Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Kültür Balıkçılığı Yapan İşletme Kümelerinin Doğal Su Kaynakları Çevresindeki Faaliyetleri: Nijerya’nın Delta Eyaletinde Ekonomik Gelişmeye Etkileri

Year 2019, Volume: 56 Issue: 1, 101 - 110, 27.03.2019
https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.398715

Abstract





Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Nijerya’nın Delta eyaletinde doğal su kaynakları etrafında kümelenen kültür
balıkçılığı faaliyetlerinin birincil, ikincil ve uyarılmış ekonomik etkileri incelenmiştir.
Materyal ve Metot: Gayeli olarak seçilen 150 kümelenmiş işletmeciden anket yoluyla toplanan
birincil veriler tanımlayıcı ve çıkarımsal istatistikler kullanarak analiz edilmiştir.
Bulgular: Bulgular, doğal su kaynakları etrafında kümelenmiş kültür balıkçılığı yapan tarım işletmelerinin anlamlı ve pozitif birincil, ikincil ve uyarılmış ekonomik etkileri olduğunu göstermiştir.
Kümelenmiş kültür balıkçılığı yapan işletmelerin gelirleri, kültür balıkçılığı girdi tedarikçilerinin tüketim harcamaları ve hükümetler tarafından su ürünleri yetiştiriciliği işletmecilerinden toplanan
vergiler, dolaşımdaki toplam para miktarına (ekonomik canlılığa) önemli (p<0.05) katkı yapmıştır.
Sonuç: Kümelenen kültür balıkçılığı işletmelerinin iç bölgelerde izole olarak çalışan meslektaşlarından daha fazla gelir elde etmeleri, kültür balıkçılığı kümelenmesinde lokasyon olarak doğal su kaynağının önemini göstermektedir. Bulgular, kümelenen tarım işletmelerinin, girdi tedarikçilerinin ve
işcilerin gelirleri yoluyla ekonomik canlılığı dolaylı olarak etkilediğini göstermektedir. Tüm tarım
işletmecileri tarafından ödenen vergiler ekonomi üzerinde uyarılmış pozitif etkiye sahiptir. Kültür
balıkçılığı işletme kümelerinin sağladığı ekonomik gelişme gözönüne alındığında, Nijerya’nın Delta
Eyaletinde bu oluşumunun sınırının genişletilmesi gerektiği ifade edilebilir.

References

  • References:Ali, M. (2007). The Competitiveness and Viability of Cluster Based Cottage Indus-tries: The Case of Handloom Sector in Ethiopia. EDRI (Ethiopian Development Research Institute) Working Paper Series, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Bentley, James W.; Cooper, Jason A.; Howell, Michael. (2014). South Carolina’s timber industry, 2011timber product output and use—forest inventory and analysis factsheet. e-Science Update SRS–096.Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service,Southern Research Station. 4 p.
  • Calos, Da S .C.(2008). Agro-Industries for Development U.K. CAB International MPG Book Group, Pp 561-568.ISBN: 978 1 84593 576 4 (CABI hardback edition).
  • Duru, M.(2012) New Challenges for Industrial Policy in Nigeria. Department of Economics, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. Universal Journal of Management and Social Sciences Vol.2, No.7
  • Hackett and Dilts (2004). Do clusters make a Difference? Defining and Assessing their Economic Performance. Regional studies, 44, 697-715.
  • INNO, R. (2010). Experience of Compliance to GAP: Initiative of Cluster of Western GAP in Thailand. Paper presented at EurepGAP Asia 05:Potential and challenges of EurepGAP in Asia, Manila, Philippines 2010. Available at: http//www.unctad.org/trade_env/test1/meetings./eurepgap/Dr%20Korpraditsukul %20Report.pdf.
  • McCormick, D. (2003). Can Africa Industrialize Through Enterprise Cluster? The Courier, 196, pp. 33-35.
  • Nicaraguan Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2004), Estrategia para la Reconversion la Diversification competitiva de la Caficultura en Nicaragua.
  • Pelmetto Institute. (2013). A study to Assess Current Situations and Opportunities for South Carolinas Agricultural and Bio-Energy Opportunities. Palmetto Institute Agribusiness Summit, 2013.
  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Location, clusters and the new microeconomics of competition, Business Economics, vol. 33-1:7-17.
  • Porter, M.E. (2000), Location, competition and economic development: Local clusters in the global economy, Economic Development Quarterly, vol. 14-1:Porter, M. (2009) clusters and economic policy: Aligning public policy with the new economics of competition. Retrieved from Harvard Business School http//www.hbs.edu/faculty/pages/items.aspx Number=46864.ife, New York: Vintage.
  • Staatz, J.E.,(1998),making globalization work, Norton & Company, New York.
  • UNIDO (2009), Cluster development Report for pro-poor growth: the UNIDO approach: Business, Investment and Technology Services Branch. Program Development and Technical Cooperation Division
  • UNIDO (2013), Industrial development Report 2013.Sustaining Employment Growth.
  • Uzor, O. (2004). Small and medium scale enterprise cluster development in Southeastern Region of Nigeria. University of Bremen, Germany.

