Year 2015, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 101 - 106 2015-12-01


Ahmet Hakan Yüksel [1]

206 269

Bureaucracy had been referred to as the usual suspect whose door was knocked with an attempt to address an organizational failure and had always been pointed at as the villain that rendered organizations incapable to adapt to the shifting paradigms in the global business environment. Nothwithstanding the fact that it has survived throughout the last century there is an extensive literature in organizational studies that is dedicated to reveal its imperfections especially after the incorporation of such concepts as fluidity and complexity into management studies. This conceptual paper proposes that bureaucracy and complexity are not mutually exclusive concepts. They both can co-exist on the way to create knowledge-based organizations in which novel ideas emerge and innovative outcomes are cultivated
Bureaucracy, complexity thinking, knowledge in organizations, big data, adaptability, innovation
  • Anderson, P., (1999). Complexity Theory and Organization Science, Organization Science, 10(3): 216-232.
  • Bauman, Z., (2000/2012). Liquid Modernity, Cambridge: Polity.
  • Birkinshaw, J., (2010). Reinventing Management, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Carroll, J.S., Rudolph, J.W. and Hatakenaka, S., (2005). Learning from Organizational Experience. In: Easterby, M. and Lyles, M.A. (eds.). The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Chakravarthy, B., McEvily, S, Doz, Y. and Rau, D., (2003). Knowledge Management and Competitive Advantage. In: Easterby, M. and Lyles,
  • M.A. (eds.). The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Chiles, T., Meyer, A. and Hench, T., (2004). Organizational emergence: The origin and transformation of Branson Missouri’s musical theaters, Organization Science, 15(5): 499-519.
  • Choo, C.W., (2006), The Knowing Organization: How Organizations Use Information and Construct Meaning, Create Knowledge, and Make
  • Decisions, New York: Oxford University Press. Clegg, S. and Lounsbury, M. (2009). Weber: Sintering the Iron Cage: Translation, Domination and Rationality. In: Adler, P.S. (ed.). The Oxford
  • Handbook of Sociology and Organization Studies, New York: Oxford University Press. Davenport, T.H., Barth, P. and Bean, R., (2015). How ‘Big Data’ Is Different, MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring 2015: 7-9.
  • Dooley, K., (1997). A complex adaptive systems of organization change, Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, & Life Science, (1): 69-97.
  • Follett, M.P. (1924/2013). Creative Experience, Mansfield Centre: Martino Publishing.
  • Garvey, B. and Williamson, B., (2002). Beyond Knowledge Management: Dialogue, creativity and corporate curriculum, Essex: FT Prentice Hall.
  • Goldstein, J.A., (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues, Emergence, 1(1): 49-72.
  • Goldstein, J., Hazy, J.K. and Lichtenstein, B.B., (2010). Complexity and Nexus of Leadership: Leveraging Nonlinear Science to Create Ecologies of Innovation, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Haas, P.M., (1992). Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Efforts to Protect Stratospheric Ozone. In: Haas, P.M. (ed.).
  • Knowledge, Power and International Policy Coordination, Columbia, University of South Carolina Press. Held, D. and McGrew, A., (2003). Globalization. In: Held, D. and McGrew, A. (eds.). The Global Transformations Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate, Cambridge: Polity.
  • Huff, A.S. and Huff, J.O., (2000). When Firms Change Direction, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kamoche, K.N., Cunha, M.P., Cunha, J.V., (2002). Introduction and overview. In: Kamoche, K.N., Cunha, M.P. and Cunha, J.V. (eds.).
  • Organizational Improvisation, New York: Routledge. Johannessen, J.A., Olsen, B. and Olaisen, J., (1999). Aspects of innovation theory based on knowledge-management, International Journal of Information Management, (19): 121-139.
  • Leavitt, H.J., (2005). Top Down: Why Hierarchies Are Here to Stay and How to Manage Them More Effectively, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Lichtenstein, B.B., (2014). Generative Emergence: A New Discipline of Organizational, Entrepreneurial, and Social Innovation, New York:
  • Oxford University Press. Manville, B., (2003). Learning in the Knowledge Era, In: Chatzkel, J.L. (ed.). Knowledge Capital: How Knowledge-Based Enterprises Really Get
  • Built, New York: Oxford University Press. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C. and Byers, A.H., (2011). Big Data: The next frontier for innovation, competition and productivity, San Francisco: McKinsey Global Institute.
  • McMillan, E., (2008). Complexity, Management and the Dynamics of Change: Challenges for Practice, New York: Routledge.
  • Nahapiet, J., (2008). There and Back Again? Organization Studies 1965-2006, In: Dopson, S., Earl, M. and Snow, P. (eds.). Mapping the Management Journey: Practice, Theory, and Context, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • NESSI (2012). Big Data White Paper,, Date of Access: 05.2015.
  • Pettigrew, A. M., (1990). Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice, Organization Science, 1(3): 267-292.
  • Rothwell, W.J., Lindholm, J.E. and Wallick, W.G., (2004). What CEOs Expect from Corporate Training, New York: Amacom.
  • Stacey, R.D., (2001). Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation, London: Routledge.
  • Thompson, P. and Alvesson, M. (2005). Bureaucracy at Work: Misunderstandings and Mixed Blessings. In: Du Gay, P. (ed.). The Values of
  • Bureaucracy, New York: Oxford University Press. Townley, B., (2008). Reason’s Neglect, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Wagner, P., (2012). Modernity: Understanding the present, Cambridge: Polity.
  • Weber, M., (1925). Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. (1967). In: Rheinstein, M. (ed)., New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R. and McKelvey, B., (2007). Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era, The Leadership Quarterly, (18): 298-318.
  • Yüksel, A.H., (2014). Visiting the Iron Cage: Bureaucracy and the Contemporary Workplace. In: Dereli, T., Soykut-Sarıca, Y. and Taşbaşı-Şen,
  • A. (eds.). Labor and Employment Relations in a Globalized World: New Perspectives on Work, Social Policy and Labor Market Implications, Heidelberg: Springer.
Subjects Humanities, Multidisciplinary
Other ID JA62DB74PS
Journal Section Articles

