Pamukta (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Su Stresi

Year 2006, Volume: 43 Issue: 3, 101 - 111, 01.09.2006

Hüseyin Başal Aydın Ünay

Abstract

Keywords

-

Water Stress in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Abstract

Keywords

-

References

• Ackerson, R.C. 1980. Stomatal response of cotton to water stress and abscisic acid as affected by water stress history. Plant Physiol. 69: 455-459.
• Allen, R. 1995. Dissection of oxidative stress tolerance using transgenic plants. Plant Physiol. 107:1049-1054.
• Ball, R.A., D.M. Oosterhuis, and A. Mauromoustakos. 1994. Growth dynamics of the cotton plant during water-deficit stress. Agron. J. 86:788-795.
• Basal, H., C.W. Smith,P.S. Thaxton, and J.K. Hemphill. 2005. Seedling drought tolerance in upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.) Crop Sci. 45: 2 (in press).
• Basal, H., P. Bebeli, C.W. Smith, and P. Thaxton. 2003. Root growth parameters of converted race stocks of upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.) and two BC2F2 populations. Crop Sci. 43: 1983-1988.
• Bland, W.L., and W.A. Dugas. 1989. Cotton root growth and soil water extraction. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53:1850-1855.
• Bohnert, H.J., D.E. Nelson, and R.G. Jensen. 1995. Adaptations to environmental stress. Plant Cell 7, 1099-1111.
• Borel, C., and T. Simonneau. 2002. Is the ABA concentration in the sap collected by pressurizing leaves relevant for analyzing drought effects on stomata? Evidence from ABA-fed leaves of transgenic plants with modified capacities to synthesize ABA. J. Exp. Bot. 53 (367): 287-296.
• Cook, C.G. 1985. Identifying root traits among MAR and non-MAR cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. cultivars that relate to performance under limited moisture conditions. Master Thesis. Texas A&M University, USA.
• Cook, C.G., and K.M. El-Zik. 1993. Fruiting and lint yield of cotton cultivars under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. Field Crops Res. 33:411-421.
• Cushman, J.C., and H.J. Bohnert. 2000. Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Plant Biology. 3: 117-124.
• Guinn, G., J.R. Dunlap, and D.L. Brummett. 1990. Influence of water deficit on the abscisic acid and indole-3-acetic acid contents of cotton flower buds and flowers. Plant Physiol. 93:1117-1120.
• Hartung, W., S. Wilkinson, and W.J. Davis. 1998. Factors that regulate abscisic acid concentrations at the primary site of action at the guard cell. J. Exp. Bot. 49: 361-367.
• Howard, D.D., C.O. Gwathney, G.M. Lessman, and R.K. Roberts. 2001. Fertilizer additive rate and plant growth regulator effects on cotton. J. Cotton Sci. 5:42-52.
• Hurd, E.A., and E.D. Spratt. 1975. Root patterns in crops related to water and nutrition uptake. p. 167-235. In U.S. Gupta (ed.) Physiological Aspects of Dryland Farming. Oxford & IBH Publ. Co., New Delhi.
• Ingram, J., and D. Bartels. 1996. The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47:377-403.
• Jordan, W.R., P.J. Shouse, A. Blum, F.R. Miller, and R.L. Monk. 1984. Environmental physiology of sorghum: II Epicuticular wax load and cuticular transpiration. Crop Sci. 24: 1168-1173.
• Koheil, M.A.H., S.H. Hilal, T.S. El-Alfy, and E. Leistner. 1992. Quaternary ammonium compounds in intact plants and cell suspension cultures of Atriplex semibaccata and A. halinus during osmotic stress. Phytochemistry 31, 2003-2008.
• Krieg, D.R. 1997. Genetic and environmental factors affecting productivity of cotton. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf. p: 1347.
• Lacape, M.J., J. Wery, and D.J.M. Annerosa. 1998. Relationship between plant and soil water status in five field-growing cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars. Field Crops Res. 57:29-48.
• Leidi, E.O., M. Lopez, J. Gorham, and J.C. Gutierrez. 1999. Variation in carbon isotope discrimination and other traits to drought tolerance in upland cotton cultivars under dryland conditions. Field Crops Res. 61: 109-123.
• Lewitt, J. 1980. Responses of plants to environmental stress. Vol. II. Water, Radiation, Salt and Others. Academic Press, New York, p. 395-434.
• Malik, R.S., J.S. Dhankar, and N.C. Turner. 1979. Influence of soil water deficits on root growth of cotton seedlings. Plant and Soil. 53:109-115.
• McCarty, J.C., Jr., and J.N. Jenkins. 1993. Registration of 79 day-neutral primitive cotton germplasm lines. Crop Sci. 33:351.
• McMichael, B.L., D.M. Oosterhuis, J.C. Zack, and C.A. Beyrouty. 1999. Growth and development of root system, in J.M. Stewart, D.M. Oosterhuis, and J. Heitholt (eds.), Cotton Physiology. Book II. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN.
• McMichael, B.L., J.E. Quisenberry, and D.R. Upchurch. 1987. Lateral root development in exotic cotton. Environ. Exp. Bot. 27:499-502.
• McWilliams, Denise. 2004. Drought Strategies for Cotton. Cooperative Extension Service Circular 582 College of Agriculture and Home Economics http://www.cahe.nmsu.edu/pubs/circulars/CR582.pdf. Erişim:October 2004.
