HACKING THE FAMILY WEB: AI AND AUTONOMY IN MORNA PEARSON’S DARKLANDS

Year 2026, Issue: 71, 54 - 66, 25.03.2026

Kağan Kaya

https://doi.org/10.53568/yyusbed.1660922

https://izlik.org/JA66RL86KE

Abstract

As the world enters a golden age of autonomous technology, artificial intelligence companies shape family decisions. Morna Pearson’s Darklands, part of the National Theatre of Scotland’s 2019 Interference trilogy, focuses on the tension between artificial intelligence (AI) and family autonomy. Set in a near-future environment, the play follows Brie and Logan, a Scottish couple whose lives are controlled by a powerful AI company. Their routines are dictated by Moira, an AI assistant that monitors their behaviour, provides guidance, and intrudes into their family lives under the guise of ensuring well-being. While this AI tool promises productivity, the Darklands raises ethical concerns about privacy, control, and the erosion of freedom. After outlining the concept of autonomy from philosophical perspectives, this essay, through thematic interpretations, examines how AI disrupts familial connections, exploring its negative impact on family sovereignty in the play. First, it analyses autonomy through philosophical perspectives, including Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Aristotle’s view of humans as civic beings/zōon politikon (ζῷον πολιτικόν). Then, it explores the relationship between man and technology. Finally, it discusses how the Darklands portrays the consequences of AI dominance, emphasising the risks of its control over family life, and questions whether true family independence could exist under AI influence.

Keywords

AI , Autonomy , Family , Theatre , Darklands , Morna Pearson

Ethical Statement

This article complies with the journal’s writing guidelines, publication principles, research and publication ethics, and journal ethics policies. The author assumes full responsibility for any potential violations related to the article.

Supporting Institution

The author’s contribution to this study is 100%. There are no conflicts of interest associated with this study.

Aile Ağını Heklemek: Morna Pearson’ın Darklands’inde YZ ve Özerklik

https://izlik.org/JA66RL86KE

Abstract

Dünya otonom teknolojinin altın çağına girerken, yapay zekâ şirketleri aile kararlarını şekillendirmektedir. İskoçya Ulusal Tiyatrosu’nun 2019 Interference üçlemesinin bir parçası olan Morna Pearson’ın Darklands’i, yapay zekâ (YZ) ile aile özerkliği arasındaki gerilime odaklanır. Yakın gelecekteki bir çevrede geçen oyun, yaşamları güçlü bir YZ şirketi tarafından kontrol edilen İskoç çift Brie ve Logan’ı izler. Onların rutinleri, davranışlarını takip eden, onlara rehberlik sağlayan ve refahı sağlama kisvesi altında onların aile yaşamlarına karışan bir yapay zekâ asistanı olan Moira tarafından belirlenir. Bu yapay zekâ aracı üretkenlik sözü verirken, Darklands gizlilik, kontrol ve özgürlüğün aşınması konusunda etik endişeler ortaya koyar. Felsefi anlamda otonomi kavramını açıkladıktan sonra, bu makale, tematik yorumlamalar yoluyla oyunda yapay zekânın ailevi bağları nasıl bozduğunu araştırır ve onun aile özerkliği üzerindeki olumsuz etkisini keşfeder. İlk olarak, Kant’ın Kategorik Zorunluluğu ve Aristoteles’in insanları toplumsal varlıklar/zōon politikon (ζῷον πολιτικό) olarak görmesi gibi felsefi görüşler aracılığıyla otonomiyi analiz eder. Daha sonra, insan ve teknoloji arasındaki ilişkiyi irdeler. Son olarak, Darklands’in YZ egemenliğinin sonuçlarını nasıl betimlediğini tartışır; onun aile yaşamı üzerindeki kontrolününün tehlikelerini vurgulayıp, YZ etkisi altında gerçek aile özerkliğinin var olup olamayacağını sorgulamaktadır.

