Is Conditionality For Loans From International Financial Institutions A Legitimate Way To Influence National Policies?

Abstract

The globalization of the international financial system continues rapidly. In the second part of the twentieth century, a new era started in the development of intergovernmental fiscal organizations with the foundation of the International Monetary Fund (hereinafter IMF) and the World Bank (hereinafter WB). Today, these international financial institutions (hereinafter IFI) play an indispensable role in the new globalized financial order. Day by day, the growing influence of the IFI has increased the number of disputes on this issue. One of the controversial issues is the conditionality policies of the IFI, and their relationship with democracy. Although it is alleged that conditionality is beneficial for the improvement of democracy, it seems that it is inimical to development of democracy. This essay will investigate whether these conditionality policies are legitimate ways to affect national policies.

Kaynakça

1. Abouharb, R. and Cingranelli, D. (2007) Human Rights and Structural Adjustment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
2. Abouharb, R. and Cingranelli, D. (2006). “The Human Rights Effects of World Bank Structural Adjustment, 1981–2000,” International Studies Quarterly 50(2): 233–62
3. Masood Ahmed, Timothy Lane and Marianne Schulze-Ghattas,’Refocusing IMF Conditionality’ (Finance & Development 38 no4 D 2001) accessed 01 March 2011
4. Alexander, N. (2006). “Decentralization and Sovereignty: How Policy Space Is Eroded,” Social Watch Report 2006. Uruguay: The Third World Institute.
5. Jean Pierre Allegret and Philippe Dulbecco, ‘The Institutional Failures Of International Monetary Fund Conditionality’ (Rev Int Org (2007) 2:309–327) accessed 11March 2011
6. Barro, Robert, 1998, “The IMF Doesn’t Put Out Fires, It Starts Them,” Business Week, December 7 Jacqueline Best, Legitimacy Dilemmas: The IMF’s Pursuit Of Country Ownership (Third World Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2007, Pp 469 – 488) accessed 12 March 2011
7. Ariel Buira, An Analysis Of IMF Conditionality (Oxford University, Department Of Economics Discussion, 104-2002) Accessed 11 March 2011
8. Chelsea Brown, Democracy’s Friend or Foe? The Effects of Recent IMF Conditional Lending in Latin America (International Political Science Review 2009 30: 431) accessed 11 March 2011

9. Collier, Paul. 1999. “Learning from Failure: The International Financial Institutions as Agencies of Restraint in Africa’, in Andrea Schedler, Larry Diamond and Marc Plattner, The Self-Restraining State:Power and Accountability in New Democracies (Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner)
10. Crisp, B. and Kelly, M. (1999). “The Socioeconomic Impacts of Structural Adjustment” International Studies Quarterly 43(3): 533–52
11. Mac Darrow, Between Light and Shadow: Between Light and Shadow: The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and International Human Rights Law( Studies in International Law Volume I, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2003)
12. Erik Denters, New Challenges To IMF Jurisdiction (Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 1998) accessed 10 March 2011
13. E.J. Dionne, Jr., The IMF & its critics (Commonweal, Jan 16, 1998) accessed 11 March 2011
14. Drazen, A. (2002). “Conditionality and Ownership in IMF Lending: A Political Economy Approach,” IMF Staff Papers 49(1): 36–67.
15. Axel Dreher, ‘A public choice perspective of IMF and World Bank lending and Conditionality’ (2003) accessed 03 March 2011
16. Axel Dreher, ‘IMF conditionality: Theory and Evidence’ (2009) accessed 07 March 2011
17. Richard Epstein Bargaining with the State ( Princeton University Press, Princeton 1993) page 39-41 Ethier, D. (2003). “Is Democracy Promotion Effective? Comparing Conditionality and Incentives,” Democratization 10(1): 99–120.
18. Frey, B.S. (1997). The public choice of international organizations. In D.C. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on public choice, 106–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Friedman, T. (2000). The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization. New York:Random House.
20. Garuda, G. (2000), “The Distributional Effects of IMF Programs: A Cross Country Analysis” Gerster, Richard (1982) ‘The IMF and Basic Needs Conditionality’, Journal of World Trade Law 16: 497–519.
21. Gianviti, F. (1999) ‘The International Monetary Fund and the Liberalization of Capital Movements’, pp. 7–16 in Current Developments in Monetary and Financial Law. Washington, DC: IMF.
22. Gold, Joseph (1996) Interpretation: The IMF and International Law. London: Kluwer Law International.
23. Gold, Joseph (1984) Legal and Institutional Aspects of the International Monetary System: Selected Essays, Vol. II. Washington, DC: IMF.
24. Goldstein, M. (2000). IMF Structural Programs. In M. Feldstein (Ed.), Economic And Financial Crises In Emerging Market Economies, 363–437. Chicago: University of Chicago.
25. Erica R. Gould, Money Talks: Supplementary Financiers and International Monetary Fund Conditionality ( International Organization Foundation, Vol. 57, No. 3 (Summer, 2003), pp. 551-586)
26. accessed 15 February 2011
27. Jochen Hippler, ‘Democratisation of the Third World After the End of the Cold War’ (Pluto Press, London, 1995)
28. Holder, William (1999) ‘Fund Jurisdiction Over Capital Movements’, ILSA Journal of International Comparative Law 5: 407–15.
29. IMF Executive Directors and Voting Power (March 03, 2011) http://www.imf.org/external/np/ sec/memdir/eds.htm accessed 10 March 2011
30. International Monetary Fund, ‘Conditionality in Fund-Supported Programs’ (20 February 2001) accessed 04 March 2011
31. International Monetary Fund, ‘IMF Conditionality’ (September 27, 2010) accessed 07 March 2011
32. Olivier Jeanne, Jonathan D. Ostry, and Jeromin Zettelmeyer, ‘A Theory of International Crisis Lending and IMF Conditionality’ (October 2008, IMF Working Papers, Vol. , pp. 1-33) < http:// ssrn.com/abstract=1316704 > accessed 08 March 2011