Research Article

The Effect of The Different Training Systems on Yield and Vegetative Growth of “Santa Maria” and “Deveci” Pear Cultivars

Volume: 31 Number: 4 December 31, 2021
EN TR

The Effect of The Different Training Systems on Yield and Vegetative Growth of “Santa Maria” and “Deveci” Pear Cultivars

Abstract

The study was conducted between 2012-2014 in order to determine the effects of the training systems on "Deveci" and "Santa Maria" cultivars grafted on Quince A rootstock. The effect of the training system on the TCSA and canopy volume values of the trees was significant, but there were differences in the effect depending on the cultivar. The trees, which had a thicker trunk, were obtained with Y Palmette in Santa Maria cultivar and Vertical Axis in Deveci cultivar. The yield values changed depending on the training system and cultivar. It has been determined that the trees treated in Vertical Axis and Y Palmette training systems have a higher yield. It can be said that the Deveci cultivar had a relatively higher yield. Deveci cultivar had larger fruit, and the effect of the training system varied depending on the cultivar. In Santa Maria cultivar, the fruit of the trees on which the One Arm Cordon training system was bigger. In Deveci cultivar, the larger fruit was harvested from the trees on which One Arm Cordon and Vertical Axis training systems. As a result, the training systems have been influential in the vegetative growth and yield of the trees.

Keywords

References

  1. Anthony, B., Serra, S., & Musacchi, S. (2020). Optimization of Light Interception, Leaf Area and Yield in “WA38”: Comparisons among Training Systems, Rootstocks and Pruning Techniques. Agronomy 2020, 10, 689; doi:10.3390/agronomy10050689
  2. Baïram, E., leMorvan, C., Delaire, M., & BuckSorlin, G. (2019). Fruit and leaf response to different source–sink ratios in apple, at the scale of the fruit-bearing branch. Front Plant Sci, 10: 1039–1052.
  3. Corelli-Grappadelli, L., & Lakso, A.-N. (2007). Is maximizing orchard light interception always the best choice? In VIII International Symposium on Canopy, Rootstocks and Environmental Physiology in Orchard Systems. Acta Hortic. 732, 507–518.
  4. Du, Y.-L. (2018). The effects of different pruning methods on growth and fruit quality of arid dwarf middle stock ‘Yanfu 3’ apple trees [M. D. Dissertation]. Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
  5. Jajo, A., Rahim, M.-D.-A., Serra, S., Gagliardi, F., Jajo, N.-K., Musacchi, S., Costa, G., Bonghi, C., & Trainotti, L. (2014). Impact of tree training system, branch type and position in the canopy on the ripening homogeneity of ‘Abbé Fétel’ pear fruit. Tree Genet Genomes, 10: 1477–1488.
  6. Jung, S.-K., & Choi, H.-S. (2010). Light penetration, growth, and fruit productivity in ‘Fuji’ apple trees trained to four growing systems. Sci Hortic, 125: 672–678.
  7. Lin, L., Yu, L., Wang, H.-N., Niu, Z.-M., & Xie, P. (2020). Effect of canopy structure on foliar photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of pears. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin, 40: 1180–1191.
  8. Lordan, J., Francescatto, P., Dominguez, L.I., Robinson, T.L., 2018. Long-term effects of tree density and tree shape on apple orchard performance, a 20 year study Part 1, agronomic analysis. Sci Hortic, 238: 303–317.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Horticultural Production

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2021

Submission Date

May 21, 2021

Acceptance Date

November 18, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 31 Number: 4

APA
Küçüker, E., & Ağlar, E. (2021). The Effect of The Different Training Systems on Yield and Vegetative Growth of “Santa Maria” and “Deveci” Pear Cultivars. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31(4), 870-875. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.940463

Cited By

Creative Commons License
Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences by Van Yuzuncu Yil University Faculty of Agriculture is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.