The effect of supplemental irrigation and exogenous application of glycine betaine on chickpea performance in the semi-arid region

Year 2024, , 189 - 199, 01.07.2024

Mohsen Janmohammadi , Hasan Kouchakkhani , Naser Sabaghnia

https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1402726

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of foliar spraying of different concentrations of glycine betaine as an osmotic regulator and supplemental irrigation under rainfed conditions on chickpea growth and yield.
Material and Methods: Simultaneous effects of foliar spray of glycine betaine (0 mM: GB0, 25Mm: GB25, and 50 Mm: GB50) and different levels of irrigation (RF: rainfed or no irrigation, SI1: supplemental irrigation during flowering stage, SI2: two supplemental irrigations during flowering and podding, and FI: full irrigation) were assessed on the morphophysiological characteristics of chickpeas under field condition in the western part of Iran.
Results: The effect of SI treatments on the growth was much more noticeable than GB foliar application. Utilization SI2 + GB25 significantly improved chlorophyll content, pod and seed number, hundred seed weight, and biological yield. SI1 and SI2 increased grain yield by 30% and 62%, respectively, compared to RF conditions.
Conclusion: Taken together, two supplemental irrigation during flowering and podding along with foliar spray of GB25 as a reasonable management options increased seed yield and the water use efficiency.

Keywords

Chlorophyll, drought stress, evapotranspiration, pod number, rainfed, water productivity

Yarı kurak bölgede ilave sulama ve ekzojen glisin betain uygulamasının nohut performansına etkisi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, doğal yetiştirme koşulları altında ozmotik düzenleyici olarak farklı konsantrasyonlarda glisin betainin yapraklara uygulamasının ve ilave sulamanın nohutta büyüme ve verim üzerindeki etkisinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.
Materyal ve Yöntem: İran'ın batısında tarla koşullarında, yapraklara glisin betain uygulamasının (0 mM: GB0, 25Mm: GB25 ve 50 Mm: GB50) ve farklı sulama düzeylerinin (RF: yağmurla sulama veya sulamasız, SI1: çiçeklenme döneminde ek sulama, SI2: çiçeklenme ve bakla bağlama döneminde iki ilave sulama ve FI: tam sulama), nohutun morfofizyolojik özellikleri üzerindeki etkileri değerlendirilmiştir.
Araştırma Bulguları: SI uygulamalarının büyüme üzerindeki etkisi, GB yaprak uygulamasına göre çok daha belirgin olmuştur. SI2 + GB25 kullanımı klorofil içeriğini, bakla ve tohum sayısını, yüz tane ağırlığını ve biyolojik verimi önemli ölçüde iyileştirmiştir. SI1 ve SI2, RF koşullarına kıyasla tane verimini sırasıyla %30 ve %62 artırmıştır.
Sonuç: Sonuçlar birlikte ele alındığında, uygun bir yönetim seçeneği olarak çiçeklenme ve bakla bağlama döneminde iki ilave sulama ile GB25'in yaprağa uygulaması, tohum verimini ve su kullanım etkinliğini artırmıştır.

Keywords

Klorofil, kuraklık stresi, buharlaşma ve terleme, bakla sayısı, yağmurla beslenme, su verimliliği