Author: Ahmet Hakan Yüksel

Bibtex @ { pap270999, journal = {PressAcademia Procedia}, issn = {}, eissn = {2459-0762}, address = {PressAcademia}, year = {2015}, volume = {1}, pages = {101 - 106}, doi = {10.17261/pressacademia.2016118143}, title = {FROM BUREAUPHOBIA TO BUREAUCOGNITIO}, key = {cite}, author = {Yüksel, Ahmet Hakan} }
APA Yüksel, A . (2015). FROM BUREAUPHOBIA TO BUREAUCOGNITIO. PressAcademia Procedia, 1 (1), 101-106. DOI: 10.17261/pressacademia.2016118143
MLA Yüksel, A . "FROM BUREAUPHOBIA TO BUREAUCOGNITIO". PressAcademia Procedia 1 (2015): 101-106 <>
Chicago Yüksel, A . "FROM BUREAUPHOBIA TO BUREAUCOGNITIO". PressAcademia Procedia 1 (2015): 101-106
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - FROM BUREAUPHOBIA TO BUREAUCOGNITIO AU - Ahmet Hakan Yüksel Y1 - 2015 PY - 2015 N1 - doi: 10.17261/pressacademia.2016118143 DO - 10.17261/pressacademia.2016118143 T2 - PressAcademia Procedia JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 101 EP - 106 VL - 1 IS - 1 SN - -2459-0762 M3 - doi: 10.17261/pressacademia.2016118143 UR - Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 PressAcademia Procedia FROM BUREAUPHOBIA TO BUREAUCOGNITIO %A Ahmet Hakan Yüksel %T FROM BUREAUPHOBIA TO BUREAUCOGNITIO %D 2015 %J PressAcademia Procedia %P -2459-0762 %V 1 %N 1 %R doi: 10.17261/pressacademia.2016118143 %U 10.17261/pressacademia.2016118143
ISNAD Yüksel, Ahmet Hakan . "FROM BUREAUPHOBIA TO BUREAUCOGNITIO". PressAcademia Procedia 1 / 1 (December 2015): 101-106.