İdari Yargı Kararları Çerçevesinde Bilimsel Yayın Etiği Soruşturmaları

Sayı: 1 1 Ocak 2014
Mustafa Yaşar Demircioğlu
PDF İndir
EN TR

Öz

Promoting honesty in scientific researches is significantly important in terms of public interest in academic and scientific public services. To that end, first of all qualified and honest scientific understanding, qualified and honest research, and qualified and honest scientist who would provide those mentioned opportunities are needed to be existed. Debates about honesty and scientific honor in academic studies considered as reflection of scientists’ qualifications have been increased. Academic corruption has turned into a common behavior among scientist in all levels. Within the cruel, arbitrary and ideological competency environment within universities and battle for certain positions, fake, misleading and deceptive paper issuing has been a common behavior among faculty members to the aim of career promotion and certain positions. Several incidents such as plagiarisation, unnecessary publishing, duplication, dissection, unjust authorship, ghost authorship or bounty authorship are some of the unethical behaviors that could be encountered in higher education institutions. The scientific quality of the papers issued during the process to obtain doctorate, assistant PhD., and PhD. titles has been gradually decreased. Thus, it is apparent that both universities and the Higher Education Institution are required to establish a scientific and an objective evaluation system in these subjects regarding training qualified individuals for public order, welfare and responsibility toward future generations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Scientific integrity, research and publication ethics, ethics investigation, plagiarism, gift authorship, duplication, ghost authorship, falcification, slicing

Kaynakça

  1. Kaynakça Bulunmuyor

Kaynak Göster

APA
Demircioğlu, M. Y. (2014). İdari Yargı Kararları Çerçevesinde Bilimsel Yayın Etiği Soruşturmaları. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 1, 145-218. https://izlik.org/JA25CT64JN
AMA
1.Demircioğlu MY. İdari Yargı Kararları Çerçevesinde Bilimsel Yayın Etiği Soruşturmaları. ABD. 2014;(1):145-218. https://izlik.org/JA25CT64JN
Chicago
Demircioğlu, Mustafa Yaşar. 2014. “İdari Yargı Kararları Çerçevesinde Bilimsel Yayın Etiği Soruşturmaları”. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, sy 1: 145-218. https://izlik.org/JA25CT64JN.
EndNote
Demircioğlu MY (01 Ocak 2014) İdari Yargı Kararları Çerçevesinde Bilimsel Yayın Etiği Soruşturmaları. Ankara Barosu Dergisi 1 145–218.
IEEE
[1]M. Y. Demircioğlu, “İdari Yargı Kararları Çerçevesinde Bilimsel Yayın Etiği Soruşturmaları”, ABD, sy 1, ss. 145–218, Oca. 2014, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA25CT64JN
ISNAD
Demircioğlu, Mustafa Yaşar. “İdari Yargı Kararları Çerçevesinde Bilimsel Yayın Etiği Soruşturmaları”. Ankara Barosu Dergisi. 1 (01 Ocak 2014): 145-218. https://izlik.org/JA25CT64JN.
JAMA
1.Demircioğlu MY. İdari Yargı Kararları Çerçevesinde Bilimsel Yayın Etiği Soruşturmaları. ABD. 2014;:145–218.
MLA
Demircioğlu, Mustafa Yaşar. “İdari Yargı Kararları Çerçevesinde Bilimsel Yayın Etiği Soruşturmaları”. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, sy 1, Ocak 2014, ss. 145-18, https://izlik.org/JA25CT64JN.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Yaşar Demircioğlu. İdari Yargı Kararları Çerçevesinde Bilimsel Yayın Etiği Soruşturmaları. ABD [Internet]. 01 Ocak 2014;(1):145-218. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA25CT64JN