Research Article

Transgressive segregation of morphological traits in populations derived from cross between Solanum habrochaites and Solanum lycopersicum

Volume: 60 Number: 1 April 1, 2023
TR EN

Transgressive segregation of morphological traits in populations derived from cross between Solanum habrochaites and Solanum lycopersicum

Abstract

Objective: Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the economically important vegetables due to its worldwide economic in both production and consumption. Due to limited genetic diversity among cultivated tomato genetic resources, wild tomato species are commonly used for unlocking the genetic potential and transferring them to cultivated tomato. Solanum habrochaites is one of those wild tomato species that has great genetic potential for improving fruit quality traits in cultivated tomato. Material and Methods: Analysis of segregating populations derived from the cross between Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum habrochaites is important for the identification and introgression of such genetic potential. Therefore, the present study analyzed transgressive segregation of fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter and color parameters in F1, F2 and F3 populations. Results: For fruit weight, transgressive segregation was observed in just F3 population and five lines had higher fruit weight than maternal parent. Although S. habrochaites had smaller fruits than cultivated tomato, there was no significant difference between populations. Although transgressive segregation was observed in F2 and F3 populations for fruit length and diameter, there was no significant difference between mean values of populations. Conclusion: The study showed that F3 population is sufficient to select larger fruits derived from S. habrochaites.

Keywords

Breeding , color parameters , interspecific populations , tomato , wild

References

  1. Alpert, K. B., S. Grandillo & S. D. Tanksley, 1995. fw 2.2: A major QTL controlling fruit weight is common to both red-and green-fruited tomato species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 91 (6-7): 994-1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223911
  2. Causse, M., R. Damidaux & P. Rousselle, 2007. “Traditional and Enhanced Breeding for Quality Traits in Tomato, 153-192”. In: Genetic improvement of Solanaceous Crops (Ed. M. K. Razdan) CRC Press, Boca Raton, 658 pp.
  3. Ensminger, H. A., E. M. Ensminger, E. J. Kolande & K. R. Robinson, 1994. Food and Nutritio Encyclopedia. 2nd Ed. Vol. l, No. 2, 2371 pp.
  4. FAO, 2020. Food and Agriculture Statistics. (Web page: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL) (Date accessed: November 2022).
  5. Frary, A., T. C. Nesbitt, A. Frary, S. Grandillo, E. Van Der Knaap, B. Cong & S. D. Tanksley, 2000. fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science, 289 (5476): 85-88. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5476.85.
  6. Frusciante, L., P. Carli, M. R. Ercolano, R. Pernice, A. DiMatteo, V. Fogliano & N. Pellegrini, 2007. Antioxidant nutritional quality of tomato. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 51 (5): 609-617. DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.200600158.
  7. García-Martínez, S., L. Andreani, M. Garcia-Gusano, F. Geuna & J. J. Ruiz 2006. Evaluation of amplified fragment length polymorphism and simple sequence repeats for tomato germplasm fingerprinting: utility for grouping closely related traditional cultivars. Genome, 49 (6): 648-656. DOI: 10.1139/g06-016
  8. Jones, J. B., Jr. B. Wolf & H. A. Mills 1991. Plant Analysis Handbook. I. Methods of Plant Analysis and Interpratation. Micro-Macro Publishing Inc.,183 Paradise Blvd, Suite 108, Athens Georgia 30607 USA, 213 pp.
  9. Kabaş, A. & S. Zengin, 2012. “Tomato variety breeding for greenhouse cultivation, 60-67”. 9. National Vegetable Agriculture Symposium (12-14 September 2012, Konya), 241 s.
  10. McGuire, R. G, 1992. Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience, 27: 1254-1255
APA
Kabaş, A., Çelik, İ., & Uluışık, S. (2023). Transgressive segregation of morphological traits in populations derived from cross between Solanum habrochaites and Solanum lycopersicum. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 60(1), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1207916