Research Article

Assessing Air Quality Improvement as a Regulating Ecosystem Service in the Ege University Housing Campus

Volume: 54 Number: 1 March 20, 2017
Çiğdem Coşkun Hepcan , Şerif Hepcan
EN TR

Assessing Air Quality Improvement as a Regulating Ecosystem Service in the Ege University Housing Campus

Abstract

Urban green areas provide many valuable ecosystem services such as regulating storm water infiltration, improving air quality, reducing urban heat island effects, provisioning food and habitats for many species, providing recreation and nature education for the city dwellers. Housing campus of Ege University is one of the largest and the most intact urban green patches in the Bornova district. This study aimed to answer the research question that is at what level air quality improvement as a regulating ecosystem service has been provided by the canopy cover of the Ege University housing campus? For this purpose, I-tree canopy tool was used to analyze the removal of atmospheric air pollutants, and carbon sequestrated and stored by canopy cover of the housing campus. The results revealed that tree and shrub canopy covers 48.3 % of the campus. While about 321.57 tons of Carbon Dioxide was sequestered annually, 8107.86 tons of Carbon Dioxide was stored by plants. In addition, it was calculated that these plants removed about 28.70 kg of Carbon Monoxide (CO), 143.85 kg of Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), 1.58 tons of Ozone (O3), 90.6 kg of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), 69.61 kg PM2.5 and 479.90 kg PM10 particulate matter per year.

Keywords

Canopy assessment,regulating ecosystem services,air quality improvement,Ege University Housing Campus

References

  1. Albayrak, İ. 2012. Ekosistem servislerine dayalı havza yönetim modelinin İstanbul-Ömerli havzası örneğinde uygulanabilirliği, Doktora Tezi, İTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  2. Agren, C. 1991. EMEP report, MCS-W 1/91 Norway.
  3. Ahern, J., Cilliers, S. and Niemela, J. 2014. The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: a framework for supporting innovation, Landscape and Urban Planning, 125: 254–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.020
  4. Aygün, M ve Yeşil Akça, G. 2012. T.C. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı bakanlığımız ve bağlı kuruluşlarınca yürütülen Ar-Ge nitelikli projeler, www.milliparklar.gov.tr/korunanalanlar/belgeler/tescil.pdf, Erişim: 21 Şubat 2016.
  5. Balkız, Ö. 2015. Ekosistem hizmetleri ve havza yönetimi, http://suyonetimi.ormansu.gov.tr/Libraries/su/EkosistemHizmetleri_OzgeBalkiz_20151216.sflb.ashx, Erişim: 21 Şubat 2016.
  6. Bassett, C.G. 2015. The environmental benefits of trees on an urban university campus, Master of Environmental Studies Capstone Projects. 66. p.
  7. Bloniarz, D. and Beals, T. 2014. I-tree canopy assessment to Springfield MA, http://www.regreenspringfield.org/, Accessed July, 20, 2016.
  8. Bolund, P. and Hunhammar, S. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas, Ecological Economics, 29: 293–301.
  9. Brack, C.L. 2002. Pollution mitigation and carbon sequestration by an urban forest. Environmental Pollution, 116:195– 200.
  10. Carey, B. and Tobin, B. 2016. Ecosystem services provided by mountshannon village trees, https://static.rasset.ie/documents/ radio1/mountshannon-ecosystem-services-provided-by-mountshannon-village-june-2016.pdf, Erişim 20 Temmuz 2016.
APA
Coşkun Hepcan, Ç., & Hepcan, Ş. (2017). Assessing Air Quality Improvement as a Regulating Ecosystem Service in the Ege University Housing Campus. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 54(1), 113-120. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.299257

Cited By