References

• Ayaz, S., B. A. McKenzie & G. D. Hill, 1999. The effect of plant population on dry matter accumulation, yield and yield components of four grain legumes. Interaction, 105 (5.1): 4-5.
• Benali, A., N. El Haddad, S.B. Patil, A. Goyal, K. Hejjaoui, A. El Baouchi, F. Gaboun, M. Taghouti, M. Ouhssine & S. Kumar, 2023. Impact of terminal heat and combined heat-drought stress on plant growth, yield, grain size, and nutritional quality in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plants, 12 (21): 3726-3731. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12213726
• Clendennen, S.K. & N.W. Boaz, 2019. “Betaine Amphoteric Surfactants-Synthesis, Properties, and Applications, 447-469”. In: Biobased Surfactants 2nd Edition (Eds. D.G. Hayes, D.K.Y. Solaiman & R.D. Ashby). Academic Press and AOCS Press, 541 pp.
• Doaei, S., E. Pazirab, S. Mahmoudi & A.M. Torkashvand, 2020. Role of conservative agriculture in the sustainability of soil structure in achieving sustainable management. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), 10 (1): 59-69.
• Giri, J. (2011). Glycinebetaine and abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 6 (11): 1746-1751. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.6.11.17801
• Hasanuzzaman, M.D., L. Shabala, T.J. Brodribb, M. Zhou & S. Shabala, 2016. Assessing the suitability of various screening methods as a proxy for drought tolerance in barley. Functional Plant Biology, 44 (2): 253-266.
• Ibrahim, E.A., N.E. Ebrahim & G.Z. Mohamed, 2023. Effect of water stress and foliar application of chitosan and glycine betaine on lettuce. Scientific Reports, 13 (1): 17274. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43992-0
• Korbu, L., B. Tafes, G. Kassa, T. Mola & A. Fikre, 2020. Unlocking the genetic potential of chickpea through improved crop management practices in Ethiopia. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 40 (1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00618-3
• Nikolaou, G., D. Neocleous, A. Christou, E. Kitta & N. Katsoulas, 2020. Implementing sustainable irrigation in water-scarce regions under the impact of climate change. Agronomy, 10 (8): 1120-1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081120
• Oweis, T., A. Hachum & M. Pala, 2004. Water use efficiency of winter-sown chickpea under supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Water Management, 66 (2): 163-179.
• Pandey, V. & A. Shukla, 2016. “Improving Crop Yield Under Drought Stress Through Physiological Breeding, 331-348“. In Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants Vol 1, Physiology and Biochemistry (Eds. M.A. Hossain, S.H. Wani, S. Bhattacharjee, D.J Burritt & L.-S.P. Tran). Cham: Springer International Publishing, Cham, 526 pp.
• Pasandi, M., M. Janmohammadi & R. Karimizadeh, 2014. Evaluation of genotypic response of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars to irrigation regimes in Northwest of Iran. Agriculture (Pol'nohospodárstvo), 60 (1): 22-30. https://doi.org/10.2478/agri-2014-0003
• Phiri, C.K., K. Njira & G. Chitedze, 2023. An insight of chickpea production potential, utilization and their challenges among smallholder farmers in Malawi-A review. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 14 (1): 100713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100713
• Rani, A., P. Devi, U.C. Jha, K.D. Sharma, K.H. Siddique & H. Nayyar, 2020. Developing climate-resilient chickpea involving physiological and molecular approaches with a focus on temperature and drought stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10: 1759. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01759
• Reddy, S.J., 1983. A simple method of estimating the soil water balance. Agricultural Meteorology, 28 (1): 1-17. Salama, Y.A., 2022. Effect of glycine betaine, chitosan and salicylic acid on pepper plants under salt water irrigation conditions. Egyptian Journal of Desert Research, 72 (2): 353-363.
• Samineni, S., M.D. Mahendrakar, A. Hotti, U. Chand, A. Rathore & P. M. Gaur, 2022. Impact of heat and drought stresses on grain nutrient content in chickpea: Genome-wide marker-trait associations for protein, Fe and Zn. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 194: 104688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104688
• Seleiman, M.F., N. Al-Suhaibani, N. Ali, M. Akmal, M. Alotaibi, Y. Refay, T. Dindaroglu, H.H. Abdul-Wajid & M.L. Battaglia, 2021. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants, 10 (2): 259. Doi: 10.3390/plants10020259
• Singh, G., H. Ram, N. Aggarwal & N.C. Turner, 2016. Irrigation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) increases yield but not water productivity. Experimental Agriculture, 52 (1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479714000520
• Sreenivasulu, N. & U. Wobus, 2013. Seed-development programs: a systems biology-based comparison between dicots and monocots. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 64: 189-217.
• Yang, Y., J. Xia, X. Fang, H. Jia, X. Wang, Y. Lin, S. Liu, M. Ge, Y. Pu, J. Fang & L. Shangguan, 2023. Drought stress in ‘Shine Muscat’grapevine: consequences and a novel mitigation strategy-5-aminolevulinic acid. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14: 1129114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1129114