COMPARISON OF SOME TESTS FOR CORRELATED ERROR IN ANIMAL STUDIES
Abstract
Some assumptions should be checkcd . because of autqçprre.Iation of residuals, when data collected on the same subject at each timtU5:ıJp_aCif Thefo is' 'no problem for testing the treatınents, whercas some
assumptfons - should be valid for testing ' the period and period freatment
interaction in case of iepeated ·measures . .in this study, . 53 male lambs werc; assigned to th '.İhree tieatmertts and each one was measured with 15 days' ·.;
interval through '70 days.: Four different analysis methods, standard analysis. ' transformed data analysis, auto-regressive error model. and inuitivariate ·.:: anaiysis· wefrf(pefforiried to comparc for epeated measures. ' There we're nô . diffo(ertces :irt terrns of imprövement , .of ,F test among standard analysis. trasfomied'·'; data' analysis and n:iultivariate . arialvsis · methods .· Thc ·
. (J .,:._ _.,:· ı'·' ff .:.'.·<. )-: ' ".d . . . . ' - : . . . . . . ., .. -
autorgrssıve. error model ımproved thc F:tcst by _%20 ,Whereas assu mptıon ,: . were'not vaıief fo{this analysis:Keywords
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Authors
Hayrettin Okut
This is me
Tufan Altın
This is me
Serhat Arslan
This is me
Ahmet Taşdelen
This is me
Publication Date
June 7, 2016
Submission Date
January 3, 2015
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 1996 Volume: 6 Number: 1
