The effect of hazelnut husk applications on some properties of hazelnut orchard soil and hazelnut yield

Year 2023, , 437 - 449, 13.10.2023

Betul Bayrakli , Coşkun Gülser , Gülen Özyazıcı , Mehmet Arif Özyazıcı , Emel Kesim

https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1291985

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of hazelnut husk released after production on some physical and biological properties, nutrient content, and hazelnut yield of hazelnut orchard soil.
Material and Methods: In experiments, each hazelnut ocak was planted at a 4.0 m x 4.5 m distance to form a parcel; Hazelnut husk was applied at doses of 0, 25, 50, and 75 kg/ocak in a randomized block design with three replications. In the first, second, and third years following the application, soil samples were taken after the hazelnut harvest in order to, determine some physical, chemical and biological properties, nutrient content, and hazelnut yields.
Results: Statistically, significant differences were determined in the organic matter (OM), penetration resistance (PR), bulk density (BD), soil respiration (SR), microbial biomass carbon (Cmic), total N, available P2O5, K2O and hazelnut yields (p<0.01) of the soil depending on the hazelnut husk dose applications. Depending on the application dose, hazelnut husk application increased the organic matter content of the soil by an average of 29.84% as compared to the control.
Conclusion: As a result of the positive changes in the physical and biological properties of the soils, increases were obtained in the applied doses in the total N, available P2O5, K2O, and hazelnut yields of the soils as compared to the control.

Keywords

Available nutrients, microbial biomass carbon, organic matter, penetration resistance, yield

Supporting Institution

TAGEM General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies

Project Number

TAGEM-BB-080205H1

Thanks

This study was produced from project codded as Project No: TAGEM-BB-080205H1 “General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies”.

Fındık zurufu uygulamalarının fındık bahçesi toprağının bazı özelliklerine ve fındık verimine etkisi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, üretim sonrası açığa çıkan fındık zurufunun fındık bahçesi toprağının bazı fiziksel ve biyolojik özelliklerine, besin elementi içeriğine ve fındık verimine etkisi belirlenmiştir.
Materyal ve Yöntem: Denemede 4.0 m x 4.5 m aralıklarla dikilmiş her bir fındık ocağı bir parseli oluşturacak şekilde fındık zurufu 0, 25, 50 ve 75 kg/ocak dozlarında tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre üç tekerrürlü olarak ocaklara uygulanmıştır. Uygulamayı takip eden birinci, ikinci ve üçüncü yılda fındık hasadı sonrası toprak örnekleri alınarak toprağın bazı fiziksel ve biyolojik özellikleri, besin elementi içeriği ve fındık verimler belirlenmiştir.
Araştırma Bulguları: İstatistiksel olarak fındık zurufu doz uygulamalarına bağlı olarak toprağın organik maddesi (OM), penetrasyon direnci (PD), hacim ağırlığı (HA), toprak solunumu (TS), mikrobiyal biyomas karbonu (Cmic), toplam N, alınabilir P2O5 ve K2O ve fındık verimlerinde (p<0.01) önemli farklılıklar belirlenmiştir. Fındık zurufu uygulaması toprağın organik madde miktarını kontrole göre ortalama %29.84 artırmıştır.
Sonuç: Toprakların bu özelliklerindeki olumlu değişiklerin sonucu toprakların toplam N, alınabilir P2O5 ve K2O ve fındık verimlerinde uygulanan dozlarda kontrole göre artışlar belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Besin elementi, mikrobiyal biyomas-C, organik madde, penetrasyon direnci, verim

Supporting Institution

General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies

Project Number

TAGEM-BB-080205H1

Thanks

This study was produced from project codded as Project No: TAGEM-BB-080205H1 “General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies”

