Research Article

The impact of inclusive landscape spaces on well-being: The case of Kapias Gardens (Poland)

Volume: 63 Number: 1 April 17, 2026
EN TR

The impact of inclusive landscape spaces on well-being: The case of Kapias Gardens (Poland)

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to examine the physical, sensory, and social dimensions of design, revealing how universal design in demonstration gardens provides accessible and multi-sensory experiences for diverse user groups. Material and Methods: The sub-spaces and user profiles of Kapias Gardens were observed, and the functions, universal design approaches, and effects on well-being were analyzed using a monographic method. Spaces were evaluated according to universal design principles, with user experiences supported through qualitative observation and spatial assessment. Results: Inclusive landscape design ensures equal opportunities for diverse users through physical accessibility, orientation, circulation, and sensory features. Spaces are effective when they provide comfort and functionality; spaces that encourage social interaction enhance user satisfaction and social integration. Conclusion: This study shows that inclusive landscape design enhances spatial quality and user experience. Approaches supporting accessibility, sensory diversity, and social interaction facilitate usage and positively affect psychological and social well-being. Thus, landscapes integrated with universal design serve as exemplary models for inclusivity and spatial quality, guiding contemporary space production.

Keywords

Demonstration gardens , experience , Kapias Gardens , universal design , well-being

References

  1. Ackerman, C. E., 2018. What is kaplan’s attention restoration theory? (Web page: https://positivepsychology.com/attention-restoration-theory/) (Date accessed: October 2025).
  2. American Society of Landscape Architects, 2025. Universal design: gardens. (Web page: https://www.asla.org/universalgardens.aspx) (Date accessed: September 2025).
  3. Center for Universal Design, 2025. The 7 principles. (Web page: https://universaldesign.ie/about-universal-design/the-7-principles) (Date accessed: October 2025).
  4. Chang, K. K. P., F. K. Y. Wong, K.L. Chan, F. Wong, H.C. Ho, H. M.S. Wong, Y.S. Ho, J. W. M. Yuen, J.Y. Siu & L. Yang, 2020. The impact of the environment on the quality of life and the mediating effects of sleep and stress. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (22): 2-17.
  5. Edward Steinfeld, E. & J. Maisel, 2012. Universal Design: Creating Inclusive Environments. John Wiley & Sons. New York, 410 pp.
  6. Fişek, N. 2025. Ealth services and the health problems of families in worker health. (Web page: https://ttb.org.tr/n_fisek/kitap_1/33.html?ysclid=mgph8anb3171113367) (Date accessed: October 2025) (in Turkish).
  7. Gregis, A., C. Ghisalberti, S. Sciascia, F. Sottile & C. Peano, 2021. Community garden initiatives addressing health and well-being outcomes: A systematic review of infodemiology aspects, outcomes, and target populations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (4): 1943 (1-12).
  8. Hansen, G., J. Sewards, R. Almeida & A. Dunn, 2012. Design and implementation of edible plant demonstration gardens: A case study of the Putnam County Extension Edible Garden, ENH1205/EP466, 11/2012. EDIS 2012 (12): 1-15. https://journals.flvc.org/edis/article/view/120361
  9. Kuśmierski, J., 2020. Hortuseum Musealisation of the European Gardens in the Twenty-First Century. Creative Commons Attribution, Poland, 67 pp.
  10. Ogrody Kapias, 2025a. Ogrodydo zwiedza­nia. (Web page: https://ogrodykapias.pl/o-nas/) (Date accessed: September 2025).
APA
Karadan, D., Chmielewski, L., & Malkoç True, E. (2026). The impact of inclusive landscape spaces on well-being: The case of Kapias Gardens (Poland). Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 63(1), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1818527