlk Stok Boyunun Kıslatılmıs Tilapiaların Büyüme Performansı, Yem Degerlendirmesi ve Yem Alımı Üzerine Etkisi. AquaST. December 2014;2014(4). doi:10.17693/yunusae.v2014i21954.235731
Chicago Dikel, Suat, Ilgın Özşahinoğlu, Pınar Mumoğullarında, Fırat Tellioğlu, and Mustafa Öz. “İlk Stok Boyunun Kıslatılmıs Tilapiaların Büyüme Performansı, Yem Degerlendirmesi Ve Yem Alımı Üzerine Etkisi”. Aquaculture Studies 2014, no. 4 (December 2014). https://doi.org/10.17693/yunusae.v2014i21954.235731.
EndNote Dikel S, Özşahinoğlu I, Mumoğullarında P, Tellioğlu F, Öz M (December 1, 2014) İlk Stok Boyunun Kıslatılmıs Tilapiaların Büyüme Performansı, Yem Degerlendirmesi ve Yem Alımı Üzerine Etkisi. Aquaculture Studies 2014 4
IEEE S. Dikel, I. Özşahinoğlu, P. Mumoğullarında, F. Tellioğlu, and M. Öz, “İlk Stok Boyunun Kıslatılmıs Tilapiaların Büyüme Performansı, Yem Degerlendirmesi ve Yem Alımı Üzerine Etkisi”, AquaST, vol. 2014, no. 4, 2014, doi: 10.17693/yunusae.v2014i21954.235731.
ISNAD Dikel, Suat et al. “İlk Stok Boyunun Kıslatılmıs Tilapiaların Büyüme Performansı, Yem Degerlendirmesi Ve Yem Alımı Üzerine Etkisi”. Aquaculture Studies 2014/4 (December 2014). https://doi.org/10.17693/yunusae.v2014i21954.235731.
JAMA Dikel S, Özşahinoğlu I, Mumoğullarında P, Tellioğlu F, Öz M. İlk Stok Boyunun Kıslatılmıs Tilapiaların Büyüme Performansı, Yem Degerlendirmesi ve Yem Alımı Üzerine Etkisi. AquaST. 2014;2014. doi:10.17693/yunusae.v2014i21954.235731.
MLA Dikel, Suat et al. “İlk Stok Boyunun Kıslatılmıs Tilapiaların Büyüme Performansı, Yem Degerlendirmesi Ve Yem Alımı Üzerine Etkisi”. Aquaculture Studies, vol. 2014, no. 4, 2014, doi:10.17693/yunusae.v2014i21954.235731.
Vancouver Dikel S, Özşahinoğlu I, Mumoğullarında P, Tellioğlu F, Öz M. İlk Stok Boyunun Kıslatılmıs Tilapiaların Büyüme Performansı, Yem Degerlendirmesi ve Yem Alımı Üzerine Etkisi. AquaST. 2014;2014(4).