References

• Abedi, T., A. Alemzadeh & S.A. Kazemeini, 2010. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on grain yield and protein banding pattern of wheat. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4 (6): 384-389.
• Aksakal, E. L., S. Sari & I. Angin, 2016. Effects of vermicompost application on soil aggregation and certain physical properties. Land Degradation & Development, 27 (4): 983-995. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2350.
• Anderson, J.P.E. & K.H. Domsch, 1978. A physiological method for the quantative measurement of microbial biomass in soils, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 10: 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717 (78)90099-8.
• Anderson, J.P.E., 1982. “Soil Respiration, 831-871”. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2-Chemical and Microbiological Properties, (Eds. A.L. Page, D. R. Keeney, D.E. Baker, R.H. Miller, R. Jr. Ellis & J.D. Rhoades). ASA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 1143 pp.
• Andrews, E.M., S. Kassama, E.E. Smith, P.H. Brown & S.D.S. Khalsa, 2021. A review of potassium-rich crop residues used as organic matter amendments in tree crop agroecosystems. Agriculture, 11 (7): 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11070580.
• Anonymous, 2021. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Agricultural Economic and Policy Development Institute. Crop Reports. (Web pages: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Sayfalar/EN/AnaSayfa.aspx) (Date accessed: March 2023).
• Arshad, M.A., B. Lowery & B. Grossman, 1996. “Physical Tests for Monitoring Soil Quality, 123-142”. In: Methods for Assessing Soil Quality, (Eds. J.W. Doran & A.J. Jones) Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America, 410 pp.
• Aşkın, T., C. Gülser, R. Kızılkaya & N. Özdemir, 2000. “The effects of inoculation of soil with different numbers of bacteria on aggregation, 242-246”. Proceedings of International Symposium on Desertification (June 13-17, Konya, Türkiye), 553 pp.
• Bandyopadhyay, K.K., A.K. Misra, P.K. Ghosh & K.M. Hati, 2010. Effect of integrated use of farmyard manure and chemical fertilizers on soil physical properties and productivity of soybean. Soil and Tillage Research, 110 (1): 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.07.007.
• Bayadilova, G., A. Zhylkibayev, J. Yessenbayeva, G. Yelibayeva, D. Kazkeyev & V.M. Karasseva, 2022. Effect of different organic wastes on biological properties of maize (Zea mays indendata) rhizosphere. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, 11 (2): 141-150. https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.1022545.
• Bayraklı, F. ,1987. Toprak ve Bitki Analizleri. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No: 17, Samsun, 200 pp.
• Bengough, A.G. & C.E. Mullins, 1990. Mechanical impedance to root growth: A review of experimental techniques and root growth responses. Journal of Soil Science, 41: 341-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00070.x.
• Bronick, C. & R. Lal, 2005. Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma, 124: 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005.
• Canarache, A., 1990. Penetr: A generalized semi-empirical model estimating soil resistance to penetration. Soil Tillage and Research, 16: 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987 (90)90021-5.
• Candemir, F. & C. Gülser, 2007. Changes in some chemical and physical properties of a sandy clay loam soil during the decomposition of hazelnut husk. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 19 (3): 2452-2460.
• Candemir, F. & C. Gülser, 2010. Effects of different agricultural wastes on some soil quality indexes in clay and loamy sand fields. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 42 (1): 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2011.528489.
• Candemir, F., 2005. Effects of organic wastes on soil quality indexes and nitrate nitrogen. Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Agriculture Department of Soil, (Unpublished) PhD Thesis, Samsun, Türkiye, 160 pp.
• Celik, I., H. Gunal, M. Budak & C. Akpinar, 2010. Effects of long-term organic and mineral fertilizers on bulk density and penetration resistance in semi-arid Mediterranean soil conditions. Geoderma, 160 (2): 236-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.09.028.
• Chenu, C., Y. Le Bissonnais & D. Arrouays, 2000. Organic matter influence on clay wettability and soil aggregate stability. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64 (4): 1479-1486. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.6441479x.
• Demiralay, İ., 1993. Toprak Fiziksel Analizleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Toprak İlmi Bölümü. Erzurum, 131 s.
