Dynamic Simulation of a Reactive Distillation Column for Ethyl Acetate Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology

Adnan Aldemir; Dilan Ersingün; İsmail Bayram

doi:10.53433/yyufbed.1100522

TR EN

Etil Asetat Üretimi için Bir Reaktif Distilasyon Kolonunun Dinamik Simülasyonu: Cevap Yüzey Yöntemi ile İşletme Koşullarının Optimizasyonu

Öz

Bu çalışmada, etanolün (EtOH) asetik asit (HAc) ile reaktif distilasyon (RD) kolonunda, esterleştirilmesi yoluyla etil asetat (EtAc) üretimi için optimum çalışma koşullarının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bunun için tasarlanan kolonun EtAc üretimi için simüle edilmiştir. HAc akış hızı, EtOH akış hızı, HAc besleme aşaması, EtOH besleme aşaması, geri akış oranı ve reaktif besleme sıcaklıkları değiştirilmiş ve bu parametrelerin EtAc üretimi üzerindeki etkileri gözlemlenmiştir. RD kolonu için optimum çalışma koşullarını tanımlamak için Merkezi Kompozit Tasarım kullanılmıştır. Regresyon katsayısı R², 0.9197'ye eşittir ve bu, tahmin edilen ve simüle edilen yanıtlar arasında iyi bir ilişki olduğunu göstermiştir. Programdan elde edilen düzeltilmiş ve tahmin edilen R² değerleri sırasıyla 0.8823 ve 0.7956'dır. EtAc üretim yanıtı için optimal koşullar, 120.00 kmol/saat HAc akış hızı, 150.00 kmol/saat EtOH akış hızı, HAc besleme aşaması 6, EtOH besleme aşaması 14, geri akış oranı 2.2 ve reaktif besleme sıcaklığı 70.28 °C olarak maksimum istenilirlik fonksiyonu ile belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dinamik simülasyon, Etil asetat, Optimizasyon, Reaktif distilasyon, Yanıt yüzey yöntemi

Proje Numarası

FYL-2018-6965

Dynamic Simulation of a Reactive Distillation Column for Ethyl Acetate Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology

Öz

In this study, we aimed to determine the optimum operating conditions for the production of ethyl acetate (EtAc) through the esterification of ethanol (EtOH) with acetic acid (HAc) in a reactive distillation (RD) column. For this, the designed column was simulated for the production of EtAc. HAc flow rate, EtOH flow rate, HAc feed stage, EtOH feed stage, reflux ratio, and reactive feed temperatures were changed and the effects of these parameters on EtAc production were observed. Central Composite Design was employed to define the optimum operating conditions for the RD column. The determination coefficient R² was equal to 0.9197 suggesting a good relationship between the predicted and simulated responses. Adjusted R² and predicted R² values obtained from the program were 0.8823 and 0.7956, respectively. The optimal conditions for the EtAc production response were HAc flow rate of 120.00 kmol/h, EtOH flow rate of 150.00 kmol/h, HAc feed stage 6, EtOH feed stage 14, reflux ratio 2.2, and feed temperature 70.28 °C, which were designated by the maximum desirability function.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dynamic simulation, Ethyl acetate, Optimization, Reactive distillation, Response Surface Methodology

Destekleyen Kurum

Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Başkanlığı

Proje Numarası

FYL-2018-6965

Teşekkür

This research is supported by Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Scientific Research Projects Department (Project Name: Determination of the Optimum Operating Conditions for a Reactive Distillation Column through a Dynamic Simulation by using the Response Surface Methodology, Project Number: FYL-2018-6965)

