Determination of Pomological and Molecular Characteristics of Some Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cultivars and Selected Genotypes

Year 2024, , 74 - 86, 31.03.2024

Nuray Koş , Sinem Öztürk Erdem

https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1394287

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to determine the quality, phytochemical contents and molecular characterization of the best thirteen pomegranate genotypes selected as a result of the selection study carried out between 2019-2020 in the İnhisar district of Bilecik province. As a result of the research, the fruit weight of the selected promising genotypes and cultivars was between 208.00 and 601.3 g, fruit width was 74.54-103.47 mm, fruit length was 63.08-92.32 mm, hundred-aril weight was 28.00-66.25 g, aril yield was determined as 35.48-85.00%. The amount of soluble solid was determined between 14.33 and 18.77%, while pH values were between 3.22 and 4.36% and titratable acidity was between 0.23 and 1.72%. The total antioxidant capacity, which was determined with the TEAC method, was 3.28-8.48 µmol TE g-1, while the total amount of phenolic substances was 956.10-2116.10 g GAE kg−1, and the total amount of anthocyanins was 45.50-344 µg Plg-3-glu/g. Seven UBC-ISSR primers were employed to conduct molecular analyses aiming to determine polymorphism levels among the selected thirteen genotypes, along with the comparative Fellahyemez, Katırbaşı, and Hicaznar varieties. The resulting dendrogram is divided into two main clusters at a 25% dissimilarity level, one smaller and the other larger. All local genotypes clustered within the larger group, with Genotype 9 and Genotype 10 exhibiting the closest similarity. When the criteria determined as a result of the study were examined, it was determined that among the selected pomegranate genotypes, there were individuals that could be registered as table and industrial.

Keywords

Antioxidant, correlation, genotypes, ISSR, selection

Supporting Institution

Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi BAP Birimi

Project Number

2020-02.BŞEÜ.01-01.

Thanks

This work has been supported by Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit.