• Moffat, A. S. (2002). Finding new ways to protect drought-stricken plants. Science Magazine, May issue.
• Morgan, J.M. and M.K. Tan. 1996. Chromosomal location of a wheat osmoregulation gene using RFLP analysis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. 23:803
• Naidu, B.P., D.F. Cameron, and S.V. Konduri. 1998. Improving drought tolerance of cotton by glycinebetaine application and selection. Proceedings of the 9th Australian Agronomy Conference, Wagga wagga.
• Nepomuceno, A.L., D.M. Oosterhuis, and J.M. Stewart. 1998. Physiological response of cotton leaves and roots to water deficit induced by polyethylene glycol. Env. Exp. Bot. 40 (1) 29-41.
• Nepomuceno, A.L., J.M. Stewart, D. Oosterhuis, R. Turley, N. Nevmaier, and J.R.B. Farias. 2000. Isolation of a cotton NADP(H) oxidase homologue induced by drought stress. Pesq. Agropec. Brasilia. 35(7):1407-1416.
• Osmond, C.B., M.P. Austin, J.A. Berry, W.D. Billings, and W.E. Winner. 1987. Stress physiology and distribution of plants. Bioscience 37:38-48.
• Pace, P.F., H.T. Cralle, S.H.M. El-Halawany, J.T. Cothren, and S.A. Senseman. 1999. Drought-induced changes in shoot and root growth of young cotton plants. J. Cotton Sci. 3:183-187.
• Pettigrew, W.T. 2004. Moisture deficit effect on cotton lint yield, yield components, and boll distribution. Agron. J. 96:377-383.
• Plaut, Z., A. Carmi, and A. Grava. 1996. Cotton root and shoot response to subsurface drip irrigation and partial wetting of the upper soil profile. Irrig. Sci. 16 (3):107-113.
• Prior, S.A., H.H. Rogers, G.B. Runion, B.A. Kimball, J.R. Mauney, K.F. Lewin, J. Nagy, and G.R. Hendry. 1995. Free-air carbon dioxide enrichment of cotton: root morphological characteristics. J. Environ. Qual. 24 (4):678-683.
• Quisenberry, J.E., B. Roark, and B.L. McMichael. 1982. Use of transpiration decline curves to identify drought-tolerant cotton germplasm. Crop Sci. 22:918-922.
• Quisenberry, J.E., W.R. Jordan , B.A. Roark, and D.W. Fryrear. 1981. Exotic cotton as genetic sources for drought resistance. Crop Sci. 21:889-895.
• Radin, J.W. and D.L.Hendrix. 1988. The apoplastic pool of abscisic acid in cotton leaves in relation to stomatal closure. Planta. 174:180-186.
• Reddy, K.R., H.F. Hodges, and J.M. McKinion. 1996. Food and agriculture in the 21st century. World Res. Rev. 8:80-97.
• Richards, R.A., H.M. Rawson, and D.A. Jhonson. 1986. Glaucousness in wheat: Its development and affect on water-use efficiency, gas exchange and photosynthetic tissue temperatures. Austral. J. Plant Physiol. 13:465-473.
• Roark, B., and J.E. Quisenberry. 1977. Evaluation of cotton germplasm for drought resistance. p. 49-50. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Conf.. Natl. Cotton Coun. Memphis, TN, USA.
• Saranga, Y., C.X. Jiang, R.J. Wright, D. Yakır, and A.H. Paterson. 2004. Genetic dissection of cotton physiological response to arid conditions and their inter- relationships with productivity. Plant, Cell, and Environment. 27:263-277.
• Schroeder J.I., G.J. Allen., V. Hugouvieux, J.M. Kwak, and D. Waner. 2001. Guard cell signal transduction. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 52: 627-658.
• Sunkar R., D. Bartels, H.H. Kirch. 2003. Overexpression of a stress-inducible aldehyde dehydrogenase gene from Arabidopsis thaliana in transgenic plants improves stress tolerance. Plant J. 35(4):452-64.
• Taylor, H.M., and B. Klepper. 1974. Water relationship of cotton. 1. Root growth and water use as related to top growth and soil water content. Agron. J. 66:584
• Tuberosa, R., M.C. Sanguineti, P. Landi, S. Salvi, E. Casarini, and S. Conti. 1998. RFLP mapping of quantitative loci controlling abscisic acid concentration in leaves of drought- stressed maize (Zea mays L.) Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 97: 744-755.
• Ulloa, M., R.G. Cantrell, R.G. Percy, E. Zeiger and Z. Lu. 2000. QTL analysis of stomatal conductance and relationship to lint yield in an interspecific cotton. Journal of Cotton Sci., 4:10-18.
• Voloudakis, A.E., S.A. Kosmas, S. Tsakas, E. Eliopoulos, M. Loukas, K. Kosmidou. 2002. Expression of selected drought-related genes and physiological response of Greek cotton genotypes. Functional Plant Biology. 29(10): 1237- 1245.
• Xu, X., and H.M. Taylor. 1992. Increase in drought resistance of cotton seedling treated with Mepiquat Chloride. Agron. J. 84:569-574.
• Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., M. Kasuga, Q. Liu, K. Nakashima, Y. Sakuma, H. Abe, Z.K. Shinwari, M. Seki, K. Shinozaki. 2002. Biological mechanisms of drought stress response. JIRCAS Working Report p:1-8.
• Yang, R.C., S. Jana, and J.M., Clarke. 1991. Phenotypic diversity and Association of some potentially drought-responsive characters in drum wheat. Crop. Sci. 31:1484-1491.
• Zhao, D., and D. Oosterhuis. 1997. Physiological response of growth chamber-grown cotton plants to the plant growth regulators PGR-IV under water-deficient dtress. Environ. and Exp. Botany. 38:7-14.