AQUACULTURE AGRIBUSINESS CLUSTERS FORMATION AROUND NATURAL WATER SOURCES: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC PROGRESS IN DELTA STATE, NIGERIA

Year 2019, Volume: 56 Issue: 1, 101 - 110, 27.03.2019
https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.398715

Abstract

Objective: In the study, the primary, secondary and induced economic effects of aquaculture clusters operations around natural water sources were evaluated in Delta state, Nigeria.
Material and Methods: Primary data collected with questionnaire from purposively selected 150
cluster operators, were analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results: The findings indicated that aquaculture agribusinesses that cluster around natural water
sources generated significant and positive primary, secondary and induced economic effects.The
income of principal operators of clustered aquaculture, the consumption expenditures of aquaculture inputs suppliers and taxes harvested from aquaculture agribusiness operators by government contributed significantly (p<0.05) to the total amount of money in circulation (economic
bouyancy).
Conclusion: The operators of agribusiness clusters earned more income than their counterparts
that operated in isolation in the hinterland, indicating the importance natural water source as a
requirement for aquaculture cluster location.The finding shows that agribusiness clusters indirectly impacted economic bouyancy through the income of laborers and input suppliers.Tax Taxes
paid by all agribusiness participants had an induced positive effect on the economy. Considering
the evidence of prospects for development derivable from aquaculture agribusiness clusters, it is
imperative to expand its frontier in Delta State, Nigeria. 

References

  • References:Ali, M. (2007). The Competitiveness and Viability of Cluster Based Cottage Indus-tries: The Case of Handloom Sector in Ethiopia. EDRI (Ethiopian Development Research Institute) Working Paper Series, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Bentley, James W.; Cooper, Jason A.; Howell, Michael. (2014). South Carolina’s timber industry, 2011timber product output and use—forest inventory and analysis factsheet. e-Science Update SRS–096.Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service,Southern Research Station. 4 p.
  • Calos, Da S .C.(2008). Agro-Industries for Development U.K. CAB International MPG Book Group, Pp 561-568.ISBN: 978 1 84593 576 4 (CABI hardback edition).
  • Duru, M.(2012) New Challenges for Industrial Policy in Nigeria. Department of Economics, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. Universal Journal of Management and Social Sciences Vol.2, No.7
  • Hackett and Dilts (2004). Do clusters make a Difference? Defining and Assessing their Economic Performance. Regional studies, 44, 697-715.
  • INNO, R. (2010). Experience of Compliance to GAP: Initiative of Cluster of Western GAP in Thailand. Paper presented at EurepGAP Asia 05:Potential and challenges of EurepGAP in Asia, Manila, Philippines 2010. Available at: http//www.unctad.org/trade_env/test1/meetings./eurepgap/Dr%20Korpraditsukul %20Report.pdf.
  • McCormick, D. (2003). Can Africa Industrialize Through Enterprise Cluster? The Courier, 196, pp. 33-35.
  • Nicaraguan Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2004), Estrategia para la Reconversion la Diversification competitiva de la Caficultura en Nicaragua.
  • Pelmetto Institute. (2013). A study to Assess Current Situations and Opportunities for South Carolinas Agricultural and Bio-Energy Opportunities. Palmetto Institute Agribusiness Summit, 2013.
  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Location, clusters and the new microeconomics of competition, Business Economics, vol. 33-1:7-17.
  • Porter, M.E. (2000), Location, competition and economic development: Local clusters in the global economy, Economic Development Quarterly, vol. 14-1:Porter, M. (2009) clusters and economic policy: Aligning public policy with the new economics of competition. Retrieved from Harvard Business School http//www.hbs.edu/faculty/pages/items.aspx Number=46864.ife, New York: Vintage.
  • Staatz, J.E.,(1998),making globalization work, Norton & Company, New York.
  • UNIDO (2009), Cluster development Report for pro-poor growth: the UNIDO approach: Business, Investment and Technology Services Branch. Program Development and Technical Cooperation Division
  • UNIDO (2013), Industrial development Report 2013.Sustaining Employment Growth.
  • Uzor, O. (2004). Small and medium scale enterprise cluster development in Southeastern Region of Nigeria. University of Bremen, Germany.
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Felix Achoja

Publication Date March 27, 2019
Submission Date March 16, 2018
Acceptance Date October 15, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 56 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Achoja, F. (2019). AQUACULTURE AGRIBUSINESS CLUSTERS FORMATION AROUND NATURAL WATER SOURCES: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC PROGRESS IN DELTA STATE, NIGERIA. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 56(1), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.398715

      27559           trdizin ile ilgili görsel sonucu                 27560                    Clarivate Analysis ile ilgili görsel sonucu            CABI logo                      NAL Catalog (AGRICOLA), ile ilgili görsel sonucu             EBSCO Information Services 

                                                       Creative Commons Lisansı This website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.