Keywords

YZ , Özerklik , Aile , Tiyatro , Darklands , Morna Pearson

References

• Acemoğlu, D. (2025, 24 Feb.). Yapay zekâ fırsatını boşa mı harcayacağız?, Gazete Oksijen. Retrieved February 29, 2025 from https://gazeteoksijen.com
• Adorno, T. W., & Tiedemann, R. (2001). Kant’s critique of pure reason (R. Livingstone, Trans.). Polity Press. (Original work published 1959).
• Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Aristotle. (1998). Politics Book I (C. D. C. Reeve, Trans.). Hackett Publishing. (Original work published ca. 350 B.C.E.)
• Arsindustrialis. (2025). Arsindustrialis. Retrieved January 25, 2025 from: https://arsindustrialis.org/vocabulaire-pharmakon-pharmacologie#_ftn1
• Atsma, A. J. (n.d.). Moirae. In Theoi Greek Mythology. Retrieved January 16, 2025, from https://www.theoi.com/Daimon/Moirai.html
• Billington, M. (2006, November 9). White Point/Broke/Distracted. The Guardian. Retrieved January 27, 2025 from https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2006/nov/09/theatre2
• Bissett, C. (2017). Director’s Note to Interference, in Interference (epub edition) (Pearson, Morna, Khalil, H. and Butucea, V. playwrights). London: Methuen Drama.
• Derrida, J. (2003). La Dissémination. Paris: Seuil.
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. Volume 1, An introduction (R. J. Hurley, Trans.). Vintage.
• Hegel, G. W. F. (2019). The phenomenology of spirit (P. Fuss & J. Dobbins, Trans.). University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1807)
• Hesiod. (1914). Theogony (H. G. Evelyn-White, Trans.). In Hesiod, the Homeric Hymns, and Homerica (pp. 116-163). Harvard University Press. (Original work composed ca. 700 B.C.E.)
• Hobbes, T. (1998). Leviathan. (J. Gaskin, Ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1651)
• Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1944)
• Jaeger, W. (1943). Paideia: The ideals of Greek culture (Vol. 2). In search of the divine center. Oxford University Press.
• Jones, H. (2021, Oct. 29). Interview With David Ryan Polgar: Imagine A Future Where Technology Is Developed with Humans In Mind. Forbes. Retrieved December 10, 2024. from https://www.forbes.com/sites/hessiejones/2021/10/29/interview-with-david-ryan-polgar-imagine-a-future-where-technology-is-developed-with-humans-in-mind/
• Kant, I. (2011). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (J. Timmermann, Ed.; M. J. Gregor, Trans.; German-English ed). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1785)
• Knight Hall Agency. (n.d.). Morna Pearson. Knight Hall Agency. Retrieved January 20, 2025, from https://www.knighthallagency.com/client/morna-pearson/
• Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and Infinity, (Alphonso Lingis, trans.). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
• Locke, J. (1988). Two Treaties of Government (P. Laslett, Ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1689)
• Mill, J. S. (1956). On Liberty. Indianapolis and New York: The Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published 1859)
• Nietzsche, F. W. (2020). Nietzsche: Thus Spake Zarathustra, Ecce Homo, Beyond Good and Evil. Arcturus.
• Oxford English Dictionary Online. (n.d). “Autonomy, n,” Oxford University Press. Retrieved March 24, 2025 from https://www-oed-com.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/view/Entry/13500?redirectedFrom=autonomy
• Pearson, M. (2019). Darklands. (epub ed.). London: Methuen Drama.
• Rousseau, J.J. (1994). The Social Contract. (C. Betts, Ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1762)
• Stiegler, B., Colette T. and Colette, R. D. (2016). Ars and Organological Inventions in Societies of Hyper-Control. Leonardo, 49 (5): 480–484. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01080
• Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: the making of the modern identity (10th printing). Cambridge University Press.
• Taylor, C. (1999). Conditions of an unforced consensus on human rights. The East Asian challenge for human rights, 124-144.
• Weithman, P. J. (2023). Rawls’s A theory of justice at 50. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1971)
• Wenger, K. (2023). Is the Algorithm Plotting Against Us? New York: Workingfires Foundation.