The Effect of The Different Training Systems on Yield and Vegetative Growth of “Santa Maria” and “Deveci” Pear Cultivars
Abstract
Keywords
References
- Anthony, B., Serra, S., & Musacchi, S. (2020). Optimization of Light Interception, Leaf Area and Yield in “WA38”: Comparisons among Training Systems, Rootstocks and Pruning Techniques. Agronomy 2020, 10, 689; doi:10.3390/agronomy10050689
- Baïram, E., leMorvan, C., Delaire, M., & BuckSorlin, G. (2019). Fruit and leaf response to different source–sink ratios in apple, at the scale of the fruit-bearing branch. Front Plant Sci, 10: 1039–1052.
- Corelli-Grappadelli, L., & Lakso, A.-N. (2007). Is maximizing orchard light interception always the best choice? In VIII International Symposium on Canopy, Rootstocks and Environmental Physiology in Orchard Systems. Acta Hortic. 732, 507–518.
- Du, Y.-L. (2018). The effects of different pruning methods on growth and fruit quality of arid dwarf middle stock ‘Yanfu 3’ apple trees [M. D. Dissertation]. Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
- Jajo, A., Rahim, M.-D.-A., Serra, S., Gagliardi, F., Jajo, N.-K., Musacchi, S., Costa, G., Bonghi, C., & Trainotti, L. (2014). Impact of tree training system, branch type and position in the canopy on the ripening homogeneity of ‘Abbé Fétel’ pear fruit. Tree Genet Genomes, 10: 1477–1488.
- Jung, S.-K., & Choi, H.-S. (2010). Light penetration, growth, and fruit productivity in ‘Fuji’ apple trees trained to four growing systems. Sci Hortic, 125: 672–678.
- Lin, L., Yu, L., Wang, H.-N., Niu, Z.-M., & Xie, P. (2020). Effect of canopy structure on foliar photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of pears. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin, 40: 1180–1191.
- Lordan, J., Francescatto, P., Dominguez, L.I., Robinson, T.L., 2018. Long-term effects of tree density and tree shape on apple orchard performance, a 20 year study Part 1, agronomic analysis. Sci Hortic, 238: 303–317.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Horticultural Production
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
December 31, 2021
Submission Date
May 21, 2021
Acceptance Date
November 18, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 2021 Volume: 31 Number: 4
Cited By
Comparative Evaluation of Pear Performances Under High- and Low-Density Planting Systems cv. ‘Santa Maria’
Erwerbs-Obstbau
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00741-3Quality Performance of Some Local Pear Cultivars on BA29 Rootstock under High Density Planting
Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.1179193Determination of Phenological and Morphological Characteristics of Some Standard Pear Cultivars on Different Quince Clonal Rootstocks
Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.31466/kfbd.1153780Impact of Quince Clonal Rootstocks on Yield and Fruit Quality Characteristics of European Pear (Pyrus communis L.) Cultivars
Erwerbs-Obstbau
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-023-00888-7Effects of Quince Rootstocks and Pear Cultivars on Fruit and Yield Characteristics
Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1263145Morphological Evaluation of Pear cvs. Santa Maria, Williams, and Deveci Grafted onto Clonal and Seedling Rootstocks
Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.1353727Phenological, Morphological and Pomological Characteristics of ‘Samsun Güzeli’ Pear Genotype on BA29 Rootstock
Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1215313Agronomic Performance of European Pear Cultivars in Different Training Systems in the Highland Region of Southern Brazil
Agriculture
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15020194Sert Çekirdekli Meyve Türlerinde Yetiştirme Teknikleri, Budama ve Terbiye Sistemlerinin Önemi
Erciyes Tarım ve Hayvan Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.55257/ethabd.1846657