References

• Akbel, E. (2017). The morphologic characterisation of pomegranates in Middle Sakarya river basin. (Master Thesis). Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Türkiye.
• Akhavan, H., Barzegar, M., Weidlich, H., & Zimmermann, B. F. (2015). Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of juices from ten Iranian pomegranate cultivars depend on extraction. Journal of Chemistry, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/907101
• Almiahy, F. H., & Jum’a, F. F. (2017). Evaluation of the genetic diversity of pomegranate accessions some Iraqi pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes using ISSR Marker. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR- JAVS), 10 (8), 44-49. doi: 10.9790/2380-1008034449
• Al-Mousa, R., Al-Biski, F., & Alshaal, A. (2019). Molecular characterization of some Syrian pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 15(3), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.35516/jjas.v15i3.52
• Amar, M. H., & El-Zayat, M. A. (2017). Utilization of ISTR, ISSR and SRAP molecular markers to reveal and classify Egyptian pomegranates (Punica granatum L.). Plant OMICS, 10(5), 237-246. doi: 10.21475/poj.10.05.17.pne794
• Boguc, F. (2018). Characterization of pomological and some chemical properties of the growing local and standard pomegranate cultivars and important pomegranate genotypes grown in Şirnak province (Master Thesis). Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Türkiye.
• Caliskan, O., & Bayazit, S. (2013). Morpho-pomological and chemical diversity of pomegranate accessions grown in eastern Mediterranean region of Türkiye. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 15, 1449-1460
• Caliskan, O., Bayazit, S., Oktem, M., & Ergul, A. (2017). Evaluation of the genetic diversity of pomegranate accessions from Türkiye using new microsatellite markers. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 41(2), 142-153. doi: 10.3906/tar-1606-124
• Cicek, M., Pakyurek, M., & Celik, F. (2019). Determination of morphological and pomological characteristics of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Genotypes Grown in Diyarbakir. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences, 3, 196-202. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2019.3.12
• Doyle, J. J., & Doyle, J. L. (1987). A rapid DNA Isolation Procedure for Small Quantities of Fresh Leaf Tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin, 19, 11-15.
• Dursun, E. (2021). Determination of the pomological properties, phenolic components and antioxidant activities of some pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). (Master Thesis). Harran University, Şanliurfa, Türkiye.
• Gercekcioglu, R., Sonmez, A., & Atasever, O. O. (2015). Plant and pomological characteristics of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) varieties in Kuytucak districts. Reserach Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8(2), 32-34. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tabad/issue/34803/385517
• Giusti, M. M. & Wrolstad, R. E. 2005. Characterization and measurement of anthocyanins byuv-visible spectroscopy. Unit F1.2, p. 19–31. In: Wrolstad”, R.E. and S.J. Schwartz (eds.), Handbook of food analytical chemistry, New York. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142913.faf0102s00
• Gundogdu, M., Yilmaz, H., & Canan, I. (2015). Physicochemical characterization of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) varieties and genotypes. International Journal of Agricultural and Wildlife Sciences, 1, 57–65. http://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/265612
• Hajiyeva, S. V., Akparov, Z. I., Hasanov, N. A., Mustafayeva, Z. P., Hajiyev, E. S., Mammadov, A. T., & Abbasov, M. A. (2018). ISSR Analysis of Variability of Cultivated Form and Varieties of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) from Azerbaijan. Russian Journal of Genetics, 54(2), 188–197. doi: 10.1134/S1022795418020072
• Heidari, E. F., Rahimmalek, M., Mohammadi, S., & Ehtemam, M. H. (2016). Genetic structure and diversity of ajowan (Trachyspermum ammi) populations based on molecular morphological markers, and volatile oil content. Industrial Crops and Product, 92, 186-196. Doi: 10.1016/J.INDCROP.2016.08.014
• Ikinci, A. & Kilic, M. E. (2016). Some pomological and chemical characteristics of local pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes grown in siverek (Sanliurfa). Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 26, 556-562. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.282765
• Ismail, O. M., Younis, R. A. A., & Ibrahim, A. M. (2014). Morphological and Molecular Evaluation of Some Egyptian Pomegranate Cultivars. African Journal of Biotechnology, 13(2), 226-237. doi: 10.5897/AJB2013.13035
• Jbir, R., Melgarejo, P., Hernández, F., Haddioui, A., & Hannachi, A. S. (2014). Efficiency of Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) markers for the assessment of genetic diversity of Moroccan pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 56, 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2014.04.003
• JUMP. JMP users guide. Version. 2020, 13.0.0. SAS Institute, Cary
• Kahramanoglu, I. (2019). Trends in pomegranate sector: production, postharvest handling and marketing. International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences, 3(2), 239-246.
• Karapetsi, L., Pantelidis, G., Pratsinakis, E. D., Drogoudi, P., & Madesis, P. (2021). Fruit Quality Traits and Genotypic Characterization in a Pomegranate Ex Situ (Punica granatum L.) Collection in Greece. Agriculture, 11(482), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060482
• Kilic, M. E. (2014). Morphological and pomological characterization of Siverek region (Şanliurfa) pomegranates (Punica granatum L.) (in Turkish: Siverek yöresi (Şanliurfa) narlarinin (Punica granatum L.) morfolojik ve pomolojik karakterizasyonu) (Master Thesis). Harran University, Sanliurfa, Türkiye.
• Kos, N. (2022). Determination of the pomological and moleculer characteristics of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes grown in inhisar county (in Turkish: Bilecik ili Inhisar ilçesinde bulunan nar (Punica granatum L.) genotiplerinin pomolojik ve moleküler karakterizasyonunun belirlenmesi) (Master Thesis). Bilecik Şeyh Edebali university, Bilecik, Türkiye.
• Montefusco, A., Durante, M., Migoni, D., De Caroli, M., Ilahy, R., Pék, Z., ... & Lenucci, M. S. (2021). Analysis of the phytochemical composition of pomegranate fruit juices, peels and kernels: A comparative study on four cultivars grown in southern Italy. Plants, 10(11), 2521.
• Okatan, V., Akca, Y., Ercisli, S., & Gozlekci, S. (2015). Genotype Selection for physico-chemical fruit traits in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) In Türkiye. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 123-132. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:83342109
• Okumus, G. (2016). Nar (Punica granatum L.) determination of antioxidant capacity in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel and seeds (Master Thesis), Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye.
• Orhan, E., Ercisli, S., Esitken, A., & Sengul, M. (2014). Molecular and morphological characterization of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes sampled from Coruh Valley in Türkiye. Genetics and Molecular Research, 6375-6382. doi: 10.4238/2014.January.14.4
• Ozden, A. N., AK, B. E., & Ozden, M. (2017) Pomological, Phytochemical Properties and Antioxidant Capacities of Different Pomegranate Varieties (Punica granatum L.). Harran Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences, 21, 164-176. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/harranziraat/issue/29825/321140
• Ozgen, M., Durgac, C., Serce, S., & Kaya, C. (2008). Chemical and antioxidant properties of pomegranate cultivars grown in Mediterranean region of Türkiye. Food Chemistry, 111, 703–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.04.043
• Ozturk, I., Pakyurek, M., & Celik, F. (2019). Determination of Pomological Characteristics of Local Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Genotypes Grown in Artuklu and Kızıltepe Vicinities, Mardin Province. Turkish Journal Of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 6, 925-933. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.633639
• Simsek, M., & Etik, R. (2022). Physico-Chemical characterization of local pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars grown in Dicle district of Diyarbakir Province. Dicle University Journal of the Institute of Natural and Applied Science, 11, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.55007/dufed.1070311.
• Singleton, V., & Rossi, J. (1965). Colorimetry of Total phenolic compounds with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 16, 144-158. Doi: 10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144
• Teixeira da Silva, J., Rana, T. S., Narzaryd, D., Vermae, N., Meshramf, D. T, & Ranade, S. A. (2013). Pomegranate biology and biotechnology: A review. Sci Hort., 160, 85-107. DOI:10.1016/J.SCIENTA.2013.05.017
• Toprak, T. (2019). Determination of pomological properties and phytochemical and antioxidant contents of different nar (Punica granatum L.) genotypes in Kahramanmaraş province (Master Thesis). Kahramanmaras Sütcu Imam University, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye.
• TURKSTAT, (2022). Turkish Statistical Institute. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?locale=tr. Access data: 10.11.2023.
• Yaman, S., Ozlem, O., Toprak, Z., Avci, F., Bayazit, S., & Caliskan, O. (2015). Determination of Fruit Quality Characteristics of ‘Hicaznar’ Cultivar Grown in Different Elevations. Fruit Science, 2015(2), 9-15. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/meyve/issue/19545/208101
• Yan, W., & Tinker, N. A. (2006). Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: principles and applications. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86, 623-645. https://doi.org/10.4141/P05-169