“AB Hukuku Kısıtları Işığında Brexit Sonrası AB-Birleşik Krallık İlişkileri İçin Olası Model(ler)”

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 20 , 35 - 68, 13.08.2021

Narin Idriz

https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.978754

Öz

Bu makale AB hukukundan kaynaklanan ve gelecekteki AB-BK ilişkilerinin dayanacağı anlaşmayı içerik ve şekil bakımından kısıtlayacak olan etmenleri ortaya
çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu hukuki kısıtlar gelecekte müzakere edilecek olan anlaşma için tarafların sahip olduğu manevra alanının sınırlarını belirleyecektir. Bu
sınırları belirlemekle hangi ilişki modellerinin gelecekteki AB-BK ilişkileri için seçenekler arasında olup hangilerinin olamayacağını tespit etmek mümkün olacaktır. Hâlihazırda var olan bazı ilişki modellerinin elenmesi, hangi modeller üzerinde odaklanılması ve gerekirse hangilerinin adapte edilip gelecekteki AB-BK ilişkileri
için temel oluşturabileceğini ortaya koyacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gelecekteki AB-BK Anlaşması, Hukuki Kısıtlar, Özerklik İlkesi, Brexit Sonrası İlişki Modelleri

POSSIBLE MODEL(S) FOR POST-BREXIT EU-UK RELATIONS IN LIGHT OF EXISTING CONSTRAINTS IN EU LAW

Öz

This article aims to identify the constraints flowing from EU law that will limit both the content and form of the post-Brexit EU-UK relationship. These legal constraints will reveal what the room for manoeuvre will be in determining the future relationship. Determining what lies within and outside the boundaries set by these constraints will help shed light on the possible future models on which this relationship could be based. Even though these boundaries are far from being clear and precise, they will nevertheless help eliminate some of the pre-existing relationship models, leaving us with the possible options, which could be further adapted to suit the needs of the future relationship

Anahtar Kelimeler

Future EU-UK Agreement, Legal Constraints, Principle of Autonomy, Post-Brexit Models

Kaynakça

• Allee, Todd, Manfred Elsig, and Andrew Lugg. "Is the European Union Trade Deal with Canada New or Recycled? A Text-as-Data Approach." Global Policy 8, no. 2 (2017): 246-52.
• Bradley, Curtis A., and Trevor W. Morrison. "Presidential Power, Historical Practice, and Legal Constraint." Columbia Law Review 113 (2013): 1097-161.
• Brexit and the Backstop: Everything You Need to Know. UK in a Changing Europe (https://ukandeu.ac.uk/brexit-and-the-backstop-everything-you-need-to-know/: 11 February 2019).
• Castillo de la Torre, Fernando. "Opinion 1/00, Proposed Agreement on the Establishment of a European Common Aviation Area." Common Market Law Review 39, no. 6 (2002): 1373-93.
• Contartese, Cristina. "The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order in the Ecj’s External Relations Case Law: From the “Essential” to the “Specific Characteristics” of the Union and Back Again." Common Market Law Review 54 (2017): 1627-71.
• Craig, Paul. "Constitutions, Constitutionalism and the European Union." European Law Journal 7, no. 2 (2001): 125-50.
• Cuyvers, Armin. "The Confederal Comeback: Rediscovering the Confederal Form for a Transnational World." European Law Journal 19, no. 6 (2013): 711-38.
• Dashwood, Alan. "States in the European Union." European Law Review 23 (1998): 201-16.
• Disdier, Anne-Celia, and Keath Head. "The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade." The Review of Economics and Statistics 90, no. 1 (2008): 37-48.
• Fahey, Elaine. "CETA and the Global Governance Law: What Kind of Model Agreement Is It Really in Law?". European Papers 2, no. 1 (2017): 293-302.
• Fallon, Richard H. "Constitutional Constraints." California Law Review 97, no. 4 (2009): 975-1037.
• Garner, Bryan A. Black's Law Dictionary. 8 ed. USA: Thomson-West, 2007.
• ———. A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage. 2 ed.: OUP, 2001.
• Grigonis, Simas. "Investment Court System of CETA: Adverse Effects on the Autonmy of EU Law and Possible Solutions." International Comparative Jurisprudence 5, no. 2 (2019): 127-41.
• Kassoti, Eva. "The Council v. Front Polisario Case: The Court of Justice’s Selective Reliance on International Rules on Treaty Interpretation." European Papers 2, no. 1 (2017): 23-42.
• ———. "The Front Polisario v. Council Case: The General Court, Völkerrechtsfreundlichkeit and the External Aspect of European Integration (First Part)." European Papers 2, no. 1 (2017): 339-56.
• Kirkpatrick, Betty. The Cassel Concise English Dictionary. London: Cassel Publishers Limited, 1989.
• Klabbers, Jan. "Völkerrechtsfreundlichkeit? International Law and the EU Legal Order." In European Foreign Policy, edited by Panos Koutrakos. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.
• Kuner, Christopher. "International Agreements, Data Protection, and EU Fundamental Rights on the International Stage: Opinion 1/15, EU-Canada PNR." Common Market Law Review 55 (2018): 857-82.
• Leonelli, Giulia Claudia. "CETA and the External Autonomy of the EU Legal Order: Risk Regulation as a Test." Legal Issues of Economic Integration 47, no. 1 (2020): 43-70.
• Majone, Giandomenico. "Unity in Diversity: European Integration and the Enlargement Process." European Law Review 33, no. 4 (2008): 457-81.
• Maresceau, Marc. "A Typology of Mixed Bilateral Agreements." In Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and Its Member States in the World, edited by Christophe Hillion and Panos Koutrakos, 11-28. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010.
• Peers, Steve. "EC Frameworks of International Relations: Co-Operation, Partnership and Association." In The General Law of E.C. External Relations, edited by Alan Dashwood and Christophe Hillion: Sweet & Maxwell, 2000.
• Phinnemore, David. Association: Stepping-Stone or Alternative to EU Membership? Contemporary European Studies, 6. Edited by Clive Archer and Judy Batt. England: Sheffield Academic Press, 1999.
• Pierson, Paul. "The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis." Comparative Political Studies 29, no. 2 (April 1996): 123-63.
• Rasi, Aurora. "Front Polisario: A Step Forward in the Judicial Review of International Agreements by the Court of Justice?". European Papers 2, no. 3 (2017): 967-75.
• Schermers, Henry G. "Opinion 1/91 of the Court of Justice, 14 December 1991; Opinion 1/92 of the Court of Justice, 10 April 1992." Common Market Law Review (1992): 991-1009.
• Sinclair, John M. Collins Cobuild English Language Dictionary. London: HarperCollins, 1994.
• Tezcan, Narin. "Legal Constraints on EU Member States as Primary Law Makers: A Case Study of the Proposed Permanent Safeguard Clause on Free Movement of Persons in the EU Negotiating Framework for Turkey’s Accession." PhD diss., Leiden University, 2015.
• Van der Loo, Guillaume, Peter Van Elsuwege, and Roman Petrov. "The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement: Assessment of an Innovative Legal Instrument." EUI Working Papers, no. LAW 2014/09. (2014).
• Weiler, Joseph H. H. "The Transformation of Europe." Yale Law Journal 100 (1990-1991): 2403-83.