Kaynakça

Aqar, D. Y., Rahmanian, N., & Mujtaba, I. M. (2017). Feasibility of integrated batch reactive distillation columns for the optimal synthesis of ethyl benzoate. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 122(1), 10-20. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2017.08.012
Bumbac, G., Ene, A., Isopescu, R., & Toma, A. (2009). Process simulation of reactive distillation in dividing wall column for ETBE synthesis process. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 18(1), 487-492. doi:10.3303/CET0918079
Candioti, L. V., De Zan, M. M., Cámara, M. S., & Goicoechea, H. C. (2014). Experimental design and multiple response optimization. Using the desirability function in analytical methods development. Talanta, 124(1), 123-138. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.01.034
Cardoso, M. F., Salcedo, R. L., Feyo de Azevedo, S., & Barbosa, D. (2000). Optimization of reactive distillation processes with simulated annealing. Chemical Engineering Science, 55(21), 5059-5078. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00119-6
Carrera-Rodríguez, M., Segovia-Hernández, J. G., Hernández-Escoto, H., Hernández, S., & Bonilla-Petriciolet, A. (2014). A note on an extended short-cut method for the design of multicomponent reactive distillation columns. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 92(1), 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2013.06.018
Cheng, J. K., Lee, H. Y., Huang, H. P., & Yu, C. C. (2009). Optimal steady-state design of reactive distillation processes using simulated annealing. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 40(2), 188-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2008.10.003
Ciric, A. R., & Gu, D. (1994). Synthesis of nonequilibrium reactive distillation processes by MINLP optimization. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, 40(9), 1479-1487. doi:10.1002/aic.690400907
Diggelen, R., Kiss, A., & Heemink, A. (2010). Comparison of control strategies for dividing-wall columns. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 49(1), 288-307. doi:10.1021/ie9010673
Feyzi, V., & Beheshti, M. (2017). Exergy analysis and optimization of reactive distillation column in acetic acid production process. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 120(1), 161–172. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2017.06.016
Georgiadis, M. C., Schenk, M., Pistikopoulos, E. N., & Gani, R. (2002). The interactions of design, control and operability in reactive distillation systems. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 26(4-5), 735-746. doi:10.1016/S0098-1354(01)00774-8

Harvianto, G. R., Ahmad, F., & Lee, M. (2017). A hybrid reactive distillation process with high selectivity pervaporation for butyl acetate production via transesterification. Journal of Membrane Science, 543(1), 49-57. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2017.08.041
Huang, W., Li, H., Wang, R., Li, X., & Gao, X. (2017). Application of the aldolization reaction in separating the mixture of ethylene glycol and 1,2-butanediol: Kinetics and reactive distillation. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 120(1), 173-183. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2017.07.004
Jie, H., Cui, X., Zhang, Y., Feng, T., Li, X., Lin, R., & Xu, L. (2016). Transesterification of methyl acetate with isobutanol in a reactive and extractive distillation column with ionic liquid as catalyst and molecular liquid as entrainer. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 55(2), 404-419. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02983
Kaewwisetkul, P., Simasatitkul, L., & Arpornwichanop, A. (2017). Design and optimization of dimethyl ether production from crude glycerol in a reactive distillation. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 117(1), 80–88. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2017.03.019
Komesu, A., Martinez, P. F. M., Lunelli, B. H., Filho, R. M., & Maciel, M. R. W. (2015). Lactic acid purification by reactive distillation system using design of experiments. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 95(1), 26–30. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2015.05.005
Lee, H. Y., Huang, H. P., & Chien, I. L. (2007). Control of reactive distillation process for production of ethyl acetate. Journal of Process Control, 17(1), 363–377. doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2006.10.002
Li, C., Duan, C., Fang, J., & Li, H. (2019). Process intensification and energy saving of reactive distillation for production of ester compounds. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 27(6), 1307-1323. doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2018.10.007
Luyben, W. L., & Yu, C. C. (2009). Reactive Distillation Design and Control. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Masuku, C. M., & Biegler, L. T. (2019). Recent advances in gas-to-liquids process intensification with emphasis on reactive distillation. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 25(1), 95-100. doi:10.1016/j.coche.2018.12.009
Nguyen, N., & Demirel, Y. (2011). Using thermally coupled reactive distillation columns in biodiesel production. Energy, 36(8), 4838-4847. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.05.020
Norkobilov, A., Gorri, D., & Ortiz, I. (2017). Comparative study of conventional, reactive-distillation and pervaporation integrated hybrid process for ethyl tert-butyl ether production. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 122(1), 434-446. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2017.07.003
Pérez-Cisneros, E. S., Mena-Espino, X., Rodríguez-López, V., Sales-Cruz, M., Viveros-García, T., & Lobo-Oehmichen, R. (2016). An integrated reactive distillation process for biodiesel production. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 91(1), 233-246. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.01.008
Petchsoongsakul, N., Ngaosuwan, K., Kiatkittipong, W., Aiouache, F., & Assabumrungrat, S. (2017). Process design of biodiesel production: Hybridization of ester-and transesterification in a single reactive distillation. Energy Conversion and Management, 153(1), 493-503. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.10.013
Rangaiah, G. P., & Bonilla-Petriciolet, A. (2013). Multi-Objective Optimization in Chemical Engineering: Developments and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Santaella, M. A., Orjuela, A., & Narváez, P. C. (2015). Comparison of different reactive distillation schemes for ethyl acetate production using sustainability indicators. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 96(1), 61-13. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2015.07.027
Santaella, M. A., Jiménez, L. E., Orjuela, A., & Segovia-Hernández, J. G. (2017). Design of thermally coupled reactive distillation schemes for triethyl citrate production using economic and controllability criteria. Chemical Engineering Journal, 328(1), 368-381. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.015
Segovia-Hernández, J. G., Hernández, S., & Bonilla-Petriciolet, A. (2015). Reactive distillation: A review of optimal design using deterministic and stochastic techniques. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 97(1), 134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2015.09.004
Sundmacher, K., & Kienle, A. (2002). Reactive Distillation: Status and Future Directions. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.
Taylor, R., & Krishna, R. (2000). Modelling reactive distillation. Chemical Engineering Science, 55, 5183. doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00120-2
Zhang, Q., Guo, T., Yu, C., & Li, Y. (2017). Design and control of different pressure thermally coupled reactive distillation for amyl acetate synthesis. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 121(1), 170-179. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2017.09.002
Zhang, Q., Yan, S., Li, H., & Xu, P. (2019). Optimization and control of a reactive and extractive distillation process for the synthesis of isopropyl acetate. Chemical Engineering Communications, 206(5), 559-571. doi:10.1080/00986445.2018.1511982

