Araştırma Makalesi

Milwaukee Psikoterapi Beklentileri Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Cilt: 15 Sayı: 21 31 Ocak 2020
PDF İndir
EN TR

Adaptation of Milwaukee Psychotherapy Expecta-tions Scale into Turkish: Validity and Reliability Study

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Milwaukee Psychotherapy Expectations Questionnaire (MPEQ). 328 adult individuals (248 females, 80 males) participated in the study. The construct validity of the scale was tested by confirmatory factor analysis. In order to test the convergent validity, the correlations with Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help and Thoughts About Psychotherapy were examined. The reliability of the scale was calculated by internal consistency and test-retest methods. As a result of the factor analysis, MPEQ was formed a two-factor structure, namely, process expectations and outcome expectations similar to the original scale. The process and outcome expectations subscale were found to be positively correlated with Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help Scale and negatively correlated with Thougts About Psychotherapy Survey. The internal consistency coefficient of the process subscale of the scale was .84, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was .82. The internal subscale coefficient of the scale was .88 and the test-retest reliability coefficient was .76. It was determined that MPEQ is a valid and reliable tool that can be used to measure the psychotherapy expectations of Turkish individuals.

Keywords

Psychotherapy,Psychotherapy expectations,Validity,Reliability

Kaynakça

  1. Berzins, J. E. (1971). Revision of the psychotherapy expectancy inventory, Unpublished manuscript.
  2. Bollen, K.A. (1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects, Psychological Bulletin, 107 (2), 256-59.
  3. Connolly Gibbons, M. B., Crits-Christoph, P., de la Cruz, C., Barber, J. P., Siqueland, L. ve Gladis, M. (2003). Pretreatment expectations, interpersonal functioning, and symptoms in the prediction of the therapeutic alliance across supportive-expressive psychotherapy and cognitive therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 13(1), 59-76, doi: 10.1093/ptr/kpg007
  4. Constantino, M. J (2012) Believing is seeing: An evolving research program on patients' psychotherapy expectations. Psychotherapy Research, 22(2), 127-138, doi: 10.1080/10503307.2012.663512
  5. Constantino, M. J., Glass, C. R., Arnkoff, D. B., Ametrano, R. M. ve Smith, J. Z. (2011). Expectations. In (J. C. Norcross, Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Evidence-based responsiveness, 354-376. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  6. Constantino, M, J., Ametrano, R. M. ve Greenberg, R. P. (2012). Clinician intervention and participant characteristics that foster adaptive patient expectations for psychotherapy and psychotherapeutic change. Psychotherapy, 49, 557-569. doi:10.1031/a0029440
  7. Dew, S. E. ve Bickman, L. (2005). Client expectancies about therapy, Mental Health Services Research, 7, 21-33. doi:10.1007/s11020-005-1963-5
  8. Ekberg, S., Barnes, R.K., Kessler, D.S., Malpass, A. ve Shaw, A.R.G. (2014) Relationship between expectation management and client retention in online Cognitive Behavioural Therapy. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, doi:10.1017/S1352465814000241.
  9. Erkorkmaz, Ü., Etikan, İ., Demir, O., Özdamar, K. ve Sanisoğlu, S. Y. (2013). Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve uyum indeksleri. Türkiye Klinikleri Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, 33(1), 210-223.
  10. Fischer, E. H. ve Turner, J. L. (1970). Orientations to seeking professional help: development and research utility of an attitude scale erratum, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35(3). Doi: 10.1037/h0020198.