Estimating the cost of bovine tuberculosis at the public and farm levels: The case of Samsun Province, Turkey
Öz
In this study, the costs of bovine tuberculosis cases at the public and farm levels were investigated in Samsun Province, Turkey. In determination of the public costs of the disease namely tuberculin costs, transportation costs, expenditure on personnel and the amount of compensation paid, were taken into consideration. In determining the losses due to the disease at the farm level, namely losses of milk and meat and the extra costs of animal replacement, were calculated. For the calculations where the disease was detected, information of outbreak and the breed yield averages of the infected animals were used. In 2016, the public cost of the disease was ₺ 652.780, with lost milk production valued at ₺ 563.500, and lost meat production valued at ₺ 37.646 for females and ₺ 6.193 for males. The cost of paid for animal restocking was calculated at ₺ 1.052 per animal. In addition, the total cost of the disease for Samsun Province in 2016 current prices was estimated at ₺ 1.418.971 ($ 403.117).
Anahtar Kelimeler
Destekleyen Kurum
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Bilimsel araştırma fonu (This study was funded bythe Ondokuz Mayıs University Scientific Research Project Fund )
Proje Numarası
(PYO. VET.1901.16.012)
Teşekkür
The authors thank Gregory T. Sullivan for helpful comments and for editing the English in an earlier version of this manuscript.
Kaynakça
- 1.Ray A. Estimation of the Economic Burden of Tuberculosis in India, Acta Scientific Medical Science. 2018; 2 (8).
- 2. Sheehy SJ, Christiansen KH. Cost/benefit analysis of Irish bovine tuberculosis eradication scheme. Dublin, University College Dublin. 1991; 79.
- 3. Anonymous a. National Dairy Council, Raw Milk Prices, Milk Prices.2016.
- 4. Anonymous b. Veterinary Biological Product Selling Price, Bovine Tuberculin PPD, Etlik Central Veterinary Control and Research Institute. 2016.
- 5. Turkish Statical Institute. Livestock and Animal Product, Prices and Production Value. 2016.
- 6. Anonymous c. Fuel Price, Socar energy. 2016.
- 7. Anonymous a. Veterinary Physician Fees, the Decision of Turkish Veterinary Medical Association. 2016.
- 8. Meisinger G. Untersuchungen über die ökonomischen Auswirkungen der Rinder tuberkulosetilgung auf die Produktivität der Rinderbestände, 1. Mitteilung: Auswirkung auf die Milchproduktion, Münchener Tierrztliche Wochenschrift, 1969; pp. 806-809.
- 9. Butler A, Lobley M, Winter M. Economic Impact Assessment of Bovine Tuberculosis in the South West of England, University of Exeter, CRPR Research Paper, No 30, 2010.
- 10. Alpan O, Aksoy AR. Cattle breeding and fattening, 7th edition. Favori Printing & Publishing San. Tic. Ltd. Sti, Uskudar, Uskudar, Istanbul. 2015; pp.33-5.
- 11. Alpan O. Cattle Breeding and Breeding, Çamlı Livestock, İzmir. 1992; pp.39.
- 12. Tıknazoğlu B. Cattle breeding, Samsun Provincial Directorate of Agriculture, Farmer Education and Extension Branch Publication, Samsun.2010.
- 13. Official Gazzete (2009): Cattle Bovine Tuberculosis Regulation, (27188, 2 Nisan/2009).
- 14. Radostits OM, Blood DC, Gay CC. Veterinary Medicine A Textbook of the Diseases of Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats and Horses Eighth Edition, W.B. Saunders, London, UK. 1990. (ISSN: 0-7020-1592-X.)
Öz
Proje Numarası
(PYO. VET.1901.16.012)
Kaynakça
- 1.Ray A. Estimation of the Economic Burden of Tuberculosis in India, Acta Scientific Medical Science. 2018; 2 (8).
- 2. Sheehy SJ, Christiansen KH. Cost/benefit analysis of Irish bovine tuberculosis eradication scheme. Dublin, University College Dublin. 1991; 79.
- 3. Anonymous a. National Dairy Council, Raw Milk Prices, Milk Prices.2016.
- 4. Anonymous b. Veterinary Biological Product Selling Price, Bovine Tuberculin PPD, Etlik Central Veterinary Control and Research Institute. 2016.
- 5. Turkish Statical Institute. Livestock and Animal Product, Prices and Production Value. 2016.
- 6. Anonymous c. Fuel Price, Socar energy. 2016.
- 7. Anonymous a. Veterinary Physician Fees, the Decision of Turkish Veterinary Medical Association. 2016.
- 8. Meisinger G. Untersuchungen über die ökonomischen Auswirkungen der Rinder tuberkulosetilgung auf die Produktivität der Rinderbestände, 1. Mitteilung: Auswirkung auf die Milchproduktion, Münchener Tierrztliche Wochenschrift, 1969; pp. 806-809.
- 9. Butler A, Lobley M, Winter M. Economic Impact Assessment of Bovine Tuberculosis in the South West of England, University of Exeter, CRPR Research Paper, No 30, 2010.
- 10. Alpan O, Aksoy AR. Cattle breeding and fattening, 7th edition. Favori Printing & Publishing San. Tic. Ltd. Sti, Uskudar, Uskudar, Istanbul. 2015; pp.33-5.
- 11. Alpan O. Cattle Breeding and Breeding, Çamlı Livestock, İzmir. 1992; pp.39.
- 12. Tıknazoğlu B. Cattle breeding, Samsun Provincial Directorate of Agriculture, Farmer Education and Extension Branch Publication, Samsun.2010.
- 13. Official Gazzete (2009): Cattle Bovine Tuberculosis Regulation, (27188, 2 Nisan/2009).
- 14. Radostits OM, Blood DC, Gay CC. Veterinary Medicine A Textbook of the Diseases of Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats and Horses Eighth Edition, W.B. Saunders, London, UK. 1990. (ISSN: 0-7020-1592-X.)
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makaleleri |
| Yazarlar | |
| Proje Numarası | (PYO. VET.1901.16.012) |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 31 Ağustos 2020 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 24 Aralık 2019 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2020 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2 |
