Year 2019, Volume 14, Issue 27, Pages 345 - 360 2019-05-23

PERSUASION AND AGREEMENT IN PLATO'S PROTAGORAS
PLATON'UN PROTAGORAS'INDA İKNA ETME VE ANLAŞMA SAĞLAMA

Tonguç SEFEROĞLU [1]

11 13

An investigation of the dialogue form is vital for understanding Plato’s philosophical arguments. Recent studies related to the dialogical aspects of Plato’s writings have underlined the significance of dramatis personae and their role in defining the philosophical content. This paper examines the roles played by Socrates and Protagoras in Plato’s Protagoras. This study concludes that the way in which Socrates and Protagoras examine the nature of excellence offers some norms of the correct philosophical argument, such as careful checking and philosophical humility. The findings can contribute to a better grasp of Plato’s metaphilosophical thoughts on agreement and epistemic development.

Diyalog formunun incelenmesi Platon’un felsefi argümanlarını anlamak için son derece önemlidir. Yakın zamanda yapılmış çalışmalar dramatik karakterlerin ve bu karakterlerin felsefi içeriğini belirlemedeki rolünün öneminin altını çizmektedir. Bu yazı Sokrates ve Protagoras’ın Platon’un Protagoras eserinde oynadıkları rolü irdelemektedir. Bu çalışmada şu sonuca ulaşılmıştır: Sokrates ve Protagoras’ın erdemin doğasını araştırırken izledikleri yol doğru felsefi konuşma yapmak için gerekli bazı normları, örneğin dikkatli denetleme ve felsefi tevazu gibi, ortaya koymaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular Platon’un anlaşma ve epistemik gelişme üzerine meta-felsefi düşüncelerinin daha iyi anlaşılmasına katkı sağlayabilir.

  • Burnyeat, Myles Fredric. "Dramatic Aspects of Plato's Protagoras." The Classical Quarterly 63.1 (2013): 419-422.
  • Christensen, David. "Epistemic Modesty Defended 1." The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. Ed. David Christensen and Jennifer Lackey. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. 76-96.
  • Cohen, Stewart. "A Defence of the (Almost) Equal Weight View." The Epistemology of Disagreement. Ed. David Christensen and Jennifer Lackey. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. 98-120.
  • Cooper, James M and D S Hutchinson, Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1997.
  • Elga, Adam. "How to Disagree about How to Disagree." Ed. Richard Feldman and Ted A. Warfield. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. 175-186.
  • Elgin, Catherine. "Persistent Disagreement." Disagreement. Ed. Richard Feldman and Ted A. Warfield. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. 53-68.
  • Evnine, Simon J. Learning From One's Mistakes: Epistemic Modesty and the Nature of Belief. Vol. 82. 2001.
  • Gagarin, M. "The Purpose of Plato's Protagoras." Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1969. 133-164.
  • Long, Alex G. Conversation and Self-Sufficiency in Plato. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • McCabe, Mary Margaret. Platonic Conversation. New York: Oxford, 2015.
  • Morrow, Glenn R. "Plato's Conception of Persuasion." The Philosophical Review 62.2 (1953): 234-250.
  • Nehamas, Alexander. "Eristic, Antilogic, Sophistic, Dialectic: Plato's Demarcation of Philosophy from Sophistry." History of Philosophy Quarterly 7.1 (1990): 3-16.
  • Sidwell, Keith. "Some thoughts on the sophist in bed." Hermathena (2005): 67-76.
  • Warman, M S. "Plato and Persuasion." Greece & Rome 30.1 (1983): 48-54.
  • Wolfsdorf, David. "The Historical Reader of Plato's Protagoras." The Classical Quarterly 48.1 (1998): 126-133.
Primary Language en
Subjects Philosophy
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Orcid: 0000-0002-8261-5759
Author: Tonguç SEFEROĞLU (Primary Author)
Institution: ARDAHAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ARDAHAN İNSANİ BİLİMLER VE EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ
Country: Turkey


Bibtex @research article { flsf540440, journal = {FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi)}, issn = {}, eissn = {2618-5784}, address = {Hamdi BRAVO}, year = {2019}, volume = {14}, pages = {345 - 360}, doi = {}, title = {PERSUASION AND AGREEMENT IN PLATO'S PROTAGORAS}, key = {cite}, author = {SEFEROĞLU, Tonguç} }
APA SEFEROĞLU, T . (2019). PERSUASION AND AGREEMENT IN PLATO'S PROTAGORAS. FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi), 14 (27), 345-360. Retrieved from http://dergipark.org.tr/flsf/issue/45340/540440
MLA SEFEROĞLU, T . "PERSUASION AND AGREEMENT IN PLATO'S PROTAGORAS". FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi) 14 (2019): 345-360 <http://dergipark.org.tr/flsf/issue/45340/540440>
Chicago SEFEROĞLU, T . "PERSUASION AND AGREEMENT IN PLATO'S PROTAGORAS". FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi) 14 (2019): 345-360
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - PERSUASION AND AGREEMENT IN PLATO'S PROTAGORAS AU - Tonguç SEFEROĞLU Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - DO - T2 - FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi) JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 345 EP - 360 VL - 14 IS - 27 SN - -2618-5784 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi) PERSUASION AND AGREEMENT IN PLATO'S PROTAGORAS %A Tonguç SEFEROĞLU %T PERSUASION AND AGREEMENT IN PLATO'S PROTAGORAS %D 2019 %J FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi) %P -2618-5784 %V 14 %N 27 %R %U
ISNAD SEFEROĞLU, Tonguç . "PERSUASION AND AGREEMENT IN PLATO'S PROTAGORAS". FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi) 14 / 27 (May 2019): 345-360.