• Dexter, A.R., E.A. Czyż & O.P. Gate, 2007. A method for prediction of soil penetration resistance. Soil and Tillage Research, 93 (2): 412-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.05.011.
• Eryılmaz, G. & O. Kılıç, 2019. Developments in organic hazelnut production and export of Türkiye. International Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 3 (1): 41-54.
• FAOSTAT, 2021. Crops and Livestock Products Statistics. (Web page: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL) (Date accessed: 20 May 2023).
• Franco-Otero, V.G., P. Soler-Rovira, D. Hernández, E.G. López-de-Sá & C. Plaza, 2012. Short-term effects of organic municipal wastes on wheat yield, microbial biomass, microbial activity, and chemical properties of soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 48: 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0620-y.
• Gülser, C. & F. Candemir, 2012. Changes in penetration resistance of a clay field with organic waste applications. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, 1 (1): 16-21.
• Gülser, C., İ. Ekberli, F. Candemir & Z. Demir, 2011. “Spatial variability of penetration resistance in a cultivated soil, 244-250”. Prof.Dr. Nuri Munsuz, Ulusal Toprak ve Su Sempozyumu (25-27 Mayıs, Ankara, Türkiye), 353 s.
• Gülser, C., 2016. “Changes in soil physical properties with hazelnut husk and tobacco waste applications, 2032-2036”. In VII International Scientific Agriculture Symposium," Agrosym 2016", 6-9 October 2016, Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Proceedings. University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Agriculture, 2970 pp.
• Gülser, C., 2022. Effects of agricultural wastes on some physical properties of clay loam soil. Agricultural Sciences/Agrarni Nauki, 14 (33). https://doi.org/10.22620/agrisci.2022.33.001.
• Gülser, C., R. Kızılkaya, T. Askın & I. Ekberli, 2015. Changes in soil quality by compost and hazelnut husk applications in a hazelnut orchard. Compost Science & Utilization, 23 (3): 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2015.1013584.
• Gülser, C., T. Minkina, S. Sushkova & R. Kızılkaya, 2017. Changes of soil hydraulic properties during the decomposition of organic waste in a coarse textured soil. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 174: 66-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.05.014.
• Herrick, J.E. & M.M. Wander, 1997. “Relationships Between Soil Organic Carbon and Soil Quality in Cropped and Rangeland Soils: The Importance of Distribution, Composition, and Soil Biological Activity, 405-425”. In: Soil Processes and The Carbon Cycle (Eds. R. Lal, J.M. Kimble, R.F. Follett & B.A. Stewart), CRC Press, 624 pp.
• Kacar, B. & A.V. Katkat, 1998. Bitki Besleme. Uludağ Üniversitesi Güçlendirme Vakfı Yayın No:127, VİPAŞ Yayınları: 3, Bursa, 595 s.
• Kacar, B., 1990. Gübre Analizleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi, Ankara, 249 s.
• Kaplan N., 2005. Effect of Organic Wastes on Biological Properties of Soil and Maize (Zea mays indendata) rhizosphere, Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Agriculture Department of Soil, (Unpublished) Master Thesis, Samsun, Türkiye,49 pp.
• Kaur, K., K.K. Kapoor & A.P. Gupta, 2005. Impact of organic manures with and without mineral fertilizers on soil chemical and biological properties under tropical conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Sciences, 168: 117-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200421442.
• Kemper, W.D. & R.C. Rosenau, 1986. “Aggregate Stability and Size Distribution, 425-442”. In: Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods (Ed. A. Klute), Madison, Wisconsin, 1188 pp. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c17.
• Kılıç, K., K. Saltalı & A.K. Sürücü, 2000. The effect of tobacco waste application on the physical and chemical properties of alkaline soils. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Foresty, 26: 87-91 (In Turkish). https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-0006-22.
• Kızılkaya, R. & C. Gulser, 2016. “Effect of different organic wastes on microbial properties of maize (Zea mays indendata) rhizosphere and root free soil, 2052-2058”. In: VII International Scientific Agriculture Symposium, "Agrosym 2016" (6-9 October 2016, Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina) Proceedings. University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Agriculture, 2970 pp.
• Kızılkaya, R. & Ş. Hepşen, 2007. Microbiological properties in earthworm cast and surrounding soil amended with various organic wastes. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 38 (19-20): 2861-2876. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620701663107.
• Kızılkaya, R., T. Aşkın, B. Bayraklı & M. Sağlam, 2004. Microbiological characteristics of soils contaminated with heavy metals. European Journal of Soil Biology, 40: 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2004.10.002.
