Research Article

Dynamic Simulation of a Reactive Distillation Column for Ethyl Acetate Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology

Volume: 27 Number: 2 August 30, 2022
TR EN

Dynamic Simulation of a Reactive Distillation Column for Ethyl Acetate Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to determine the optimum operating conditions for the production of ethyl acetate (EtAc) through the esterification of ethanol (EtOH) with acetic acid (HAc) in a reactive distillation (RD) column. For this, the designed column was simulated for the production of EtAc. HAc flow rate, EtOH flow rate, HAc feed stage, EtOH feed stage, reflux ratio, and reactive feed temperatures were changed and the effects of these parameters on EtAc production were observed. Central Composite Design was employed to define the optimum operating conditions for the RD column. The determination coefficient R2 was equal to 0.9197 suggesting a good relationship between the predicted and simulated responses. Adjusted R2 and predicted R2 values obtained from the program were 0.8823 and 0.7956, respectively. The optimal conditions for the EtAc production response were HAc flow rate of 120.00 kmol/h, EtOH flow rate of 150.00 kmol/h, HAc feed stage 6, EtOH feed stage 14, reflux ratio 2.2, and feed temperature 70.28 °C, which were designated by the maximum desirability function.

Keywords

Dynamic simulation , Ethyl acetate , Optimization , Reactive distillation , Response Surface Methodology

References

  1. Aqar, D. Y., Rahmanian, N., & Mujtaba, I. M. (2017). Feasibility of integrated batch reactive distillation columns for the optimal synthesis of ethyl benzoate. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 122(1), 10-20. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2017.08.012
  2. Bumbac, G., Ene, A., Isopescu, R., & Toma, A. (2009). Process simulation of reactive distillation in dividing wall column for ETBE synthesis process. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 18(1), 487-492. doi:10.3303/CET0918079
  3. Candioti, L. V., De Zan, M. M., Cámara, M. S., & Goicoechea, H. C. (2014). Experimental design and multiple response optimization. Using the desirability function in analytical methods development. Talanta, 124(1), 123-138. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.01.034
  4. Cardoso, M. F., Salcedo, R. L., Feyo de Azevedo, S., & Barbosa, D. (2000). Optimization of reactive distillation processes with simulated annealing. Chemical Engineering Science, 55(21), 5059-5078. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00119-6
  5. Carrera-Rodríguez, M., Segovia-Hernández, J. G., Hernández-Escoto, H., Hernández, S., & Bonilla-Petriciolet, A. (2014). A note on an extended short-cut method for the design of multicomponent reactive distillation columns. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 92(1), 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2013.06.018
  6. Cheng, J. K., Lee, H. Y., Huang, H. P., & Yu, C. C. (2009). Optimal steady-state design of reactive distillation processes using simulated annealing. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 40(2), 188-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2008.10.003
  7. Ciric, A. R., & Gu, D. (1994). Synthesis of nonequilibrium reactive distillation processes by MINLP optimization. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, 40(9), 1479-1487. doi:10.1002/aic.690400907
  8. Diggelen, R., Kiss, A., & Heemink, A. (2010). Comparison of control strategies for dividing-wall columns. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 49(1), 288-307. doi:10.1021/ie9010673
  9. Feyzi, V., & Beheshti, M. (2017). Exergy analysis and optimization of reactive distillation column in acetic acid production process. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 120(1), 161–172. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2017.06.016
  10. Georgiadis, M. C., Schenk, M., Pistikopoulos, E. N., & Gani, R. (2002). The interactions of design, control and operability in reactive distillation systems. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 26(4-5), 735-746. doi:10.1016/S0098-1354(01)00774-8
APA
Aldemir, A., Ersingün, D., & Bayram, İ. (2022). Dynamic Simulation of a Reactive Distillation Column for Ethyl Acetate Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 27(2), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.53433/yyufbed.1100522