Does Plate Size Used in Food Service Affect Portion Perception?

Öz

 

Introduction: One of the environmental factor affect obesity is increased size of food portions. According to widespread belief people consume much more food with large plates The food portion perception could be changed with the size of plates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of plate size on food portion perception. Methods: This experimental study includes 100 students with ages ranged 20-34 years. One portion of pasta was served with three different plates.  And the portion of pasta was asked to determined for each plates from each participants separately. The data was analyzed by SPSS 17.0 and p value below 0.05 was considered as significant. Results: The rate of Delboeuf illusion in second plate was %7 and it reaches up to 23% in third plate. Nearly half of the participants (49%) had Delboeuf illusion with first plate. The accuracy of portion evaluations of attendance does not show significant difference according to gender and body mass index. Conclusion: As a result, serving foods with small plates may reduce the amount of food and decrease the energy intake. Therefore, it could be used for a cost effective method for obesity fight.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Obesity,portion sizes,services

Kaynakça

1. 1. Brantley PJ, Myers VH, Roy HJ. Enviromental and life style influences on obesity. J La State Med Soc 2005;157 (1):19-27.
2. 2. Ledikwe JH, Ello-Martin JA, Rolls BJ. Portion size and the obesity epidemic. J Nutr 2005;135(4):905-909.
3. 3. Akarçay E, Suğur N. Dışarıda yemek: Eskişehir’de yeni orta sınıfın fast-food yeme-içme örüntüleri. JSR 2015; 18 (1):1-29.
4. 4. Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM. Patterns and trends in food portion sizes, 1977-1998. JAMA 2003;289 (4):450-453.
5. 5. Wansink B, Cheney MW. Super Bowls: Serving bowl size and food consumption. JAMA 2005; 293(14):1732-1728. DOI:10.1001/jama.293.14.1727.
6. 6. Ittersum KV, Wansink B. Plate size and color suggestibility: Delboeuf Illusion’s bias on serving and eating behavior. J Consum Res 2012; 39(2):215-228.
7. 7. Penaforte FRO, Japur CC, Diez-Garcia RW, Hernandez JC, Palmma-Linares I, Chiarello PG. Plate size does not affect perception of food portion size. J Hum Nutr Diet 2014; 27(S2):214-219. DOI:10.1111/jhn.12111nsink
8. 8. McClain AD, van der Bos W, Matheson D, Desai M, McClure SM, Robinson TN. Visual illusions and plate design: the effects of plate rim widths and rim coloring on perceived food portion size. Int J Obes (Lond) 2014;38(5): 657-662. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2013.169.

9. 9. Sharp D, Sobal J.Using plate mapping to examine sensitivity to plate size in food portions and meal composition among college students. Appetite 2012;59(3): 639–645
10. 10. DiSantis KI, Birch LL, Davey A, Serrano EL, Zhang J, Bruton Y, et al.Plate size and children’s appetite. Effects of larger dishware on self-served portions and intake. Pediatrics 2013;131(5): 1451–1458.
11. 11. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Halverson KH, Meengs JS. Using a smaller plate did not reduce energy intake at meals. Appetite 2007;49 (3):652-660.
12. 12. YipW, Wiessing KR, Budgett S, Poppitt SD. Using a smaller dining plate does not suppress food intake from a buffet lunch meal in overweight, unrestrained women. Appetite 2013 ;69:102-7.
13. 13. van Kleef E, Shimizu M, Wansink B.Serving bowl selection biases the amount of food served. J Nutr Educ Behav 2012;44(1):66–70.
14. 14. Brunstrom JM, Rogers PJ, Pothos EM, Calitri R, Tapper K. Estimating everyday portion size using a 'method of constant stimuli': in a student sample, portion size is predicted by gender, dietary behaviour, and hunger, but not BMI. Appetite 2008; 51(2):296-301
15. 15. Burger KS, Kern M, Coleman KJ. Characteristics of self-selected portion size in young adults. J Am Diet Assc 2007;107:611-818.