Greasy fleece weight and live weight performances of the Kaçeli sheep breed under conservation
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the greasy fleece weight (GFW) and shearing live weight at shearing (SLW) of the Kaçeli sheep breed conserved under Türkiye’s National Animal Genetic Resources Conservation Program.
Materials and Methods: The animal material for this study consisted of 291 Kaçeli sheep (283 females and 8 males) raised under semi-intensive conditions on the Çeşme Peninsula. The animals ranged in age from 2 to 7 years. Dirty fleece weights were recorded during shearing in May, and live weights at shearing were measured using digital scales. Due to the small sample size and physiological differences in males, ram data were evaluated only descriptively and were excluded from statistical models. Descriptive statistics, general linear models, least squares means, and phenotypic correlation analyses were performed on the ewe data using SAS software. Farm, age, and live weight were included as fixed effects in the models, and between-group differences were determined using the Duncan Multiple Range Test.
Results: Mean GFW was 1.70 kg in rams and 1.26 kg in ewes, while mean SLW was 57.61 kg and 41.40 kg, respectively. Farm effects were significant; Farm 2 showed the highest SLW (45.38 kg). Each 1 kg increase in SLW resulted in a 0.020 kg rise in GFW. Age negatively affected GFW (–0.046) but positively influenced SLW (1.112).
Conclusion: Kaçeli sheep display moderate productivity, broad phenotypic diversity, and strong adaptability, providing key data for sustainable breeding and conservation strategies.
Keywords
Conservation, phenotypic variation, sheep, wool
Supporting Institution
İzmir Metropolitan Municipality
Ethical Statement
We declare that there is no need for an ethics committee for this research.
Thanks
The authors wish to express their profound gratitude to the İzmir Metropolitan Municipality for its substantial financial and logistical support, as well as its pivotal role in field organization and other critical aspects of the study. Appreciation is also extended to the Çeşme Municipality and the Çeşmeköy Agricultural Development Cooperative for their invaluable collaboration and technical assistance throughout the research process.
References
- Alarslan, E., T. Aygün & N. Kaçar, 2019. Yalova genotipi koyunların kırkım sonu canlı ağırlığı ve yapağı özellikleri. Hayvan Bilimi ve Ürünleri Dergisi, 41: 63-72. https://doi.org/10.51970/jasp.912558
- Bağkesen, Ö. & S. Koçak, 2018. Ramlıç ve dağlıç koyunlarda kırkım sonu canlı ağırlık, yapağı verimi ve özellikleri. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, 11: 148-155. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.402769
- Becker, G.M., D. Schaub, J.B. Taylor, M.R. Mousel, C.S. Wilson, J.A. Smitchger, J. W. Thorne & B.M. Murdoch, 2025. Genome-wide associations with body and fleece weight in United States sheep. Genes, 16 (7): 733. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16070733
- Cloete, S.W.P., J.B. van Wyk & F.W.C. Neser, 2004. Estimates of genetic and environmental (co)variances for live weight and fleece traits in yearling South African Mutton Merino sheep. South African Journal of Animal Science, 34: 37-43.
- Corscadden, K., J.N. Biggs & D.K. Stiles, 2014. Sheep's wool insulation: A sustainable alternative use for a renewable resource? Resources Conservation and Recycling, 86: 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.01.004
- Doyle, E.K., J.W.V. Preston, B.A. McGregor & P.I. Hynd, 2021. The science behind the wool industry. The importance and value of wool production from sheep. Animal Frontiers, 11: 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfab005
- Drucker, A.G., V. Gomez & S. Anderson, 2001. The economic valuation of farm animal genetic resources: a survey of available methods. Ecological Economics, 36: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00242-1
- Eusebi, P.G., A. Martinez & O. Cortes, 2020. Genomic tools for effective conservation of livestock breed diversity. Diversity-Basel, 12: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12010008
- FAO, 2007. The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. (Eds. B. Rischkowsky & D. Pilling). Rome, Italy. 505 pp.
- FAO, 2015. The Second Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. (Eds. B. Rischkowsky & D. Pilling). FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments, Rome, 606 pp. https://doi.org/10.4060/I4787E