• Lewandowski, A. & M. Zumwinkle, 1999. Assessing the Soil System. A Review of Soil Quality Literature. Minessota Department of Agriculture, 63 pp.
• Marinari, S., G. Masciandar, B. Ceccanti & S. Grego, 2000. Influence of organic and mineral fertilizers on soil biological and physical properties. Bioresource Technology. 72: 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524 (99)00094-2
• Martens, D. A., 2000. Plant residue biochemistry regulates soil carbon cycling and carbon sequestration. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32 (3): 361-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717 (99)00162-5.
• Martin, P.J. & W. Stephens, 2001. “The Potential for Biomass Production on Restored Landfill Caps, 337-344”. In: Aspects of Applied Biology (Eds. M.J. Bullard, D.G. Christian, J.D. Knight, M.A. Lainsbury & S.R. Parker).
• Meli, S., M. Porto, A. Belligno, S. A. Bufo, A. Mazzatura & A. Scapa, 2002. Influence of irrigation with lagooned urban wastewater on chemical and microbiological soil parameters in a citrus orchard under Mediterranean condition. Science of The Total Environment, 285: 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697 (01)00896-8.
• Mujdeci, M., 2011. The effects of organic material applications on soil penetration resistance. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 9 (3/4 part 2): 1045-1047.
• O’sullivan, M.F., J.W. Diskon & D.J. Campell, 1987. Interpretation and presentation of cone resistance data in tillage and traffic studies. European Journal of Soil Science. 38 (1): 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1987.tb02131.x.
• Oades, J.M., 1984. Soil organic matter and structural stability: Mechanisms and implications for management. Plant and Soil, 76: 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02205590.
• Özenç, D. B., F. I. Yılmaz, C. Tarakçıoğlu & S. Aygün, 2019. Fındıktan üretilen atıkların toprağın fiziko-kimyasal ve biyolojik özelliklerine etkileri. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 32: 7-13. https://doi.org/10.29136/mediterranean.558856.
• Özenç, N., 2004. Fındık zurufu ve diğer organik materyallerin fındık tarımı yapılan toprakların özellikleri ve ürün kalitesi üzerine etkileri, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Toprak Anabilim Dalı, (Unpublished) Doktora Tezi, Ankara, Türkiye, 423 s.
• Ribon, A.A. & J. Tavares Filho, 2004. Models for the estimation of the physical quality of a yellow red latosol (oxisol) under pasture. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 47: 25-31.
• Sarker, T. C., G. Incerti, R. Spaccini, A. Piccolo, S. Mazzoleni & G. Bonanomi, 2018. Linking organic matter chemistry with soil aggregate stability: Insight from 13C NMR spectroscopy. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 117: 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.11.011.
• Smith, J.L. & E.A. Paul, 1990. “The Significance of Soil Microbial Biomass Estimations, 357-396”. In: Soil Biochemistry (Eds. J.M. Bollag & G. Stotzky), Newyork, 584.pp.
• Tavares Filho, J., C.T.M., Feltran, J.F.D. Oliveira & A.E.D. Almeida, 2012. Modelling of soil penetration resistance for an oxisol under no-tillage. Revista Brasileira de Ciˆencia do Solo, 36: 89-95.
• TMO, 2017. 2016 Yılı Fındık Sektör Raporu. 31 s.
• To, J. & B.D. Kay, 2005. Variation in penetrometer resistance with soil properties: the contribution of effective stress and implications for pedotransfer functions. Geoderma, 126: 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.08.006.
• Tüzüner, A., 1990. Toprak ve Su Analiz Laboratuarları El Kitabı. Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müd. Yay., Ankara, 375 s.
• Ünsal, T. & S.S. Ok, 2001. Description of charasteristics of humic substances from different west materials. Bioresource Technology, 78: 294-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524 (01)00019-0.
• Vaz, C.M.P., J.M. Manieri, I.C., de Maria & M. Tuller, 2011. Modeling and correction of soil penetration resistance for varying soil water content. Geoderma, 166: 92-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.07.016.
• Vaz, C.M.P., J.M. Manieri, I.C. de Maria & M.Th. van Genuchten, 2013. Scaling the dependency of soil penetration resistance on water content and bulk density of different soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 77: 1488. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2013.01.0016.
• Wardle, D.A. & A. Ghani, 1995. A critique of the microbial metabolic quotient (qCO2) as a bioindicator of disturbance and ecosystem development. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 27: 1601-1610. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717 (95)00093-T.
• Yursever, N., 1984. Deneysel İstatistik Metotları. Toprak ve Gübre Enstitüsü Yayınları, Genel Yayın No: 121, Ankara, 623 s.