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Mühendislik

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Adnan Aldemir ^*
0000-0001-9884-0961
Türkiye

Dilan Ersingün
0000-0002-4105-6751
Türkiye

İsmail Bayram
0000-0002-5065-4497
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Ağustos 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

8 Nisan 2022

Kabul Tarihi

18 Mayıs 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.53433/yyufbed.1100522

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA65BW82FA

APA

Aldemir, A., Ersingün, D., & Bayram, İ. (2022). Dynamic Simulation of a Reactive Distillation Column for Ethyl Acetate Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 27(2), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.53433/yyufbed.1100522

AMA

1.Aldemir A, Ersingün D, Bayram İ. Dynamic Simulation of a Reactive Distillation Column for Ethyl Acetate Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology. YYUFBED. 2022;27(2):365-379. doi:10.53433/yyufbed.1100522

Chicago

Aldemir, Adnan, Dilan Ersingün, ve İsmail Bayram. 2022. “Dynamic Simulation of a Reactive Distillation Column for Ethyl Acetate Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology”. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 27 (2): 365-79. https://doi.org/10.53433/yyufbed.1100522.

EndNote

Aldemir A, Ersingün D, Bayram İ (01 Ağustos 2022) Dynamic Simulation of a Reactive Distillation Column for Ethyl Acetate Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 27 2 365–379.

IEEE

[1]A. Aldemir, D. Ersingün, ve İ. Bayram, “Dynamic Simulation of a Reactive Distillation Column for Ethyl Acetate Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology”, YYUFBED, c. 27, sy 2, ss. 365–379, Ağu. 2022, doi: 10.53433/yyufbed.1100522.

ISNAD

Aldemir, Adnan - Ersingün, Dilan - Bayram, İsmail. “Dynamic Simulation of a Reactive Distillation Column for Ethyl Acetate Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology”. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 27/2 (01 Ağustos 2022): 365-379. https://doi.org/10.53433/yyufbed.1100522.

JAMA

1.Aldemir A, Ersingün D, Bayram İ. Dynamic Simulation of a Reactive Distillation Column for Ethyl Acetate Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology. YYUFBED. 2022;27:365–379.

MLA

Aldemir, Adnan, vd. “Dynamic Simulation of a Reactive Distillation Column for Ethyl Acetate Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology”. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 27, sy 2, Ağustos 2022, ss. 365-79, doi:10.53433/yyufbed.1100522.

Vancouver

1.Adnan Aldemir, Dilan Ersingün, İsmail Bayram. Dynamic Simulation of a Reactive Distillation Column for Ethyl Acetate Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology. YYUFBED. 01 Ağustos 2022;27(2):365-79. doi:10.53433/yyufbed.1100522