Araştırma Makalesi

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MEDIA COVERAGE OF WHISTLEBLOWING CASES

Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1 1 Temmuz 2021
PDF İndir
EN TR

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MEDIA COVERAGE OF WHISTLEBLOWING CASES

Öz

The way and manner, in which whistle blowing stories are told and constructed by the media, affect and influences the way the public view whistle blowers. For a whistle blowing story to receive attention from the media, it must fit with the prevailing news agenda and predominant social and economic trends. Through a comparative discourse and quantitative content analysis, the study concludes that with laws that protect the whistle blowers from victimization and retaliation, a legal framework that promotes, make ease the whistle blowing process, ensure that agencies investigate, respond to whistle blowers claims and protect whistle blowers in the public sectors. A sound media that exposes persecution of whistle blowers and penalty for employers both in the public and private sector that maltreat whistle blowers, more persons can come forward to expose misconduct.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Adetayo, O. (2016, December 22). FGokays 5% of recoveredlootforwhistleblowers.Punch.Retrieved fromhttp://punch.ng.com/fg-okays-5-recovered-loot-whistleblowers/
  2. Brennan, N., & Kelly, J. (2007).A study of whistle blowing among trainee auditors. The British Accounting Review, 39(1), 61-87.7

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Halkla İlişkiler

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Sandra Ochuko Okpor
0000-0002-0310-1240
Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti

Feriha Dikmen *
0000-0003-4846-3736
Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Temmuz 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

22 Nisan 2021

Kabul Tarihi

16 Haziran 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Okpor, S. O., & Dikmen, F. (2021). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MEDIA COVERAGE OF WHISTLEBLOWING CASES. Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 24-41. https://izlik.org/JA78DG85TX
AMA
1.Okpor SO, Dikmen F. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MEDIA COVERAGE OF WHISTLEBLOWING CASES. ABUIJSS. 2021;2(1):24-41. https://izlik.org/JA78DG85TX
Chicago
Okpor, Sandra Ochuko, ve Feriha Dikmen. 2021. “A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MEDIA COVERAGE OF WHISTLEBLOWING CASES”. Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2 (1): 24-41. https://izlik.org/JA78DG85TX.
EndNote
Okpor SO, Dikmen F (01 Temmuz 2021) A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MEDIA COVERAGE OF WHISTLEBLOWING CASES. Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2 1 24–41.
IEEE
[1]S. O. Okpor ve F. Dikmen, “A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MEDIA COVERAGE OF WHISTLEBLOWING CASES”, ABUIJSS, c. 2, sy 1, ss. 24–41, Tem. 2021, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA78DG85TX
ISNAD
Okpor, Sandra Ochuko - Dikmen, Feriha. “A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MEDIA COVERAGE OF WHISTLEBLOWING CASES”. Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2/1 (01 Temmuz 2021): 24-41. https://izlik.org/JA78DG85TX.
JAMA
1.Okpor SO, Dikmen F. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MEDIA COVERAGE OF WHISTLEBLOWING CASES. ABUIJSS. 2021;2:24–41.
MLA
Okpor, Sandra Ochuko, ve Feriha Dikmen. “A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MEDIA COVERAGE OF WHISTLEBLOWING CASES”. Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 2, sy 1, Temmuz 2021, ss. 24-41, https://izlik.org/JA78DG85TX.
Vancouver
1.Sandra Ochuko Okpor, Feriha Dikmen. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MEDIA COVERAGE OF WHISTLEBLOWING CASES. ABUIJSS [Internet]. 01 Temmuz 2021;2(1):24-41. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA78DG85TX

Aday makaleler akademik intihal engelleme programından (Örneğin:Turnitin, Ithenticate, intihal.net vb.) alınmış orijinallik raporu ile birlikte gönderilmelidir. Bu oran %20'ye kadar kabul edilmektedir. %20 nin üzerinde benzerlik oranı olan çalışmalar ön kontrol aşamasında iade edilecektir.