Sustainability of sheep farming: case of İzmir province
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to measure sustainability level of sheep farming and to make suggestions on the policies that could be developed for improving the production, marketing and management of its processes by examining holistically the economic, social and environmental factors which are effective in sheep farming.
Material and Methods: The data set of the study obtained from surveys with 126 sheep enterprises in the year 2018 in İzmir. Sustainability has been measured with the aid of a composite index calculated using a series of hierarchical methods.
Results: The sustainability composite index was calculated as 28.30% (economic sustainability 14.13%, social sustainability 4.76% and environmental sustainability 9.42%). According to the sustainability level reference developed by FAO, the sustainability of sheep farming in İzmir is at the limit.
Conclusion: Economic factors are more effective than social and environmental factors in the sustainability of sheep farming activities. However, improvement of the system and sustainability depends on a holistic approach that considers the evaluation of economic, social and environmental factors.
Keywords
References
- Emsen, H., M. Yaprak, E. Emsen & F. Köyceğiz, 2008. Romanov koyununun Erzurum şartlarına adaptasyonu projesi. (Web page: http://www.erzurumtb.org.tr) (Date accessed: 28/10/2018) (in Turkish).
- FAO, 2013. Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture Systems Guidelines (SAFA). Version 3.0. Rome. 268 pp.
- Gezici, K., 2018. Van’da Koyun Yetiştiriciliğinin Genel Yapısı ve Çiftlik Faaliyetleri. Van Y.Y.Ü. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, (Unpublished) Master Science Thesis,Van, Turkey, 72pp (in Turkish with abstract in English).
- Hasanshahi, H., H. Iravani, A. Zh. Daneshevar & Kh. Kalantari, 2015. Measure and comparison of economic, social and ecological sustainability of farming systems in the Marvdasht plain, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran, Desert 20 (2): 231-239. https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/jdesert.2015.56485
- Kaymakçı, M., A. Eliçin, F. Işın, T. Taşkın, O. Karaca, E. Tuncel, M. Ertuğrul, M. Özder, O. Güney, P. Gürsoy, O. Torun, T. Altın, H. Emsen, S. Seymen, H. Geren, A. Odabaşı & R. Sönmez, 2018. Türkiye küçükbaş hayvan yetiştiriciliği üzerine teknik ve ekonomik yaklaşımlar. http://www.zmo.org.tr/resimler/ekler/569df159ec47745_ek.pdf?tipi=14&sube= (Date accessed: June 2018).
- Kılıç, İ., Z. Bozkurt, M. Tekerli, S. Koçak & K. Çelikeloğlu, 2013. Afyonkarahisar ili koyunculuk işletmeleri çalışanlarının hayvan refahını etkileyen faktörlerle ilgili algıları. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 53 (1): 29-38 pp.
- Krajnc, D. & P. Glavic, 2005. How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability. Journal of Ecological and Economic, 55: 551-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2004.12.011
- Madai, H., A. Nabrad & M. Lapis, 2009. Sheep production in Hungary: Is it a sustainable sector? University of Debrecen Centre for Agricultural Sciences and Engineering, Hungary, 95-99pp.
- Masera, O. & S. Lopez-Ridaura, 2000. Sustentabilidad y Sistemas Campesinos, Cinco experiencias de evaluation en el Mexico rural, Mexico: GIRA Mundi Prensa-UNAM.
- OECD, 2008. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators, Methodology and User Guide. (Web page: https://www.oecd.org/sdd/42495745.pdf) (Date accessed: February 2019).